Chan hopes US ruling brings reason to tariff chaos
Chan hopes US ruling brings reason to tariff chaos
Paul Chan says the recent IPO market resurgence solidifies Hong Kong's position as a global leader in new listings. Photo: RTHK
Financial Secretary Paul Chan has expressed hope that a US federal court ruling against recent tariff measures would bring President Donald Trump back "to reason".
Chan's comments came soon after a US trade court blocked Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs on Wednesday, ruling that the American president exceeded his authority by imposing blanket duties on imports from countries that export more to the United States than they import.
Speaking at a fireside chat during the Capital Markets Forum, Chan stressed the importance of countries maintaining an open mind in new trade negotiations.
"We have our value to bring to the negotiation table," he said.
"Say, for example, the mainland is the only country in the world that has the whole complete manufacturing chain.
"Also, it is not just about low cost, no more, but it is about the quality of the products and the capacity to serve huge overseas markets and the responsiveness to the change in market taste and style.
"So I think this is a core competitiveness of the mainland."
Chan also noted that mainland companies are increasingly relocating parts of their supply chains to southeast Asia, a shift he said that could significantly alter the international trade landscape.
He also said the SAR's IPO market is experiencing a resurgence, solidifying its position as a global leader in new listings.
The city has raised around US$10 billion through initial public offerings so far this year, equivalent to approximately 90 percent of the total funds raised in all of 2024.
Chan said more than 100 major companies are currently in the IPO pipeline.
"We welcome both mainland and international companies," he said.
"I think only we welcome them with open arms.
"So there is also a process for people to do some pre-IPO consultation on a confidential basis with the stock exchange, and going back to the earlier point about the vibrancy of this market, truly the valuations have been quite reasonable.
"So people are looking for bargains.
"In my engagements with overseas fund managers, I think they have underweight their allocation to this part of the world. So they need to catch up. That gives this additional liquidity.
"And also given the current geopolitics, Hong Kong is a safe haven for international capital. So all the more the reason to support the coming IPOs here."
Chan further added that Hong Kong continues to attract both mainland and foreign companies, pointing to growing collaboration between the SAR and Middle East markets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
38 minutes ago
- RTHK
Xia Baolong leaves HK after five-day visit
Xia Baolong leaves HK after five-day visit John Lee says Xia Baolong gave Hong Kong clear directions on development during a speech at a forum to mark five years since the National Security Law came into force. Photo: RTHK The director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, Xia Baolong, departed Hong Kong on Sunday evening after a five-day inspection tour of the city. He spent around 15 minutes at a community living room in To Kwa Wan, where he was joined by Chief Executive John Lee and the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Chris Sun. Xia also met district councillors at the government's headquarters in Tamar, and visited Beijing's liaison office in Western. Lee was at Shenzhen Bay Port as Xia and his team left the SAR on a minibus in the evening. The chief executive said Xia gave Hong Kong clear directions on development during a speech on Saturday at a forum to mark five years since the National Security Law came into force. "Hong Kong must implement the country's concept of comprehensive national security and use high-level security to safeguard high-quality development," Lee said. "We should also make full use of the SAR's unique advantages in internal and external connections and promote high-quality development through our openness." Lee added that the director told Hong Kong to rely on its rule of law, maintain its executive-led system and improve governance to help the territory push for high-quality development. The chief executive said Xia also wrote a poem to district councillors affirming their work, saying they should do everything they can for the people, regardless of how big or small the issue in question is. Lee went on to say that the director affirmed his work, as well as that of the SAR government, quoting him as saying local officials should balance security and development and make use of the stable environment to focus on improving the economy and people's livelihoods.
RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
'New Payment Connect service is fast and convenient'
'New Payment Connect service is fast and convenient' The Monetary Authority said Payment Connect had a smooth start on Sunday. File photo: RTHK Finance sector lawmaker Ronick Chan on Sunday said a new cross-border electronic payment service is convenient for both Hong Kong and mainland people. His comment came as the Payment Connect had a smooth start, with thousands of payments made on the first day of operation. There were 2,000 northbound transactions and 7,400 southbound payments made as of noon on Sunday, according to the Monetary Authority. The new service links up Hong Kong's Faster Payment System with the mainland's Internet Banking Payment System, allowing FPS users to transfer up to HK$10,000 a day per account to the mainland, with an annual cap set at HK$200,000. Speaking to RTHK, Chan said the new system has proven to be a quick and easy money transfer mechanism. He said in the past, remittances had to be handled by banks during office hours and the process took one to two days to be completed. 'Right now, it takes just a few seconds' time to complete the whole transaction. I think it really offers members of the public in both the mainland and Hong Kong a very convenient way of completing their money transfer,' he said. Chan also said the current limit for transactions is sufficient for users, adding that people can transfer money via different bank accounts if necessary.
