Baloch rebels see opportunity in Pakistan's adversity, hoist flags of liberation

While Pakistan is busy launching futile drone and missile attacks on Indian civilians and military sites across its eastern front, Baloch rebels have stepped up their offensive against Pakistani security forces. At least three groups of Baloch fighters have seized control of parts of its western province, Balochistan. The developments come amid fighting between several rebel groups and Pakistani forces escalating and calls for Balochistan's independence growing louder. Images and videos of Baloch people hoisting their flags after pulling down Pakistan's are all over social media.advertisementBaloch pro-independence groups carried out coordinated attacks on Pakistani security forces and their assets swept across Balochistan on Thursday, according to news reports and posts from credible handles.The attacks on the Pakistani regime in Balochistan have gained momentum in the last week. The attacks come even as the Islamabad-Rawalpindi establishment is focused on reacting to India's strike on terror camps as part of Operation Sindoor.
The Baloch groups have intensified to such an extent that the forces of the Pakistani security forces faced at least four attacks by "unidentified armed assailants" in the provincial capital of Quetta on Thursday. Explosions and intense gunfire were reported across Quetta, according to Balochistan-based Radio Zrumbesh English.On Thursday, the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) rebels targeted "the Pakistani Army and its collaborators in six separate attacks in Kech, Mastung and Kachi", according to Radio Zrumbesh English.advertisement"Baloch people have started hoisting their own flags and taking down Pakistani flags. Time for the world to pull back their diplomatic missions from Pakistan and shift them into the newly emerging country of Balochistan. Farewell to Pakistan, welcome to Balochistan," Baloch writer Mir Yar Baloch posted on X.This spate of attacks comes days after former Pakistani Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi said that Pakistan's federal government and army were losing control over the restive province of Balochistan, especially after dark.Abbasi said senior government officials and ministers couldn't move around in Balochistan without security escorts. Abbasi also challenged the narrative of Army Chief Asim Munir regarding the scale of rebellion in Balochistan.BALOCH REBELS RAMP UP ATTACKS ON PAK ARMYOn Thursday, the BLA fighters targeted a bomb disposal squad of the Pakistani army in Dashtuk, Kech District, using a remote-controlled IED, killing one soldier on the spot.In a separate incident, BLA fighters launched an attack on a Pakistani army outpost in Katgan, also in Kech, using automatic weapons, reportedly killing some security personnel, Balochistan-based journalist Bahot Baluch wrote on X, citing Jeeyand Baloch, the BLA spokesperson.Similar IED blasts on the Pakistani army and its supply vehicles took place in Zamuran's Sah Dem area, which claimed several lives, according to Bahot Baluch.advertisementThese attacks on Thursday followed several attacks on Wednesday where Pakistan's critical infrastructure like gas pipelines and resource transport vehicles came under rebel attack. Three pro-independence Baloch armed groups claimed responsibility for these incidents, reported The Balochistan Post.On Wednesday, two IED attacks hit Pakistani security forces and a military supply vehicle in Zamuran in Balochistan's Kech district, the Post reported separately.Baloch writer Mir Yar Baloch also claimed that the rebels have attacked Pakistan's gas fields in Dera Bugti, an area where over 100 gas wells, operated by the state-owned Pakistan Petroleum Limited, are located."A possible announcement should soon be done as the collapse of the terrorist Pakistan is near. We have claimed our independence, and we request India to allow Balochistan's official office, and embassy in Delhi," Mir Yar Baloch wrote on X.While the Pakistani army chief, Asim Munir, has claimed that the "unrest" in Balochistan is the result of just 1,500 people, the government in Islamabad has conveniently blamed the Indian government for the home-grown, decades-long resistance in the province.While Balochistan is rich in natural resources, the Islamabad-Rawalpindi combination has for decades extracted the mineral wealth, giving nothing in return to the local Baloch people. While Balochistan has seen episodes of the fight for liberation, this is one of the longest-running resistances in recent decades.advertisementFormer Pakistan PM Abbasi, who raised the alarm about the situation in Balochistan, said, "This is not a breakdown in law and order. It is a sign of the state's fading authority".Abbasi's also challenged Munir's absurd assertion on Balochistan, saying, "whatever Asim Munir may say is his opinion, I am only stating what I saw".The former prime minister's remarks came on May 5.On May 6, as if to prove him right, the BLA killed 14 army personnel of the Pakistan army in two separate attacks in Balochistan's Bolan and Kech, news agency ANI reported.WHY THIS BALOCHISTAN UPRISING AGAINST PAKISTAN, CHINA IS DIFFERENTThe people of Balochistan, since Pakistan went back on its words and occupied it in 1948, have faced economic marginalisation, resource exploitation, and human rights abuses.Balochistan, Pakistan's largest province by area and mineral-rich yet least populated, has been plagued by a decades-long armed and peaceful movements by ethnic Baloch people over economic marginalisation, resource exploitation, and human rights abuses.advertisementPakistan's federal government, its powerful army, and Chinese assets are facing the fiercest wave of resistance yet from the Baloch rebel groups. The resistance, led by the BLA, has intensified attacks on Pakistani security forces and infrastructure built by the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)'s China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).The Pakistani military has responded with heavy-handed tactics, including enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings.It's not just armed groups resisting the Pakistani state. Women like Mahrang Baloch are at the forefront of a peaceful movement, challenging the Pakistani army's forced disappearances of Baloch men, with courage and defiance.Mahrang, herself, is now in jail.Some Baloch women have picked up arms and are turning into suicide bombers.The attacks by Baloch armed rebel groups have dealt massive damage to the Pakistani apparatus, and Chinese assets, in the province.In 2024, Pakistan's civil and military security forces witnessed a 40% increase in casualties (383) in Balochistan compared to 2023, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal.Now, the Baloch rebels, knowing that Pakistan is distracted after Operation Sindoor, have intensified their attacks on the Pakistani forces, including in Quetta, and hoisted flags of independence.Must Watch

