3 teachers tell us the changes they're making in the classroom to address students' rampant use of AI

AI has made its way into the classroom. Along with it, concerns from teachers about student apathy.
"Some of the ones that I see using it all the time — I think if it wasn't there, they would just sit there looking blindly into space," Gary Ward, a physics, economics, and business teacher at Brookes Westshore High School in Victoria, British Columbia, told Business Insider.
Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022 and the mass adoption of it and other generative AI tools, concerns surrounding academic plagiarism have multiplied. Educators found themselves needing to react quickly, adapting their curriculums to embrace or counter a technology that had tremendous potential to both be a teaching aid and a " homework cheating machine."
Ward, who's been a teacher for about thirty years, said that he's noticed student usage of AI increase in increments — until this year, when it just "exploded."
"Literally, all students are using it this year," he said. In order to try and prevent students from gaming all of his assignments with artificial intelligence, Ward said he's begun to use it defensively. He's asked ChatGPT to help him develop work that would be harder for anyone completing it to feed back into an LLM.
"I just started it with a conversation in ChatGPT, and sort of iteratively went through — explained in my prompt what was happening, and said, 'This is what I want,'" Ward said. "It told me, 'These are things you can do to make it harder for students to be able to just answer with some large language model.' And typically, it's making it more personalized."
At Manchester Metropolitan University in Manchester, England, Richard Griffin — a lecturer in the business faculty specializing in project management and portfolio development — says a similar strategy is underway.
The university has developed an in-house system that educators can feed their assignments into, which will then provide an assessment of how difficult it might be to cheat it with AI and recommendations to make it more difficult to do so.
"The IT department have done their own tool which assesses how AI safe it is, or AI savvy it is, and will give you a bit of a grade to say, 'Well, really, you will need to adjust some of this,'" Griffin said. "It doesn't give us specific information, but it does give you a bit of a scroll to say, No, this isn't very safe. You need to add some deeper challenges here, or you need to make this more personal, etcetera."
A shift back toward analog assignments
The best defense against AI so far, according to Ward, is to spin back the clock a couple of decades.
"I've tried to sort of shift back toward some handwritten assignments, instead of having them do it on the computer," Ward said. "That way, I can tell this is how they're writing. I know it's theirs."
Even if Ward can't go analog for all the coursework he assigns, at the very least, it helps him determine a baseline for each student's writing, making it easier to determine when future work is produced synthetically.
"Now, yeah, it's expensive and it takes a lot of time to grade them, but I think that needs to continue," he added.
The goal of a classroom is generally to empower students with foundational skills — proficiency in research, deep thought, and comprehension, to name a few. By substituting the typical processes of studying with seeking out AI answers, many students are no longer meeting those benchmarks, said Paul Shockley, an assistant professor at Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas.
"Many students today are using AI as a way of fulfilling their assignments, and it is creating a loss of critical thinking, a loss of originality, a loss of discernment, a loss of personal reflection, and so on," said Shockley, who primarily teaches courses in philosophy and religious studies.
