Belgian officials go after a 92-year-old diplomat for his role in the murder of Patrice Lumumba
Belgian prosecutors are looking to take Etienne Davignon (92), a former diplomat who was allegedly involved in the murder of the Congolese revolutionary, Patrice Lumumba.
Belgian prosecutors are investigating Etienne Davignon's involvement in Patrice Lumumba's murder.
Accusations center on unlawful detention and degrading treatment of Lumumba prior to his execution.
Davignon was a trainee diplomat at the time and is the sole survivor among the suspects.
According to the prosecutor's office, the accused was involved in the "unlawful detention and transfer" of the former Congolese head of state, who was wrongly imprisoned and subjected to "humiliating and degrading treatment".
AFP news agency disclosed that Davignon is the only survivor of ten Belgians who are suspected of being engaged in Lumumba's assassination.
He held the position of vice-chairman of the European Commission throughout the 1980s and was a trainee diplomat at the time of the killing.
As reported by the BBC, in 2011, Lumumba's children filed a complaint in Belgium to seek justice for their father's murder at the age of 35.
A hearing is scheduled for January 2026 to determine if he should go to trial.
The news was welcomed by Juliana, Lumumba's daughter, who told Belgian network RTBF: "We're moving in the right direction. What we're seeking is, first and foremost, the truth."
Life of Patrice Lumumba
Patrice Lumumba, born in 1925 in the Belgian Congo, was a fierce anti-colonial leader and the first Prime Minister of an independent Congo.
A powerful orator and visionary, he led the Congolese National Movement and played a central role in securing the country's independence from Belgium on June 30, 1960.
His passionate Independence Day speech, in which he denounced the cruelty of Belgian colonialism, shocked Western leaders and marked him as a threat to foreign interests.
Within months of independence, Congo descended into crisis.
The mineral-rich Katanga province, backed by Belgian interests, declared secession. As Lumumba sought Soviet assistance to defend Congo's unity, Western powers, including the U.S. and Belgium, grew increasingly hostile.
He was soon overthrown in a coup led by Colonel Joseph Mobutu, who had Western backing.
Lumumba was arrested, humiliated, and eventually handed over to Katangan secessionists. On January 17, 1961, he was executed by firing squad alongside two allies.
His body was dismembered and dissolved in acid to prevent a grave from becoming a rallying point.
Foreign complicity in his death is widely acknowledged today. Patrice Lumumba remains a martyr of African liberation, his life and brutal killing symbolize the deep struggles Africa faced in shaking off the chains of colonialism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump refining ‘very likely' Iran strike plan if no diplomatic deal struck within two weeks: sources
WASHINGTON — President Trump is hoping for a peace deal with Iran in the next two weeks — but in the meantime is refining war plans to have the most effective airstrikes possible 'mapped out,' sources close to the White House told The Post, one of whom said the commander-in-chief is favoring the strikes. Four sources describe Trump as personally reviewing details of the plans with his military commanders, including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine and CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael Kurilla. 'Very likely there will be strikes,' one source said. 'But [Trump] wants a very mapped out and deliberate plan on what happens next. [He] doesn't want to just figure it out step by step.' 4 President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on April 7, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Another source close to the administration said Trump 'is more engaged than just about any president in a pre-strike scenario like this with his top commanders. President Trump is talking very intensively with both [Caine and Kurilla], more than most presidents would.' 'He's talking to them directly and so it's not like they're coming up with new plans, but they are refining plans that are already on the table and tweaking them based on circumstances there now,' the second source said. Trump said Thursday he will be making a decision 'within the next two weeks' on whether to join Israel in bombing Iran to halt its nuclear program. On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi countered that Tehran would never hold nuclear talks with the US 'until Israeli aggression stops.' 'Americans want to negotiate and have sent messages several times, but we clearly said that as long as this aggression doesn't stop, there's no place for talk of dialogue,' Araqchi said in an address on Iran's state television. But retired four-star Gen. Jack Keane also warned on 'Fox & Friends' Friday that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, won't agree to placing limits on his nation's uranium enrichment. 'The reason why he has never made a deal is because he had built an enterprise to survive an attack — and he believes they can absorb the attack, survive it, recover it, and then rebuild,' Keane said. 