
Can You Legally Record Audio or Video on Your Security Camera? I Focus on These Rules
If you're thinking about installing a new security camera in your home, a legal question appears: Is it legal for you to record audio and video anywhere you want in your home? Are there limitations or the possibility of lawsuits from your neighbors?
This is something I've thought about a lot as I've tested security cameras in all parts of my home for years. Owners must know when and where it's legal to record everything from their front yard and streets to friends, babysitters, and pet sitters. Breaking privacy laws could lead to fines, lawsuits and other huge headaches. I've gathered all the details below so you'll understand what to avoid and what's safe to do. Let's start with a key rule, the expectation of privacy.
Read more: Want Better Home Security? Never Put Your Cameras in These Spots
Public vs. private surveillance
Common sense about privacy can keep you out of a lot of trouble.
Lorex/Amazon
First, let's talk about the most important rule when recording video (anywhere). The standard that the courts have widely adopted is called the "reasonable expectation of privacy" and it's very, very important.
You can generally set up security cams in your home as you please, but you can't interfere with someone's reasonable expectation of privacy. In practice, that comes down to how people tend to use rooms. Surveilling living rooms, entryways, kitchens or dining rooms is fine because those rooms are more "public" spots used by everyone in the house and are generally highly visible.
However, setting up a cam to record video in a bedroom, bathroom or changing room is usually considered illegal without explicit consent, even in your own home. People expect a higher level of privacy in these areas and the law agrees. Minor/dependent limitations also apply: Parents can monitor their baby's bedroom, for example. But when in doubt, apply the rule of a reasonable expectation of privacy. If you do need cams in more private areas, consider disabling them when guests are over.
The expectation of privacy is even more important if neighbors are pointing security cameras at you. No one can film you without your permission on private property, like filming your backyard or through your windows.
One vs. two-party consent
Audio privacy laws are particularly strict if you want to save camera audio conversations.
Luis Alvarez via Getty
Now let's turn to the big rule in audio recording, which is your local consent laws. Because of the Federal Wiretap Act and similar legislation, states are divided into one-party and two-party/all-party consent laws. In a one-party consent state such as Colorado, Tennessee or Texas, one side of the conversation needs to give consent to be recorded, which makes it legal to record telephone calls you are part of and (in theory) two-way audio conversations you have through a camera.
In two-party consent states such as California, Florida or Michigan, both or all sides need to give their consent to have their conservation recorded. It is never legal to record a conversation where no one is giving consent.
This consent is usually a verbal affirmation at the beginning of a call or a separate acknowledgement that consent was given. Justia has a guide breaking down the rules by individual state where you can find more information.
Four tips to record video in your home
Video recording is legal in your home as long as you respect privacy.
Lorex/Amazon
Let's break down video capture, a primary goal of installing a security camera in your home. Today's cameras use motion detection and frequently have video storage options to automatically save video clips -- both to local storage and the cloud -- when they see people. These steps will help you know what to do.
Step 1: Review your state laws
Laws about surveillance can vary by state, so if you want to stay safe you need to start by looking up the laws in your own state. State websites, local law firms and others will often summarize these laws for you to save time. Here's a breakdown of California's law as an example.
States may have specific laws about hiding security cameras, how you can use security camera recordings in court and if you need permits for specific kinds of security cameras. A few minutes of reading up can give you important parameters to follow. For example, the California law mentioned above has specific language about "intent to invade privacy" and intent to view "the body or undergarments" that can help clarify what's not allowed.
Step 2: Follow the 'reasonable expectation of privacy'
Don't record video in any area where people expect privacy. Keep recordings focused on common areas such as entryways, porches and primary rooms.
Step 3: (For renters) Let the owner know about cameras
Property owners broadly have the right to install security cameras on their private property, including inside homes that they own. They don't usually need a permit, either. If you aren't the property owner, the law gets less comfortable with you recording video.
When renting, contact the owner of the property if you want to install a security camera and notify them, getting written permission if possible. Sometimes leases will have more specific information on who is in charge of security systems, while other leases have more leeway. Tenants usually have the right to install their own security cameras to watch over the personal space they're legally renting. But letting the owner know can precent future issues.
Step 4: Notify guests about cameras, including short-term rentals
If you have guests over, hire a nanny or have a friend staying over for a couple of weeks, let them know that you have security cameras, no matter where they are. It's polite and it avoids any chance you could be accused of hiding cameras and recording without consent.
Important note: Other regulations can apply in certain circumstances. The best example is Airbnb, which in March 2024 banned all use of indoor security cameras (video doorbells, etc. should still be fine) by Airbnb hosts. Previously, Airbnb had allowed the use of indoor cams in some regions as long as guests were notified. The rules changed -- which is why it's important to look up the details if you aren't sure about the law.
Four tips to record audio in your home
Apps often offer ways to record or disable audio.
