Has Philippine President Marcos outplayed the Dutertes in impeachment fight?
Published: 12:00pm, 8 Feb 2025 The impeachment of Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio by more than two-thirds of the Philippine House of Representatives – including lawmakers from her family's southern stronghold of Mindanao – has signalled to analysts that President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr and his allies have 'outmanoeuvred' the Duterte dynasty in its own backyard. Out of the 60 congressmen representing the southern Philippines , 41 have signed the Articles of Impeachment that were sent to the Senate on Wednesday, according to the Philippine Centre for Investigative Journalism. One signatory is from the Davao region, where the vice-president's father, former president Rodrigo Duterte , reigned supreme for more than three decades.
'It's political jujitsu,' said historian Manolo Quezon, a former palace insider under presidents Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Benigno Aquino III. In the 2022 elections, Marcos Jnr and Duterte-Carpio campaigned together as a unified ticket and secured landslide victories. However, the alliance between them and their politically powerful families has transformed into a bitter public feud over the last year, with the vice-president even making public threats of assassination .
02:02
Philippine VP Sara Duterte to fight impeachment case in escalating clash with Marcos Jnr Philippine VP Sara Duterte to fight impeachment case in escalating clash with Marcos Jnr Despite that, Marcos Jnr had consistently described the effort to impeach the vice-president as an unnecessary government distraction before Wednesday's vote, describing it as a 'storm in a teacup' amid growing calls among his allies to oust her from office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
2 days ago
- Asia Times
Tucker Carlson's a Trump-coddling coward
The online meltdown over Tucker Carlson's evisceration of Ted Cruz was predictably theatrical. Social media buzzed with the usual suspects declaring it a must-see affair, praising Carlson's surgical dismantling of the Texas senator's Iran hawks routine. And yes, watching Cruz squirm like a pinned beetle was wildly entertaining. The man's capacity for public humiliation remains genuinely impressive. Cruz, a man-shaped lobbyist pamphlet, was an easy target, though. Carlson's takedown wasn't brave—it was bloodsport for clicks. He used Cruz as a stand-in to criticize US policy on Iran while conveniently dodging the one person actually responsible: Donald Trump. The man who greenlit the military aid to Israel. The man Carlson won't touch. This is the sleight of hand. Carlson postures as a dissident, but his crosshairs never rise above the Senate floor. He talks like an outsider, but never punches up. The result is cowardice—calculated avoidance dressed up as defiance, monetized for maximum clicks. Carlson isn't challenging power; he's cackling all the way to the bank, turning selective outrage into a subscription model. And in many ways, that's worse than the naked sycophants. At least Cruz grovels openly. Carlson misleads his audience into thinking he's rebelling against the machine, when in truth he's guarding its king. He lashes out at the foot soldiers and spares the general. This is not journalism. Not the respectable kind, anyway. When Israel began pounding Iran, Carlson didn't question the president's role in approving support—he attacked Cruz's rhetoric. Trump got a pass. He always does from Carlson. From the entire pseudo-revolutionary right. They all know who signs the checks, who pulls the strings, and who might one day hand them a podium or a pardon. That's why the silence is deafening. Steve Bannon, that other supposed voice of anti-establishment fire, falls into the same craven category. The architect of MAGA is perfectly willing to criticize the decision to assist Israel's Iranian adventures—but only in the abstract, never with Trump's name attached. For all his blue-collar cosplay and populist posturing, Bannon knows exactly which side his bread is buttered on. Without Trump, he's just another uber-wealthy ex-Goldman Sachs banker playing dress-up in work shirts and five o'clock shadow. But this isn't harmless. If Iran falls, the region doesn't get freer—it gets bloodier. The Islamic Republic is brutal, yes—but it's also a geopolitical keystone. Remove it, and the arch collapses. The aftermath wouldn't be democratic reform or some Instagram-filtered 'Persian Spring.' It would be tribal fragmentation, religious warfare, and the violent settling of decades-old scores. Hezbollah would spin even looser in Lebanon. Israel would face attacks on multiple fronts. ISIS remnants would resurface in the chaos, feeding off the vacuum like parasites in open wounds. Iraq would fracture again. