logo
Whitmer seeks May 29 extension for Northern Michigan ice storm federal assistance request

Whitmer seeks May 29 extension for Northern Michigan ice storm federal assistance request

CBS News21-04-2025

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has filed another letter in her efforts to seek federal money toward recovery of the Northern Michigan ice storm.
This
latest step
involves asking for an extension until May 29 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency on filing a major disaster declaration request.
A "major disaster" decision from FEMA could determine whether homeowners and renters can get direct FEMA assistance; and whether local governments and tribal agencies can get reimbursement for public expenses such as debris removal and response costs.
"With recovery efforts still ongoing, I am asking FEMA for an extension to submit a major disaster declaration request, so we can get a complete picture of what resources and support these local communities need as they recover from this devastating storm," Whitmer said.
The
ice storm of March 28-30
resulted in widespread power outages, some of which still linger. There were also impassable roads in many areas because of utility poles and trees that were knocked down. Some schools were out of session for two weeks; the Michigan National Guard provided both equipment and personnel to the region; and many state trails have been closed.
The state emergency declaration list covers Alcona, Alpena, Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, Mackinac, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego and Presque Isle counties.
Whitmer
did request a
Presidential Emergency Declaration from President Trump April 11 that she hoped would expedite funding for debris removal and cleanup within the Northern Michigan counties, along with lands controlled by the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.
But that specific request is still pending.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: Vote-by-mail's not the reason Republicans are losing elections; chromosomes not a simple solution for trans sports issue
Letters to the Editor: Vote-by-mail's not the reason Republicans are losing elections; chromosomes not a simple solution for trans sports issue

Chicago Tribune

timea day ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Letters to the Editor: Vote-by-mail's not the reason Republicans are losing elections; chromosomes not a simple solution for trans sports issue

I find it amusing that Kevin Coyne, chair of the DuPage County GOP, has concluded the only reason DuPage Republicans are losing elections is because they don't vote by mail. Like most of the Republicans left in his party, he refuses to admit that his is now a party of insanity. Many Republicans have jumped ship to the Democratic Party, wandered off as independents or become non-voters out of disgust. Some did so during President Trump's first term; still more in his latter. No, it must be that all-powerful vote by mail and not because Trump rejected the outcome of the 2020 elections, incited a violent insurrection on Jan. 6 and then pardoned the participants, hobbled emergency and health agencies like FEMA and the National Weather Service, and gutted the EPA so polluters are fully free to poison our air and water for greater profits. It can't possibly be because the president rolled back decades of progress for civil and human rights, shut down the heinous 'Sesame Street' or diverted money from seniors' Meals on Wheels so millionaires can be a given a greater tax break. He's made it so it's now OK to threaten universities and oppose law firms you don't like, to accept foreign gifts for personal favor and to sell U.S. citizenship, for which many veterans gave their lives, for the bargain price of $5 million. No, Republicans losing elections must be the result of something else. So, yes, Kevin, please sign your entire party up for vote-by-mail. It's a great plan — for the rest of us, who live in the world of the sane.I am writing in response to the letter, 'Chromosomes should dictate who competes against who,' which ran in the June 15 edition of the Naperville Sun. The idea that 'chromosomes should dictate who competes against who' in sports competitions is overly simplistic and does not reflect the reality of genetic diversity in human beings. Chromosomally, sex is not easily defined. There are many chromosomal variations other than XX or XY, including XXX, XYY and XXX, and many more. What about women who have Turner syndrome or only have one X chromosome or men with Klinefelter syndrome with an XXY karyotype? Should we bar them from sports too? The vast majority of people have not had their own genome sequenced. The original letter writer herself may even have a chromosomal variation other than XX and may never know it. There is no one way for women's bodies, and genes, to be. Trans people belong in sports and denying them the right to participate based on their chromosomes is up in Naperville deeply influenced my path. The opportunities I had at Naperville School District 203 ignited my passions for science and service. Later, federal research experiences shaped my future. When I approached graduation from Lake Forest College, I felt lost. How could I blend my passions into a career? I found the answer during a research internship at Rush University on a project funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease. Today, at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, I am a doctoral candidate in epidemiology, the field that works to understand and reduce disease. My research and training are largely supported by the National Cancer Institute. Epidemiologists help fight cancer by collecting and analyzing data on cancer cases and deaths. For example, epidemiology research supports the 2022-27 Illinois Cancer Control Plan to reduce cancer, promote prevention and improve care. My research explores why people get colorectal cancer at different rates. While overall rates have decreased since the 2010s, cases in people under 50 have increased by 44% in Illinois over the past two decades. At all ages, Black Illinoisans face the highest rates. Despite great strides, we have a long way to go in the fight to end cancer. But I fear for the future of this fight. This year, federally mandated cuts to the National Institutes of Health's budget will eliminate essential resources like staff, buildings and utilities. Public universities in Illinois are facing a $71.5 million loss in funding, devastating science infrastructure and destroying jobs. Additionally, Illinois universities have had millions in already-awarded grants canceled (including more than $1 million at Rush). These cuts pause essential research, threaten economic growth and undermine the training of the next generation of scientists. Dwindling research funds are not the only threat. In March, the Centers for Disease Control blocked $449 million awarded to the Illinois Department of Public Health. With these cuts, we lose support to fight chronic diseases, like cancer, and infectious disease, like the flu and COVID-19. This is not an issue of political affiliation. Sweeping cuts threaten the research and resources needed to fight disease, leaving everyone's health at stake. Please contact your local, state and federal elected officials and tell them you oppose cuts to science and public health funding. You can also express support by signing the Citizens for Science Policy pledge at was the recent U.S. Army's 250th anniversary overlooked? There was lots of coverage and criticism of the June 14 parade but not much in the way of gratitude for the U.S. Army. Although there's a lot of political turmoil right now, let us never, ever forget that freedom is not free. I'm not going to talk about political views but just be sure to thank all of our military folks and especially the U.S. Army, whose soldiers have protected our freedoms for 250 years! Maybe what was overlooked is that our military are the ones who really guard the gates of freedom around the world for all of us. They are the ones who enable the rights we all enjoy, especially the right to free speech, and have been doing so from 1775 to 2025. Whatever our political views may be, I think we should be both mindful of and thankful for the Army's faithful service to our country. They did a great job in the parade and made us proud. May God continue to bless our country and all of our military.

