Women revolt at NZ government's pay equity walk-back

New Zealand's government is confronting a backlash from women after cancelling dozens of gender-based pay claims to make savings ahead of a tough-as-nails budget.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is poised to bank billions from the move, which was announced and legislated inside 48 hours last week.
The new law prompted hastily organised protests spanning the length of the country, recalling the mighty pushback that Chris Luxon's government weathered around ill-fated Treaty of Waitangi reforms.
This time around, rather than Maori who raised their voices, it has been women.
"Women across the country will pay the price for this ... it's a dark day," public sector union boss Fleur Fitzsimons said.
Pay equity claims are designed to raise wages in female-dominated industries, in a complex process that involves comparing their work to similar industries.
One such example was nursing, which saw a pay equity claim finalised in 2023, bumping salaries for 30,000 workers by tens of thousands of dollars a year - partially to compete with Australian wages.
Teachers, hospice workers and midwives were among 150,000 workers in industries who were hoping to finalise similar claims with the government until the shock move last week, which axed 33 unresolved claims.
Those industries are expected to lodge claims under a new model, despite the higher thresholds involved.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden said the system needed to be streamlined, given settled claims were costing the government an extra $NZ1.78 billion ($A1.64 billion) each year.
Her argument of cost-saving, ahead of the May 22 budget, has allowed opposition parties to claim the government had effectively docked their pay.
Prime Minister Chris Luxon argues that isn't right.
"The opposition, the unions and frankly the media have been actually scaremongering and being a bit disingenuous about all of this," he said.
"We know what we want to fix ... we have moved quickly to make sure that we can get one system in place."
Others believe otherwise.
"I don't think we've ever seen a clearer example of a government gaslighting half the population than the one we've seen in the last few days," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.
"This is about saving money."
Alongside the spontaneous protests this weekend, there was near universal condemnation from the commentariat, including one explosive attack from senior and respected journalist Andrea Vance.
Ms Vance labelled Ms Willis a "c***" and a "girlboss" who betrayed feminism by defending the cuts by holding a press conference backed by five other female ministers.
"All united in a historic act of economic back-handing other women ... kind of like watching a 'Lean In' seminar hosted by the ghost of Margaret Thatcher," Ms Vance wrote in Wellington newspaper The Post.
In a right-of-reply in the same masthead, Ms Willis said she was appalled by the arguments.
"Having the C-word directed at me by a journalist in a mainstream publication wasn't on my bingo list for Mother's Day 2025. Nor was being accused of 'girl-math'," she wrote.
Ms Willis defended the cuts to "unwind a blow-out in costs that Treasury had been forecasting" in favour of other spending.
But there will be precious little of that in the May 22 budget, given she has already trimmed her operating allowances in pursuit of a surplus in 2027.
New Zealand's government is confronting a backlash from women after cancelling dozens of gender-based pay claims to make savings ahead of a tough-as-nails budget.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is poised to bank billions from the move, which was announced and legislated inside 48 hours last week.
The new law prompted hastily organised protests spanning the length of the country, recalling the mighty pushback that Chris Luxon's government weathered around ill-fated Treaty of Waitangi reforms.
This time around, rather than Maori who raised their voices, it has been women.
"Women across the country will pay the price for this ... it's a dark day," public sector union boss Fleur Fitzsimons said.
Pay equity claims are designed to raise wages in female-dominated industries, in a complex process that involves comparing their work to similar industries.
One such example was nursing, which saw a pay equity claim finalised in 2023, bumping salaries for 30,000 workers by tens of thousands of dollars a year - partially to compete with Australian wages.
Teachers, hospice workers and midwives were among 150,000 workers in industries who were hoping to finalise similar claims with the government until the shock move last week, which axed 33 unresolved claims.
Those industries are expected to lodge claims under a new model, despite the higher thresholds involved.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden said the system needed to be streamlined, given settled claims were costing the government an extra $NZ1.78 billion ($A1.64 billion) each year.
Her argument of cost-saving, ahead of the May 22 budget, has allowed opposition parties to claim the government had effectively docked their pay.
Prime Minister Chris Luxon argues that isn't right.
"The opposition, the unions and frankly the media have been actually scaremongering and being a bit disingenuous about all of this," he said.
"We know what we want to fix ... we have moved quickly to make sure that we can get one system in place."
Others believe otherwise.
"I don't think we've ever seen a clearer example of a government gaslighting half the population than the one we've seen in the last few days," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.
"This is about saving money."
Alongside the spontaneous protests this weekend, there was near universal condemnation from the commentariat, including one explosive attack from senior and respected journalist Andrea Vance.
Ms Vance labelled Ms Willis a "c***" and a "girlboss" who betrayed feminism by defending the cuts by holding a press conference backed by five other female ministers.
"All united in a historic act of economic back-handing other women ... kind of like watching a 'Lean In' seminar hosted by the ghost of Margaret Thatcher," Ms Vance wrote in Wellington newspaper The Post.
In a right-of-reply in the same masthead, Ms Willis said she was appalled by the arguments.
"Having the C-word directed at me by a journalist in a mainstream publication wasn't on my bingo list for Mother's Day 2025. Nor was being accused of 'girl-math'," she wrote.
Ms Willis defended the cuts to "unwind a blow-out in costs that Treasury had been forecasting" in favour of other spending.
But there will be precious little of that in the May 22 budget, given she has already trimmed her operating allowances in pursuit of a surplus in 2027.
