British father-to-be feels like ‘second class citizen' over family visa rules

David Todd, 33, is calling on the Government to reform the policy, including to scrap or lower the minimum income requirement (MIR) for British citizens to bring their partners to the country, as ministers mull over updating the visa route.
His plea comes as charities Reunite Families UK and Coram published reports on Monday documenting the 'significant emotional and psychological harm' to families from the policy, particularly for children who grow up under long separation from one of their parents.
Mr Todd had hoped to move back to the UK from Germany with his American wife, Claire Todd, 32, before the birth of their first baby which is due in October.
But the couple are facing being split up for Mr Todd to return to the UK alone to build up enough income proof as the British citizen in the relationship, or raise savings of more than £88,500 dictated by the visa rules to allow them to return as a family.
Mr Todd told the PA news agency: 'There's been lots of times where I've stayed awake at night worrying about it and how it's all going to work out, because you feel completely helpless.
'It's like we're second class citizens because we married someone who fell in love with someone who wasn't British.'
Earlier this month the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) set out its recommendations after a review requested by the Home Secretary to look at how to set an MIR for family visas that balances economic wellbeing and family life.
It warned against raising the threshold for family visas to the same level for skilled workers, as planned by the previous government.
Skilled workers are only eligible to come to the UK if they earn a salary of £38,700 or more, compared to £29,000 required mainly for family visas.
The UK's current £29,000 threshold, which was set in 2024, is high compared to other high-income countries reviewed by the MAC.
It was previously set at £18,600 since 2012.
Mr Todd, from Solihull, West Midlands, added increasing the level to £38,700 would be 'devastating'.
'Even with this MAC report now, we don't know what the Government's going to do, how they're going to react,' the classical music conductor said.
'It's this feeling that you're kind of helpless, you're stuck in limbo, and you're desperately trying to contort yourself into this position where you can make it work just because you want to live with your wife or husband.'
The couple, living in Wurzburg, Germany, first left the UK after Ms Todd's student visa ended and moved to the European nation so they could be together seven years ago.
After building 'good careers' as classical musicians on the continent, the couple began trying to make a return to the UK up to a year ago, wanting to be near family as they start their own.
For Mr Todd, he said the Government should at least make the ways to prove income easier, and to include the spouse's salary to contribute to the income threshold.
He said it is 'ridiculous' his wife's income cannot be used to meet the salary requirement despite her remote job as a content creator paying enough to mean they 'could move to the UK tomorrow'.
Mr Todd said he wants to 'avoid at all costs' the prospect of being separated from his wife and child, adding: 'It just feels wrong, am I going to have to turn to my child when she's older and say to her: 'Well, sorry, the reason I wasn't with you for the first year of your life was because I was trying to get work for the family to move.''
British father Ed Moon, currently living in Taipei with his Taiwanese wife Amber Moon and four-year-old daughter Maya, is also applying to the family visa route to move back to the UK as Maya reaches school age.
He told PA the most difficult thing is the 'extremely extensive' documentation you need to provide with any errors meaning the visa is denied and the process must be started again, with visa fees costing around £2,000.
'We're having to dip into every ounce of our savings to do this,' the 36-year-old from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, said.
'You feel just unwanted by your country essentially. It's been especially tough, really like from a personal perspective.'
The journalist also said it is a waste of money for the taxpayer for him to grow up and be educated in the UK, to then not let him and his family live there, adding: 'I want to be able to contribute to the UK.'
The research by Reunite Families and Coram found that British citizens face exile, increased financial pressure and separation from their partners often for long periods of time from the family visa policy.
For children separated from one of their parents, the charities warned they can face life-changing trauma and distress.
The report also highlighted how the rules particularly discriminate against those including British mothers, who are more likely to experience hardship, working class and low income partners and black and ethnic minority workers, who are more likely to earn less than their white counterparts.
Reunite Families UK executive director Caroline Coombs said 'simple and practical changes' from the Home Office could make significant differences to families, starting with scrapping the MIR and simplifying the rules and application process to stop the need for expensive legal advice.
'These rules have become the tax on love. People are suffering and want to be heard.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We understand the minimum income requirement for family visas needs to balance a respect for family life while also maintaining the UK's economic stability, which is why the Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review.
'We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Metro