The Left's dehumanization of Trump is pushing people over the edge
The Left's dehumanization of Trump is pushing people over the edge

Fox News

timea day ago

  • Fox News

The Left's dehumanization of Trump is pushing people over the edge

Print Close By Douglas MacKinnon Published June 20, 2025 Occasionally, your eyes see something that your mind doesn't immediately comprehend or believes is based in reality. That just happened to me when I read that "A former Coast Guard lieutenant and sharpshooter has been arrested by the FBI for allegedly making threats to kill President Trump." The background which followed made it even harder for my mind to connect the informational dots to reality. A 19-page affidavit from the FBI further stated that the alleged wanna-be assassin not only served 33 years in the U.S. Coast Guard, but also served as a Federal Emergency Management Agency instructor. "Wait a minute," my mind screamed. "If this guy served our nation for over three decades in uniform while spending part of his life trying to help Americans devastated by various disasters, surely, he is a level-headed, bright, and compassionate individual who would never think of murdering a fellow human being. Least of all, the president of the United States." But as my mind flashed its neon "this is impossible" sign, the reporting told a different story. REPORT GIVES NEW DETAILS ON TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT SUSPECT'S 'DESCENT INTO MADNESS' The FBI affidavit also revealed that the former Coast Guard sharpshooter made online statements that suggested using a gun, a knife and poison to assassinate President Trump. The FBI also reported that the would-be assassin "has self-identified as a member of ANTIFA." "But how," my confused mind went on, "could someone who seems like such a normal upstanding citizen flip into the persona of someone fantasizing and seemingly actually planning to kill the president of the United States? This makes no sense." But then, in but a nanosecond, my mind replayed a recent incident where a man with a PhD stood less than a foot away from me screaming so hard that his spittle descended upon my body like acid rain. What prompted the unhinged attack was that moments earlier, he had told me in a very loud voice that "Trump is dramatically worse and more dangerous than Putin." When I simply asked him what Trump policies made him come to such a conclusion, he snapped. After ten years of Donald Trump being on the political stage, most of us have run into one or multiple people whose minds have been turned to mush by "Trump Derangement Syndrome." The question being, how did such seemingly intelligent people get that way? Constant and escalating loud attacks upon Trump from the Left are the main answer. Indoctrination is a thing. Most especially when it is premeditated and exponentially amplified. Many on the Left have long accused the "Right" of using "Dog Whistles" to send hidden messages or beliefs. They generally make those accusations for three reasons. First, to have a majority of the mainstream media amplify the often vile and inflammatory meaning. Next, to first fundraise off the charge. And third, to provoke the far-Left to further fuel the hate machine. But if the "intelligentsia" on the Left believe some on the Right offer-up subtle, heavily muffled, often impossible to identify "dog whistles" to attack them or their policies, what instrument do they believe they use to smear Trump? A bullhorn? An array of rock concert loudspeakers? Or worst of all, the platforms of countless media, "news," and pundit sites blasting out false accusations against Trump 24/7? There are no "dog whistles" from the Left. No subtlety. No "I wonder what they really meant." No. Every attack against Trump is deafeningly loud. Every smear, every comparison to "Hitler," a "dictator," a "totalitarian," a "monster," is meant to dehumanize a very human man with a wife, children, and grandchildren. But wait, within that strategy there may be a "dog whistle" after all. The unspoken strategy within