'That is where this guy is. And I don't see him, in the near term, making the deal here whatsoever.' The messaging from the West Wing has been that Trump is getting briefed daily by his national security team in the situation room and seeks a diplomatic solution if possible — but hasn't ruled out joining the fray with targeted military strikes. 'It's a little bit hard to someone to stop,' the president told reporters Friday evening after landing in New Jersey for a Republican fundraiser at his Bedminster golf club. 'We're going to see what that period of time is, but I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum.' The question of US involvement centers on Israel's possible inability to destroy the Fordow nuclear enrichment site located beneath a mountain. Israel has been dropping 2,000-pound US-made bombs, but lacks the aircraft required to drop a 30,000-pound US-made 'bunker buster.' 4 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a press conference in Jerusalem, May 21, 2025. AP 4 Israeli security personnel and first responders inspect an area hit by an Iranian missile strike on central Tel Aviv. The 'within two weeks' window gives Trump time to leverage both the possibility of striking a deal if Iran wants, and more time for the national security team to fully monitor the situation and provide the best plans. A third source close to the administration said that in the end, only Trump knows what the final decision will be regarding striking Iran's below ground nuclear facilities, or taking out Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei, like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to. 'Only he knows. Him and Netanyahu being on different pages about killing Khamenei suggests Trump is buying time for peace,' the source said. 'But we won't know what this two weeks was actually for until there are strikes or [a] pause in tension.' The two-week period allows Trump to have 'better military plans' drawn up, the source added, 'while also giving a chance for Iran to throw in the towel in a way he can sell to the world as meaningful and divide Netanyahu's base of support.' 4 Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei delivers a televised speech in Tehran A fourth source, who is close to the Pentagon, described the current status of planning 'a natural progression' where 'you get more specific based off the broader operational plans,' though they note Trump still is hesitant to strike. 'I think the president has since 2019 had a very extreme aversion to getting directly involved in a war with Iran, however it does not mean the door is completely shut,' the source said. 'I think he has changed over the past week and a half and is more open to military action, but he is clearly still conflicted. … The Israelis have put the president in a corner.' Israel accomplished a similar but simpler mission in Iraq — destroying a nuclear reactor in 1981 — by dropping 16 of its 2,000-pound bombs and it's unclear whether some resolution could allow them to see similar success at Fordow after the Jewish state already established air supremacy over Iran. Trump previously ordered US attacks in March on Iran-backed Houthi fighters who control northern Yemen and forced the group into an Omani-brokered deal to halt their bombardment of international shipping in the Red Sea. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth played a leading role in deliberations about the Yemen strikes, providing a detailed but respectful message supporting the operation in a later-leaked Signal group chat when Vice President JD Vance expressed concern that 'we are making a mistake.' Hegseth has been at the White House daily since Israel began striking Iran last week and Pentagon and White House officials say he also is an active part of deliberations. 'The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week,' Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Iran meeting with European officials ends with no breakthrough
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told his European counterparts Friday that Iran will not negotiate directly with the U.S. as long as Israel continues its military campaign, according to two European diplomats with direct knowledge of the discussions. Why it matters: The meeting in Geneva between Araghchi and top diplomats from the European Union, France, the U.K. and Germany marked the first in-person engagement between Iran and Western powers since Israel launched its war a week ago. It came a day after President Trump announced he would make a decision "within the next two weeks" on whether to strike Iran's nuclear program, leaving the door open to a diplomatic solution. The EU, U.K., France and Germany spoke to the Trump administration to coordinate ahead of the meeting. State of play: The two-hour meeting with the Iranians on Friday did not produce a diplomatic breakthrough, with neither side presenting a new proposal. The talks were described as an initial engagement, and the parties agreed to meet again next week, the European diplomats said. Behind the scenes: The European diplomats told Axios that the Iranians appeared more open than in previous talks to discussing not just limits on their nuclear program, but also a range of non-nuclear issues. Those include Iran's missile program, its regional proxy network, military assistance to