'28 Years Later' used 20 iPhones in tandem for some wild shots
It's no secret that 28 Years Later used iPhones to shoot parts of the film. Now its director, Danny Boyle, has discussed the use of iPhones for the film in more detail with IGN . The first film in the franchise, 28 Days Later , was shot on digital video, giving it a homemade feel. Boyle explained that he and writer Alex Garland got the idea from the fact that home video cameras were common at the time, and people would've shot videos with them if an apocalypse had indeed happened. Those cameras, of course, have since been replaced by smartphones.
The movies used three special rigs for the iPhone sequences: One for eight cameras that one person can carry, another with 10 and another with 20. "I never say this, but there is an incredible shot in the second half [of the film] where we use the 20-rig camera, and you'll know it when you see it," Boyle told IGN . He described the 20-iPhone rig as "basically a poor man's bullet time," which is a visual effect that uses multiple cameras to freeze or slow down time. Think the scene in The Matrix , wherein Neo dodged bullets in super slow motion.
Doyle said that the 20-camera rig can be attached to cranes or dollies and give you 180 degrees of vision of an action. In editing, you can choose from any of the footage each iPhone takes to, say, move between perspectives or jump forward and backward. For 28 Years Later, the team used the rig for violent scenes to emphasize their effect. "For a moment the audience is inside the scene, the action, rather than classically observing a picture," Doyle explained.
In addition to the iPhones, the filmmakers also used drones, cameras attached to actors and even farm animals to achieve an immersive feel for its 2.76:1 widescreen aspect ratio. They decided on the aspect ratio to create a sense of unease, since you'd have to keep scanning the screen to see potential threats coming from the sides.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Weekend Box Office: ‘Dragon' Slaying '28 Years Later' And ‘Elio'
Mason Thames in "How to Train Your Dragon." How to Train Your Dragon is projected to top the domestic box office again ahead of newcomers 28 Days Later and Elio. The live-action version of the 2010 animated hit How to Train Your Dragon is projected by Deadline to earn $35.2 million in its second-weekend frame from 4,373 theaters, which is below the trade publication's forecast of $40 million earlier this week. If Deadline's projection holds, it will up Universal Pictures' How to Train Your Dragon's domestic tally to $158.6 million through Sunday. Meanwhile, director Danny Boyle's zombie thriller 28 Years Later is projected by Deadline to gross $28 million to $30 million from 3,444 theaters through Sunday, which is in line with the trade's projections earlier this week. The projected weekend domestic tally is on the low end, however, of Box Office Pro's long-range tracking for 28 Years Later, which on June 7 was forecasting a $30 million to $40 million opening. Released by Sony Pictures Entertainment, 28 Years Later — which stars Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer and Aaron Taylor-Johnson — had a production budget of $60 million before prints and advertising, Deadline reported. A scene from "Elio." 'Elio' Tops Projections But Has A Lot Of Ground To Make Up Disney and Pixar's animated sci-fi adventure Elio is projected by Deadline to earn $22 million to $24 million from 3,750 million in its opening weekend frame, which is ahead of the trade's $20 million-plus forecast from earlier this week. Still, an opening weekend tally of $24 million domestically falls far short of Box Office Pro's long-range tracking forecast from May 31, which pegged the film to open in the $35 million to $45 million range. Elio a lot of ground to make up in the long term, since the film cost $150 million before its marketing spend, Deadline noted. By contrast, Disney's Pixar's Inside Out 2 opened with $154.2 million from 4,440 North American theaters a little over a year ago. There's also one other newcomer this week — Bride Hard — though it's not opening nearly as wide as 28 Years Later or Elio. Directed by Con Air and Lara Croft: Tomb Raider helmer Simon West, Rebel Wilson and Anna Camp's action comedy Bride Hard is debuting in 2,000 theaters domestically. Bride Hard is the product of Magenta Light Studios, which distributed last summer's indie serial killer thriller Strange Darling. Note: This box office report will be updated throughout the weekend with the most current numbers as they become available. The final numbers for this weekend's box office will be released on Monday.