the strategy is that by continually dehumanizing Trump and categorically stating day after day that he is a "threat to Democracy" that an already sick or twisted mind will finally be pushed over the edge enough to literally take a shot at Trump. To assassinate him. CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION In Butler, Pennsylvania, Trump came within a millimeter of having his head exploded by a would-be assassin's bullet. Then, almost exactly two months later, he came within seconds of potentially being gunned down. There is continual talk that the gunmen in both those cases had seemingly very troubled minds. Minds which could be triggered by a constant bombardment of incendiary rhetoric smearing and dehumanizing President Trump. Is the mind of the seemingly "normal" and "upstanding" former member of the Coast Guard arrested for threatening to kill President Trump also troubled? Could it have been triggered by years of non-stop hateful smears directed at Trump by the Left? CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP More importantly, how many more "normal" and "upstanding" minds across our nation – or the world – have been pushed over the edge into contemplating the assassination of our president? Words matter. Words trigger. And words are used to eulogize the assassinated. Enough with the dehumanizing indoctrination. Print Close URL

President Trump's plan to "wean off" FEMA doesn't resonate with some N.J. residents still recovering from hurricanes
President Trump's plan to "wean off" FEMA doesn't resonate with some N.J. residents still recovering from hurricanes

CBS News

time3 days ago

  • CBS News

President Trump's plan to "wean off" FEMA doesn't resonate with some N.J. residents still recovering from hurricanes

President Trump said recently he wants to move toward getting rid of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, better known as FEMA, and get states to take on responsibilities. But some disaster survivors in New Jersey and an organization that helps them are not in favor of the idea. "The FEMA thing hasn't been a very successful experiment" Mr. Trump said June 10 the plan is to "wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level, a little bit like education. We're moving it back to the states." The president said he wants that to start after hurricane season and for governors to lead the way. "Now, if they can't handle it, they shouldn't be governor. But these governors can handle it," Mr. Trump said. "The FEMA thing hasn't been a very successful experiment. [It's] very, very expensive and it doesn't get the job done." The president said once this all comes together, it will be good for the country. CBS News New York reached out to the local FEMA office, but it said it could not comment. We also tried to get comment from the national office, but have not heard back. Some N.J. residents sound off on Trump's FEMA stance Nearly four years after Hurricane Ida damaged her Milford home, Leanna Jones is still waiting for state help. "I still haven't gotten my money from the state to do the long-term recovery," Jones said. Jones said despite FEMA's imperfections, the agency was there for her right after disaster struck. "They did put $4,000 in my pocket right away, even before my insurance company came to do the first inspections," Jones said. That's why she says she's worried about what the president is saying about FEMA. "If everything is handed to the states, then people will be waiting for four years to get any money. That is just not okay," Jones said. Organizations helping Superstorm Sandy and Ida survivors also don't think it's a good idea. In recent recommendations to the FEMA Review Council, both the New Jersey Resource Project and New Jersey Organizing Project suggested more FEMA aid and less denial rates, adding, "None of our recommendations included dismantling FEMA. Rather, we have specific suggestions on how FEMA can be improved and provide continued benefit to impacted communities."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store