logo
ENع
Trump tax bill squeeze on clean power could raise energy bills

Trump tax bill squeeze on clean power could raise energy bills

Reuters10-06-2025

June 10 - President Trump's tax bill passed by the House of Representatives on May 22 is set to slow the country's clean energy expansion by accelerating the expiry of key tax credits introduced under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and making them harder to access.
The bill, which is now being debated by the Senate, shortens the window for developers to start and complete new clean energy projects in order to qualify for a production tax credit (PTC) or an investment tax credit (ITC). Developers would have to begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment and the project must become operational before the end of 2028 in order to access the tax credits. The inflation act stipulated these tax credits would be available until at least 2032.
Solar and battery storage activity soared on the back of falling costs and tax credits but President Trump's rollback of clean energy support and prioritisation of fossil fuels will curb activity in the coming years, industry experts warn.
"Requiring a range of advanced energy projects to commence construction within 60 days of enactment, along with moving up the 'placed in service' deadline to 2028, will pull the rug out from a host of projects in active development and effectively end use of the ITC & PTC going forward," Advanced Energy United, an association supporting low carbon power and transport, said in a statement.
CHART: US planned power generation installs in 2025
If approved, the bill could see a surge in clean energy investments in the short-term as developers rush to meet new construction deadlines, followed by a "big drop," Gautam Jain, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, told Reuters Events.
Approval of the bill would see a lot of projects trying to start construction within 60 days, John Powers, Schneider Electric's VP for Cleantech and Renewables, said.
For companies with renewable energy or carbon reduction targets, 'it's the time to be proactive in the market,' Powers noted.
Join hundreds of senior executives across energy, industry and finance at Reuters Events Global Energy Transition 2025.
Beyond the short-term bump, the bill would "have an adverse impact on deployment," Jain warned.
In the long run, this would likely lead to "higher electricity costs for consumers," he said, since the levelised cost of solar and other clean power sources have dropped significantly over the last 10 to 15 years and are often lower than the cost of gas-fired power.
Import worries
Trump's cutbacks to clean energy support and higher import tariffs and have created major uncertainty for developers and manufacturers.
Clean power developer RWE has introduced higher requirements for future investments in the U.S. since the start of the year, a spokesperson told Reuters Events. RWE owns and operates over 10 GW of US clean power capacity and has over 4 GW under construction.
"In addition to a stable incentive framework, all necessary federal permits must be in place, all relevant tariff risks mitigated and projects must have secured offtake at the time of the investment decision," the spokesperson said. "Only if these conditions are met will further investments be possible, given the uncertain policy environment.'
CHART: Levelised cost of US utility-scale solar
Developers are concerned about another restriction in Trump's tax bill that would prevent developers and manufacturers from gaining tax credits if they source components from foreign entities of concern (FEOC). This includes China, a key global supplier of components for solar, wind and battery storage. The bill has slowed the expansion of U.S. clean energy manufacturing as suppliers await clarity before making investments in new factories. Developers and manufacturers are already facing higher costs due to hikes in import tariffs imposed by President Trump.
Developers had feared the bill would also restrict the transferability of tax credits, a mechanism which has expanded financing sources for small and mid-size developers, but following a last-minute change this was left intact for the life cycle of the tax credits.
The bill also reflected more kindly on nuclear power developers by giving them a later deadline of breaking ground by the end of 2028 in order to qualify for tax credits.
Trump wants to accelerate a new wave of nuclear plant construction and on May 23 he ordered the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to streamline regulations and fast-track new licenses for reactors. In March, the DOE reissued a tender for $900 million of federal funding towards light water reactor (LWR) SMR technology (Gen III+), removing a requirement for community engagement.
Senate scrutiny
Trump has said he wants Senate approval and a final bill on his desk by July 4 but many Republican Senators have seen benefits from the tax credits in their states and the bill may be adapted and sent back to the House.
The Senate tends to be a moderating force in comparison to the House, David A. Sausen, partner at Arnold and Porter, noted.
'I think there's some hope that some of the more extreme measures here will be dialed back,' he told Reuters Events.
For exclusive insights on the energy transition, sign up to our newsletter.
The clean energy sector has called for less drastic changes to the tax credits along with greater clarity on the foreign entity measures, which could take time. The foreign entity rules would take effect on January 1, 2026, under the current bill.
'I'm getting a lot of concern from clients that it's going to be very difficult to interpret these (foreign entity) rules,' Sausen said.
The current language of the rules is "fundamentally unworkable," Advanced Energy United said.
The foreign entity rules must be clarified and should not deter manufacturing investment, Schneider Electric's Chief Policy Officer Jeannie Salo told Reuters Events.
'Let's remember the underlying goals of the bill...They want a tax policy to bring down the deficit, of course, but they want a tax policy that's going to attract more manufacturing and investment into the United States," Salo said.
"We need to make sure that there aren't provisions in the bill that inadvertently disrupt that goal.'