Geek Tyrant
3 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
Review: Danny Boyle's 28 YEARS LATER is Wickedly Unhinged with Punk Rock Energy — GeekTyrant
Danny Boyle isn't interested in giving you a comfortable horror experience, and that's exactly why 28 Years Later hits so hard. The third entry in the rage virus saga is raw, relentless, and absolutely unhinged in the best ways. From its opening moments, this film announces itself with punk-rock energy and doesn't let up. It's not here to deliver a safe, by-the-numbers sequel. It's here to shove your face in the mud, rip your heart out, and somehow, make you feel something in the middle of the chaos. I loved this movie! Boyle, working again with writer Alex Garland, doesn't just return to the world of 28 Days Later , he reimagines it and gives audiences something unexpected and insane. The film centers on a remote island community still under quarantine almost three decades after the virus first broke out. A father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) takes his 12-year-old son, Spike, on a dangerous rite of passage into the mainland, a place where rage-infected monsters roam, and survival is a brutal art form. Right away, you're immersed in a world where violence is routine, and childhood has no place. Spike's father pushes him into danger, and it proud when Spike makes his first kill. Their dynamic never feels manipulative; instead, it's a rugged portrait of a parent forging a warrior out of a child, no matter the cost. It's a wild coming-of-age film! It's seriously a coming-of-age story soaked in blood. Spike's first mission is as intense and traumatic as anything the franchise has shown us, but what's striking is how normalized it all is. Boyle doesn't flinch. The horror here isn't just the infected, it's watching a kid be molded into a survivor in a world that no longer allows innocence. Alfie Williams, who plays Spike, gives a performance that's honest and gripping. It's a quiet kind of emotional power that cuts through the carnage. Things shift gears when Spike returns from his first venture into the mainland. His mother is sick and he's terrified and desperate, so the boy sneaks her out of their community to find a rumored doctor deep in the mainland. What follows is a harsh but strangely beautiful survival journey. We're treated to stunning Northern English landscapes, quiet forests, rolling hills, decayed towns, all crawling with the danger of the infected, and they are just as terrifying as ever as they have evolved in different ways. One thing that makes 28 Years Later so fascinating is that it's more reflective than the previous entries, interested not just in jump scares or chase sequences, though it has pl;enty of those moments, but in the emotional scars left behind. Ralph Fiennes plays the mysterious doctor, a figure we assume will be deranged but turns out to be one of the film's most humane characters. His scenes with Spike offer something rare in this franchise… tenderness. But in a dark, twisted, and WTF way. Visually, the film is awesome. I love Boyle's energetic and unique film style that blends handheld chaos with painterly wide shots, giving the movie both immediacy and eerie beauty. The editing occasionally cuts in archival-like footage and surreal imagery, turning parts of the movie into something that feels like a fragmented memory of a civilization that's long gone. Add the gritty sound design and a moody score, and you've got a cinematic experience that feels alive and constantly on edge. Not everyone will be on board with where this movie goes. Some narrative choices are flat-out bizarre. The third act especially takes some wild swings that are sure to divide viewers. The ending of the film especially was so unexpected and insane, but I loved the film for that! I loved the ending! 28 Years Later doesn't care about playing it safe. It's a bold evolution of the franchise that asks more from its audience emotionally, intellectually, and viscerally. And if you're willing to go along for the ride, it rewards you with an amazing cinematic experience. Ultimately, this isn't just a great horror sequel, it's a standout in the genre. Boyle and Garland have crafted a film that's ferocious, unpredictable, and unexpectedly moving. It's a blood-soaked elegy for a world that's fallen apart, and a powerful reminder that even in the darkest times, a sliver of humanity can still shine through.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Apple sued by shareholders over delayed Siri AI rollout, $900 billion in value lost
Apple AAPL.O was sued on Friday by shareholders in a proposed securities fraud class action that accused it of downplaying how long it needed to integrate advanced artificial intelligence into its Siri voice assistant, hurting iPhone sales and its stock price. The complaint covers shareholders who suffered potentially hundreds of billions of dollars of losses in the year ending June 9, when Apple introduced several features and aesthetic improvements for its products but kept AI changes modest. Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment. CEO Tim Cook, Chief Financial Officer Kevan Parekh and former CFO Luca Maestri are also defendants in the lawsuit filed in San Francisco federal court. Artificial intelligence: Will AI replace Google on your iPhone? Apple thinks so. Here's why. Shareholders led by Eric Tucker said that at its June 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple led them to believe AI would be a key driver of iPhone 16 devices, when it launched Apple Intelligence to make Siri more powerful and user-friendly. But they said the Cupertino, California-based company lacked a functional prototype of AI-based Siri features, and could not reasonably believe the features would ever be ready for iPhone 16s. Shareholders said the truth began to emerge on March 7 when Apple delayed some Siri upgrades to 2026, and continued through this year's Worldwide Developers Conference on June 9 when Apple's assessment of its AI progress disappointed analysts. Apple shares have lost nearly one-fourth of their value since their December 26, 2024 record high, wiping out approximately $900 billion of market value. The case is Tucker v. Apple Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 25-05197. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Mark Porter and Rod Nickel