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

31 minutes ago

• First Post

With a 2-hr closed-door meeting, Trump may have made it difficult for Asim Munir

While their meeting has been seen as a sign of US-Pakistan bonhomie, US President Donald Trump might have put Pakistani Army chief Asim Munir in a difficult position: Munir risks compromising ties with China with the turn to the United States and Trump's demands go against longstanding Pakistani foreign policy. read more Pakistan's Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir salutes after laying wreath on the martyrs' monument during a guard of honour ceremony at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi. AFP While their meeting is definitely a sign of the brewing US-Pakistan bonhomie, US President Donald Trump appears to have put Pakistani Army chief Field Marshall Asim Munir in a difficult spot: while Trump's offerings are generous, his demands are taxing and risk compromising longstanding Pakistani position. Trump held a two-hour-long meeting with Munir on Wednesday, which was seen as a breakthrough in the US-Pakistan relationship. For one, Trump wants Pakistan to distance itself from China and pivot to the United States. That is a non-starter for Pakistan as China is invested so much in the country economically, politically, and militarily that distancing is not just infeasible but unthinkable. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, Trump's outreach to Pakistan —and offers— don't come for free. The risks for Munir are also substantial. Trump puts Munir in difficult spot While Trump made generous offers to Munir, he also sought substantial returns on his investment. Trump sought Pakistan's military bases and seaports from Munir in exchange for fifth-generation fighter planes, significant financial aid, and new trade and security deals, according to CNN-News 18. Trump told Munir that the offer rests on the condition that Pakistan would curtain dealings with China and Russia. A source further said that Trump would want Pakistan to be on the US side if he would decide to join Israel in attacking Iran. ALSO READ: Trump wants military bases from Munir, offers security-trade deals in US-Pak reset: Report While Trump's offerings are great, they put Munir in a tough spot as accepting these offers would mean diluting yearslong relationship with Pakistan and undoing the longstanding policy regarding Israel. Consider these facts: China accounts for around 23 of all Pakistan's trade, China is the largest source of foreign investment in Pakistan with a share of around 40 per cent, and just one project, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), adds 2-2.5 per cent of Pakistan's economy. Moreover, while Pakistan has historically used Western weapons, the military has been increasingly armed by China in recent years . In the past five years, around 80 per cent of Pakistan's military imports have been from China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With such dependence, it is impractical —if not impossible— for Munir to curtail ties and engagement with China and replace it with the United States as the principal partner of the United States. But, once you have had an audience with Trump and received such offers, it is not easy to bluntly say no. That means that either Munir would lose face in front of Trump by refusing the offers or he would try to reach middle ground that could upset both Trump and Xi Jinping of China. Trump seeks reset in US-Pakistan ties With his meeting with Munir, Trump has made it clear that he is seeking a reset in US-Pakistan ties. In an unprecedented meeting that lays bare who truly runs Pakistan, Trump held a meeting at the White House with Munir on Wednesday. This was the first time a President of the United States held a direct, formal meeting with a Pakistani army chief. Three previous army chiefs, Ayub Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, and Pervez Musharraf, held meetings with the US president but only when they were heads of state while running a military regime after a coup — not in capacity as army chiefs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The reset in US-Pakistan relationship has come at a time when Trump's policies and actions have soured times with India . He has not just continued to falsely claim mediation in the India-Pakistan conflict last month but has also hyphenated India and Pakistan, intervened in the Kashmir dispute, and made deals with jihadists from West Asia to South Asia that adversely affect India's security interests. ALSO READ: Beyond Pakistan: Trump's open embrace of jihadist forces across Asia a new headache for India However, as mentioned above, Trump is not making offers but also seeking substantial returns. South Asia analyst Michael Kugelman describes it as a 'classic Trump' give-and-take approach. 'There's been US-Pakistan engagement on crypto, minerals and counter-terrorism, and Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these. This is classic Trump: 'What can you do for me? What can I get out of this?' Kugelman, a Senior Fellow at Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, told Guardian. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

