The Irish Times view on cross-border cooperation: analysis need to turn into action
For many years reliable information and analysis comparing Northern Ireland and the Republic was surprisingly sparse. The data and studies were there on both sides of the Border, but rigorous comparative analysis was lacking in many areas and sporadic in others.
For this reason, the work undertaken in recent years by the Economic and Social Research Institute(ESRI), funded under the Shared Island Initiative by the Irish Government is both welcome and important. Fact are the best basis for policy. As a
summary of the research published yesterday
shows, work remains to be done in several areas, but some key conclusions – drawn together from a variety of earlier reports – are clear.
The Republic has, in recent years, become a more developed, higher-income economy, partly due to greater levels of foreign direct investment. That said, as the report points out, full comparisons of living standards are tricky. Inequality in earned incomes is greater in the Republic, though a more progressive tax system – and more widespread welfare supports in Northern Ireland – level the playing field for after-tax income.
There are a few key messages. One is that the educational system in Northern Ireland requires investment and policy change. Rates of early school leaving in the North are two to three times those in the Republic, and fewer have university qualifications. In turn this has a knock-on impact on lifetime income and on wider economic development. Those who are streamed via the Northern Ireland system into grammar schools seem particularly at risk of leaving school early.
READ MORE
Under the Belfast Agreement – and in other areas – there is already significant North-South cooperation. But there is clearly room for more. There are, for example, specific areas where the health systems work together on both sides of the Border, but scope for more to be done, with long waiting lists a problem across the island.
Barriers to progress in areas such as health, education, the environment and agriculture 'have been primarily political in nature, ' the report says, stemming either from the long periods of suspension of Stormont or 'ingrained political viewpoints.' The latter are a target of the Shared Island Initiative, though whether it can accelerate new policy cooperation remains to be seen.
The report points to the constraints under which Stormont operates, with limited fund-raising powers. The North's economy has been given an opportunity under the Windsor Framework to attract new inward investment – but maximising this requires policy and political stability. And there are questions for the Republic, too. The two jurisdictions cooperate well on tourism, for example, but would the Republic do the same on foreign direct investment? On one small island, with diverse offerings to investors, doing so would just be common sense,
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on caring for older people: deserving of dignity, gratitude and respect
Much is rightly made of the statements of intent and idealism that characterised the foundation documents of this Republic. These included the Democratic Programme unveiled at the meeting of the first Dáil in January 1919, in which 'The Irish Republic fully realises the necessity of abolishing the present odious, degrading and foreign Poor Law System, substituting therefor a sympathetic native scheme for the care of the Nation's aged and infirm, who shall not be regarded as a burden, but rather entitled to the Nation's gratitude and consideration'. At the centre of that poor law system established under British rule was the workhouse, which was feared and detested in equal measure. While independent Irish governments subsequently sought to develop a more humane and empathetic social contract, the care of our elderly population has for far too long been compromised, sometimes egregiously. There is excessive reliance on nursing homes, a dependency more alarming given the shortcomings in Ireland's history of institutional care. There has also been a dramatic shift towards the privatisation of these homes. In the 1980s, public nursing homes accounted for roughly 60 per cent of total beds nationally, but a report from the ESRI last year highlighted that in 2022, '83 per cent of all Long-Term Residential Care (LTRC) home beds were provided by voluntary/private sector LTRC homes, with private for-profit operators alone contributing 74 per cent'. Considering the recent revelations by RTÉ Investigates, the Minister of State for Older People and Housing, Kieran O'Donnell, has said he has 'concerns' about the scale of privatisation and has ordered officials to study this issue . The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) has highlighted the need to give it more power in relation to private nursing homes and their corporate owners. READ MORE The current controversies are all the more disturbing given it is 20 years since distressing images of the use of Buxton chairs to restrain elderly nursing home residents at the Leas Cross home in Dublin. A subsequent report by consultant geriatrician Desmond O'Neill described the care shortcomings at the home as 'institutional abuse'. As was often and remains the case, various concerns had been raised but it took journalistic exposé to bring matters to a head. In 2022, our population aged 65 years and over was 781,400 and is set to reach over one million by 2030. The number aged over 85 is projected to rise to 301,000 by 2051. What has been uncovered must generate an urgent dynamic to address the care of our elderly, who now, no more than when their needs were voiced by the architects of Irish independence, need to be treated with the dignity, gratitude and respect they deserve.
