Judge in Abrego Garcia case tells DOJ she has "no tolerance for gamesmanship"
Greenbelt, Maryland
— A federal judge on Tuesday admonished the Department of Justice for not complying with her order to facilitate the release of a Maryland man who the Trump administration admitted had been mistakenly deported to a prison in El Salvador, and ordered expedited discovery in the case.
"We have to give process to both sides, but we're going to move… there will be no tolerance for gamesmanship or grandstanding," U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis said at the start of a hearing in the case involving Kilmer Abrego Garcia, who was sent to El Salvador last month.
Xinis ordered for the depositions to be completed by April 23. When the Justice Department suggested they might invoke privilege, Xinis told them "cancel vacation, cancel other appointments" and added that she expects "all hands on deck."
Lawyers for Abrego Garcia and the Justice Department faced off in Xinis' courtroom Tuesday, one day after El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said
he would not be returning Abrego Garcia
. Drew Ensign, a Justice Department attorney, said Tuesday that the Trump administration would facilitate Abrego Garcia's return if he arrived at a port of entry, and continued to dodge straightforward questions on what the Trump administration is doing, if anything, to return the man.
Joseph Mazzarra, acting general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security, said in a filing shortly before the hearing that if Abrego Garcia does show up at a port of entry, he would be detained by the Department of Homeland Security and either removed to a third country or be stripped of a legal protection that he was granted in 2019, which forbid immigration authorities from removing him to his home country of El Salvador.
To revoke that legal status, known as withholding of removal, the Department of Homeland would have to re-open his immigration case and ask an immigration judge to terminate it.
Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, said before the hearing that she is asking the Trump administration to "stop playing games with the life of Kilmar."
At Tuesday's hearing, Xinis said the Justice Department "has not yet fulfilled the mandate, the order, that I issued," while lawyers for the Justice Department asked for any orders to be stayed after the Supreme Court ruling.
Xinis said Tuesday that "every day Mr. Abrego Garcia is detained in CECOT is another date of irreparable harm," and gave both sides two weeks to complete expedited discovery, or fact finding, in the case, including sworn depositions from Trump administration officials with first-hand knowledge of the efforts to return him.
"I've gotten nothing, I've gotten no real response [from the government]," Xinis said, calling the Justice Department's arguments thus far "two misguided ships passing in the night."
Xinis responded to the Justice Department's suggestions that the back and forth is simply a legal dispute, and that there is "so much daylight between what you keep saying and what the posture of the case is.
"I will have the record before me to call it like I see it," Xinis said, before she rules on holding the government in contempt of her order.
Despite the Justice Department's filings this week citing the exchange between President Trump and Bukele in which Bukele said he would not be returning Abrego Garcia to the United States, Xinis said that "if that were in a court of law — it would have real infirmities in a trial, in a court of law."
"No press release is going to move the court the same way that sworn, under oath testimony from persons with knowledge," Xinis said.
Xinis had ordered the Justice Department to provide her with answers to those questions after the Supreme Court last week unanimously
affirmed a portion of an earlier order
that
required the U.S. to "facilitate
" Abrego Garcia's release from Salvadoran custody.
Lawyers for Abrego Garcia
argued
in a filing that the Trump administration defied the district court and Supreme Court orders by refusing to provide "even basic information" about their client's location and what it is doing to follow the directive to return him to the U.S. They asked Xinis to provide three types of relief, including ordering the government to explain why it shouldn't be held in contempt for failure to comply with her prior rulings.
During a hearing Friday, after the high court released its decision, Drew Ensign, a Justice Department lawyer, repeatedly said he could not provide information about Abrego Garcia's whereabouts. Xinis said in a written order after the proceedings that the
Trump administration "failed to comply
" with her directive and "made no meaningful effort to" obey it. She ordered the government to provide daily updates to the court about Abrego Garcia's location and custodial status, as well as the efforts taken by the administration to bring him back to the U.S.
