French antiques expert convicted
PARIS: A French court on Wednesday sentenced a top antiques expert to jail for duping the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors into buying furniture he had helped build, claiming it dated from the 18th century.
The ruling from the court in Pontoise, north of Paris, caps one of the biggest forgery scandals to rock the rarified world of France's top museums.
Bill Pallot, 61, along with five other people as well as a prominent gallery, stood trial in the spring.
Pallot and woodcarver Bruno Desnoues were convicted of having produced and authenticated chairs they sold, which they passed off as historic pieces that once adorned the rooms of the likes of Madame du Barry, the mistress of Louis XV, or of Queen Marie-Antoinette.
Customers duped by the pieces included the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors including a member of the Qatari royal family.
Pallot was sentenced to a four-year term including four months behind bars, fined 200,000 euros ($230,000) and handed a five-year ban on working as an expert.
He will not go to jail having spent time in detention after his arrest.
Known for his distinctive long hair and three-piece suits, Pallot has been described by magazine Vanity Fair as "the world's leading expert on the works of 18th-century France."
Paris Match branded him "the Bernard Madoff of art", referring to the late American financier who devised a notorious pyramid scheme.
- 'A little harsh' -
Pallot said the sentence was "a little harsh financially," although he was satisfied that his apartment would not be seized, contrary to the prosecutor's demand.
"We thought we'd do it for fun, to see if the art market would notice or not," Pallot has told the court.
"It went without a hitch," he added.
Desnoues, a prominent woodcarver, was sentenced to a three-year term including four months behind bars, and fined 100,000 euros.
In court, he presented himself as a humble artisan uninterested in money and motivated only by his love of art and "the pleasure of working, of making beautiful things".
A lawyer for the Palace of Versailles implied the men got away too easily, denouncing "the particularly diabolical manoeuvres" of the two main defendants and pointing to "clean, white-collar trafficking."
"When you are caught red-handed, you are not sentenced to very long prison terms," said Corinne Hershkovitch.
"We feel that we are not protected for the future," she added.
- 'Pallot's blessing' -
The pair pocketed nearly 1.2 million euros in commissions.
Galleries and auction houses made even more, selling fake furniture pieces to the Palace of Versailles and billionaire collectors.
After the French Revolution, the Palace of Versailles was completely emptied, with thousands of royal furniture pieces and other items dispersed at revolutionary sales.
Nearly half of Pallot and Desnoues' fakes were acquired through various channels by the Palace of Versailles, which has since the 1950s sought to refurnish the former home of French royalty.
"Indeed, Versailles's decision to purchase the chairs hinged on Pallot's blessing," Vanity Fair said in 2018.
"And based on Pallot's imprimatur, the government classified two of his fake lots as national treasures."
Accused of failing to carry out sufficient checks, the prestigious Kraemer antique gallery was acquitted. The public prosecutor had sought a fine of 700,000 euros.
Intermediaries between the forgers and the final buyers believed they had been misled by Pallot's reputation, and charges for most of them were dismissed during the eight-year-long investigation.
Unnoticed for years, the scam caused an estimated 4.5 million euros in damage.
The fraud was discovered by accident during an investigation into the lavish lifestyle of a Portuguese couple who were laundering Desnoues' money.
When the scandal erupted in 2016, the ministry of culture swiftly ordered an audit of Versailles's acquisitions policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Matthew Perry death doctor to plead guilty
The main doctor charged in connection with the drug overdose of American-Canadian actor and Friends star Matthew Perry is expected to enter a guilty plea in the coming weeks, the US Justice Department said on Monday. Salvador Plasencia "has agreed to plead guilty to four counts of distribution of ketamine, which carries a statutory maximum sentence of 40 years in federal prison," the department said in a statement. The second doctor in the case, Mark Chavez, pleaded guilty last October to conspiring to distribute ketamine in the weeks before the actor was found dead in the hot tub of his Los Angeles home in 2023. Perry's lengthy struggles with substance addiction were well-documented, but his death at age 54 sent shockwaves through the global legions of Friends fans. A criminal investigation was launched soon after an autopsy discovered the actor had high levels of ketamine – an anesthetic – in his system. Plasencia allegedly bought ketamine off Chavez and sold it to the desperate star at hugely inflated prices. Jasveen Sangha, the alleged "Ketamine Queen" who supplied drugs to high-end clients and celebrities, is charged with selling Perry the dose that killed him. She has pleaded not guilty. Comedic television series Friends, which followed the lives of six New Yorkers navigating adulthood, dating and careers, drew a massive global following and made megastars of previously unknown actors. Perry's role as the sarcastic man-child Chandler brought him fabulous wealth, but hid a dark struggle with addiction to painkillers and alcohol. In 2018, he suffered a drug-related burst colon and underwent multiple surgeries. In his 2022 memoir Friends, Lovers and the Big Terrible Thing, Perry described going through detox dozens of times. "I have mostly been sober since 2001," he wrote, "save for about sixty or seventy little mishaps."