Irish Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ireland nuclear bomb map shows potential catastrophic damage amid WW3 fears
The prospect of World War Three is a deeply unsettling thought, but with escalating attacks between Iran and Israel this week - and Iran's growing alliance with China and Russia - the world feels closer to a global conflict than it has in years. The conflict between Israel and Iran has intensified dramatically over the past week. Israel launched extensive airstrikes on Iranian military sites and Iran retaliated with missile strikes targeting Israeli cities. Iran has warned that any US intervention could trigger an "all-out war," while US President Donald Trump has demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and called for an increased US military presence in the region. In recent years, Iran has strengthened its ties with China and Russia, creating a powerful alliance that challenges the existing international order and could dramatically shift global power dynamics. Amid escalating tensions, fears of nuclear conflict have resurfaced, with experts warning that any wider escalation involving Iran, Israel and their powerful allies could dangerously increase the risk of nuclear weapons being used. This has left some people asking the ultimate hypothetical - what could happen if a nuclear bomb hit Ireland? The Irish Government has an emergency operation – called the National Plan for Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Exposures – in place to deal with any such incident. It sets out steps for a national response to such a crisis, and the subsequent transition to a managed existing exposure situation. Now, an alarming interactive map shows how much of Ireland could be destroyed if a nuclear bomb hit. Users can check the potential impact of a nuke being detonated in their area, including the number of fatalities and injuries it could cause. The website NUKEMAP was created by Alex Wellerstein, a historian of nuclear weapons, in a bid to "help people visualise nuclear weapons and get a sense of the scale of the bombs". He explained: "We live in a world where nuclear weapons issues are on the front pages of our newspapers on a regular basis, yet most people still have a very bad sense of what an exploding nuclear weapon can actually do." The map allows you to choose from a wide range of nuclear weapons already produced, tested or used. We used the Topol (SS-25), which is currently in Russian arsenal, to see what would happen if it hit various locations around Ireland. The warhead is 800 kiloton and can deliver a payload of 1,000 kg to a range of 11,000 km. If this nuclear bomb were to land in Dublin city centre, it could kill an estimated 330,150 people and injure a further 481,860 according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, including some living in neighbouring counties Meath, Kildare and Wicklow. The people most impacted would be those living within 0.97 km of the blast, who would be in the 'fireball radius'. The map explains anything inside the fireball is effectively vaporized. Those living within 6.53km of the bomb would see 'moderate damage'. Areas included here include Dundrum, the Phoenix Park and Ballymun. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire". Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - like Blanchardstown, Dublin Airport and Tallaght - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation". The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This includes the likes of Lucan and Malahide, as well as parts of Meath, Kildare and Wicklow. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Cork city centre, it could kill an estimated 109,170 people and injure a further 95,730, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, meaning it would reach as far as Crosshaven, Watergrasshill and Cobh. Those living within 6.53km of the bomb - which includes Cork Airport and Glanmire - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - such as Passage West, Carrigaline, Blarney and Ballincollig - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Galway city centre, it is estimated that it could kill 48,510 people and injure 36,400 more, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, including those living near the border in Clare. Those living between 6.53km of the bomb - which includes Salthill and the Atlantic Technological University - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - such as Claregalway and Oranmore - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This goes almost as far as Athenry. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Belfast city centre, it could kill an estimated 182,440 people and injure a further 231,100, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, with it reaching as far as Bangor, Carrickfergus and Lisburn. Those living between 6.53km of the bomb - such as Balmoral, the Upper Falls and Springfield - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - including Holywood, Dundonald and Carryduff - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This include Carrickfergus, Bangor and Hillsborough. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." You can try the map for yourself here. The only two times nuclear weapons have been dropped on inhabited areas was in 1945, when the US detonated two nuclear weapons over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As many as 220,000 people were killed in the atrocity. However, over 2,000 nuclear tests have been conducted globally since then, primarily for research and military demonstration purposes.
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Child Benefit rates will not be cut to fund a second rate for less well-off families
A two-tier children's allowance payment would cost €773m, an Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection heard yesterday, and would help to lift 55,000 children out of poverty. Taoiseach Micheál Martin, said on Monday that two rates of the benefit are being considered and that 'nothing is off the table' when it comes to a more targeted Child Benefit payment. 'We are looking for more targeted responses on the child poverty issue,' he said. Government sources indicated last night that there would be no question of reducing the universal €140 rate to fund the new top-up rate. Child Benefit was cut in 2010 to €140 a month and while one-off double payments have been made, the rate has not increased in 14 years. The history of Child Benefit being cut during the recession has resulted in some 'anxiety' among parents that it would be cut again, according to a source, but another cut to the universal rate would not be politically viable now. 'It is not 2010, and while we had some cover to do it then, we definitely wouldn't have the cover to do it now,' a source said. Meanwhile, one government TD is calling for children with a disability to be included in any second-tier payment. Fianna Fáil's Catherine Ardagh said there are 'huge costs' to raising a child with a disability and that including them in a top-up payment is 'the right thing to do'. She said additional costs can include a range of therapies that many families have to pay for privately, but also additional activities or separate days out from the rest of the family to suit a child's needs. The Dublin South-West TD said the new second-tier payment needs to be introduced 'as a matter of urgency', but more senior sources suggest that it is not guaranteed in next year's Budget and may well be the following year. The ESRI recommended the second-tier payment as a way of reducing child poverty. Over 100,000 children in Ireland live in consistent poverty. About half are children of lone parents or parents with a disability. The ESRI's Karina Doorley said that the welfare system is the best way to reduce child poverty.