In a declaration submitted to the court Saturday, Michael Kozak, a senior State Department official, said
Abrego Garcia is currently being held
in the
Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT
, in El Salvador.
"He is alive and secure in that facility," Kozak wrote. "He is detained pursuant to the sovereign, domestic authority of El Salvador."
In another
declaration
filed Sunday, Evan Katz, assistant director for the Removal Division at ICE, said the administration had no updates for the court beyond what had already been shared. The latest filing, submitted Monday from Mazzara said the agency "does not have the authority to forcibly extract an alien from the domestic custody of a foreign sovereign nation."
Trump administration officials have been defiant in their response to Xinis' order that they take steps to bring Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. and have argued that their obligations are limited only to removing "any domestic obstacles" that would impede his ability to return to the U.S., where he has lived since arriving unlawfully in 2011.
Federal courts, they said in a
filing
Sunday, are powerless "to direct the Executive Branch to conduct foreign relations in a particular way, or engage with a foreign sovereign in a given manner."
Abrego Garcia was arrested by immigration authorities in March and flown to El Salvador with more than 200 other migrants who are now confined at CECOT. His lawyers have argued that his removal to El Salvador was unlawful, as an immigration judge in 2019 granted him a withholding of removal, a legal status that forbids the Department of Homeland Security from returning him to his home country of El Salvador because he is likely to face persecution from local gangs.
Numerous Trump administration officials at the
Departments of Justice
and
Homeland Security
— including Solicitor General John Sauer — have acknowledged that Abrego Garcia's deportation to El Savaldor was an "administrative error" because he was granted withholding of removal.
But Katz, the ICE official, said in his declaration that Abergo Garcia is no longer eligible for that relief because of his alleged membership in the gang MS-13, which President Trump designated as a foreign terrorist organization.
While the Department of Homeland Security has claimed that Abrego Garcia has ties to MS-13, citing allegations from a confidential informant, his lawyers argue that he is not a member of MS-13 or any other gang. They have also said he has never been charged or convicted of any crimes in the U.S., El Salvador or any other country.
Abrego Garcia's case landed before the Supreme Court last week after Xinis issued an order on April 4 that directed the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate" Abrego Garcia's return by 11:59 p.m. on April 7.
The Justice Department appealed, and Chief Justice John Roberts
issued a temporary order
pausing that deadline to allow the Supreme Court more time to consider whether to grant the Trump administration's request to block Xinis' order.
The high court on Thursday upheld part of the decision that required the government to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's release from Salvadoran custody, but said the district court should clarify its directive that the Trump administration "effectuate" his return.
Xinis moved swiftly in responding, and issued a new order requiring the Trump administration to take all available steps to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S. "as soon as possible."
Trump administration officials have claimed that it is
up to the Salvadoran government
to decide if they want to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. But during a meeting with President Trump on Monday, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele said he does not "have the power" to do so.
"How can I return him to the United States?"he said in response to questions from reporters. "I smuggle him into the United States or what do I do? Of course I'm not going to do it. The question is preposterous."