Russia, and European detainees held in Iran. Araghchi told the European ministers that Iran is willing to restrict its uranium enrichment in a manner similar to the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump withdrew the U.S. from in 2018. The European foreign ministers urged Araghchi to engage directly with the Trump administration and proposed including U.S. representatives in future talks — but Araghchi refused, the diplomats said. Between the lines: Although the Iranian foreign minister has maintained direct contact with White House envoy Steve Witkoff since the war began, he reiterated in Geneva that Iran will not negotiate with the U.S. as long as Israeli strikes continue. What they're saying:"E3 Ministers and the High Representative of the European Union reiterated their longstanding concerns about Iran's expansion of its nuclear programme," the European ministers said in a joint statement after the meeting. "They discussed avenues towards a negotiated solution to Iran's nuclear programme, while emphasising the urgency of the matter." The other side: Araghchi told Iranian media after the meeting that Tehran remains committed to diplomacy and is prepared to meet again with the European foreign ministers. He stressed that Iran will not negotiate on its defensive capabilities. What's next: The European diplomats said they made clear during the meeting that time is running out to reach a diplomatic solution.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Colombia joins BRICS-backed bank in shift toward new financial order
June 20 (UPI) -- Colombia's recent entry into the BRICS-backed New Development Bank marks a significant shift in its foreign and economic policy. With the move, President Gustavo Petro's administration aims to reduce the country's long-standing reliance on Western financing and attract new investment for strategic infrastructure projects. "Colombia officially joins the BRICS New Development Bank. This membership opens new financing opportunities for strategic projects and is a key step toward diversifying alliances and strengthening the country's economy," the Colombian presidency announced Thursday in a post on X. Colombia's membership involves an initial $512 million commitment and makes it the first South American nation to formally join the bank, which is backed by 11 BRICS full members, including China, Russia, India, South Africa and Brazil. Foreign Minister Laura Sarabia welcomed the announcement, saying the move goes beyond financial strategy and reflects broader national goals. "We continue to pave the way for new opportunities for the country," she wrote on X. Beyond access to loans with fewer conditions, the move carries significant symbolic weight. It reflects the Petro administration's interest in redefining Colombia's international role, shifting away from the traditional Washington-Bogotá axis to pursue a more independent path aligned with the Global South. The announcement has sparked both enthusiasm and skepticism among Colombian analysts, who warn of financial risks, geopolitical consequences and the delicate balance Bogotá must maintain with the United States, its primary trading and military partner. The Petro government has defended the move as a pragmatic step amid global economic volatility and the weakening of the traditional multilateral order. Officials also see it as an opportunity to advance strategic projects such as the interoceanic railway -- an ambitious infrastructure initiative aimed at positioning Colombia as a commercial hub between Asia and the Caribbean. Colombia's Foreign Ministry and Finance Ministry officials emphasized that joining the New Development Bank does not signal a break with the Inter-American Development Bank or the International Monetary Fund. "This is about having more options, not replacing allies," Finance Minister Ricardo Bonilla said. Still, reactions in Colombia remain divided. While lawmakers from the ruling coalition praised what they called the country's "financial emancipation," opposition groups and business associations raised concerns about the fiscal burden and reputational risks of aligning with a bloc that includes China and Russia. "Do we want to depend on the yuan or the ruble? What guarantees does a bank dominated by authoritarian regimes offer?" conservative senator and former presidential candidate Enrique Gómez asked. Colombia has long been one of the United States' closest allies in the fight against drug trafficking and in supporting the liberal economic model promoted by Washington. Against that backdrop, closer ties with China have raised tensions. The U.S. State Department has said it will firmly oppose financing for Latin American projects tied to China's Belt and Road Initiative, a global investment strategy backed by Beijing that aims to expand its economic influence through critical infrastructure development around the world. Founded in 2015, the New Development Bank aims to provide financing for infrastructure and sustainable development in emerging economies, with fewer political conditions than the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. To date, it has approved more than $40 billion in funding for 122 infrastructure projects in sectors such as transportation, clean energy and sanitation.
