Despite US objections, 5 reasons why India-Russia partnership will endure

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said India's military purchases from Russia had "rubbed the United States the wrong way" while speaking at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) Leadership Summit."There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the US the wrong way... for instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America, if you go to buy your armaments from Russia," Lutnick said.advertisementThe commerce secretary's understanding of the India-Russia relationship is limited. India buys Russian weapons because Russia does not attach strings to these sales. It willingly shares technology and co-produces weapons with India and allows technology transfers in areas no country will collaborate with. THE SOVIET UNION SOLD WEAPONS NO ONE ELSE DID
When India began its rearmament in the mid-1960s after the defeat in the 1962 war with China, it first turned to the West. It wanted submarines and warships for the Navy and fighter jets for the Air Force. These were not offered.The Soviet Union stepped in with sales of frontline Foxtrot class submarines, first-of-its-class missile boats, anti-submarine corvettes and MiG-21 supersonic fighter aircraft. These platforms were used with devastating effect in the 1971 India-Pakistan war. The US, UK and China supported Pakistan in that war.advertisementThe Soviet Union sent its submarines in pursuit of the USS Enterprise carrier battle group that President Nixon sent into the Indian Ocean to intimidate India. This relationship continued through the 1980s. In 1987, the Soviet Union transferred to India on a three-year lease the K-43, the world's first nuclear-powered attack submarine that could fire anti-ship missiles from underwater.RUSSIA CONTINUES THE SOVIET LEGACYThis strategic partnership continued after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The successor state, Russia, sold to India the BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles in the late 1990s. This weapon now equips all three services and was used with devastating effect during Operation Sindoor in smashing Pakistani airbases and radar installations. Russia has shared all the technology for this radical missile it developed during the Cold War.It leased a second nuclear submarine, the Chakra-2, in 2012. It is refurbishing a third unit, the Chakra-3, which will be transferred to India on a ten-year lease by the end of this decade. Sure, Russia charges a hefty fee for this refurbishment and lease - over $3 billion - but with the exception of the US-UK partnership, no country has sold or transferred nuclear-powered submarine technology to another country. It has offered India advanced hypersonic weaponry and long-range missile systems and fifth-generation fighter aircraft.SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS PROGRAMMESadvertisementNuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines are the third leg of the triad of air, land and sea-based nuclear weapons. They are also the most secure leg of the triad because submarines can hide deep under the ocean beyond the reach of the enemy.Russia helped India build its fleet of four Arihant class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. India began constructing these submarines after the Pokharan nuclear tests in 1998. Today, two Arihant-class submarines have been commissioned and two more will be commissioned in the next four years.These are the most complex defence platforms ever built by India. Then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acknowledged Russia's support for the programme while speaking at the 2009 launch of the INS Arihant in Visakhapatnam.NO STRINGS ATTACHEDThis is among the most important aspects of the relationship. The US imposed sanctions and embargoed the sale of military equipment to India because of the Pokharan-2 nuclear tests in 1998. President Donald Trump spoke of using trade as a tool to coerce India into negotiating a ceasefire during Operation Sindoor (a fact denied by India).This has led to fears that the sales of US weapons to India could be similarly used in a crisis. Russia has never attached such strings to its weapons sales to India. It has never imposed embargoes or restricted transfers of weapons.advertisementRELATIONSHIP LIMITED ONLY BY IMAGINATIONThe sky is the limit when it comes to the Russia-India strategic partnership. Russia has provided technical assistance for India's Matsyayan ocean bed expedition that aims to send Indians to the deepest point of the Indian Ocean.It has also provided help for the Gaganyaan expedition, which aims to launch India's first astronauts in an Indian-built space vehicle. The India-Russia relationship is limited only by the imagination of the two partner countries.Must Watch