For Shockley's part, he was an early adopter of AI and was experimenting with the capabilities of LLMs soon after the launch of ChatGPT. He expects the technology not only to endure long-term, but to improve exponentially, and he began to believe it was crucial to help students build a healthy relationship with it.
"My mindset on the topic, since AI has emerged, has shifted, moved like a pendulum from fascination to fear, given how it may be used," Shockley said. "But my fascination with AI is rooted in what it may be able to ameliorate, ameliorate things in the energy sector, industry, natural environment, medicine, science, person-centered care, but I decided that I would be open to using AI and my pedagogy in a Socratic approach."
Originally, he developed an assignment for his undergraduate courses in philosophy and religious studies that encouraged students to dialogue with an LLM and analyze the output. He hoped that students would not only learn how to ask smarter questions but also develop a healthy skepticism of artificial intelligence.
He has since discontinued the assignment and no longer allows any use of AI in lower-level classes. Too many students, he found, used it to outright cheat — including one instance in which he said a student submitted a paper that cited a hallucinated quote from a book Shockley co-authored.
"The use of AI in the classroom for me as a philosopher is limited to inquiry among senior-level students doing research where they have maturity," Shockley said. "They have the chance to grow and so, and become equipped with critical thinking skills for themselves."
Some assignments are naturally more AI-resistant
Though Shockley still assigns research papers, he also tries to deploy "experiential" assignments whenever possible. For instance, in undergraduate environmental ethics and religious studies courses, Shockley has sent students out to visit local nature spots or religious sites.
He hopes to engage students, he added, by "hooking" them — connecting them more personally to the subject matter that they'll eventually interact with in more traditional ways. That way, they may be less likely to turn to AI to complete their work. Additionally, he's begun to attach reflective components to any assignments that could likely be gamed by AI on their own.
"What is it that students want? What is it that people want to experience these days?" he said. "What is it that young people want to experience these days, right? They want to have phenomenal experiences, you know, transformative experiences, cool experiences, and so, how can I harmonize those things together?"
Generally, certain disciplines are more insulated against AI cheating, given that they better lend themselves to project-based assignments. In Griffin's case, many of the business courses he teaches require actual interaction with a real-world client.
"We're challenging them with quite difficult tasks out in the real world to deliver projects for clients, you know, and there's a huge variety of expectation and understanding, both from the clients' perspective, but also from our sort of undergrads as well," Griffin said.
Much like Shockley, Griffin is focusing on incorporating reflection into his curriculum, hoping that the layered steps will prompt deeper thinking.
"I'm using projects and portfolios, so people are out in the real world. We're also relying very much on reflective aspects of that," Griffin said. "So they'll deliver a project with a client. If you're going to use AI and tell the client some really tough information, they're not going to be particularly happy.
"And then that reflective element means that they really have to delve deeper and give us some honesty, which wouldn't normally be there in normal sort of assignments or assessments," he added.
A shift toward oral assessments and discussion-based assignments, Griffin said, is also likely as AI continues to develop.
"So assessments, I don't know whether I'd say they're going to become harder," he said. "They'll certainly become more focused. I think we need to accept that. We maybe can't teach as broad a topic as we'd like to, but we can certainly teach criticality."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