The U.S. is
paying the Salvadoran government
$6 million to house migrants at CECOT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
LA journalists sue Noem over DHS response to unrest amid immigration raids
The Los Angeles Press Club and other journalists are suing Kristi Noem, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secretary, for using 'Unnecessary and excessive violence to prevent them from exercising their First Amendment rights.' The lawsuit also accuses DHS of violating the Fourth Amendment prohibiting arbitrary arrests, and the Fifth amendment, which demands due process of law. 'Since June 6, at least seven members of our organization have been subject to use of force or suffered a serious press rights violation by DHS officers,' Adam Rose, press rights chair of the Los Angeles Press Club, said in a statement. 'Democracy depends on an informed public. An informed public depends on a press free to do its job without fearing violence by federal agents.' On June 6, protests erupted in Los Angeles while Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were conducting raids in the garment district rounding up undocumented immigrants. On June 8, President Trump sent in 1,700 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to help control the protests without California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request or consultation. As protests grew, so did the violence. Some protesters were throwing rocks at law enforcement or burning vehicles. Law enforcement was shooting rubber bullets and using tear gas against protesters. The legal complaint reads, 'DHS agents did not target their assault towards people posing a threat in any way. Rather, they fired their weapons indiscriminately and at every angle in front of them in the direction of the gathered community, hitting people in the head with projectiles and choking them with tear gas. Some agents shot tear gas canisters and rubber bullets directly at people as they did this.' On June 18, Trump sent another 2,000 additional troops to the area. The DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The plaintiffs are arguing that the excessive use of force led to many journalists being unable or fearful of covering the protests, essentially limiting the amount of press coverage. 'What happened in LA isn't just a press crackdown, it's an assault on the rights of all Americans, especially working people,' said Jon Schleuss, president of NewsGuild-CWA in a statement. 'This state-sanctioned violence against journalists is meant to stop the public from learning the truth.' The lawsuit explains how multiple journalists were hurt in their encounters with DHS. Journalist Sean Beckner-Carmitchel was shot in the head with a rubber bullet and a tear gas canister by DHS agents on June 7, the complaint alleges. The same day, Ryanne Mena, who was wearing visible press credentials and working with the Southern California Newsgroup, was shot with a pepper ball and rubber bullet. This lawsuit was accompanied by a temporary restraining order meant to halt DHS' actions in LA by the weekend. The request was denied on Friday.
UPI
7 hours ago
- UPI
JD Vance mocks Sen. Alex Padilla, criticizes California officials
1 of 5 | Vice President JD Vance got the name of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., wrong while criticizing him along with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass over immigration raids in that city. Photo by Kenny Holston/UPI | License Photo June 21 (UPI) -- Vice President JD Vance got the name of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., wrong while criticizing him, along with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, over immigration raids in that city. Vance referred to Padilla as "Jose" during a news conference in Los Angeles this week. A former senator, Vance also took aim at his ex-colleague's forced removal from a Department of Homeland Security news conference earlier in the month, calling it "theater." The senior California Senator was handcuffed and removed from the room after trying to speak to Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem but later said the detention was not done to grab attention. Padilla on Saturday fired back at Vance. "The Vice President knows my name. But that's not the point. He should be focused on removing the thousands of unnecessary troops from the streets of Los Angeles, not petty slights," he said during an interview with MSNBC and posted on X. "Look, sadly, it's just an indicator of how petty and unserious this administration is," he continued. "He's the vice president of the United States. You think he'd take the situation in Los Angeles more seriously." Vance spent five hours in Los Angeles, first speaking publicly to update the situation around the continued arrest and detention efforts of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, arguing Bass, Padilla and Newsom continue to hinder those attempts. President Donald Trump has ordered in thousands of California National Guard Troops and hundreds of U.S. Marines to assist federal agents. Officials began carrying out major immigration raids in Los Angeles on June 6. Newsom and other officials have argued the move to bring in the military is illegal. This week, the a three-judge panel with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the troop deployment was "likely legal." Trump, who has pushed for major deportation operations since his presidential campaign, later called it a "Big win," on Truth Social. "What happened here was a tragedy. You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law, and you had rioters, egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job," Vance told reporters at the news conference. "It was necessary to send in the National Guard to stop that process to bring some order back to this great city." He later met privately with military personnel before attending the six-figure Republican National Committee's annual summer retreat in Beverly Hills.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thieves accused in record $100 million jewelry heist also nabbed Apple AirTags and Samsung electronics, authorities claim
