
New state law allots $50M for Indianapolis roads but can't be used for sidewalks, bike lanes
A state matching grant program could bring $100 million more a year to Indianapolis roads, but not to its sidewalks and bike paths.
The city's 8,400 lane miles are chronically underfunded because the state's road-funding formula allots the same amount to a two-lane road and a six-lane road.
The new law allows Indianapolis to triple certain taxes on vehicles to raise more revenue for roads.
A new state law offers Indianapolis an additional $50 million in state funding each year to improve the city's battered roads. But the money, which could prove difficult to obtain, comes with strings attached that outlaw its use for increasingly popular traffic-calming changes like narrower streets, bike trails and sidewalks.
Under House Bill 1461, Indianapolis can access up to $50 million a year from the statewide Community Crossings grant program, starting in 2027. Signed into law by Indiana Gov. Mike Braun May 1, the bill also increases speed limits on Interstate 465 from 55 to 65 miles per hour, effective July 1, 2025, and offers other local governments tools to expand their road budgets.
To receive the money, Indianapolis must match any dollars the state provides, meaning the city could see up to $100 million more a year for roads by 2027. But an amendment by State Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis, requires the city to match the state with new funding outside of its transportation and public safety budgets, a city spokesperson confirmed, which are two of the city's largest annual expenses.
The 2025 city-county budget was more than $1.6 billion, with nearly $1 billion devoted to public safety services including the Indianapolis police and fire departments, the Marion County sheriff's and prosecutor's offices, and Marion County courts. The city allotted nearly $200 million to roads, bridges and greenways in 2025.
The amendment also prevents Indianapolis from using the state's $50 million for five purposes: "reducing the capacity of existing roads and streets; greenways; bike lanes; bike trails; and sidewalks."
Some pedestrian advocates say that provision creates an incentive for the city to maintain larger roads instead of reducing lane counts, which could decrease maintenance costs and improve overall traffic safety.
The new state money won't solve Indy's pothole problem. A 2022 city-commissioned study found Indianapolis would need to spend more than $500 million a year to improve its roads to fair condition.
Regardless, city leaders are praising this bill for giving Indianapolis a larger share of state dollars. Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett called the legislation "the most significant new investment from the state of Indiana into Indianapolis road infrastructure in decades."
The city has 8,400 miles of pavement but currently receives state funding for only 3,400 "center-lane" road miles. That discrepancy stems from a road-funding formula that disregards lane counts, sending the same amount of money to a two-lane road in a rural county and a six-lane road in Indianapolis.
Can the city match up to $50 million in state funding?
City officials will work in upcoming budgeting sessions to figure out how Indianapolis can shift money around to make the most of the state's contributions, Department of Public Works Director Todd Wilson said in a statement.
The legislation allows the city to raise money by tripling wheel taxes on large commercial vehicles and excise taxes on smaller personal vehicles, but city leaders have not signaled whether they intend to do so.
The bill raises the city's wheel tax limit from $80 to $240 and the excise tax limit from $50 to $150. Under the current limits, however, Indianapolis and Marion County still leave a combined $67 million in potential revenue on the table by charging less than the maximum allowed.
"I don't see the need for us to raise our wheel tax to come up with that $50 million when we have a $1.65 billion budget, probably going up to $1.7 (billion) this next year," Republican Indianapolis City-County Councilor Joshua Bain said during an April 17 public works meeting.
Democratic Councilor Jared Evans said that budgeting more money toward roads will be especially challenging because the city faces millions of dollars in lost property tax revenue after the passage of Senate Bill 1.
"While it's good for the roads, we also know we have some cuts coming due to the property tax bill," Evans said in the same meeting. "I don't think it's going to be an easy thing to achieve."
In a May 2 emailed statement, Indianapolis City-County Council President Vop Osili said he expects the city to benefit from the full $100 million available each year under the new law.
"For too long, limited funding has prevented us from addressing the full scope of our city's infrastructure needs," Osili said. "With this additional support, more streets will be repaved, more neighborhoods will be revitalized, and more residents will experience a higher quality of life."
Why the money can't go toward "road diets," bike lanes, sidewalks
While a potential boon for motorists, pedestrian advocates criticize the law for limiting road improvements that enhance safety for all users. The city has redoubled its commitment to such changes in recent years with the Vision Zero plan to reduce traffic deaths and the 2022 overhaul of its Complete Streets ordinance, a policy requiring city planners to design streets with all travelers in mind.
Many multi-lane roads in Indianapolis see less traffic since the advent of the interstates, local urban designer Jeffery Tompkins told IndyStar, yet the city is stuck with about 8,400 miles of pavement. Barring spending on "road diets" to remove lanes and add more bike paths and sidewalks, as the city will do south of downtown on the six-lane Madison Avenue, upholds a status quo that Indianapolis can't afford to maintain, Tompkins said.
"If I was a city leader with deferred maintenance of thousands of lane miles that I couldn't pay for," Tompkins said, "I think that maybe it would be a better idea to get rid of some of those lane miles that aren't serving my population."
Anthony Cherolis, executive director of Bike Indianapolis and the Central Indiana Bicycling Association, criticized Freeman in an emailed statement for "state-level meddling in local design details" that would enhance road safety for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists.
Freeman did not respond to IndyStar's request for comment. In the 2024 legislative session, Freeman fought unsuccessfully to stall IndyGo's Blue Line bus route, arguing it shouldn't reduce lanes for car traffic on Washington Street.
State Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said he voted in favor of the bill despite Freeman's amendment because Indianapolis can't afford to miss out on $50 million in state money after decades of underfunding.
"I'm excited for any piece of legislation that helps us address the backlog of roads and streets that need to be repaved and reconstructed, especially residential roads," Qaddoura told IndyStar.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Braun says he has ‘no interest' in White House bid
Indiana Gov. Mike Braun (R) sought to tamp down a report that he is interested in running for president, in remarks to reporters Thursday. 'That's had nothing to do with anything I've said,' Braun told the Indiana Capital Chronicle, a nonprofit news site covering state government, in response to a question about a potential presidential run. 'I'm concentrating on being governor, and have no interest in that.' Politico reported in early June that Braun had discussed the idea of mounting his own presidential campaign, citing three unnamed Republicans close to the governor. Braun previously served as a U.S. senator for one term, and in Indiana's statehouse from 2014 to 2017. He maintained that his focus was on the governorship, the Indiana Capital Chronicle reported. 'I'm focused on being the most entrepreneurial governor we've got in this country,' Braun told the outlet. 'We've been doing things bolder than what most states would do and going after tough issues like health care, education, workforce.' Braun recently appeared at an event with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that announced that Arkansas, Idaho and Utah would no longer permit soda and candy to be purchased with food stamps. As governor, he has also issued a number of executive orders, ranging from declaring there are only two genders to prohibiting collective bargaining among state employees.


Indianapolis Star
2 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Braun's power grab over IU silences alumni, harms IU brand
Gov. Mike Braun has attacked Indiana University by replacing three alumni-elected trustees after Republicans in the Indiana General Assembly inserted a special provision in the state budget allowing Braun to select all of its members. Alumni have elected three out of nine trustees for more than a century. Changing this to further Braun and the state legislature's extremist, out-of-touch political agenda is not what is best for IU or the state. Braun claimed the move was necessary, as the alumni election process 'enabled a clique, a few people, to actually determine three board members," ironically deeming that he alone is more qualified than thousands of alumni to know what is best for several major research universities. His claim is disingenuous, at best. The move appears to be a power grab from an uninspiring politician trying to emulate President Trump's recent retribution against Harvard. My IU degree is part of my personal brand and has carried me far in life, including to executive positions in my career and opportunities to serve my community. As an alumnus who has been engaged in matters related to the university for decades, I see Braun's interference at IU as detrimental to that brand. The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed a lawsuit against Braun, claiming the provision in the state budget that specifically targeted Indiana University's board of trustee elections was a form of "special legislation" in violation of the Indiana constitution. I pray for the success of their lawsuit against Braun for his warrantless seizure of all of the trustee positions, and that IU would be protected from further political attacks.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Duke Energy Indiana agrees to Cayuga coal unit feasibility study in addition to building new gas units on-site
The study will explore the possibility of a sale of existing coal units Settlement with state's coal producers is aligned with Indiana Governor Mike Braun's executive orders on coal PLAINFIELD, Ind., June 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Duke Energy Indiana and Reliable Energy Inc., which represents several of Indiana's major coal producers, have reached a settlement in Duke Energy Indiana's request pending before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission for a proposed new natural gas plant at its Cayuga Generating Station in Vermillion County, Ind. If state utility regulators approve the gas plant proposal as well as the settlement, Duke Energy Indiana has agreed to perform an engineering study to evaluate the technical feasibility of continued operation of the site's current coal units by third parties that may be interested in purchasing them. Duke Energy would then issue a request for proposal to solicit interest in the coal units, which could be available for sale after the two proposed gas units are placed in service in 2029 and 2030. "The settlement is aligned with Indiana Governor Mike Braun's recent executive orders aimed at making sure there's a careful evaluation before retiring coal units and encouraging additions to the state's power supplies," said Duke Energy Indiana President Stan Pinegar. "The new natural gas units we've proposed add additional, highly efficient power capacity to Indiana's electric grid. This agreement commits to studying the feasibility of a third party continuing to operate Cayuga's existing coal units once the Cayuga gas units are operational." A condition of the settlement is that this process will not affect the construction schedule, estimated cost or future operation of the new gas units. "This agreement represents a meaningful step toward preserving reliable, in-state power generation for Hoosiers," said Reliable Energy President Savannah Kerstiens. "It wouldn't have been possible without the leadership of Governor Braun and Secretary Jaworowski, whose continued commitment to Indiana's energy resilience made this outcome achievable. As the state works to attract new investment and grow the economy, ensuring affordable electricity for working families means keeping every option on the table to maintain generation capacity." Duke Energy Indiana Duke Energy Indiana, a subsidiary of Duke Energy, provides about 6,300 megawatts of owned electric capacity to approximately 920,000 customers in a 23,000-square-mile service area, making it Indiana's largest electric supplier. Duke Energy Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK), a Fortune 150 company headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., is one of America's largest energy holding companies. The company's electric utilities serve 8.6 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky, and collectively own 55,100 megawatts of energy capacity. Its natural gas utilities serve 1.7 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky. Duke Energy is executing an ambitious energy transition, keeping customer reliability and value at the forefront as it builds a smarter energy future. The company is investing in major electric grid upgrades and cleaner generation, including natural gas, nuclear, renewables and energy storage. More information is available at and the Duke Energy News Center. Follow Duke Energy on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook, and visit illumination for stories about the people and innovations powering our energy transition. Contact: Angeline Protogere24-Hour: 800.559.3853 View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Duke Energy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data