logo
‘It's a joke': KZN detective guilty of plotting commissioner's murder dismisses 10-year sentence

‘It's a joke': KZN detective guilty of plotting commissioner's murder dismisses 10-year sentence

The Citizen14-05-2025

The Newcastle Regional Court on Wednesday found Roshlanal Banawo guilty of conspiracy to commit murder.
Former police detective Captain Roshanel Banawo has been found guilty of plotting the murder of Umzinyathi District Commissioner Major General Francis Slambert.
Banawo appeared in the Newcastle Regional Court on Wednesday, which found that he had conspired to kill Slambert.
The former police captain was sentenced to 10 years in jail. His defence asked for a wholly suspended sentence.
When asked about his reaction to the sentence, Banawo dismissively responded: 'It's a joke.'
He was responding to questions from the media inside the court.
Banawo denied plotting to kill Slambert.
Former SAPS Detective Captain Roshanlal Banawo has been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment after being found of plotting to murder former Mountain Rise police station commander Major-General Francis Slambert.
Read full story here: https://t.co/pmPeiULBv6 #kzn #Police pic.twitter.com/aQk1XNXBOE — The Witness (@WitnessKZN) May 14, 2025
The former detective was arrested on 26 November 2023, when Francis' assassination plans were revealed by the KZN task team.
KZN detective's conviction details
Banawo was found guilty on one count of conspiracy to commit murder but acquitted on a second charge of incitement to murder.
The former police captain has been in custody since his arrest in November 2023, having been denied bail on three separate occasions.
The case began formal proceedings on 10 September 2024, after being transferred to the provincial organised crime unit for thorough investigation following his initial arrest.
ALSO READ: JMPD takes action against illegal and unsafe delivery bikers, 10 foreign nationals arrested
Mystery surrounding motive for murder
Despite the conviction, authorities have not yet established why Banawo plotted to kill the District Commissioner.
According to The Witness, Magistrate Theunis Colditz, delivering the judgment, stated: 'For some reason which is not clear, the accused seems to have some sort of obsession with the complainant.
'I don't understand why he had a grudge against her—she was not involved in his dismissal.'
Banawo was dismissed from the South African Police Service (Saps) in 2021 after illicit substances were found in his home.
He was subsequently arrested in November 2023 following intelligence that revealed alleged attempts to assassinate Major General Slambert.
ALSO READ: Why Chris Hani's killer went free but Alison Botha's rapists went back to jail
Multiple assassination attempts
The court reportedly heard details of a 'chilling case' involving at least two alleged attempts on Slambert's life.
Between May and August 2023, Slambert survived two assassination attempts while serving as district commissioner in Dundee.
She had previously worked as a station commander at Peter Maritzburg's Mountain Rise Police Station.
Financial incentives for hitmen
Witnesses reportedly testified that Banawo had offered R50,000 to hired hitmen to carry out the assassination.
The court acknowledged there were inconsistencies in the testimonies of the hitmen.
'Although the testimonies of the two hired hitmen were inconsistent and must be treated with caution—as they were accomplice witnesses—there was sufficient evidence to support the charge of conspiracy to commit murder,' Colditz explained.
The court rejected Banawo's claim that he had been set up and that witnesses were used to entrap him.
NOW READ: Millions unaccounted for as ex-mine bosses face court over fraud

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case
ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case

Daily Maverick

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case

A man who allegedly made millions in cash by hacking ATMs in the Eastern and Western Cape was released on bail late last week after the Bhisho High Court ruled that the magistrate had made a mistake by not giving reasons for the decision to keep him behind bars. One of the men arrested by the Hawks in March 2025 and linked to a syndicate that has allegedly netted R7-million by hacking ATMs has been released on bail after the court ruled that the magistrate hearing his bail application had made a mistake. Mongameli Tom was arrested with another man near Peddie in the Eastern Cape after the pair allegedly hacked into two ATMs in Mdantsane, Buffalo City. At the time of Tom's arrest the Hawks said that he was also linked to a series of ATM fraud incidents in the Western Cape. Tom has denied any involvement. Tom and the other man were intercepted near Peddie on 17 March 2025 following a multidisciplinary, intelligence-driven operation led by the East London Serious Organised Crime Investigation team. The Hawks explained at the time that the suspects allegedly disguised themselves as cash-in-transit security guards, armed with a rifle, to create the illusion that they were legitimately servicing the ATM. But instead they were using 'jackpot' software to hack into the ATM and take all the money. Tom was arrested by the Hawks on 19 March 2025. On 9 April 2025 he applied for bail but this was refused. He is charged with 51 counts of fraud and 52 counts of theft which were allegedly committed between Cape Town and East London. Four of these offences were committed in the Eastern Cape and two in the magisterial district of Mdantsane, where he appeared in court. In February and March 2025 amounts of R143,500 and R236,900 were taken from two ATMs at two garages in Mdantsane. Tom, from Mitchells Plain in the Western Cape, is the director of two companies, Abakwazidenge Trading (Pty) Ltd and Khundulu Holdings (Pty) Ltd. According to Tom both companies made between R30,000 and R50,000 profit a month but had stopped operating after he was arrested. In an affidavit before court – detailing his personal circumstances – he stated that he had dependent children and had to provide for their needs. Acting Judge Aaron Zono said the magistrate hearing Tom's bail application had not dealt with an affidavit setting out his personal circumstances. Tom has no previous convictions nor pending cases. 'There is not a single reason in the magistrate's judgment why [Tom's] case or version has not been accepted or rejected. We may only assume that it was rejected for the fact that it is not referred to in the judgment,' Zono said. 'In fact, the magistrate's failure to accept or reject appellant's case is rooted in his failure to consider the same. One cannot accept or reject something he has not considered. No balancing act has been made by the magistrate. 'The magistrate did not account for the judgment he gave. He did not analyse the evidence before arriving at his conclusion. He did not explain why the evidence of the accused persons was not accepted and why that evidence did not meet the standard of being reasonably possibly true. He did not even explain on what basis he found that the state had discharged its onus of proof and why its evidence was accepted. 'A judgment without reasons is arbitrary. Equally a judgment that does not account for all the evidence is arbitrary. A judgment without balancing exercise between the two opposing versions or evidence lacks proper analysis and is consequently arbitrary. Zono also said the State had not rebutted evidence presented by Tom, who denies knowledge of any crimes, but only stated that the prosecution's case is strong and Tom's case is weak. He added that the magistrate should have given a reasoned ruling on why bail was refused.

