Airbus seals VietJet deal as hopes rise at Paris Air Show for end to tariffs

Airbus struck a deal with budget airline VietJet for up to 150 single-aisle jets at the Paris Airshow today, where industry hopes of a return to tariff-free trade were given a boost by US Transport Secretary Sean Duffy.
Sean Duffy said he wanted civil aviation to return to a 1979 zero-tariff trade agreement, in one of the clearest signs yet that the Trump administration might favour such a move.
However, Duffy added that while the White House was aware that the US is a net exporter in aerospace, it was also dealing with a complex tariff situation.
US President Donald Trump's 10% tariffs on nearly all airplane and parts imports are a headache for an industry already battling supply chain challenges and facing fresh turbulence from last week's deadly Air India crash and conflict in the Middle East.
In early May, the US Commerce Department launched a "Section 232" national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports.
Airlines, planemakers and several US trading partners have been lobbying Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement.
On day two of the air show, European planemaker Airbus said it had signed a memorandum of understanding for VietJet to buy 100 A321neo planes, with the option to buy up to 50 more in future. The agreement confirmed an earlier Reuters story.
A deal for 150 A321neos could be worth around $9.4 billion, according to estimated prices provided by Cirium Ascend.
The agreement was the latest in a flurry of business announced by Airbus at the world's biggest aviation trade fair.
US rival Boeing is expected to have a more subdued show as it focuses on the probe into last week's fatal crash of an Air India Boeing 787 and after it racked up huge deals during Trump's recent tour of the Middle East.
On the defence side of the show, Leonardo chair Stefano Pontecorvo said the Italian group had bought a European cybersecurity company to strengthen its position in an area seen as increasingly important in new combat systems.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Journal

an hour ago

• The Journal

The Israel-Iran conflict is splitting Trump's MAGA movement in two

Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025 AS WAR CLOUDS gather over the Middle East and Donald Trump edges closer to authorising military strikes, an objector has emerged from inside his own ranks. Meet the lead dissenting voice: Tucker Carlson. You may have come across footage of a tense exchange this week between two of Trump's most loyal allies – Republican Senator Ted Cruz and right-wing broadcaster Tucker Carlson – clashing over the situation in Israel and Iran. In a fiery interview, Carlson grilled Cruz on why the United States, and Trump in particular, are flirting with the idea of striking Iran in support of Israel. Cruz defended the president, citing biblical obligation and national security threats. Iran, he argued, is 'trying to murder Donald Trump'. Carlson, on the other hand, rejected both the religious framing and the geopolitical justification, labelling the strikes a mistake and warning that Trump's foreign policy credibility hangs in the balance. The exchange revealed a widening schism within the MAGA movement — between those who support Trump's 'America First' pledge to end 'forever wars', and those who see Iran as a pressing threat to US and Israeli security that must be addressed militarily. MAGA civil war? Trump's supporters are no longer unified on foreign policy. At its core, the MAGA divide is over what 'America First' actually means. For some, it's about rejecting foreign entanglements and endless wars. For others, it includes projecting strength abroad and standing by allies like Israel, especially against common enemies like Iran. Trump, who once decried the invasion of Iraq as 'the worst decision ever made,' now flirts with another conflict in the region . 'I may do it, I may not do it,' he said cryptically when asked whether the US would join Israeli efforts to hit Iranian nuclear sites. A destroyed building in Tehran, Iran. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump's comments shook his base, exposing a growing divide. On one side are traditional conservatives like Senators Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell, who believe the US must act to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. 'President Trump understands the threat the ayatollah presents to us, not just Israel,' Graham said, voicing confidence that Trump would ultimately side with Israeli forces. On the other side are populist nationalists like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who see any military action as a betrayal of Trump's promise to avoid foreign wars. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel-Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Greene wrote on X. 'We are sick and tired of foreign wars.' Even Trump's own vice-president, JD Vance, long sceptical of foreign intervention, has attempted to bridge the gap, insisting that Trump 'is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals.' But the balancing act is proving more difficult as rhetoric escalates and the conflict enters its second week. Advertisement Online MAGA resistance The Trump backlash hasn't been limited to Capitol Hill. Trump's broad online coalition is now fractured, with many influencers who strongly supported the president taking sharply different stances. Tucker Carlson's public opposition drew a rebuke from Trump, who called him 'kooky'. That, in turn, sparked defence from various pro-Trump voices. Right wing content creator Candace Owens called the moment 'unbelievable', arguing that Trump had 'completely fractured his base.' Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones warned that backing war against Iran was 'the stuff nightmares are made of.' Still, some in the MAGA media ecosystem have remained firmly pro-Trump. Far-right influencer Charlie Kirk declared his 'full and complete trust' in Trump's judgement, while activist Laura Loomer reminded followers that 'America First is whatever President Trump says it is.' Others, like Jack Posobiec, have tried to hold the movement together, warning that 'regime change war would break up the MAGA coalition', which he suggested the neoconservatives are counting on. Voters say no to foreign wars US polling reflects the internal disunity. A YouGov/Economist survey found 60% of Americans (including a majority of Trump supporters) oppose US military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. In an Echelon Insights poll, 45% of voters said they supported Israel's strikes on Iran, while 35%were opposed. Asked what role the US should play, only 8% said that they would favour joining Israel in military attacks, while 41% said they want America to stay completely out. The message is clear: Trump's voters are worried about another foreign war. Even Trump's own intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, has voiced caution. In recent congressional testimony, she acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment was at a record high, but said there was no evidence they were building a nuclear weapon. She later warned that the 'political elite' was 'carelessly fomenting fear' that risked global catastrophe, a stance which reportedly infuriated Trump. Some Republicans such as Congressman Thomas Massie have even joined with Democrats to try to block any unauthorised military action. 'This is not our war,' Massie posted. 'Congress must decide such matters.' What happens next? For now, the future of US involvement remains uncertain. Trump has insisted that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon,' while hinting at further escalation, posting ominously that the US knows 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding.' Whether Trump ultimately strikes or holds back, the political damage may already be done. The Iran-Israel conflict has laid bare ideological tensions in the MAGA movement that have simmered beneath the surface for years. In the words of Carlson: 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency.' Perhaps it will reshape his movement altogether. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Irish Times