8 minutes ago

• Metro

WWE fans call for Night of Champions to be 'cancelled' after Iran strikes

WWE has faced calls to consider moving this weekend's Night of Champions event out of Saudi Arabia following the US strikes on Iran. The sports entertainment juggernaut is set to broadcast both Friday Night Champion and Saturday's premium live event (PLE) from the kingdom this week. Saturday's show will be the 13th PLE the company has held in Saudi Arabia under its 10-year partnership supporting Saudi Vision 2030. As well as a blockbuster world championship bout between Hollywood star John Cena and longtime rival CM Punk, the likes of Randy Orton, Asuka and Dominik Mysterio are booked for the event. The Saudi deal is a big money spinner for WWE, and the promotion has already announced its return in January 2026 with the Royal Rumble moving outside North America for the first time. With the major event just days away, many fans are calling for the company to take action and either cancel both SmackDown and Night of Champions, or move them to another location. While there has been no suggestion Iran could launch an attack on Saudi Arabia, WWE fans are concerned about the close proximity between the two countries in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry has called for de-escalation and restraint, adding that they are following the situation with 'deep concern'. In recent years, Saudi Arabia – which has relied on US support in the past – has sought for diplomacy with Iran, which mean it may be a less likely target. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Iranian state television has claimed 'every American citizen or military personnel in the region is now a target', which has sparked further fears given WWE's show in Riyadh. X user @tbrunowvu wrote: '@WWE should cancel Night of Champions in Saudi Arabia. 'With Iran warning that 'every American in the region is now a target' after U.S. airstrikes, there's no way to guarantee the safety of talent or fans. No match is worth risking lives. Pull the plug @TKOGrp @TripleH' '@WWE needs to cancel going to Saudi and move Night of Champions to the performance centre or another city in Canada or the US,' added @TheGoodGary, while @coachbronze said: '@WWE please cancel the show.' And @HUMAT0N urged: 'Cancel Night Of Champions. Nothing is worth that risk, even if the risk might be small.' As it stands, WWE has not given any signs the show will be cancelled. Although Metro has contacted the company, we're yet to hear back. More information could be given during tonight's Monday Night Raw broadcast live on Netflix. A decision will have to be made soon, with WWE talent and crew set to fly out to Saudi Arabia on Wednesday. According to PWInsider, crew already in Riyadh have continued pre-production work as normal. In on-screen general manager Adam Pearce's preview for tonight's show, he referenced Night of Champions without mentioning Saudi Arabia – but that could have been to keep his weekly announcement video short and sweet. It's unlikely the event would get cancelled outright, and the deal with Saudi Arabia could impact the decision. Meanwhile, it's important to note that there has been no direct threat made to Saudi Arabia, which could mean WWE and its parent company TKO decide to move on with the week as normal. The US, where WWE will be leaving from on a charter flight, has called for 'increased caught'. A statement on the government website reads: 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East. More Trending 'There is the potential for demonstrations against U.S. citizens and interests abroad. The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution.' In an update on the Foreign Office pages for several destinations, the UK warns that 'ongoing hostilities' have the potential to 'deteriorate quickly'. View More » They are: Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: 'Shelter in place' warning for Americans in Qatar after worldwide travel alert MORE: What will happen if Iran blockades the Strait of Hormuz? MORE: TV star reveals his voice has actually changed thanks to 15 years playing iconic character

The National

9 minutes ago

• The National

John Swinney 'concerned' UK could become part of Middle East conflict

Tensions escalated further over the weekend as the US struck three of Iran's nuclear sites and President Donald Trump floated the idea of 'regime change' in the country following strikes between it and Israel. While Downing Street said on Monday the focus would be on 'diplomacy', a spokesman for Number 10 said preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon was a 'good thing'. Speaking during a visit to a school in the Springburn area of Glasgow on Monday, John Swinney urged the international community to work to find a resolution. READ MORE: LIVE: Palestine Action protest in London as group to be proscribed 'I share the concerns of Scots about the events in Iran over the weekend,' he said. 'To wake up to what we woke up to yesterday morning is very, very frightening and alarming and I don't think any of us should underestimate the significance and the severity of the situation that we face.' He added: 'That's why I have made a strong plea for every resource of the international community to be deployed to de-escalate the situation and to get the world to step back from the brink.' Swinney went on to encourage the UK Government to 'put all of their weight' behind diplomatic efforts to stem the conflict. Asked if he was concerned about British involvement in the conflict, he said: 'There's obviously the potential for this to have very wide-ranging implications and they could involve the United Kingdom. 'So, of course, I'm concerned about that point. 'I think we need to step back, to find a negotiated settlement to the issues that have been raised and to avoid any further escalation, which will simply increase the severity and the significance of the dangers that we all face.'