Asia Times
3 hours ago
- Asia Times
US enters Israel-Iran war. Here's what could happen next
After prevaricating about whether the United States would enter Israel's war on Iran, President Donald Trump finally made a decision. Early Sunday, US warplanes and submarines struck three of Iran's nuclear sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, where the Iranians have a uranium enrichment plant buried about 80 metres beneath a mountain. These strikes have to be viewed as part of an overall continuum that began with the Gaza war following Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and then continued with Israel's attacks on Hezbollah (the Iran-backed militant group in Lebanon) and the fall of the Iran-backed Assad regime in Syria. Iran has never been weaker than it is now. And when Trump said it may take two weeks for him to decide whether to bomb Iran, the Israelis likely pushed him to act sooner. We can assume there was a lot of Israeli pressure on Trump to use the massive ordnance penetrators, the 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) 'bunker buster' bombs that only the US can deploy with its B2 bombers. Now that Trump has taken the significant step of entering the US in yet another Middle East war, where could things go from here? There are a few possible scenarios. The Iranians know they don't have the strength to take on the US, and that the Americans can do enormous damage to their country and even put the Iranian regime's stability at risk. This is always the prime consideration of the clerical regime led by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – everything else is subordinate to that. To gauge Iran's possible reaction, we can look at how it responded to the first Trump administration's assassination of the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' elite Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, in January 2020. Iran said there would be a major reaction, but all it did was launch a barrage of missiles at two American bases in Iraq, which caused no US fatalities and very little damage. After that token retaliation, Iran said the matter was closed. Iran's reaction to the new US strikes will likely be along these lines. It probably won't want to get into a tit-for-tat with the US by launching attacks against American facilities in the region. Trump has promised to respond with force: Iran, a bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier. It's also unclear how long Iran will be able to prosecute this war. This depends largely on how many ballistic missiles and launchers it has left. There are various estimates as to how many ballistic missiles Iran may have remaining in its stockpiles. It was believed to have about 2,000 missiles capable of reaching Israel at the start of the war. Some estimates say Iran has fired 700 of them; others say around 400. Whatever the number is, its stockpiles are dwindling quickly. Israel has also destroyed about a third of Iran's ballistic missile launchers. If Israel is able to destroy all of them, Iran would have very limited ability to fight back. Before the US got involved in the conflict, Iran said it was prepared to negotiate, but it wouldn't do so while Israel was still attacking. So, one scenario is that some sort of compromise can now be worked out, in which Israel announces a ceasefire and Iran and the US agree to resume negotiations on Tehran's nuclear program. The big problem is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he doesn't trust the negotiating process and he doesn't want to stop Israel's military actions until all of Iran's nuclear facilities have been completely destroyed. He's also been bombing Iran's oil terminals and gas facilities to put even more pressure on the regime. A handout photo made available by the Iran Atomic Energy Organisation reportedly shows the inside of Iran's Fordow nuclear facility in 2019. Photo: Atomic Energy Organisation handout / EPA via The Conversation But the regime has shown itself to be incredibly determined not to lose face. It was under great pressure at different times during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s and never considered surrendering until a US missile mistakenly took down an Iranian passenger jet, killing 290 people. Iran then agreed to a UN-brokered ceasefire. But the Iran-Iraq war lasted eight years, causing an estimated one million deaths. And when the then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, agreed to the ceasefire, he said it was 'worse than drinking poison'. Given the state of Iran's military capabilities, Khamenei, the current supreme leader, might surrender simply to try to preserve the regime. But this would be quite a climbdown as far as he's concerned, and he has been very obstinate in the past. The regime is very unpopular, but the Iranian people, in my experience, are strongly patriotic – loyal to their country, if not the regime. Though it's difficult to gauge opinion in a country of 90 million people, a lot of Iranians would not want to be ordered to do anything by the US or Israel, and would rather fight on. Netanyahu has said he wants to create the conditions for the Iranian people to rise up against the regime. But it's worth bearing in mind that the opposite of autocracy is not necessarily democracy. It could possibly be chaos. Iran has a number of different ethnic groups and there may be huge disagreements over what should take the place of the clerical regime, were it to fall. At this stage, the regime will probably be able to hold together. And even if Khameini were to die suddenly, the regime will likely be able to quickly replace him. Though we don't know his probable successor, the regime has had plenty of time to plan for this. Those in senior positions will also know that a post-Khamenei succession struggle really would put the regime at risk. According to the new polling by The Economist and YouGov, released on June 17, 60% of Americans were opposed to joining the conflict between Israel and Iran, with just 16% in favour. Among Republicans, 53% opposed military action. So, these strikes were not an obviously popular move among Americans at this stage. However, if this is an isolated event and succeeds in bringing a swift end to the war, Trump will probably be applauded by a majority of Americans. If the US has to go back with more bombers – or there are serious attacks on US interests in the region – there could be more adverse reactions among Americans. Another question is whether Iran's 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium have been destroyed in the US attack. If it hasn't been destroyed, and depending how much damage has been done to its centrifuges, Iran may be able to reconstruct its nuclear program relatively quickly. And it could have more incentive to further enrich this uranium to 90% purity, or weapons-grade level, to build a nuclear device. Ian Parmeter is research scholar, Middle East Studies, Australian National University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
