Trump extends TikTok deadline for third time

USA - US President Donald Trump will this week give TikTok a fresh 90-day extension to find a non-Chinese buyer, the White House said Tuesday, the third time he has put off a threatened ban on the popular app.
A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration.
"President Trump will sign an additional Executive Order this week to keep TikTok up and running. As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.
"This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure."
Trump, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video sharing app.
"I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension."
- Digital Cold War? -
Trump said at the time that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations.
Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business.
The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape."
Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election.
Motivated by national security fears and belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor.
TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain.
The Republican president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19.
- Tariff turmoil -
Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing.
ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law".
Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company.
Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok.
Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally.
Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm.
"TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Forrester Principal Analyst Kelsey Chickering.
Meanwhile, it appears TikTok is continuing with business as usual.
TikTok on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.
By Danny Kemp With Glenn Chapman In San Francisco

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

33 minutes ago

• IOL News

Trump's last card: the Gulf of Tonkin false flag justification

US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. Image: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. He is not alone. He finds himself in the same position as many US presidents before him, who had to authorise the military to go to war, rehearsing how the justification could be elegantly and persuasively announced. The pacing up and down the lawn of the White House and in Trump's case, the silliness of the diversionary tactics, including the hosting of two 'big beautiful' poles on each side of the White House, is not a sign of preoccupation with whether or not to go to war. That decision has already been taken. The White House resident is mulling over the speech that justifies the war he has already authorised, especially on how its impact would be felt by different constituencies that make up his political and financial support base. President Trump has had a similar decision to make in his first stint as POTUS 45. He was required to authorise decapitation strikes against General Suleimani of Iran, who was on an official visit to Iraq. As provocative and illegal as the decapitation strikes are, there were no retaliatory measures or follow-up exchanges. The lesson was learnt. Pinpoint strikes against Iran will not have any consequence against the US nor its allies, for that matter. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In his second term, having authorised the military strikes against Iranian nuclear and oil facilities, including the killing of nuclear scientists and that country's top military brass, it is difficult to imagine what, if anything… is Trump still waiting to decide in two weeks. Along came deception. The second term of DJT, Elon Musk's endearment for the Donald, is characterised by deception as the primary instrument of statecraft. Briefing journalists both in the Oval Office and inside Air Force One, President Trump struck a note of confidence, convinced that he was the ultimate America First deal maker who would get the best nuclear deal for Israel first and America second. And so at the end of the fifth round of negotiations with Iran, his decapitation drones had already left Tel Aviv to decapitate the Iranian negotiators he was negotiating with. There could be no sixth. Sometimes the deception starts with the US President calling the President of another country 'my friend'. When such endearments gain currency, he is certainly planning something unsavoury against them. While President Xi Jinping is a dear friend of Trump, with whom he got along very well, and in his words, with great respect, he was buttering him up for something nasty. On the 25th of April 2025, Trump's administration produced a fact sheet that imposed a combined tariff rate of a whopping 245%. And this was just for a dear friend, he got along with them very well and with respect. President Vladimir Putin has come to learn of this strategy of deception at great cost. Whilst Trump supported and encouraged a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian negotiators planned for Istanbul, the US president sat with Zelensky in the hall of the Vatican and discussed something pressing. In full view of the world, they sat for 15 minutes discussing a sensitive subject which was mutually strategic for both countries, and exhilarating for the accompanying European leaders. So soon thereafter, the nuclear bombers of the Russian Federation went up in billows of smoke from drone explosions launched from smuggled trucks into various parts of the Russian Federation. The United Kingdom was quick to confirm that the success of this attack is owed to Operation Spiderweb, which had been in the making for 18 months, as far back as the time of Joe Biden. Only, Trump had to see it through as a negotiating pressure tactic against Russia. And it had plausible deniability of direct US involvement. Of plausible deniability and false flags, the US always deploy them as two successive pages of the same war book. When one is used, the other will inexorably follow. Perhaps it is that script which has popularised the adage that in politics, there are no coincidences and in war, all coincidences are suspect. The preeminent requirement for the US to refer to the war book in the first place is when a decision to go to war has already been taken. Thereafter, the usual blood-curdling rituals follow, with the demonisation of the target by the mainstream media leading the charge. Horrible things start happening to the said adversary without the US being perceived to be directly involved. That is enough plausible deniability. Suddenly, without warning, the war mongers start yearning for more blood. Considering that the administration had long acquiesced to war, all they needed was an excuse to escalate. But the war hawks know what the world knows already. They must provide their own justification in order to fully inhabit the theatre of conflict. That justification is on the very next page of the book. In the Vietnam War, it was officially called the USS Maddox incident, an infamous deception known to historians as the Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation. This Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation marked a historic milestone. It eulogises every false flag justification with a name of its own. With the resolve to topple Saddam Hussein in a full invasion, the justification had a heavy title. 'Weapons of mass destruction!' For such a loquacious group, their vocabulary is disturbingly sparse. The titling of these justifications has limits, apparently, occasioned no doubt by the need to retain shock and horror and manufactured consent. In Libya, the justification that toppled Gaddafi is shockingly called 'the weapons of mass destruction'. President Trump may not need to worry about his MAGA constituency, nor his utterances of many years that the senseless forever wars must come to an end. So much proselytising was fair game in electioneering season and accordingly was meant for votes. No normal US president can ever imagine that they would finish a term without obliging some military adventurism or spilling of blood, however infinitesimally, in some small country or exotic island. But this is deception's open season. There are no two weeks within which to decide. The strike will be within days of the announcement by the White House spokesperson. If Trump were facing re-election concerns and possible dethroning by his Democrat rivals, he would have shut this war down a long time ago. But he has been liberated from such psychological constrictions. The trillion dollars of investments from Saudi Arabia are almost ready for purchase. So is the Palace in the Sky 747 aircraft gift from the Emir of Qatar. It is humming on the tarmacs of Doha. No matter. No business is more urgent than, nor competes in importance with, Netanyahu's fabled wars with ubiquitous foes. After all, the letter from his ambassador in Jerusalem, Mike Huckabee, has confirmed that Trump is the second coming of the Messiah, to do what the Messiah is wont to do. The messianic to-do list may be a stretch for the Donald, with at least 8 billion people yearning for their reward for a lifetime of religious loyalty. All he has to do is save only that sliver of humanity who are his allies and destroy everyone else. He has an amazing name for this messianic operation, composed of many false flags. Helped by the charismatic evangelists, its haloed name is shocking for its biblical end-of-time-ish fatalism. The Gog of Magog. * Ambassador Bheki Gila is a Barrister-at-Law. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.