38 minutes ago

• Forbes

5 Ways ChatGPT Is Redefining LinkedIn Networking For Entrepreneurs

Entrepreneur building LinkedIn network According to the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023-2024 report, 24% of young entrepreneurs are actively engaged in starting or running businesses, yet many struggle with time management while balancing growth activities on LinkedIn and other platforms. Teen and young adult entrepreneurs face additional challenges, including building credibility while competing against more established professionals on LinkedIn. LinkedIn has become essential for business development, but traditional LinkedIn networking approaches consume hours without guaranteed returns. This time crunch hits younger entrepreneurs particularly hard as they juggle business building with school, family commitments, and limited resources. Young entrepreneurs face a choice: spend significant time crafting individual LinkedIn messages and content or risk appearing generic in a crowded LinkedIn marketplace. ChatGPT offers entrepreneurs of all ages a middle path—maintaining personalization while scaling LinkedIn networking efforts efficiently. For younger business owners, AI tools level the playing field by helping them create professional content and outreach that competes with seasoned entrepreneurs. Here's how smart business owners are using AI to build meaningful professional relationships on LinkedIn. Writing individual connection requests and follow-up messages can consume several hours each week. Most entrepreneurs either send generic messages or spend too much time personalizing each one. ChatGPT helps you find the middle ground. Use this prompt: "I want to connect with [specific role/industry] professionals on LinkedIn. Help me create a connection message template that I can customize with specific details about each person. The message should be professional, specific, and under 200 characters." For LinkedIn follow-up messages, try: "I recently connected with someone on LinkedIn who [specific background detail] The key is using ChatGPT for structure while adding personal details about each LinkedIn contact. A message that mentions their recent article or company milestone performs far better than AI-generated content alone. Most entrepreneur profiles read like resumes rather than marketing tools. They list past jobs instead of showcasing current value and future potential. ChatGPT can help reframe your LinkedIn profile around client needs. Use this prompt: "I'm an entrepreneur in [industry] who helps [target client] achieve [specific outcome]. Help me write a LinkedIn headline and summary that attracts potential clients, partners, and investors. Focus on results I deliver rather than credentials I have." Your LinkedIn headline should answer this question: "What problem do you solve for whom?" Instead of "Startup Founder," try "Helping Restaurants Increase Revenue 30% Through Data-Driven Marketing | SaaS Entrepreneur | Foodtech Innovator." Young entrepreneurs can add credibility by highlighting specific results rather than relying solely on years of experience. For your LinkedIn summary, lead with client outcomes, include a brief origin story, and end with a clear call to action. It's all about developing and sharing your personal brand. Teen entrepreneurs should focus on passion, problem-solving abilities, and early wins rather than traditional credentials. People connect with entrepreneurs who can help them, regardless of age. Consistent posting on LinkedIn helps build visibility, but many entrepreneurs struggle with creating engaging content. They either share random thoughts or spend hours crafting posts that few people engage with. ChatGPT can generate LinkedIn content ideas aligned with your business goals. Try this prompt: "I'm building a [type of business] and want to attract [specific audience] on LinkedIn. Generate 10 post ideas that position me as an expert while providing value to potential clients. Include questions that encourage engagement." The most effective LinkedIn content for entrepreneurs combines industry insights with personal experiences. Share lessons from specific client projects, predictions based on your expertise, or frameworks you've developed. People follow entrepreneurs who offer practical wisdom, not generic business advice. Post consistently on LinkedIn rather than perfectly. Two valuable posts a week are better than one brilliant post quarterly. Random networking wastes time. Successful entrepreneurs connect strategically on LinkedIn with potential clients, partners, investors, and mentors who align with their business goals. ChatGPT can help you identify ideal LinkedIn connections. Use this prompt: "I'm building [business description] and need to connect with [specific types of people] on LinkedIn. What LinkedIn search terms should I use? What mutual interests or challenges might we share? How should I position myself when reaching out?" Create LinkedIn connection campaigns around specific business objectives. If you're raising funding, target angel investors in your particular industry or sector. If you need strategic partnerships, focus on complementary service providers. Quality beats quantity in LinkedIn entrepreneurial networking. Research LinkedIn prospects before connecting. Check their recent posts, company news, or mutual connections. A reference to their latest achievement or shared connection dramatically increases response rates. Networking isn't about collecting LinkedIn connections—it's about building relationships that create mutual value. Many entrepreneurs connect and then disappear, missing opportunities to develop partnerships. ChatGPT can help you maintain consistent LinkedIn engagement. Try this prompt: "I want to stay connected with my LinkedIn network without being pushy. Help me create a system for engaging with others' content, sharing valuable resources, and maintaining relationships over time." Engage with others' LinkedIn content before promoting your own. Comment thoughtfully on posts from potential clients or partners. Share relevant articles with specific LinkedIn connections who might find them helpful. Make introductions between contacts who could benefit from knowing each other. Use ChatGPT to draft LinkedIn comments that add value rather than just praise. Instead of "Great post!" try something like "This reminds me of a similar challenge we faced at [company]. We found that [specific insight] was particularly helpful. Thanks for sharing your perspective." ChatGPT makes LinkedIn networking more efficient, but successful entrepreneurs still invest time in building genuine relationships on LinkedIn. Use AI to handle structure, templates, and initial drafts, then add personal touches that reflect authentic interest in others. The entrepreneurs who succeed on LinkedIn provide value before asking for anything—regardless of their age or experience level. They share insights, make connections, and solve problems for others. ChatGPT makes these LinkedIn activities more scalable, giving younger entrepreneurs the tools to compete professionally. For teen and young entrepreneurs, start with one area—perhaps optimizing your LinkedIn profile or planning your next month of LinkedIn content. As you see results, expand your use of AI tools to other LinkedIn networking activities. The key advantage younger entrepreneurs have is adaptability and a willingness to embrace new tools, such as AI.

