Mull islanders raise £50,000 for school legal challenge
Residents on the Isle of Mull have raised £50,000 to fund a judicial review over the local council's decision on where to build a new school.Argyll and Bute Council decided earlier this year to build the new £43m school campus close to the current high school in Tobermory.Many parents wanted a more central location so that pupils in the south of the island would no longer have to travel by ferry to Oban for schooling and stay in hostels during the week.In order for the legal challenge to proceed, campaigners needed to raise £50,000 in one month, but they managed to do it in a week.
A spokesperson for the Mull Campus Working Group said: "We had a month to get here, but thanks to the huge generosity of all our backers we did it in just a week."That in itself should send a loud message to the council - this community is not lying down, and we have the capacity and energy for the fight."A judicial review is a type of legal case where a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public authority.A spokesperson for Argyll and Bute Council previously said they had been made aware of the proceedings.
The location of the island's only high school has long been a source of division on Mull.Pupils living in the north go to the school in Tobermory, but the commute is more than 90 minutes for those living in the south, and most travel to Oban on the mainland, staying in hostels during the week.Funding was secured in 2023 to build a "like-for-like" replacement school on the Isle of Mull to replace the depilated Tobermory High School, which also houses a primary and nursery school.A number of sites where the new school could be built were identified across the island.Campaigners argued for a split option, with a new secondary school to be built in a more central location such as Craignure, while keeping a primary school in Tobermory.But the council said splitting the campus would cost the authority an extra £12m, and that any further delay could jeopardise promised Scottish government funding, This option would leave the island's most populated town, Tobermory, without a primary school.Ultimately councillors voted to go ahead with building the new school in Tobermory, near to the existing school.Campaigners launched a petition and held protests against the decision, and the issue has been debated at Holyrood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tony Blair to help Scottish Labour beat SNP
Sir Tony Blair has been enlisted to help Scottish Labour oust the SNP from power in next year's Holyrood election. The former prime minister's Institute for Global Change has been asked to help the party develop new health policies. They have been earmarked for Scottish Labour's manifesto for next May's Holyrood election, with the SNP's record on running the NHS expected to be one of the key issues. The Sunday Times reported that the institute is working for no fee on proposals for how to improve access to GPs and measures to prevent illness. It is also expected to make proposals about how 'more effective use of technology solutions' will help drive down record waiting lists for operations. Sir Tony's not-for-profit institute works in more than 40 countries and focusses on harnessing new technologies and artificial intelligence to reform how governments are run and public services delivered. But the former prime minister, who won three general elections, remains a controversial figure within and outside the Labour Party. A review by Audit Scotland has warned that 'difficult decisions' may be needed about whether some NHS services can continue, with major reform 'urgently needed' to cope with growing demand. First Minister John Swinney unveiled his NHS recovery blueprint in January and admitted there were crises in parts of the health service. But unions and professional bodies representing Scotland's NHS medics attacked the plan's lack of detail, and questioned where the funding and staff would come from. SNP ministers have also faced heavy criticism for failing to develop an NHS app, which has been available to patients in England since 2019. It is hoped that a trial of the Scottish app will be launched by the end of this year, but it will have limited functionality compared with its English equivalent. A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available. 'The conversations we have had with Scottish Labour are specifically around how our health policy proposals could apply to healthcare in Scotland. We intend to publish this work regardless of the outcome of the election.' Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman, said: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. 'From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' At the end of March, there were 63,403 people waiting for outpatient treatment that had been continuing for more than a year, an increase of 34 per cent compared with 12 months previously. They included 5,262 cases waiting two years or more for treatment, a record high. Angus Robertson, chair of the SNP's campaign committee, said: 'It speaks volumes that Scottish Labour are relying on the advice of the man to led us into a disastrous, illegal war in Iraq to tell them what is best for Scotland. 'Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar have no vision for Scotland's future and rather than listening to the people of Scotland, they can only look backwards at a discredited, unpopular figure like Tony Blair. 'Only the SNP is offering people a positive, ambitious vision for Scotland's future — improving our NHS, tackling the cost of living and ensuring Scotland reaches its full potential with the powers of independence.'