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Israel manufacturing war to escape accountability
In the early hours of June 13, Israel launched an unprecedented and illegal military assault deep into Iranian territory, striking nuclear facilities, government buildings and residential areas in what it dubbed "Operation Rising Lion". Far from a defensive maneuver, this was a calculated escalation designed to ignite a broader regional war, deflect global scrutiny from its ongoing genocide in Gaza and edge closer to the goal of Eretz Israel. This is not self-defense. This is empire in motion. According to reports, Israeli fighter jets targeted not only Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow but also civilian apartment blocks in Tehran, killing several senior military leaders and civilians. Among the dead were Major General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of Iran's conventional military, and Hossein Salami, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) - a deliberate attempt to decapitate Iran's military command structure. As commentator Belén Fernández noted, "Israel thrives on perpetual upheaval and mass killing, all the while portraying itself as the victim of the folks it is slaughtering." The latest strike, she argues, represents Netanyahu's continued use of war as a political escape hatch - one that shields him from mounting corruption charges and domestic unrest, while solidifying Israel's regional dominance. Just as troubling is the geopolitical context. This brazen attack came just days before planned negotiations between the US and Iran over reviving the nuclear deal, which Trump had once called a "priority". But as Juan Cole observed, "Netanyahu launched the strikes to thwart the peace negotiations striking a day before the next talks were scheduled to take place." This isn't just warmongering - it's sabotage. Netanyahu's strategy is disturbingly familiar. Following the classic authoritarian script, he manufactures external threats to justify violence, sow panic and change the narrative. Israel's genocidal campaign in Gaza has triggered worldwide condemnation and legal scrutiny. The ICJ is reviewing allegations of genocide. International NGOs have documented systematic targeting of civilians, journalists and aid workers. So what does Netanyahu do? Strike Iran. Shift the frame. Expand the war. As the Atlantic Council noted, the key question now is whether Israel's true goal is merely to delay Iran's nuclear programme or to catalyse regime change. But as their analysis warns: "What is likely to follow a theocratic Iranian government is not democracy but IRGC-istan a government much more hardline than the current one." The United States has tried to distance itself from the attack. President Trump denied prior knowledge and emphasised that no US forces were involved. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared, "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region." Yet such denials ring hollow. Just months ago, Trump boasted that the US was "sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job" in Gaza. The vast stockpile of American weapons and intelligence flowing to Israel makes the claim of non-involvement dubious at best. Even as the White House disclaimed responsibility, Trump warned Iran to "cut a deal before there is nothing left". Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress rallied behind the assault, with Senator John Thune proclaiming, "Iran must never gain access to a nuclear weapon Israel has determined that it must take decisive action to defend the Israeli people." But as Juan Cole points out, "Iran is not assessed by U.S. intelligence to have a military nuclear weapons program, only a civilian uranium enrichment program." In fact, until Trump tore up the 2015 nuclear deal, Iran was in full compliance with the terms - verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency. By contrast, Israel is not even a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and possesses an undeclared nuclear arsenal of several hundred warheads. This isn't about preventing nuclear war. It's about maintaining unchallenged regional supremacy. Iran has, meanwhile, responded. Before Iran's response, analysts at Bloomberg had outlined four possibilities: a narrow strike limited to Israel; a broad escalation targeting US assets; a nuclear breakout; or a coerced return to the negotiating table under humiliating terms. The worst-case scenario, already plausible, is a regional conflagration pulling in multiple actors from Iraq to Yemen. And still, much of the world stays silent. The double standards of international law have never been starker. Iran is vilified for enriching uranium under international supervision, while Israel bombs multiple countries with impunity. Gaza is starved, razed, and suffocated, but Western capitals remain mute. Palestinian children die under rubble, while Western media recycles Israeli talking points about "security." Meanwhile, the global arms industry cheers. As Fernández notes, "Key sectors of U.S. capitalism make a killing off Israel's regional savagery." One wonders how many weapons contracts were signed as Tehran burned. Israel's current path does not lead to peace or security - it leads to perpetual war, international instability and the erosion of global legal norms. The pursuit of Eretz Israel is not just destroying Palestinian life; it is destabilising the entire region and pushing the world toward another catastrophic conflict. It is time to stop pretending that this is about defence. The international community must act decisively: to rein in Israeli impunity, to prevent further escalation, and to apply international law equally to all states. Silence now is not neutrality. It is complicity. Let us be clear: one can oppose Iran's authoritarianism and its proxy conflicts, while still recognising that Israel's current conduct is far more dangerous. It threatens not just Palestinians or Iranians, but the global order itself.
Express Tribune
5 days ago
- Express Tribune
KATSEYE's Lara falsely reported to ICE amid fan dispute and immigration raids across US cities
KATSEYE's Lara falsely reported to ICE amid fan dispute and immigration raids across US cities A member of HYBE's girl group KATSEYE, Lara, was falsely reported to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during a fan dispute, despite being a confirmed US citizen. The situation began when a social media user on platform X claimed to have submitted a tip-off alleging Lara was in the US illegally. The post, which coincided with intensified ICE raids across major American cities, quickly drew criticism for targeting an artist based on misinformation. ICE operations under the Trump administration have expanded recently, focusing on cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York. With increased reports of masked agents, home raids, and cases of mistaken identity, the climate surrounding immigration enforcement remains tense. Critics online called the action 'disgusting' and condemned the fan responsible, urging others not to escalate disagreements to harmful extremes. Several fan accounts have already reported the offending post for harassment and misinformation. Though HYBE has not issued a formal statement, support for Lara has surged, with fans reminding others of the responsibilities that come with online platforms and the real-world impact of false claims.