New Zealand's government is confronting a backlash from women after cancelling dozens of gender-based pay claims to make savings ahead of a tough-as-nails budget.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is poised to bank billions from the move, which was announced and legislated inside 48 hours last week.
The new law prompted hastily organised protests spanning the length of the country, recalling the mighty pushback that Chris Luxon's government weathered around ill-fated Treaty of Waitangi reforms.
This time around, rather than Maori who raised their voices, it has been women.
"Women across the country will pay the price for this ... it's a dark day," public sector union boss Fleur Fitzsimons said.
Pay equity claims are designed to raise wages in female-dominated industries, in a complex process that involves comparing their work to similar industries.
One such example was nursing, which saw a pay equity claim finalised in 2023, bumping salaries for 30,000 workers by tens of thousands of dollars a year - partially to compete with Australian wages.
Teachers, hospice workers and midwives were among 150,000 workers in industries who were hoping to finalise similar claims with the government until the shock move last week, which axed 33 unresolved claims.
Those industries are expected to lodge claims under a new model, despite the higher thresholds involved.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden said the system needed to be streamlined, given settled claims were costing the government an extra $NZ1.78 billion ($A1.64 billion) each year.
Her argument of cost-saving, ahead of the May 22 budget, has allowed opposition parties to claim the government had effectively docked their pay.
Prime Minister Chris Luxon argues that isn't right.
"The opposition, the unions and frankly the media have been actually scaremongering and being a bit disingenuous about all of this," he said.
"We know what we want to fix ... we have moved quickly to make sure that we can get one system in place."
Others believe otherwise.
"I don't think we've ever seen a clearer example of a government gaslighting half the population than the one we've seen in the last few days," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.
"This is about saving money."
Alongside the spontaneous protests this weekend, there was near universal condemnation from the commentariat, including one explosive attack from senior and respected journalist Andrea Vance.
Ms Vance labelled Ms Willis a "c***" and a "girlboss" who betrayed feminism by defending the cuts by holding a press conference backed by five other female ministers.
"All united in a historic act of economic back-handing other women ... kind of like watching a 'Lean In' seminar hosted by the ghost of Margaret Thatcher," Ms Vance wrote in Wellington newspaper The Post.
In a right-of-reply in the same masthead, Ms Willis said she was appalled by the arguments.
"Having the C-word directed at me by a journalist in a mainstream publication wasn't on my bingo list for Mother's Day 2025. Nor was being accused of 'girl-math'," she wrote.
Ms Willis defended the cuts to "unwind a blow-out in costs that Treasury had been forecasting" in favour of other spending.
But there will be precious little of that in the May 22 budget, given she has already trimmed her operating allowances in pursuit of a surplus in 2027.
New Zealand's government is confronting a backlash from women after cancelling dozens of gender-based pay claims to make savings ahead of a tough-as-nails budget.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is poised to bank billions from the move, which was announced and legislated inside 48 hours last week.
The new law prompted hastily organised protests spanning the length of the country, recalling the mighty pushback that Chris Luxon's government weathered around ill-fated Treaty of Waitangi reforms.
This time around, rather than Maori who raised their voices, it has been women.
"Women across the country will pay the price for this ... it's a dark day," public sector union boss Fleur Fitzsimons said.
Pay equity claims are designed to raise wages in female-dominated industries, in a complex process that involves comparing their work to similar industries.
One such example was nursing, which saw a pay equity claim finalised in 2023, bumping salaries for 30,000 workers by tens of thousands of dollars a year - partially to compete with Australian wages.
Teachers, hospice workers and midwives were among 150,000 workers in industries who were hoping to finalise similar claims with the government until the shock move last week, which axed 33 unresolved claims.
Those industries are expected to lodge claims under a new model, despite the higher thresholds involved.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden said the system needed to be streamlined, given settled claims were costing the government an extra $NZ1.78 billion ($A1.64 billion) each year.
Her argument of cost-saving, ahead of the May 22 budget, has allowed opposition parties to claim the government had effectively docked their pay.
Prime Minister Chris Luxon argues that isn't right.
"The opposition, the unions and frankly the media have been actually scaremongering and being a bit disingenuous about all of this," he said.
"We know what we want to fix ... we have moved quickly to make sure that we can get one system in place."
Others believe otherwise.
"I don't think we've ever seen a clearer example of a government gaslighting half the population than the one we've seen in the last few days," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.
"This is about saving money."
Alongside the spontaneous protests this weekend, there was near universal condemnation from the commentariat, including one explosive attack from senior and respected journalist Andrea Vance.
Ms Vance labelled Ms Willis a "c***" and a "girlboss" who betrayed feminism by defending the cuts by holding a press conference backed by five other female ministers.
"All united in a historic act of economic back-handing other women ... kind of like watching a 'Lean In' seminar hosted by the ghost of Margaret Thatcher," Ms Vance wrote in Wellington newspaper The Post.
In a right-of-reply in the same masthead, Ms Willis said she was appalled by the arguments.
"Having the C-word directed at me by a journalist in a mainstream publication wasn't on my bingo list for Mother's Day 2025. Nor was being accused of 'girl-math'," she wrote.
Ms Willis defended the cuts to "unwind a blow-out in costs that Treasury had been forecasting" in favour of other spending.
But there will be precious little of that in the May 22 budget, given she has already trimmed her operating allowances in pursuit of a surplus in 2027.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Perth Now