Lorex/Amazon
Audio recording is a different beast than video recording: It has more legal implications and is traditionally used often as evidence in courts. When audio is involved, people have extra protections. Our rules will help you stay within the bounds of the law.
Step 1: Review your state laws (but even closer this time)
Find out if your state is a one-party or two-party consent state and check if it has any specific language about recording audio, wiretapping and similar situations.
Step 2: Exercise caution if your cam can record audio
Camera apps often allow you to record audio -- if you have a Ring Protect plan, for example, you can usually record and download video and audio from a Ring doorbell, then keep it or share it with others. Eufy also gives you the option to record audio when a video is recorded.
But recording audio without consent risks crossing an audio law red line, even if it's automatic. It's often up to users to go into apps and disable audio functions for legal safety. Even if a home cam theoretically saved incriminating audio, it might not be usable in court and could lead to countersuits or other problems.
Step 3: Get or give consent for any recording
If you really want to record audio, find a device that can do it and make sure people are giving consent to be recorded. We suggest getting permission from both sides of a conversation even in one-party consent states, just to stay safe and polite. That's how phone interviews are conducted, for example.
Step 4: Avoid false pretenses when recording someone
Federal law prohibits recording conversations with criminal or malicious intent and many state laws confirm that with similar wording. Avoid any accidental appearance of blackmail or similar scheming. That includes any effort to try to trick someone into having a certain conversation or saying certain words, or pretending to be someone you aren't while talking to another person.
What about outdoor security cameras?
Privacy laws apply to outdoor cams too, with a couple of extra considerations.
Arlo/Amazon
Outdoor security cameras are still on your property (or they should be) and they typically fall under the same laws as indoor cameras. As long as security cameras generally face public spots -- the front of your home, sidewalks and streets -- they fall well within the law. If you're the owner, you have the right to film your backyard and other parts of your property, too.
However, you cannot film areas where other people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. That means you cannot film a neighbor's backyard or angle a camera so that it can record through their windows. Many cameras have privacy zones and other tricks you can use to avoid even the appearance of spying on someone.
The same rules for audio also apply to outdoor cameras. You'll need one-party or two-party consent to record conversations. Security companies skip that hassle by only allowing live audio. That's why you can talk through your video doorbell, for instance, but can't set it up to record conversations.
Finally, if you are renting, make sure to stop by our guide on the best security devices and tips if you're living with roommates, which can create another set of headaches when people start encroaching on your personal space.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Camarillo liquor store targeted, Fillmore man tied to April stabbing, more
A Camarillo liquor store was burglarized early June 21 with the culprits smashing through a front glass area and using a power tool to get past a metal gate, authorities said. The burglary was reported around 7:15 a.m. when workers arrived to find the front glass broken out, said Ventura County Sheriff's Capt. Tyler Abbott. The city of Camarillo contracts its police services with the sheriff's office. Surveillance video later showed the break-in happened around 2:55 a.m., and the suspects used a sledgehammer to break the glass and a power tool called a sawzall to cut through a metal gate, he said. The suspects hauled off with $1,000, lottery scratcher tickets and a tip jar, Abbott said. The culprits left in an older model Honda CRV with no plates. No alarm was activated in the burglary, Abbot said. Anyone with information about the burglary can call Camarillo police at 805-388-5100. Authorities arrested a Fillmore man on June 18 in connection to a pair of stabbings in April and for allegedly threatening a potential witness. The Ventura County Sheriff's Office arrested the 22-year-old man on suspicion of dissuading a witness by force or threat, battery and participation in a street gang, according to a sheriff's office news release. The city of Fillmore contracts its police services with the sheriff's office. The arrest comes after a monthslong investigation into two stabbings that took place shortly after 2:20 p.m. on April 15, sheriff's officials said. One victim with a stab wound was found by deputies in the 400 block of Mountain View Street. The second victim arrived at the Fillmore Police Station seeking medical assistance and was transported to a local hospital, sheriff's officials said. The suspect allegedly confronted, dissuaded and battered a member of the community while they attempted to gather information during the incident. Sheriff's investigators searched a residence in the 200 block of Mutau Circle in Fillmore and found evidence that tied the man to the alleged stabbings and a criminal street gang, according to the sheriff's office. The man was released on bond on June 18, jail records show. He is scheduled to appear in Ventura County Superior Court on July 2. Two Ventura County residents were arrested on June 18 after being tied to alleged illegal firearms sales, including a 'ghost gun,' authorities said. A 19-year-old Camarillo man and a 20-year-old Oxnard man were arrested on suspicion of felony offenses, including conspiracy to commit a crime, possession of a large capacity magazine and unlawful transfer of a weapon, according to the Ventura County Sheriff's Office. The sheriff's office is contracted to provide police services for the city of Camarillo. The arrests came