Daily Mirror

15 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

Everyday UK items that could go up in price after Donald Trump attack on Iran

Oil prices has risen to a five-month high - threatening to hit British households in the pocket. Brent crude topped $80 a barrel in early trading, before falling back to $78 by lunchtime on Monday. It has been low as $61 as recently as early May, before Israel launched its first missile strikes on Iran. There are fears that the price could jump to $110 a barrel or beyond, if the crisis deepens. ‌ The increase, fuelled by US President Donald Trump 's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last Friday, risks feeding through to different aspects of everyday life, depending how the latest twist in the Middle East conflict pans out. ‌ Fuel prices The most obvious shorter-term impact of higher oil prices is the price paid at the pump. Drivers in the UK had seen some reprieve from a spike in the cost of petrol and diesel, but that could all change. RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: 'The average price of a litre of petrol has increased by 1.5p to 133.5p in the last week while diesel has gone up by 2p to 140p. 'Although the cost of a barrel of oil jumped by $5 to $74 straight after Israel's June 13 attack on Iran, so far it hasn't climbed much higher. It's now at trading around $77 - $12 a barrel more expensive than it has been for the last three months - which is not yet enough to cause a major hike at the pumps. 'As retailer margins have been high for some time, the oil price rise has squeezed these to fairer levels for drivers. If, however, retailers are set on maintaining margins of around 12p a litre, we may well see the average price of fuel go up further.' He added: 'It's also important to note that the oil price is a long way off the $137.72 seen in the early days of the Ukraine war in spring 2022, which led to average prices reaching record highs in the summer of 191.5p for petrol and 199p for diesel.' Air fares Falling oil prices had led to lower air fares for passengers, with hopes this could be sustained over the peak summer months. ‌ Any increase in the cost of out could therefore cancel out the savings, or lead to upward pressure in fares. That said, airlines have often long-term contracts to buy jet fuel, protecting them against short-term fluctuations. Energy bills Millions of households are able to benefit from cheaper energy bills, with Ofgem's price cap falling from July 1. The average customer on a standard tariff will see prices drop by 7%, equivalent to £129 over the next year. ‌ In reality, the cap is likely to change three more times more times over the next 12 months and wholesale prices - what suppliers pay for the energy they sell to us - is a big factor in whether it will keep falling, or rise back up. Not only said the traded price of oil have a cut-across to wholesale gas prices, there is also a risk that the price of liquefied natural gas will rise if Iran restrictions shipments through the all-important Straits of Hormuz. Wider inflation The cost of living has remained stubbornly high for a host of reasons. While in the UK the Consumer Prices Index eased to 3.4% in May, it is still well above the Bank of England's 2% target. ‌ Oil feeds through into the cost of mainly things we consume, from of course fuel but also transporting goods and manufacturing. That could mean higher prices in shops for everything from food to toys and clothes. Any sharp rise in oil prices could therefore push inflation back up. Interest rates The Bank of England froze its base rate at 4.25% recently, as it waits to see the path for wage settlements and inflation. Economists think the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee could next cut rates in August, but much could change between now and then. Any sign of volatility may prompt the MPC to set on its hands, while it waits to assess the fall-out of the conflict on inflation and the economy. A delay to cutting rates is a setback for borrowers, including home buyers and others getting a new mortgage, but is better news for savers. ‌ Are these risks overblown? Only time will tell but it is worth keeping in mind that the oil price rise has been limited to date, with City traders judging that Tehran does not want to hurt its own source of income. As well as oil, Iran is also a major gas producer. Set against that is a current oversupply of oil given the weakness of the global economy. The International Energy Agency last week predicted that oil supplies would will substantially outstrip demand. 'In the absence of a major oil disruption, oil markets in 2025 look well supplied,' the IEA said. ‌ But experts think oil prices could surge if Iran retaliates and closing the Straits of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world 's oil supplies flow. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said it would be 'economic suicide' for Iran to close the passage. Investors are weighing up the extent of the geopolitical risk premium in oil markets given the Middle Eastern crisis is yet to impact on supply. Ole Hansen, analyst at Saxo Bank, said: 'All eyes remain on the Strait of Hormuz ... and whether Iran will seek to disrupt tanker traffic.' Investment bank Goldman Sachs says Brent crude could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months. The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, citing global incentives to try to prevent a sustained and very large disruption. ‌ Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'At a time when there were signs that inflation was becoming a little less troublesome, the geopolitical situation has added a slick of fresh uncertainty into the mix, pushing up energy prices.' Dr Eric Golson, associate professor of economics at the University of Surrey, urged caution. He said: 'The news surrounding the closing of the Strait of Hormuz is over baked for the global economy. 'At the moment, it is unclear whether the Iranians can directly close the Strait. Even if they tried, their forces would be challenged quickly. Markets are assigning very low odds of this happening. Economically, if Hormuz were to close in the short run, there is currently such a global oversupply of oil (outside of Hormuz) that it is unlikely we would see record prices. The disruption would likely be very minimal.'