Engadget

38 minutes ago

• Engadget

Big discounts at Udemy: New customers can save up to 80 percent on tech courses

There are only so many hours in a day, so how do you find the time to enhance your skills for the job you have, or the one you want? Udemy offers educational courses in all types of fields, from tech and AI to marketing and communications. Right now, you can get up to 80 percent off many of the top courses, signing up for little more than the cost of a large pizza. For those pressed for time — and who isn't nowadays? — Udemy gives you the chance to do these courses from the comfort of your home, and at a pace and time that works for you. And now, that equation gets even better with the added bonus of a killer price that won't strain your budget. Whether you want to learn a new method of coding, get acquainted with ChatGPT or gain project management skills before submitting a promotion application, Udemy has you covered. Not sure where to start? The best-selling Better Business Writing Skills course is useful for any business vertical, and it's on sale for an incredible price right now: down from its regular cost of $129.99 to just $22.99, saving you 82 percent. The course is structured to help you learn persuasive writing, which is ideal for sales, marketing and even presentations. Complete it in an afternoon or do it over the course of a month — however you'd like to dive into the four hours of video, 11 articles and 17 downloadable resources. You'll start with structure and move through to more advanced topics, like business writing with ChatGPT. More than 35,000 learners give this course an average 4.6-star rating, praising how well thought out and organized the material is. "The points brought up are so relevant and valuable," writes one learner. If you're looking for something more technical, consider Pre-Programming: Everything you need to know before you code. A great course for those just starting out or looking to switch to a different career, the 4.7-star rated, best-selling course is down 82 percent from $129.99 to $22.99. You'll learn the fundamentals of programming, get help choosing which programming language you want to pursue and even receive a refresher on computers and web technology to paint a holistic picture. The course is just over six hours long, divided into 10 easily digestible sections with 87 short lectures. Among the more than 12,000 happy learners who have taken this course, one describes it as being an "absolute joy to go through," while most generally appreciate the sense of humor in the teaching style. It's praised for being suitable for a non-technical person looking to get into the field. 'The instructor is super fun and hilarious,' adds one course completer. When trying to work your way up the management ranks, you want skills that can help you stand out. Project Management for Non Project Managers – PMP/PMI is a solid course that's translatable to all types of industries. At a regular price of $119.99, it's 79 percent off right now, so you can add to cart for just $24.99. Using strategies like interactive role play, you can learn about the most common mistakes people usually make when managing projects and how to balance budgets. There are 30 lectures across four sections, coming in at under 2.5 hours to completion. With an average 4.7-star rating from nearly 15,000 students, this course has easy-to-follow steps with good pacing, and learners appreciate how applicable it is to various verticals. Now is a great time to enhance your knowledge with 80 percent (or more!) off some of the top courses from Udemy. You'll find courses on a variety of topics, from learning about technical subjects you can add to your resume to improving softer skills that are valued in any type of business and role. Knowledge is power, and these courses help you gain more without ever having to leave the house.