Hashtags

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Israel could go it alone without US bunker buster bombs
How Israel could go it alone without US bunker buster bombs

Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Times

How Israel could go it alone without US bunker buster bombs

The United States appears to have sent two B-2 stealth bombers to a military base in the Indian Ocean. The decision to send the warplanes, shortly after sending the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier to the region, could be a last minute negotiating tactic or a prelude to war. The bombers, which were probably making their way to Guam or the Diego Garcia military base, are equipped with the capability to use 'bunker buster' bombs which could offer the best chance of taking out Iran's Fordow nuclear facility. However, President Trump is still uncommitted for the time being to offensive action and is talking up diplomacy. If the president is unwilling to use his assets in the region to attack Iran, the question arises of how far the Israelis might be able to go on their own. Several targets, including the heavy-water reactor at Arak and the most important uranium enrichment plant, Natanz, have already been struck. The boss of the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that the centrifuges there were stopped so abruptly by airstrikes that they have been 'severely damaged if not destroyed altogether'. But other key sites are believed to remain intact, including the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Centre and the uranium enrichment plant deep underground at Fordow. The first of these (also a subterranean facility) is thought to have been the storage site for the 400-plus kilograms of uranium already enriched close to weapons grade. The second site is home to the most secure processing facilities available to the Islamic Republic. So, what are the other options? Expert opinion seems divided. Yoav Gallant, Israel's defence minister until last year, in an article in the Free Press co-authored with Sir Niall Ferguson, argued, 'only one air force has the power to finish off Fordow … only America can do this'. Gallant, however, like many on the Israeli side, wants to draw the Americans in, and US attacks on this and other deeply buried facilities might turn out to be more a question of delaying for longer than completely eliminating Iran's nuclear programme. Even if America does join in the assault, Fordow's centrifuges, shielded by 80-90 metres of rock, may prove invulnerable to its 'bunker buster' — the massive ordnance penetrator or GBU-57 bomb which is rated as effective down to 60m. Speaking on an Israeli podcast, Zohar Palti, Mossad's former analytical chief, said of Fordow: 'It would be better if the Americans strike there. They truly have the capacity to make the place 'evaporate', and I chose that word deliberately.' The phrasing was chilling, hinting that a tactical or low-yield nuclear weapon might be the only way to ensure its destruction. The idea of a nuclear weapon being used, something the White House would not rule out this week, seems like an extraordinary escalation but might be threatened at this stage as another attempt to intimidate Iran into making concessions. It's fascinating also that the Mossad veteran implied that a deep penetration unconventional weapon was a capability the US has, but not Israel. If President Trump's desire to avoid another Middle Eastern war means he sits this one out, it's possible the Israelis may have secretly produced a better penetrator weapon than its publicly acknowledged inventory suggests. There's also been some speculation — shades of blowing up the Death Star — that Fordow has an Achilles heel, a ventilation shaft that could provide a pathway for a bomb. But so far Israel has not attempted an assault on Fordow. David Albright, an American academic who's spent many years looking at Iranian nuclear sites, is one of those who's more upbeat about the chances of putting it out of action, saying 'Israel doesn't need the United States to come in with bunker busters and destroy it … Israel can do it on its own'. He argues that destroying generators, ventilation systems and so on at Fordow's other support plant could wreck the centrifuges inside in the same way that Natanz's were. It's noteworthy also that this week Israel bombed the factory where new enrichment machines are made. If all else fails, it's likely that the Israelis also have a plan to attack Fordow using ground forces. Their main airborne formation, the 98th Paratroopers Division, was withdrawn from Gaza earlier this month to be ready for action elsewhere. Israeli C-130 transport planes have also been seen over Syria, apparently on missions to or from Iran. There could be many reasons for those flights, for example to set up refuelling points for Israeli aircraft or ferry their forward air controllers to or from operations. But the suppression of Iran's air defences has been so extensive that it may soon be viable to mount the type of airlift needed to insert a force of several thousand troops to a forward mounting base near Fordow. It could be that a desire to retain the option of such a mission lies behind the fact that the tunnel entrances of the complex have not yet been attacked. They might need to be used by an assault force after all. This type of operation, though, would be fraught with difficulty — indeed in the view of Gallant and Ferguson it's 'not realistic'. There are thousands of Iranian troops deployed around the plant, so casualties could be high. Although the quantity of explosive needed to destroy it from the inside out might be a lot less than bombing it, it would remain considerable. While the Israelis are likely to have developed numerous plans, Iran may still hold some wild cards. 'All enriched materials have been transferred and are in secure locations,' Major General Mohsen Rezaie of the Revolutionary Guard Corps said earlier this week. He added: 'We will come out of this war with our hands full.' Many believe Iran has indeed dispersed its stockpile of highly enriched uranium from Isfahan to other sites too. A third uranium enrichment site at a secret location is believed to have been under preparation when the conflict started. What all the 'kinetic' options require — from GBU-57 bombs to ground forces — is an continuing onsite inspection regime to ensure that in the months or years to come Iran's nuclear project is not reconstituted. That might be necessary even in the 'regime change' scenario: note that international organisations are currently trying to secure the remnants of Syria's chemical arsenal. At talks with the UK, France, and Germany in Geneva on Friday, Iran showed both its willingness to engage on these issues but also its refusal to give up uranium enrichment. That's a longstanding position which is, so far, unchanged by the war. This refusal to bend may be sufficient for President Trump, mindful of the political divisions within his Maga movement, to say that a deal is impossible, despite his recent attempts to pressure Iran into one. His line last week — saying 'I may or may not' attack — may also simply have been stalling for time while final military deployments went ahead. Evidently Pentagon planners have wanted to head off various contingencies if, for example, Iran were to retaliate against their bases or diplomatic facilities in the region. But with the arrival of two stealth bombers, alongside two aircraft carriers and soon a number of F-22 stealth fighters and tanker planes, Trump will be able to deliver a final ultimatum to Iran. When that happens, the question of whether Israel can take out Fordow and other key facilities on its own may become academic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store