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states would pour in money, weapons, and jihadist mercenaries to counterbalance rising Shia influence. Iran's Revolutionary Guard wouldn't simply vanish—it would splinter, with rogue commanders forming warlord fiefdoms across the region. Russia and China, already circling, would seize the chance to claim strategic energy corridors and military influence. Western embassies would go dark. Diplomacy would give way to drone strikes. And Europe? It would face a second refugee crisis, exponentially worse than 2015. Millions of displaced Iranians, Afghans, Iraqis, and Syrians, fleeing instability, starvation, or sectarian cleansing, would flood the Mediterranean and Balkans. Greece and Italy, already on the brink, would snap. France and Germany would fracture internally. The EU itself might not survive another wave. What falls in Tehran doesn't stay in Tehran. And yet no one on the right with any real influence is willing to say the obvious: Trump bears responsibility. Not Ted Cruz. President Trump, a man whose decisions, backroom deals, vanity, and erratic instincts bring us closer to World War III. Carlson won't say it. He can't. His son, Buckley, works for Vice President J D Vance. His livelihood depends on proximity to Trump's orbit. He'll hurl rocks at Congress but never at the throne. The result is a pathetic parody of journalism, where everything is questioned except the one man most responsible. We are ruled by strongmen and served by courtiers. Carlson's job is to entertain the peasants while never threatening the king. And as long as this charade continues, the real culprits walk free, while the world inches closer to complete carnage.
Asia Times
2 days ago
- Asia Times
Marcos vs Duterte feud enters critical phase in Philippines
MANILA – Vice President Sara Duterte's closely watched impeachment trial in the Philippine Senate has been delayed, with political allies closing ranks to protect the popular daughter of the country's former president, Rodrigo Duterte, now detained in the Hague for thousands of deaths in his drug war. Sara Duterte became the first Philippine vice president ever to be impeached in February, in what she has dismissed as 'political persecution' by the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, once a staunch ally and her running mate in 2022. She is accused of violating the constitution, corruption, alleged misuse of more than 10 million dollars in public funds and – most damning of all – of plotting to assassinate Marcos and his wife. Weeks later, her father was arrested and flown to the Hague to face trial for 'crimes against humanity' at the International Criminal Court, in a surprise move orchestrated by Marcos officials that added salt to already deep political wounds. Styling herself as the leader of a new opposition against Marcos, Sara Duterte clawed back in May with candidates she backed in the midterm polls winning seats in the Senate – the very body that, under the constitution, should transform itself into a court to subject her to trial. This includes the president's own sister, Imee Marcos, and her father's former aides Ronald dela Rosa, Christopher Go and Robinhood Padilla. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr on the last day of campaigning for his party's candidates at May 2025 polls. Photo: Jason Gutierrez / Asia Times Dela Rosa was the chief of police who launched Rodrigo Duterte's bloody drug war from 2016-2022 and is reputed to be among other Filipino officials the ICC wants in its custody. Padilla, an ex-convict, has publicly stated his allegiance to the Duterte family, raising questions about the supposed impartiality of the impeachment court to begin with. As the Senate impeachment court opened to hear the case last week, dela Rosa argued that the complaint was 'constitutionally-infirm.' The Senate then voted to return it to the House of Representatives last week. It is now clear that the impeachment trial will now have to be tackled by the next Congress, which will convene in July. In his argument before his peers, dela Rosa questioned the soundness of the case against Vice President Duterte and argued that it was rushed by the House, whose Speaker is a cousin of Marcos, while his son is also a senior member. He branded the cases 'constitutionally infirm.' Impeachment, he said, can serve as a 'weapon against anyone who does not agree with the interests of political enemies.' 'This is a fire that can raze not just one house but an entire community,' he said in an emotional speech on the Senate floor that was beamed live on television. The House has placed the Senate 'in a tight and impaired position' because any action it would take regarding the articles of impeachment will be questioned by the public, dela Rosa stressed. 