2 hours ago

• Irish Times

Irish pharma exports drive euro zone trade in first quarter

Irish pharma exports were the main driver of euro zone exports in the first quarter, according to the European Central Bank (ECB). In its latest economic bulletin, the Frankfurt-based central bank said exports of euro area goods 'rose substantially' – by 4.9 per cent – in the first three months of the year on the back of 'US tariff-related front-loading'. 'This was driven chiefly by pharmaceutical exports, mainly from Ireland and via Switzerland, but also from Germany, France and Italy,' it said. Irish good exports rose by 64 per cent to €88.4 billion in the first quarter as companies fast-tracked product into the US to avoid incoming tariffs. READ MORE The ECB, however, warned that the export boom may be short-lived. [ Irish exports surged ahead of Trump's 'liberation day' tariffs Opens in new window ] 'While more front-loading may take place in the coming months, higher tariffs, policy uncertainty and the appreciation of the euro are expected to cause headwinds for export volumes further ahead,' it said. It also warned that on the import side, 'the appreciation of the euro and trade deflection resulting from US-China trade tensions' were likely to dampen import prices. The stronger euro has helped bring down inflation quicker than expected. Headline inflation is now set to average 2 per cent this year, 1.6 per cent in 2026 and 2 per cent in 2027, it said. In its report, the ECB warned the economic outlook for the bloc was 'clouded by trade tensions and elevated global uncertainty'. For 2025 as a whole, these effects are seen to be partly compensated by stronger than expected economic activity in the first quarter. In the medium term, economic activity will be supported by recently announced fiscal measures, including Germany's €1 trillion military and infrastructure investment plan. US president Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU but has put a stay on the measure until July 9th to allow for talks. [ Von der Leyen: EU needs until July 9th to reach trade deal with US Opens in new window ] 'Overall, the conditions remain in place for euro area GDP growth to strengthen over the projection horizon,' the ECB said. 'In particular, rising real wages and employment, less restrictive financing conditions – mainly reflecting recent monetary policy decisions – and a rebound in foreign demand in the later part of the projection horizon should all support a gradual recovery.' The bank noted that trade tensions and the stronger exchange rate have resulted in a downward revision to growth for 2026, while growth is unrevised for 2027. It sees GDP growth across the bloc averaging 0.9 per cent in 2025, 1.1 per cent in 2026 and 1.3 per cent in 2027. On the US economy, the ECB said the growth outlook has deteriorated. 'Real GDP turned slightly negative in the first quarter of 2025, as the front-loading of imports resulted in a large negative contribution from net trade. 'At the same time, domestic demand remained relatively solid; it is, however, expected to slow down as the impact of tariffs take hold,' it said, noting that tariffs are projected to increase the cost of imported goods, 'which will likely spill over to domestic prices'.

Irish Examiner

4 hours ago

• Irish Examiner

Iran says no nuclear talks while under Israeli fire as Trump considers options

Iran said on Friday it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the United States considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week after it began attacking Iran, Israel's military said it had carried out new strikes on dozens of military targets overnight, including missile production sites and a research organisation involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran. Iran launched at least one new barrage of missiles early on Friday, striking near residential apartments, office buildings and industrial facilities in the southern city of Beersheba. The White House said on Thursday that US president Donald Trump would decide on "whether or not to go" with US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks, citing the possibility of negotiations involving Iran in the near future. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi said on Friday there was no room for negotiations with Israel's superpower ally the United States "until Israeli aggression stops". But he was due to meet European foreign ministers in Geneva later on Friday for talks at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy over Iran's nuclear programme. Two diplomats said before the meeting involving France, Britain, Germany and the European Union's foreign policy chief that Araqchi would be told the US is still open to direct talks. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, diplomats say. Israel began attacking Iran last Friday, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this. Israeli air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a US-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. Read More Trump sets deadline of two weeks to decide if US will join Israel's war on Iran