Philippines, US hold joint maritime drills in South China Sea, World News
MANILA — Coast Guard vessels of the Philippines and the United States have taken part for the first time in joint maritime exercises with naval and air force units in the contested South China Sea, Manila's armed forces said on Wednesday (May 21).
The exercises, held on Tuesday in waters off Palawan and Occidental Mindoro, involved the Philippine Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard, alongside the US Coast Guard Cutter Stratton and a US Navy P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft.
The "maritime cooperative activity," which was the second for the year and sixth overall since the allies launched the joint activities in 2023, included communication drills and search-and-rescue scenarios, the military said in a statement.
"Joint activities like the MCA reaffirm the Armed Forces of the Philippines' commitment to modernising its capabilities and strengthening defence partnerships to secure our national and regional maritime interests," AFP Chief Romeo Brawner said.
Relations between the Philippines and China have been strained by disputes over sovereignty in the South China Sea, a conduit for more than US$3 trillion (S$3.8 trillion) of annual ship-borne commerce.
China claims most of the strategic waterway despite a 2016 ruling by an international arbitral tribunal that found Beijing's claims have no basis under international law. China does not recognise the decision.
[[nid:718205]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Japan says no US demand for defence spending worth 3.5% of GDP
[TOKYO] Japan denied a report that the US directly asked Tokyo to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of annual gross domestic product, with its top government spokesperson saying that the amount of spending was less important than how Japan raises its military capabilities. 'Regarding defence spending, there's no truth to that,' Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said at a press conference on Monday (Jun 23) when asked about a Financial Times (FT) report that a senior Pentagon official had told Japan to boost military spending. The comments come as US President Donald Trump's administration ramps up pressure on its allies to boost defence spending amid mounting global security concerns. Tensions continue to build with conflict in the Middle East intensifying, Russia's war in Ukraine rumbling on and China continuing to intimidate its neighbours through military activity. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a security conference in late May that US allies in Asia should boost total spending related to defence, warning that more urgency is needed to prepare for a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan. 'Nato members are pledging to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence – even Germany,' Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. 'So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence.' A Pentagon spokesperson told Japanese media outlets last week that the 5 per cent goal should apply to Japan. Nato countries formally approved the plan at their summit meeting over the week, setting a target for defence spending at 5 per cent of GDP. Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte has framed that target as spending of 3.5 per cent on core defence items such as weapons, and an additional 1.5 per cent in defence-related spending such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. In his comments, Hayashi also pushed back against the FT's claim that Tokyo scrapped a meeting of US-Japan defence and foreign affairs ministers in response to the US demand. 'The date for the next Japan-US 2+2 meeting has yet to be decided,' the spokesperson said. According to the FT report, Tokyo decided to put off that meeting after the spending demand from a senior Pentagon official. That demand, reportedly issued by Elbridge Colby, undersecretary of defence for policy, comes as Japan is working towards raising its defence spending to 2 per cent of GDP by 2027 from its long-held stance of keeping it around 1 per cent. BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Despite clashes with US presidents, Netanyahu usually gets his way, World News
JERUSALEM — A little over a month ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to have been shunted to the shadows by US President Donald Trump, who hopscotched the Middle East without visiting Israel, traditionally Washington's closest regional ally. Worse still, from Netanyahu's perspective, Trump lifted sanctions on neighbouring Syria — something Israel opposed — and talked up the prospects of securing a nuclear deal with Iran, something the prime minister has always cautioned against. Fast forward five weeks and the United States has bombed Iran's main nuclear installations, fulfilling a decades-old dream of Netanyahu to convince Washington to bring its full military might to thwart Tehran's atomic ambitions. The US attack underscores a broader truth that has defined Netanyahu's career: no matter how fraught his relationships with successive presidents, he normally ends up getting what he wants. For over three decades, Netanyahu has clashed — often spectacularly — with American leaders. He has lectured them, defied them, embarrassed them publicly and privately. And yet, across Democratic and Republican administrations, US military aid has flowed largely uninterrupted to Israel. Washington remains Israel's chief arms supplier and diplomatic shield. "He probably has concluded that he always gets away with it," said a senior United Nations official in Jerusalem who declined to be named. "It's hard to argue otherwise." Just one month ago, opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of