‘Apple's policies crushed Facebook's viral games like FarmVille,' says Mark Zuckerberg
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has blamed Apple's strict App Store policies for the decline of Facebook's popular games and apps, such as the once-viral FarmVille. In a recent interview with tech writer Ben Thompson fromStratechery, Zuckerberg looked back at how Facebook's app and game platform thrived on desktop computers in the late 2000s but struggled as people moved to smartphones, reportedMacrumors.
'The original Facebook platform was really built for the web, before mobile became big,' Zuckerberg said. 'When people started using mobile more, Apple told us, 'You can't have apps inside your app.' That hurt something that had grown to be an important part of our business.'
At its peak around the time Facebook went public in 2012, games and apps made up about 20 per cent of Facebook's revenue. But as Apple prevented Facebook from running its own app platform inside the iPhone, this business couldn't continue to grow.
According to the report, Facebook also played a role by limiting access to some tools and changing policies in the early 2010s, partly because of concerns about privacy and security. These changes affected developers who made apps and games for Facebook.
Still, he said Apple's decisions created 'deep bitterness' between the two companies. 'Apple just said, 'You can't do things we think would be valuable,' and that hurt,' Zuckerberg said. 'It's unfortunate.'
In recent years, Facebook has also been hurt by Apple's App Tracking Transparency rules, which made it harder to show targeted ads on iPhones.
Zuckerberg believes mobile platforms should be more open, like desktop systems such as Windows or macOS, where developers have more freedom.
His comments come as Apple faces growing legal challenges over its App Store. Just this week, a U.S. judge ruled that Apple had broken a 2021 order by still stopping app developers from linking users to outside payment options. The judge ordered Apple to stop blocking those links and banned its 27% commission on such payments.
Apple is also facing an antitrust lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Justice, which claims the company keeps an illegal monopoly over the smartphone market.
With regulators pushing back, Apple's 'walled garden' might finally be opening up—a change Zuckerberg has long hoped to see.
First Published: 1 May 2025, 10:02 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
iPhone 17 Air: अब तक का सबसे पतला iPhone?
मोहिनी केडिया Produced by: | Navbharat Times• 22 Jun 2025, 5:31 pm iPhone 17 Air: अब तक का सबसे पतला iPhone? | Apple का Galaxy S25 Edge को जवाब!
Economic Times
10 hours ago
- Economic Times
Former Meta VP Karandeep Anand takes on CEO role at Character. ai
Live Events Google-backed AI chatbot service Character. ai has appointed Karandeep Anand as its next chief executive officer on to this, he was vice president and head of business products at Meta . He has also held executive roles at the new role, Anand will focus on advancing Character. ai's long term strategy to enhance multimodal-AI technology and expand the user has been a board advisor to Character. ai for the last nine months. In a note, he laid out plans for the company over the next 60 days. These plans include working on refining open source models in an attempt to improve memory and overall model quality. He also aims to improve search and discoverability features to help users navigate parallel, Anand hinted at expanding Character. ai's creative toolkit to help creators design richer, immersive characters, with audio and video give users better control, he said he is going to make the content filters less overbearing to ease out restrictions. Additionally, he aims to roll out 'Archive' option to allow users to hide or archive characters if they wish company also announced Dominic Perella as chief legal officer and senior vice president (SVP) of global ai uses deep learning models similar to GPT-type models, offering conversational AI characters while also allowing character creation. However, it does not support generating images or code, making it a solely text-based model.
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
From the Opinions Editor: India needs a well thought out trade strategy, but first it needs a China strategy
Dear Express Reader Over the past 11 years, the Narendra Modi government has taken several steps to shore up the economic momentum, and put the country on a higher growth trajectory. But, despite its efforts to ensure macroeconomic stability, revive private sector investments and boost household consumption, growth has been less than spectacular. Between 2014-15 and 2024-25, the economy grew at an average of just 6.2 per cent. Now, in its third term, whether pushed by Donald Trump's tariff war or the imperatives of growth, the government is making a determined effort to sew up trade agreements, hoping they will help embed the country into global supply chains, catalyse exports, and push up growth. A trade deal has been struck with the UK, and talks are proceeding with the US and the EU, with many of the issues that have previously held back these agreements being either resolved or sidestepped. These agreements will ensure greater market access and bring down tariffs, improving competitiveness of exports. But the question is: Will these trade deals be enough? Can they alone facilitate India's deep integration with global supply chains? Can the country emerge as a major production hub without integrating more closely with the supply chains that run through South and East Asia which form a vital part of global production systems? The case of Apple is instructive. The dramatic scaling up of the Apple ecosystem in the country — the company has recently said that iPhones sold in the US market will be mostly sourced from India — is a remarkable development. It is a consequence of both the government's production linked incentive scheme and the firm wanting to diversify its production bases away from China. Now, Apple provides a supplier list — a list that represents 98 per cent of the company's direct spend for materials, manufacturing and assembly of its products worldwide. This would include suppliers not only those involved in the production of the iPhone but also in other Apple products. As per this list, in 2023, 156 of the company's suppliers had manufacturing locations in China, 42 suppliers were located in Japan, 35 in Vietnam and 33 in South Korea, and 14 in India. Two years later the numbers would have changed slightly — as per a recent report there are now more than 20 component suppliers in India — but, they would still point towards the centrality of South and East Asia, and China in particular, to the global production system — a fact that cannot be ignored. If India wants to be a part of the production chain of other Apple products and grab a greater share of the value addition in the production process, it would need the smooth flow of components/materials into the country and more component manufacturers to be located here. And therein lies India's conundrum. What is India's China strategy? Should the country also be a part of RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership)? In 2019, India chose not to be part of RCEP — the trade agreement that spans China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and the 10 ASEAN member states (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). The decision to not join was in large part attributed to concerns over China. But the trade relationship with China has only deepened since. And that is the reality, contrary to the desire of reducing the dependence on China. In 2018-19, before India withdrew from RCEP, its trade deficit with China stood at $53.5 billion. By 2024-25, it had surged to $99.2 billion, without RCEP. India, though, is not alone. Even as the US has tried to reduce its reliance on China, its deficit with the country, though it has declined in recent years, stood at a staggering $295 billion in 2024. And this does not account for rerouting of exports through other countries. But, it's not just about companies like Apple. The issue around rare earth minerals — used in a range of sectors such as smartphones, TVs, EV cars, solar panels and jet engines — underlines China's centrality to the global production system. This reality cannot be wished away. China accounts for 90 per cent of global processing of rare earths. With the country placing restrictions on its exports, EV manufacturers in India have reportedly sought the government's intervention in the matter. If these supplies continue to be restricted, India's EV push, and thus its efforts in shifting towards a cleaner vehicle fleet, risk being affected. And that won't be the only sector that is likely to be impacted. There are some reports which suggest that the government has raised the issue of export curbs on rare earth minerals and magnets with China. But it's not just India. Even the US has been affected. In fact, one of the key aspects of the US-China agreement that was announced by Donald Trump is the upfront export of full magnets, and any necessary rare earths by China. It is difficult to see companies move their production to India on the scale that is needed for the country to emerge as a manufacturing powerhouse unless they can be sure of stable trade relations, of supply chains working smoothly, of the seamless movement of components/personnel from other jurisdictions. India needs a well thought out trade strategy. The lack of clarity partly explains the sluggish pace of investments in the country by domestic as well as foreign firms — both of whom seem to be more inclined to invest in other jurisdictions presumably because the risk-return matrix is not as favourable in India. A clear strategy should give these firms the confidence needed to invest in the country. Take care, Ishan