'An acquittal, conviction, or even the propriety of proceeding with trial will be hounded not only by legal or constitutional questions but by accusations of extreme bias, partiality, and lack of sufficient deliberation,' dela Rosa stressed, likening the complaint to a house that is not well-built whose 'cracks and holes have begun to show.' If Sara Duterte survives impeachment, it would catapult her to the driver's seat in the 2028 presidential polls. She has not yet publicly stated her stand, but her actions and the wider public opinion show that she is priming for a run. There is currently no strong contender emerging, and the constitution restricts Marcos to a single six-year term. Filipino political and security analyst Lucio Pitlo, who has been closely watching domestic affairs and how they relate to foreign policy, said that if the results of the May elections are a gauge, Sara Duterte has placed her bets well. 'The results of the mid-term polls .. shows the Dutertes remain a political force,' Pitlo told Asia Times. The Dutertes regained political control of southern Davao city, with ex-president Rodrigo winning as mayor, while two sons winning as vice mayor and congressman. It is, however, unclear how Duterte, in jail in the Netherlands, will carry out his mandate, but his victory indicates that their clout has not diminished, at least regionally. 'Delays and bickering over her impeachment also work in her favor,' he said. 'If VP Sara weathers the impeachment debacle, especially if she (is) acquitted, she would be a strong contender in the 2028 presidential election.' If Vice President Duterte is convicted and removed from office, she would also be disqualified from running for public office in the future, which means, essentially ending her presidential ambition. However, if she does win, it will likely increase her political stock, observers say. Supporters of the Duterte clan flash banners calling for Rodrigo Duterte's return to the Philippines. Photo: Jason Gutierrez / Asia Times For Marcos, on the other hand, it would give him a chance to select Vice President Duterte's replacement if she is convicted as outlined in the constitution's succession rule. He may nominate from the Senate or the House of Representatives, where he has several clear and prominent allies. Ex-senator and chief Duterte critic Leila de Lima, who was jailed on trumped-up accusations by the Duterte regime that she profited from the illegal drug trade, said the Senate's decision to remand the impeachment complaint to the House showed the real political motivations of Sara Duterte's allies. The senators ignored the 'constitution at no cost to themselves and without any accountability.' 'I am not so optimistic that the trial will proceed promptly as envisioned by the Constitution after the wanton abuse of the process has been normalized and became acceptable,' de Lima told Asia Times. 'There is no reason not to follow the Constitution other than for political self-interest because the directive of the Constitution is clear,' said de Lima, a former secretary of justice who won election as a member of the House of Representatives in May and is likely to be one of the prosecutors in the impeachment trial. She blamed Senate President Chiz Escudero for stalling in convening the upper chamber as an impeachment court. This, de Lima said, empowered the other members–only five senators voted to proceed with the trial–to 'ignore the constitution at no cost to themselves and without any accountability.' Jason Gutierrez was head of Philippine news at BenarNews, an online news service affiliated with Radio Free Asia (RFA), a Washington-based news organization that covered many under-reported countries in the region. A veteran foreign correspondent, he has also worked with The New York Times and Agence France-Presse (AFP).
South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- South China Morning Post
US Senate passes stablecoin bill in win for crypto, Trump
The US Senate passed stablecoin legislation setting up regulatory rules for cryptocurrencies pegged to the dollar, in a landmark win for the ascendant crypto industry and President Donald Trump. The 68-30 vote on Tuesday evening marked a rare moment of bipartisanship in the deeply divided Senate, despite Republicans blocking Democratic efforts to bar Trump from profiting from his many crypto ventures while in office. A Trump-affiliated stablecoin already has a US$2 billion market value. The House has been pursuing its own legislation, including a more sweeping measure to regulate the broader crypto market. House lawmakers must now decide whether to take up the Senate bill or negotiate a compromise measure. The US Senate passed stablecoin legislation setting up regulatory rules for cryptocurrencies pegged to the dollar. Photo: Dreamstime/TNS The stablecoin vote, years in the making, is the crypto industry's most tangible return yet on the hundreds of millions of dollars it poured into electing a crypto-friendly Congress. Crypto titans who flooded money into last year's election with the best-funded alliance of corporate political action committees in US history have similar plans for the 2026 midterm elections. Dollar-pegged stablecoins would have to hold dollar-for-dollar reserves in short-term government debt or similar products overseen by state or federal regulators.