eNCA

an hour ago

• eNCA

Tesla to build first grid-scale power plant in China

NEW YORK - Tesla announced that it signed an agreement to build its first grid-scale energy storage power station project in mainland China. The project will help with the flexible adjustment of grid resources, and "effectively solve pressures relating to urban power supply," Tesla said in a post to the Chinese social media platform Weibo. "After completion, this project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China," Tesla added. Such energy storage systems help to enhance stability in the electricity grid at a time when there are greater supplies of solar and wind power. Chinese media outlet Yicai reported that Tesla Shanghai, Shanghai authorities and China Kangfu International Leasing Co. held a signing ceremony Friday for the project. It added that the deal involved investments of 4 billion yuan ($560 million). The contract comes at a moment of tension between Washington and Beijing, with the two sides yet to hash out a long-term trade agreement following tariffs announced by President Donald Trump.

eNCA

3 hours ago

• eNCA

Iran's nuclear programme: From its origins to today's dispute

TEHRAN - A week ago, Israel launched an unprecedented attack against Iran, saying the country was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon, a claim Tehran has always denied. Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the rapid expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. The following is a recap of the main developments regarding Iran's nuclear programme, as European foreign ministers are holding nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart in Switzerland on Friday. - 'Structured programme' - Iran laid the foundation for its nuclear programme in the late 1950s with technical assistance from the United States, when Iran's ruling shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, signed a civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with the US. In 1970, Iran ratified the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), committing it to declare its nuclear material to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). But revelations in the early 2000s about undeclared nuclear sites raised concerns. An 2011 IAEA report, collating "broadly credible" intelligence, said that at least until 2003 Iran "carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device". - Historic accord left in tatters - After suspending enrichment activities, Iran began talks with European and then international powers that would later culminate in a historic deal. On July 14, 2015, Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany reached an accord in Vienna. The deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), placed significant restrictions on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief after 12 years of crisis and 21 months of protracted negotiations. But the hard-won deal began to unravel when the US under President Donald Trump walked away from it on May 8, 2018, and reimposed sanctions on Iran. - 'Nuclear escalation' - Following the US withdrawal, Iran retaliated by stepping up its nuclear activities as if "a red cape had been waved in front of a bull," said Clement Therme, associate researcher at the Rasanah International Institute for Iranian Studies. According to Therme, Iran "embarked on a strategy of escalation" in a bid to up pressure and obtain help to circumvent sanctions. But Tehran's moves were unsuccessful and came at an "exorbitant economic cost". Iran first began enriching uranium to five percent -- breaching the limit of 3.67 percent imposed by the deal -- before it raised the enrichment levels to 20 and then to 60 percent in 2021, which is a short step from the 90 percent required for use in a weapon. Iran has also increased its stockpiles of enriched uranium, which was set at 202.8 kilogrammes under the deal. Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile is currently believed to be more than 45 times that limit. And Tehran has since exceeded the number of centrifuges -- the machines used to enrich uranium -- it is allowed to have while beginning to produce more material faster by using advanced models at its plants. Efforts to revive the deal have been fruitless so far, with European-led talks on hold since summer 2022. After Trump's return to the White House, talks between Washington and Iran and mediated by Oman resumed in April. While the US president has voiced confidence that Iran would eventually sign a nuclear deal, Tehran has said that Israeli strikes that targeted a slew of military and nuclear sites "dealt a blow" to diplomacy. - 'No indication' - Faced with Iran's rapidly expanding nuclear programme, the IAEA expressed "serious concern" in its latest quarterly report at the end of May. According to the UN agency, Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state to enrich uranium to 60 percent. It theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for more than nine bombs. However, the manufacturing and delivery of a nuclear bomb requires many other steps, including mastering both ballistics and the miniaturisation of the nuclear charge. The IAEA has said it currently has "no indication" of the existence of a "systematic programme" in Iran to produce a nuclear weapon. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to a Senate committee in March that Iran was not actively building a nuclear bomb. Iran has always denied having such ambitions, regularly referring to a long-standing fatwa, or religious edict, by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, prohibiting atomic weapons. by Anne Beade