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

27 minutes ago

• India Today

Iran rules out halting nuclear activities amid escalating conflict with Israel

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Saturday that Tehran will not halt its nuclear activities "under any circumstances," even as Israeli strikes target nuclear facilities and tensions between the two countries a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, Pezeshkian emphasized that Iran remains open to diplomatic engagement on its nuclear program, but ruled out any rollback of its nuclear are ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities. However, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances,' he was quoted as saying by Iran's official IRNA news agency. The president reaffirmed Iran's right to pursue a civilian nuclear program, saying that such rights "cannot be taken away by threats or war." Israel has claimed that Tehran is on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon, a charge Iran firmly intensifying conflict has seen Israel and Iran exchange successive rounds of strikes since June 13, with Iran's nuclear sites reportedly hit in recent Israeli attacks. Pezeshkian warned that Iran's retaliation will escalate if Israeli operations continue. 'Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating,' he figures vary widely. Iran's health ministry reported over 400 people killed and more than 3,000 wounded by Israeli strikes. Meanwhile, Iran's retaliatory attacks have killed at least 25 people in Israel, according to official Israeli sources. Independent rights groups estimate the toll in Iran may be even higher, with one US-based NGO citing over 650 deaths, including hundreds of efforts appear stalled. Talks held Friday in Geneva ended without progress. While European diplomats voiced hope for future dialogue, Iran's foreign minister insisted that Tehran would not negotiate under fire. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again, and once aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed,' he information inside Iran remains scarce. Internet watchdog reported another collapse in connectivity on Saturday amid a nationwide internet blackout that has persisted for several InMust Watch

Time of India

29 minutes ago

• Time of India

We treat India-Pak hostility as inevitable but these divides formed within living memory

Sam Dalrymple was set for a career in particle physics, until a family trip to Afghanistan to visit the remains of the Bamiyan Buddha rerouted him into history. He started a virtual reality project connecting Partition survivors which, in turn, inspired, his debut book ' Shattered Lands ' tracing the unravelling of the Indian empire. In an interview with Sunday Times, he talks about why our complex pasts shouldn't be ignored Several years ago, you co-founded Project Dastaan connecting those displaced by the 1947 Partition through virtual reality. Was it Dastaan that sparked off this deep dive into five partitions or something else? Dastaan was very much the origin of the book. In 2018, my college friends and I began reconnecting individuals displaced in the 1947 Partition of India, the largest forced migration in history, to their ancestral villages through VR. It was while researching the impact of Partition on Tripura and Northeast India for Dastaan that the book idea first came together. I was chatting with an academic in the region and when I asked about Partition, he said, 'Which one? Burma in 1937, Pakistan in 1947 or Bangladesh in 1971.' That conversation made me think about the multiple ruptures and borders that have carved their way through the subcontinent. The five partitions you write about are the separation of Burma, Arabia and Pakistan from India, the division of 500 princely states, and finally, the creation of Bangladesh. Why did you want to tell this story? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo We live the consequences of these partitions every day. Just look at the recent war between India and Pakistan. Today, South Asia is one of the most bordered regions in the world, and you can actually see its borders from space. However, 100 years ago none of these borders were foreseen. Demands for 'independence' were widespread, but no one could have suspected that the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Yemen and Burma would soon emerge from the wreckage of British India. Nor would anyone have imagined that tiny princely states like Bhutan and Dubai would last until the end of the century while massive states like Hyderabad would not. Your book challenges some widely held beliefs— like the idea that India's borders were drawn solely by Cyril Radcliffe. Could you tell us more about that? Cyril Radcliffe was famously charged with drawing the Partition border that would slice through British India. Jinnah had suggested his name because he had never been east of Paris and supposedly his obliviousness would make him impartial. This, of course, had deadly consequences. But what we often forget is that he only drew the lines dividing Punjab and Bengal. Both the LoC and the entire stretch of the India-Pakistan Border from the Arabian Sea to Sri Ganganagar — collectively 81% of the present India-Pakistan border fence — result from the decisions of seven local princes and have nothing to do with Radcliffe. Thirty-six per cent of the border with East Pakistan (modern Bangladesh) was made by another ten. Had states like Jodhpur joined Pakistan, or had states like Bahawalpur joined India, the border would look very, very different. The chapter on the Arabian Peninsula ties a global moment — the British withdrawal from Aden (now in Yemen) — to a personal story about Dhirubhai Ambani. How did that shape the trajectory of Reliance? We often forget today that Aden was the Dubai of the 1960s. It was the great business hub of its time, and this remained the case right until 1967 when the British pulled out and the revolutionary NLF took over. Dhirubhai Ambani had worked in Aden until the late 1950s, and after the British evacuation from Aden, he found himself perfectly placed to hire his dispossessed colleagues and found use of 'a ready-made source of educated managers, accountants and salesmen, drilled to European standards'. He had just ended a business partnership with his cousin and gone solo, forming a new company called the Reliance Commercial Corporation. Reliance ballooned in the years after the fall of Aden, underpinned by a generation of Indian-origin Adenis versed in free market capitalism rather than Nehruvian socialism. Given that your book comes out against the backdrop of India-Pakistan tensions, what is the perspective you hope readers will take away? So often we treat the hostility between India and Pakistan as inevitable. Even President Trump chimed in, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that India and Pakistan had been fighting 'for a thousand years, probably longer than that.' But this really isn't the case. These divisions were formed within living memory — as were the divisions between India and Bangladesh, Burma and Yemen etc. Today, the region's borders have become so embedded in our subconscious that it is easy to forget there were other possibilities for a post-colonial South Asia. Several prominent nationalist figures including PM Nehru and Burma's founding father Aung San had once spoken of an 'Asiatic federation' in the 'not very, very distant future', a 'United Nations of South Asia' encompassing India, Pakistan, Ceylon and Burma. Long after the British departed, many still hoped the new borders might prove temporary. Yet in every single one of these countries, govts have made sure to paper over the shared cross-border heritage of their peoples. The last decade has witnessed the decline of globalisation, the strengthening of borders and the resurgence of nationalism across the world. India's partitions are a dire warning for what such a future might hold. Your dad, historian William Dalrymple , sparked a lot of debate recently saying that academics don't make their work as accessible as popular historians. Where do you stand on this? I don't think they have to stand in opposition at all. We obviously need both.