The Print

33 minutes ago

• The Print

Moksha, not motor cars—BR Shenoy's idea of a truly Indian welfare state

Human well-being is inseparably bound up with the immediate and the ultimate purpose of human existence. We cannot escape the question, 'What are we here for?' Are we here to worship on the altar of man's standard of living? Would it be right to say that the purpose of human existence is to live a life of carefree comfort? Much of our thinking today seems to move in that direction. At first sight, this answer might seem to satisfy the question well enough. But it really begs the question. We have said little more than that welfare is equal to well-being of man. We are still far from formulating the issues. If we wish to be scientific and logically consistent, we cannot run away from certain fundamentals of the problem of welfare. The accent of the welfare state is, clearly, on welfare, as there can be no welfare state without welfare. The question at once arises: whose welfare does the welfare state aim at achieving? The answer, probably, would be the welfare of the common man. If it is objected that the common man is very hard to find, we would, probably, amend our answer and say that the objective of the welfare state is the welfare of the masses of people, the maximum well-being of the maximum [number] of people. What is the aim of life? What has [MK] Gandhi to say on the subject? He is always a good and safe guide in these matters. Gandhi had his feet firmly on Indian soil. His thinking went to the roots of our tradition. He has answered the question, 'What is the purpose of human existence,' in the Introduction to The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Says Gandhi: 'What I want to achieve—what I have been striving and pining to achieve these thirty years—is self-realisation,… to attain Moksha. I live and move and have my being in pursuit of this goal. All that I do by way of speaking and writing, and all my ventures in the political field, are directed to this same end' (p. 5). Since it is Gandhi that writes, he means every syllable of what he has recorded. The purpose of all his activities, public and private, political activities not excluded, was the attainment of Moksha. This goal of life conforms to the traditional teachings of this land. Our Institutions and our way of life were attuned to it. The attainment was done scientifically and with rigorous logical consistency. Our daily duties and responsibilities on the mundane plane broadly fall under two categories, the wealth or income-acquiring (Arthic) activities and the want-satisfying (Kamic) activities. Since both activities had to be so regulated as to attain Moksha, their roots had necessarily to be well-grounded in Dharma. For speeding up the inner journey towards Nirvana, it is important that we acquire wealth only in consistence with Dharma and Dharma alone should govern the propensity for the satisfaction of wants. Where does the State fit into this context? It is obvious that the State has no jurisdiction over the inner changes leading to self-realisation, Nirvana. But the remaining three, Dharma, Artha and Kama, the thri-vargas, fall within its purview. The responsibility of the king, who symbolised the State, was to propagate the thri-vargas, subject to the overriding requirement that the Arthic and the Kamic activities were always conditioned by Dharma. It is significant that, under Indian polity, sovereignty lay not in the people, but in Dharma. The concern of the executive wing of the State, the king and his ministers, was to ensure that the rule of the sovereign, Dharma, prevailed. Dharma, like truth, is indivisible and all-pervasive. The State enforced the rule of Dharma in all the activities of the people coming within its ambit, in the administration of justice, in the collection and disbursal of revenues, in the defence of the country, and in every other of its functions and responsibilities. A state where the rule of Dharma prevails is a welfare state, the objective of welfare here being the creation, to the extent permissible on the governmental side, of conditions facilitating the attainment of the goal of life by individuals. How far can such a state go in developing its public sector of economic activity? The essence of a welfare state It follows that under the Indian concept of a (welfare) state, each individual should be left free to pursue his lawfully chosen vocation. Free enterprise, subject only to the rule of Dharma, is an essential feature of the economic setup of the (welfare) state. As the injunction applied to the king and the ministers, it follows, too, that the state, consistently with the rule of Dharma, cannot enter into the sphere of economic activities, which is the sacred domain of the private sector, even if the state was capable (which is a matter of serious doubt) of more efficient production than private firms. The rule of Dharma would restrict government activities to public utilities, basic industries (which the private sector is unable to undertake), basic needs of development, industries of strategic importance from the standpoint of defence, and the like. In particular, a policy of indiscriminate nationalisation of private enterprise was contrary to this doctrine. Minimum state, ideal of India This suggests that the Indian concept of a welfare state was a minimum state. It was wholly antagonistic to a garrison police state. The latter rests on violence and Adharma—under it, the individual is coerced into yielding to the will of the state, which, in practice, means the tyranny of an individual or a group of individuals, who are, for the time being, in possession of the machinery of state. The concept of a welfare state today is linked up with the provision for all citizens of 'minimum' standards of consumption. It provides (or aims at providing) minimum standards of food, shelter, education, health, and income (either by way of minimum wages or public assistance for the destitute). The minima are a floor below which no individual would be allowed to fall. In an economy with an expanding national income, the minimum standards would be progressively lifted up. This concept of a welfare state does not necessarily conflict with the Indian concept. It is the responsibility of an enlightened state to provide relief from abject poverty, which causes starvation or such other suffering. Even in the richer economies, there may be people in need of such relief. But how far shall the state go in lifting up the minimum for all? Will it be the responsibility of the state to provide the more unfortunate families of the nuclear age with motor cars, at least scooters, washing machines, refrigerators, telephones, television and radio sets, and the like? Or would we say that to do so would be going too far. I wish to suggest that this difficult problem may not confront the welfare state of the Indian conception. The limiting condition of the rule of Dharma will prevent the state from acquiring such large revenues as vulgar charity of this character may demand. The need for ensuring minimum standards of consumption is great in under-developed economies, like ours, where the level of consumption of even foodgrains by the masses of people is below nutritional standards. In the Indian context of poverty, the urgency to raise the ratio of goods to man needs no stress. But shall we do this at the sacrifice of the dignity and freedom of the individual? What use is that welfare which ignores the true goal of human life and sets aside the elevating rule of Dharma? A welfare state, which aims solely at Artha and Kama, is devoid of true welfare. Our happiness and welfare would be in proportion to our success in recapturing and translating into our daily life and activities the Dharma-pradhan ideal of life. Consistently with that ideal, our conception of a welfare state would be a minimum state. To quote Gandhi: 'That state is perfect and non-violent where the people are governed the least' (Harijan, p 12, 1940). Sovereignty, according to Indian polity, lay not in the people, but in Dharma. It was the responsibility of the king to enforce the rule of Dharma. A state where the rule of Dharma prevailed was a welfare state, the objective of welfare being to assist man in the attainment of the goal of life. The welfare state of the traditional Indian concept was, thus, a minimum state. It was wholly antagonistic to a garrison police state. It did not conflict with the present-day idea of a welfare state guaranteeing minimum standards of consumption. In the excessive importance we are paying to the successful implementation of the Second [Five-Year] Plan, there was inherent danger to this concept of the welfare state, as insistence on the Plan might lead, step by step, to the adoption of totalitarian devices for raising the requisite resources. To prevent this, we have to be constantly on the vigil. This is part of ThePrint's Great Speeches series. It features speeches and debates that shaped modern India.