an hour ago

• Perth Now

Vance stirs the pot in California, after a tense week

Vice President JD Vance has used an appearance in Los Angeles to renew criticism of the city's officials over violent unrest there, and rebut claims that it was fuelled by the Trump administration sending in federal officers. Vance also referred to US Senator Alex Padilla, the state's first Latino senator, as 'Jose Padilla,' a week after the Democrat was forcibly tackled and handcuffed by officers for speaking out during a news conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. "I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question," Vance said, in an apparent reference to the altercation at Noem's event. "I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theatre." In a statement on X, California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Vance's reference to "Jose Padilla," saying the comment was no accident. Jose Padilla also is the name of a convicted al-Qaida terrorism plotter during President George W Bush's administration, who was sentenced to two decades in prison. A spokesperson for Padilla, Tess Oswald, noted in a social media post that Padilla and Vance were formerly colleagues in the Senate and that Vance should know better. "He should be more focused on demilitarising our city than taking cheap shots," Oswald said. Responding to the outrage, Taylor Van Kirk, a spokesperson for Vance, said of the vice president: "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law." Vance's visit to Los Angeles to tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Centre and a mobile command centre came as demonstrations calmed down in the city and a curfew was lifted this week. Vance echoed the president's harsh rhetoric toward California Democrats as he sought to blame them for the protests in the city. "Gavin Newsom and (Los Angeles Mayor) Karen Bass, by treating the city as a sanctuary city, have basically said that this is open season on federal law enforcement," Vance said after he toured federal immigration enforcement offices. "What happened here was a tragedy," Vance added. "You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law and they had rioters egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job. That is disgraceful.' Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon said in a statement, "The Vice President's claim is categorically false. The governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear." At City Hall, Bass said Vance was "spewing lies and utter nonsense." She said hundreds of millions of dollars were wasted by the federal government on a "stunt." The friction in Los Angeles began June 6, when federal agents conducted a series of immigration sweeps in the region that have continued since. Amid the protests and over the objections of state and local officials, Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the city. Trump has said that without the military's involvement, Los Angeles "would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years." Earlier Friday, Newsom urged Vance to visit victims of the deadly January wildfires while in Southern California and talk with Trump, who earlier this week suggested his feud with the governor might influence his consideration of $40 billion in federal wildfire aid for California. "I hope we get that back on track," Newsom wrote on X. "We are counting on you, Mr Vice President."

The Age

4 hours ago

• The Age

UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving way for historic law change

London: Britain's parliament has voted in favour of a bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation. The legislation passed by a vote of 314-291, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Starmer voted in favour. Loading Supporters of the bill say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Hundreds of people gathered outside parliament to hear news of the vote.

Sydney Morning Herald

4 hours ago

• Sydney Morning Herald

UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving way for historic law change

London: Britain's parliament has voted in favour of a bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation. The legislation passed by a vote of 314-291, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Starmer voted in favour. Loading Supporters of the bill say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Hundreds of people gathered outside parliament to hear news of the vote.