The Verge

an hour ago

• The Verge

You sound like ChatGPT

Join any Zoom call, walk into any lecture hall, or watch any YouTube video, and listen carefully. Past the content and inside the linguistic patterns, you'll find the creeping uniformity of AI voice. Words like 'prowess' and 'tapestry,' which are favored by ChatGPT, are creeping into our vocabulary, while words like 'bolster,' 'unearth,' and 'nuance,' words less favored by ChatGPT, have declined in use. Researchers are already documenting shifts in the way we speak and communicate as a result of ChatGPT — and they see this linguistic influence accelerating into something much larger. In the 18 months after ChatGPT was released, speakers used words like 'meticulous,' 'delve,' 'realm,' and 'adept' up to 51 percent more frequently than in the three years prior, according to researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, who analyzed close to 280,000 YouTube videos from academic channels. The researchers ruled out other possible change points before ChatGPT's release and confirmed these words align with those the model favors, as established in an earlier study comparing 10,000 human- and AI-edited texts. The speakers don't realize their language is changing. That's exactly the point. One word, in particular, stood out to researchers as a kind of linguistic watermark. 'Delve' has become an academic shibboleth, a neon sign in the middle of every conversation flashing ChatGPT was here. 'We internalize this virtual vocabulary into daily communication,' says Hiromu Yakura, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development. ''Delve' is only the tip of the iceberg.' But it's not just that we're adopting AI language — it's about how we're starting to sound. Even though current studies mostly focus on vocabulary, researchers suspect that AI influence is starting to show up in tone, too — in the form of longer, more structured speech and muted emotional expression. As Levin Brinkmann, a research scientist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development and a coauthor of the study, puts it, ''Delve' is only the tip of the iceberg.' AI shows up most obviously in functions like smart replies, autocorrect, and spellcheck. Research out of Cornell looks at our use of smart replies in chats, finding that use of smart replies increases overall cooperation and feelings of closeness between participants, since users end up selecting more positive emotional language. But if people believed their partner was using AI in the interaction, they rated their partner as less collaborative and more demanding. Crucially, it wasn't actual AI usage that turned them off — it was the suspicion of it. We form perceptions based on language cues, and it's really the language properties that drive those impressions, says Malte Jung, Associate Professor of Information Science at Cornell University and a co-author of the study. This paradox — AI improving communication while fostering suspicion — points to a deeper loss of trust, according to Mor Naaman, professor of Information Science at Cornell Tech. He has identified three levels of human signals that we've lost in adopting AI into our communication. The first level is that of basic humanity signals, cues that speak to our authenticity as a human being like moments of vulnerability or personal rituals, which say to others, 'This is me, I'm human.' The second level consists of attention and effort signals that prove 'I cared enough to write this myself.' And the third level is ability signals which show our sense of humor, our competence, and our real selves to others. It's the difference between texting someone, 'I'm sorry you're upset' versus 'Hey sorry I freaked at dinner, I probably shouldn't have skipped therapy this week.' One sounds flat; the other sounds human. For Naaman, figuring out how to bring back and elevate these signals is the path forward in AI-mediated communication, because AI is not only changing language — but what we think. 'Even on dating sites, what does it mean to be funny on your profile or in chat anymore where we know that AI can be funny for you?' Naaman asks. The loss of agency starting in our speech and moving into our thinking, in particular, is what he is worried about. 'Instead of articulating our own thoughts, we articulate whatever AI helps us to articulate…we become more persuaded.' Without these signals, Naaman warns, we'll only trust face-to-face communication — not even video calls. We lose the verbal stumbles, regional idioms, and off-kilter phrases that signal vulnerability, authenticity, and personhood The trust problem compounds when you consider that AI is quietly establishing who gets to sound 'legitimate' in the first place. University of California, Berkeley research found that AI responses often contained stereotypes or inaccurate approximations when prompted to use dialects other than Standard American English. Examples of this include ChatGPT repeating the prompt back to the non-Standard-American-English user due to lack of comprehension and exaggerating the input dialect significantly. One Singaporean English respondent commented, 'the super exaggerated Singlish in one of the responses was slightly cringeworthy.' The study revealed that AI doesn't just prefer Standard American English, it actively flattens other dialects in ways that can demean their speakers. This system perpetuates inaccuracies not only about communities but also about what 'correct' English is. So the stakes aren't just about preserving linguistic diversity — they're about protecting the imperfections that actually build trust. When everyone around us starts to sound 'correct,' we lose the verbal stumbles, regional idioms, and off-kilter phrases that signal vulnerability, authenticity, and personhood. We're approaching a splitting point, where AI's impacts on how we speak and write move between the poles of standardization, like templating professional emails or formal presentations, and authentic expression in personal and emotional spaces. Between those poles, there are three core tensions at play. Early backlash signals, like academics avoiding 'delve' and people actively trying not to sound like AI, suggests we may self-regulate against homogenization. AI systems themselves will likely become more expressive and personalized over time, potentially reducing the current AI voice problem. And the deepest risk of all, as Naaman pointed to, is not linguistic uniformity but losing conscious control over our own thinking and expression. The future isn't predetermined between homogenization and hyperpersonalization: it depends on whether we'll be conscious participants in that change. We're seeing early signs that people will push back when AI influence becomes too obvious, while technology may evolve to better mirror human diversity rather than flatten it. This isn't a question about whether AI will continue shaping how we speak — because it will — but whether we'll actively choose to preserve space for the verbal quirks and emotional messiness that make communication recognizably, irreplaceably human.