Seven California men allegedly orchestrated what federal prosecutors say is the largest jewelry theft in U.S. history, with millions in gems and lavish watches stolen from an armored truck following an international jewelry trade show. Two men were arrested last week, and all seven have been charged with conspiracy and theft, according to the Department of Justice. From the dark evening hours until the early morning of July 11, 2022, a crew of California men allegedly stalked a Brinks armored semi truck for 300 miles. The truck made its way south from an international jewelry expo in San Mateo in the San Francisco Bay Area, to rest stops in Buttonwillow and Lebec, California, both north of Los Angeles. The truck was carrying 73 bags of jewelry including pink sapphires in cushion cuts, deep-blue sapphires showing rare six-pointed stars, emeralds with sizable carat weights, and jade green pendants surrounded by diamonds. The seven-man crew allegedly struck in the morning while the truck was in Lebec, after plotting the heist for three days, authorities alleged in an indictment unsealed this month. The group allegedly stole 24 bags of gems including diamonds, rubies, emeralds, and expensive jewelry and Rolex watches from the Brinks truck. Victims later valued the haul at $100 million, making the alleged robbery the largest heist in U.S. history, according to prosecutors. The seven-man crew then allegedly brought the stolen goods to east Hollywood and each proceeded to deactivate their cellphone numbers in the days after the alleged caper. The indictment, returned this week, charged the seven California men with two counts of conspiracy to commit theft, among other theft and robbery charges. Each defendant faces five years in federal prison for theft conspiracy and 10 years for each theft charge. According to authorities, the men charged include Carlos Victor Mestanza Cercado, 31, of Pasadena; Jazael Padilla Resto, 36, of Boyle Heights and currently an inmate in Arizona state prison; Pablo Raul Lugo Larroig, 41, of Rialto; Victor Hugo Valencia Solorzano, 60, of the Rampart Village neighborhood of Los Angeles; Jorge Enrique Alban, 33, of South Los Angeles; Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores, 42, of Upland; and Eduardo Macias Ibarra, 36, of the Westlake neighborhood of Los Angeles. Messages left for Cercado, Lugo Larroig, and Alban were unreturned and attempts to reach Padilla Resto, Valencia Solorzano, Flores, and Ibarra were unsuccessful. Authorities alleged in the indictment that this wasn't the crew's first rodeo. The court documents show the alleged thieves are accused of striking trucks and drivers for months before the massive jewelry heist allegedly took place. Back in March 2022, Mestanza, Lugo Larroig, Valencia Solorzano and other conspirators allegedly hunted a truck hauling electronics from Ontario, California, out for delivery. On March 2, the truck driver stopped at a store in Ontario and while the trio allegedly distracted him inside, others fled with $240,573 worth of Samsung devices, authorities alleged. They allegedly brought the goods to Padilla's place, where he took photos of the stolen electronics. Then on March 11, Lugo Larroig allegedly served as a scout while Mestanza, Padilla, Valencia Solorzano, Alban and others allegedly trailed a box truck carrying Apple AirTags from China to be delivered to a warehouse in Fontana, California. When the driver stopped for food in Fontana, the four served as lookouts around the restaurant, according to court documents. However, authorities say the driver caught the group trying to steal the AirTags and a confrontation ensued. One allegedly yelled at the driver, 'Don't move or I will f—k you up!' while holding a small knife, authorities alleged. The four eventually made off with the stolen Apple gear, valued at $57,377, authorities claim. On May 2, 2022, the group was allegedly at it again and drove to a truck stop in Fontana to target a semi truck. At the rest stop, one of the defendants allegedly used a crowbar to break into a truck. The group later stole Samsung electronics valued at $14,081, authorities alleged. Following the May haul, the group allegedly spent three separate days scouting the jewelry show before following the Brinks truck on the evening of July 10. Authorities said search warrants carried out last week recovered some of the $100 million in jewelry stolen in the heist. In a statement, a Brinks spokesperson told Fortune the company appreciated law enforcement's work in resolving the theft. 'Like everyone, we want to see those responsible brought to justice and the stolen goods returned,' the spokesperson said. Representatives from Apple and Samsung did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This story was originally featured on