after a monthslong investigation into a suspect in possession of an illegally owned firearm, sheriff's officials said. Investigators identified the suspect as the Camarillo man and later tied the Oxnard man as a conspirator. Sheriff's investigators searched a residence in 1700 Block of Alexander Street of Oxnard. The 20-year-old suspect allegedly attempted to flee during the search but was caught and arrested, sheriff's officials said. He also faces a charge of resisting arrest, authorities said. Detectives also searched the 19-year-old's residence in the 1200 block of Harris Avenue in Camarillo and found a Glock-style 9 mm without serial numbers, also known as a 'ghost gun." Investigators also found a 31-round Glock large-capacity magazine and an AR-15 upper receiver, sheriff's officials said. He also faces a felony charge for possession of a large-capacity magazine. Both men were released on bond on June 19, jail records show. They are scheduled to appear in Ventura County Superior Court on July 2, jail records show. Ernesto Centeno Araujo covers breaking news for the Ventura County Star. He can be reached at ecentenoaraujo@ This article originally appeared on Ventura County Star: Camarillo liquor store targeted, Fillmore man nabbed in stabbing, more
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FAA Blocks Drones Before NBA Finals Game 7
The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a temporary flight restriction for a half nautical mile radius around Paycom Center in Oklahoma City (Okla.) that will begin at 5:00 pm local time and last until midnight. The TFR, which was issued on Friday, is among the security measures being set in place for Game 7 of the NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and the Oklahoma City Thunder. The game will be played in the aftermath of the United States Air Force and Navy bombing nuclear sites in Iran this weekend and Iran vowing revenge. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's National Terrorism Advisory System issued a bulletin Sunday stating the 'ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States.' Advertisement More from The TFR prohibits unmanned aircraft systems, which include drones and model aircrafts, from flying from the surface up to, and including, 400 feet above ground level. The prohibition excludes drones operated by DHS, police, firefighters and commercial operators who obtain an airspace waiver. Violators can face a bevy of sanctions, including revocations of licenses and fines. In certain instances, criminal charges are also possible. Earlier this year, the Department of Justice charged a man, Alexis Perez Suarez, who flew a drone over Baltimore's M&T Bank Stadium during an AFC Wild Card game. Suarez was charged with operating a drone without a license and willfully violating U.S. National Defense Airspace. Suarez, who insisted he was only trying to take photographs, pleaded guilty and last week was sentenced to one year of probation, 100 hours of community service and a $500 fine. In a statement issued by the Department of Justice regarding Suarez's sentencing, FBI acting special agent in charge Amanda M. Koldjeski said, 'It is not just irresponsible and reckless, but illegal to fly a drone over a major sporting event such as a Ravens playoff game.' Koldjeski went on to say, 'capturing a photo is not worth the risk of hurting any spectators, players, or employees. As shown by this investigation, the FBI and our partners will hold those caught violating the law fully accountable.' Advertisement The FAA's move to block drones around Paycom Center is consistent with agency practices. The FAA regularly restricts unmanned aircraft systems from flying above a stadium, ballpark, racetrack and other venues. Federal law also imposes numerous restrictions on drone use, including as to permissible locations and how drones interact with air space and aircraft. Data suggests that drone incursions into restricted airspace are occurring more frequently. Science and technology publication The Debrief recently reported a 25.6% increase in illegal drone incursions near U.S. airports from January to March 2025 compared to that time period in 2024. Incursions could become more worrisome in light of national security concerns connected to U.S. military operations abroad. Drones have caused injuries to unsuspecting bystanders, including those celebrating sports. Last October, two people in Boston were hurt when a drone hit a light pole and crashed during a Boston Celtics opening night watch party at City Hall Plaza. Tip off for Game 7 is at 7:00 pm local time. Advertisement Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.


CBS News
43 minutes ago
- CBS News
Woman dies after car crashes into street poles, tree in South Elgin, Illinois, police say
An investigation is underway after a woman was killed in a crash Saturday morning in South Elgin, Illinois. South Elgin police said just before 2 a.m., officers responded to the area of Randall Road at Stearns Road for a report of a single-car crash involving a gray 2021 Kia Sorento. Preliminary information from witnesses and evidence collected at the scene indicated that the Kia was heading northbound on Randall Road. After passing through the intersection at Stearns Road, the Kia left the roadway to the right for an unknown reason. According to police, the car hit a traffic sign, a street light pole, an electrical utility pole, and a tree before coming to a stop. The car sustained extensive damage, including full airbag deployment, and the engine was separated from the car. Police found the driver and sole occupant of the vehicle unconscious by responding police and South Elgin Fire District personnel. She was taken to Ascension Saint Joseph Hospital, where she was later pronounced dead. The driver was identified as Erin M. Vitale, 46, of South Elgin. Police said she was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash and had to be extricated from the vehicle due to the severity of the damage. Investigation into the crash remains ongoing. The Kane County Accident Reconstruction Team assisted at the scene.