India Today

an hour ago

• India Today

Operation Sindhu: 700 Kashmiri students still trapped in Iran, says J&K Students Association

The Jammu and Kashmir Students Association on Friday said that over 700 Kashmiri students are still stranded across various parts of Iran including Tehran, Kerman, Gilan, Shiraz, Arak and other areas and efforts are on to rescue them. "They are yet to be relocated and evacuated. We are in constant touch and remain in coordination with the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Indian Embassy in Tehran, and the Jammu & Kashmir Chief Minister's Office to ensure their safety and timely evacuation," said the association in a statement. advertisementThe Indian students stuck in different parts of Iran are being airlifted and brought back safely to the country as part of India's Operation Sindhu. "Efforts are underway to first relocate the students to safer locations before facilitating their evacuation via Mashhad and other designated border routes. We want to assure parents that all students are safe at present," the statement added. The Jammu and Kashmir Students' association has also said that the two Kashmiri students who sustained injuries have already been shifted to safer places, and necessary arrangements are being made for their evacuation within the next two days. "We remain committed to the well-being of every stranded student and will continue to coordinate closely with all relevant authorities until each one is safely brought home," the statement added. advertisement"We consider Indians as our own people. Iran's airspace is closed but because of this issue, we are making arrangements to open it for the safe passage of Indian nationals," Mohammad Javad Hosseini, the deputy chief of mission at the Iranian embassy, said at a media briefing on Friday. Flights carrying nearly 1000 students from Iran landed in Delhi on Friday night and on Saturday after Tehran opened its airspace amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Tune InMust Watch