Four men sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering woman for funeral policy money
Four men sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering woman for funeral policy money

Eyewitness News

time13 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Four men sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering woman for funeral policy money

CAPE TOWN - An adoptive father of a mentally disabled woman and three hitmen have been sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering the woman for funeral policy money. The four men were sentenced in the Knysna High Court on Friday. Mboneleli Msila was handed two life sentences for masterminding the murder of his adopted daughter, 22-year-old Nosipho Mafana in Plettenberg Bay. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila says Mboneleli Msila says hitman Monde Tshemese will also serve two life sentences for his role in Mafana's murder. "Msila arranged for Mafana to take out three funeral policies with three different banks which would pay out an amount of R600,000 if she died an unnatural death." Ntabazalila says Msila and Tshemese planned Mafana's murder along with Mbulelo Jack and Lungisile Lucas. Jack and Lucas were sentenced to 17 years in prison for conspiracy to commit murder and 17 years for murder. After Mafana's murder in April 2022 Msila's claim for the policy was rejected after it became the subject of a police investigation.

EFT payments and cybercrime: Court says car buyer is liable to ensure money is paid into the correct account
EFT payments and cybercrime: Court says car buyer is liable to ensure money is paid into the correct account

IOL News

time15 hours ago

  • IOL News

EFT payments and cybercrime: Court says car buyer is liable to ensure money is paid into the correct account

In a case involving cybercrime, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that it is the duty of a buyer to ensure that the money is paid into the seller's correct bank account. Image: File Cybercrime was once again the topic of a legal wrangle - this time before the Supreme Court of Appeal, which found that payment via electronic transfer (EFT) is only complete when the funds are received by the correct account holder. This judgment followed legal proceedings between two car sale companies – with the one who bought two bakkies from the other only to discover after delivery of the vehicles that cybercriminals had intercepted the electronic payment made for the vehicles. None of the parties were prepared to take the financial loss, and the seller initially turned to the regional court in Louis Trichardt to get its R290,000 back – the price at which it sold the two bakkies. The lower court earlier ruled that Hyundai Louis Trichardt had to pay Northcliff Nissan the R290, 000 for the vehicles. The magistrate reasoned that the two car dealerships had a contract in place and, cybercrime or not, Northcliff Nissan was due payment for the two bakkies. Aggrieved with this judgment, Hyundai successfully turned to the Limpopo High Court, sitting in Thohoyandou, to appeal the lower court's verdict. But Northcliff Nissan took the matter on appeal to the SCA. The risk of erroneous payment due to the cybercrime was that of the payer in this instance, the SCA found. 'A debtor bears the risk of misdirected EFT payments and must ensure that the payment is made to the correct bank account,' it said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The court added that the onus of proof in contract disputes over payment lies with the payer (debtor). 'Cybercrime risks do not automatically shift liability to the payee, and the courts will not impose an overarching legal duty on creditors to protect debtors from cyber fraud,' the court said. The court was told that in October 2018, Hyundai purchased two Nissan bakkies from Northcliff Nissan for the sum of R145,000,00 each. Northcliff Nissan emailed the invoices for both vehicles to the buyer. The invoices provided details of the nominated bank account for payment of the purchase price for the bakkies. On the same day, Hyundai paid for one bakkie and emailed proof of payment to Northcliff Nissan, after which the bakkie was then delivered. A few days later, Hyundai made another payment and took delivery of the second bakkie. At that stage, no one realised that cybercriminals were at work. Approximately a week later, Northcliff Nissan told Hyundai that payment of the purchase price for the bakkies had not been reflected in its bank account. It then became clear to the parties that the emails had been intercepted and the bank account details on the invoices were altered by a cyber fraudster. The parties realised that they were victims of business email compromise (BEC), a cybercrime that has become popular in this technological age of electronic communication and payment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store