Business Standard

36 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Operation Sindhu: 827 Indian nationals brought back from Iran, says MEA

More than 800 Indian nationals have so far returned home from Iran under Operation Sindhu, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said on Saturday. The MEA shared the update on the status of the evacuation operation in a series of posts on X. More Indian nationals, including students, arrived in Delhi late on Friday evening and in the early hours of Saturday after being evacuated from Iran as its military confrontation with Israel intensified. India announced the launch of Operation Sindhu on Wednesday to evacuate its nationals from Iran. "#OperationSindhu flight brings citizens home. India evacuated 290 Indian nationals from Iran, including students and religious pilgrims by a charter flight. The flight arrived in New Delhi at 2330 hrs on 20 June and was received by Secretary (CPV& OIA) Arun Chatterjee," MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said on X. "Government of India is grateful to the Government of Iran for the facilitation of the evacuation process," he added. In another post, Jaiswal shared the details of an evacuation flight that arrived from Turkmenistan. "#OperationSindhu continues. A special evacuation flight from Ashgabat, Turkmenistan landed in New Delhi at 0300 hrs on 21st June, bringing Indians from Iran home. With this, so far 517 Indian nationals from Iran have returned home under Operation Sindhu," he said. The first batch of 110 Indian nationals evacuated from Iran arrived in India on Thursday, with many evacuees sharing first-hand accounts of the frightening situation they witnessed before being moved to safer locations. Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh welcomed them on their arrival at the Delhi airport after their arduous journey. In another post in the evening, Jaiswal informed about the arrival of a separate evacuation flight. "#OperationSindhu Another evacuation flight from Mashhad landed in New Delhi at 1630 hrs on 21 June with 310 Indian nationals from Iran. With this, a total of 827 Indians have been evacuated," he said. Also, the Indian embassy in Iran, in a post on X, said, "On request of the Governments of Nepal and Sri Lanka, the Indian Embassy's evacuation efforts in Iran will also cover citizens of Nepal and Sri Lanka.