BreakingNews.ie
3 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Schools have to send 'begging bowl' to parents due to inadequate funding
Three retiring principals say schools are living on 'a wing and a prayer and have to send the 'begging bowl' to parents to help pay for school running costs due to inadequate funding from central government. The three Co. Louth principals, from rural schools within a 10 kilometre radius of one another, said the cost of school insurance alone takes up almost a third of funding provided by the government to cover running costs. Advertisement Bryan Collins from Scoil Naomh Fechin in Termonfeckin, Edel Victory of Sandpit NS and Ambrose McGinnity of Callystown NS in Clogherhead will retire next week after spending almost forty years each in primary teaching and most of that time as school principals. "Schools are expected to give more and more but with less and less funding and in a lot of cases, the capitation grant for children is barely covering school insurance, never mind anything else," said Ms. Victory. "When we had chalk boards, we could afford the chalk," said Mr McGinnity. "Now we have interactive white boards, chrome books and other electronic devices and we are given money to buy these items but we aren't provided with ongoing financial support so that these essential devices can be maintained, repaired and replaced.' Advertisement "Schools are living on a wing and a prayer. There is a huge gap between the cost of running schools and what we are given and we have been asking parents to fill that gap by organising fundraisers but in reality, we are educators and not fundraisers. "It is a sad state of affairs." Mr Collins added: "We have been beating this drum for quite some time. I don't think that the general public realise that schools are getting the same level of capitation as we received 17 years ago and that annual grant is supposed to cover a school's day-to-day running costs, despite a significant increase in the cost of living over this period of time. "A primary school's Capitation Grant equates to just over €1 a day per child. That's completely inadequate in this day and age. Primary schools have always been very resourceful and we are very good at cutting costs and looking for savings wherever we can find them but if we can't pay for the daily running costs, then we have to go out with the begging bowl to parents and ask for assistance. Advertisement "The government needs to start listening to school leaders and embark on a systematic change in the way schools are funded and resourced. " Mr Collins also criticised the government for the lack of supports and services in primary schools for children with additional needs. "The lack of supports for children with additional needs is a different problem but no less important. Ireland How anti-immigrant activists tried to 'weaponise'... Read More "We (teachers and principals) spend a large proportion of our time fighting for the rights of the most vulnerable young children in our schools. Advertisement "The services and supports that these children deserve and should be entitled to automatically are not available and in a first world country like Ireland it is simply not acceptable to have an inadequate number of Special Needs Assistants (SNAs), support teachers and wrap around services like psychologists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, etc. available to schools. "It seems to me that once the Department of Education and the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) provide a classroom space for children with additional needs, they wash their hands of it and let schools make the best of any resources that they can get hold of. "It is hugely disappointing that not a great deal has changed over the last decade to cater for the needs of our most vulnerable pupils."
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rayner facing fight over China ‘super-embassy' in heart of London
Robert Jenrick has called for a judicial review if the Government approves plans for a new Chinese 'super-embassy' in London. In a highly controversial move, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, is expected to wave through proposals for a new Chinese complex near the city's financial hub within weeks. The proposed 'mega embassy' at the former Royal Mint site, near the Tower of London, has been locked in a planning battle for years, with the decision called in for review by Ms Rayner last year. The Planning Inspectorate, a Government agency, has now reportedly given the development the green light, with the Deputy Prime Minister set to rubber stamp the decision by September. There have been fears the building could effectively become a nest of spies in the heart of London. The US has reportedly warned the UK to reject the proposals on security grounds given the site's proximity to a hub of sensitive data near key financial centres. Tory critics of the controversial proposals have accused the Government of capitulating to China and warned that the new embassy would pose a threat to Britain's national security. Ms Rayner also faces a backlash from her own party if she waves through the application, with one Labour MP telling The Telegraph they thought it would be wrong to approve it. The backbencher said they had concerns about the possible security implications and warned the UK would 'do well' to listen to Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of MI6, who highlighted the site's proximity to sensitive communication cables. Mr Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said he would support a judicial review into the decision if the plans were approved. This would involve challenging the lawfulness of the decision, raising the prospect of it being overturned in the courts. A judicial review is different to an appeal. It would look at whether the decision was made in the proper manner, rather than the merits of the decision itself. Mr Jenrick told The Telegraph: 'The super-embassy 'spy hub' would be damaging for our national security, and must be stopped. The process is a fiasco and needs to be reviewed.' The expectation that the decision will be approved by September was first reported by The Sunday Times, which said the Planning Inspectorate's report had landed on Ms Rayner's desk just under two weeks ago. Mark Francois, the shadow defence minister, told The Telegraph: 'This Government is rapidly running out of people to surrender to. 'Whether it's the transport unions over drivers' pay, the EU over our fishing rights, Mauritius over the Chagos Islands, Spain over the border at Gibralta, Gerry Adams over Northern Ireland Veterans and now China over their desired 'mega embassy' – atop cables which are critical to the financial security of the Western economies. And this all in less than a year. 'Just think how many other countries and organisations they could abjectly capitulate to, with a bit of real extra effort, over a whole Parliament?' In a debate on the development earlier this month, Marie Rimmer, the Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, warned that China had a 'track record of aggressive state-backed espionage'. 'Surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of the risk should this go ahead as expected,' she said. 'Experts warn that there could be the foreign leverage of signals, interception and monitoring of sensitive Government and corporate communications. To what extent can individuals make representations, because everyone is extremely concerned that such a massive and historic building was sold some years ago? 'This is pre-empted. This is how China works – it plans years ahead. We cannot not say anything in this House, we must comment on what we see. Please, understand that we must.' Mark Sewards, the Labour MP for Leeds South West and Morley, added: 'I appreciate that the Minister cannot comment on individual planning applications from the despatch box, but when I speak to Hong Kongers in my constituency, they are seriously concerned about the risks that come with transnational repression and that might come along with the creation and construction of this embassy.' The row presents an awkward dilemma for Sir Keir Starmer, who has pursued a strategy of engagement with Beijing while attempting to maintain a positive relationship with Donald Trump, a prominent China sceptic. Earlier this month, Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, said the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any security fears raised. He said: 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. We are very experienced of it, and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time.'