destroying Israel's relations with the United States. This weekend's action represents the closest US-Israeli military alignment yet against a common adversary. Withstanding pressure Netanyahu's belief in his ability to advance his agenda, and withstand American pressure when needed, has deep roots. Barely a month after becoming prime minister for the first time in 1996, he met President Bill Clinton in Washington and immediately rubbed him up the wrong way. "Who the f*** does he think he is? Who's the f****** superpower here?" Clinton asked his aides afterwards, according to US diplomat Aaron David Miller, who was present. But vital US aid to Israel continued to flow — something that would remain a constant over the years. Netanyahu was voted out of office in a 1999 election and did not return to power until a decade later, by which time Barack Obama, a Democrat like Clinton, was in the White House. Relations between the two turned openly hostile, initially over Israeli settlement building in occupied territory that Palestinians claim for a future stake — a constant thorn in US-Israeli relations. Matters deteriorated further as Obama entered negotiations with Iran to curb its nuclear drive — a project that Israel said is aimed at creating atomic bombs and that Tehran has said is for purely civilian purposes. Netanyahu spoke to Congress in 2015 at the invitation of Republicans to denounce the prospective deal, without informing the White House. "(The accord) doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves Iran's path to the bomb," he said. Obama was widely reported to have been furious, but still, the following year Washington delivered the largest military aid package to Israel in US history — US$38 billion (S$49 billion) over 10 years. Political analysts say Netanyahu takes US support as a given, confident that backing from evangelical Christians and the small Jewish-American community will guarantee that Israel remains well-armed, however much he antagonises the White House. Convincing Trump When Hamas militants launched a surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, then-President Joe Biden flew to Israel to show his support, authorising a huge flow of weapons to help with the conflict unleashed in Gaza. [[nid:719377]] But relations between Netanyahu, a right-winger, and Biden, a Democrat, deteriorated rapidly, as Washington grew alarmed by the spiralling number of civilian deaths and the burgeoning humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave. Biden held back on some heavy munitions deliveries and imposed sanctions on a number of violent Israeli settlers, so his defeat at the hands of Trump in last November's presidential election was celebrated by Netanyahu. Finally, he had a Republican in office at a crucial moment for Israel. However, things did not go smoothly, at least to start with. Like Biden before him, Trump was unhappy at the protracted conflict in Gaza and then he blindsided Netanyahu during a meeting on April 7, when he revealed that he was launching direct talks with Tehran aimed at finding a diplomatic solution to the protracted nuclear stand-off with Iran. But while Trump publicly positioned himself as a peacemaker, Netanyahu consistently pushed for military intervention. Although it is unclear if Netanyahu ever got him to say "yes" to Israel's war plans, it was at least not a "no", according to two senior US officials and a senior Israeli source. As soon as Israel launched its aerial war on Iran in the early hours of June 13, Israel pushed the United States to join in, urging Trump to be on the winning side of history, two Israeli officials said last week. "Mr President, Finish the job!" read large billboards that have popped up in Tel Aviv. The sense of relief when the US bombers struck Iran's most protected nuclear sites on Sunday was palpable. "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said in a brief video address. "May God bless our unshakeable alliance, our unbreakable faith," he concluded. [[nid:719373]]
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Philippine Vice-President Duterte criticises Marcos for leaning towards US
Philippine Vice-President Sara Duterte slammed President Ferdinand Marcos Jr for leaning towards the US, while signaling openness to friendlier ties with China. Ms Duterte particularly criticised Mr Marcos' move to allow an American missile system on Philippine soil that has angered Beijing, saying Manila has nothing to do with tensions between the US and China. 'There is no reason for you to lean towards the US,' she said in a livestreamed speech on June 23 before supporters in Melbourne, Australia. The vice-president also said the tensions between Manila and Beijing in the South China Sea don't make up the entirety of the relations between the two countries. 'You have to always stay in the middle because you are not part of the bigger conflict,' Ms Duterte said. 'You are friends with US, yes. You are friends with China, yes. And why not?' Ms Duterte's statements mark her sharpest criticisms yet of Mr Marcos' US-friendly foreign policy stance, at a time when the administration's allies are pushing for her ouster through impeachment proceedings. Her position also echoes that of her father, Rodrigo, who pivoted towards China during his 2016-2022 presidency. Mr Marcos' office has yet to respond to the vice-president's remarks. Under Mr Marcos, the Philippines has bolstered longstanding defense ties with the US, expanding access to military bases and allowing the deployment of American weapons. His government has also been more assertive in pushing Manila's claims in the South China Sea, often leading to skirmishes with Beijing in disputed waters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
