Trump to flex muscle with huge military parade
Long fascinated with military pomp, Trump has openly envied the military spectaculars seen in cities from Paris to Moscow and Pyongyang ever since his first term as president.
The $45 million parade is officially being held to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US army, which commander-in-chief Trump this week called the "greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth."
But critics say the parade is more about Trump than the army.
Protesters have pledged to rally on Saturday against what they call Trump's growing authoritarianism, at a time when he just ordered troops into Los Angeles after demonstrations against his immigration policy.
So-called "No Kings" rallies -- named after the idea that America's Revolutionary War against the British was to free the country from monarchs and autocrats -- are planned in dozens of cities, including just outside Washington.
But Trump is unrepentant.
The president said on a visit to the Fort Bragg army base on Tuesday that "we want to show off a little bit" with the parade, and vowed "very big force" if protesters try to disrupt it.
He made the comments in an extraordinary speech that breached the usual separation of politics and the military and saw Trump goad troops into jeering his opponents.
'Big birthday party'
Trump's long-cherished parade plans are also rare for a country which has traditionally preferred to avoid displays of military might on its own soil.
The parade will be the biggest in Washington since 1991 after the first Gulf War -- and before that for the inauguration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1949, the army said.
Nearly 7,000 army soldiers will march past historic landmarks including the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument and the White House.
Roaring overhead will be a fleet of more than 50 helicopters including Apache gunships, giant twin-rotor Chinook transport choppers and sleek Black Hawks.
Around 150 military vehicles -- including 28 M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, 28 Bradley armored vehicles and 28 Stryker vehicles -- will rumble along the route.
Following the parade, the army's Golden Knights parachute team will jump in and present Trump with a US flag.
Troops have been moving tanks and other hardware into place throughout the week.
"I think the reception here is going to be very warm," US army Colonel Kamil Sztalkoper told AFP during a media preview. "Who doesn't like a big birthday party when you're 250 years old?"
'Believe in democracy'
But the display of American muscle is also a flex of Trump's own strongman image as commander-in-chief, at the start of a second term when he has been pushing US presidential power further than ever before.
Trump has been obsessed with having a parade since his first term as president when he attended France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of Emmanuel Macron in 2017.
Back then he was put off by the huge cost, then estimated at $92 million, and warnings that heavy tanks could damage Washington's streets.
This time, the army says metal plates will protect the roads.
At the time it also sparked comparisons to similar events in autocratic countries like Russia, China and North Korea -- comparisons which have resurfaced in his second term.
Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media, said the American aversion to such displays went back to the earliest days of US independence.
"We were founded by a group of merchants and farmers who were tired of a standing army invading their streets in the name of keeping them safe," Loge told AFP.
"We've always looked down on grand military parades in Russia across Red Square or in North Korea, because we're not like that. We're Americans, and we believe in democracy, not in military shows of force."
Trump's show of US military might does however come at a time of mounting international tensions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
31 minutes ago
- France 24
Fearful Syrian Christians demand justice, protection after church bombing
"I want (Syrian interim President) Ahmed al-Sharaa to personally bring me justice," a distraught Nasr said on Monday as she received mourners at her home. "Isn't he the president? Are we not a democratic state now?" she said, after Sunday's attack, which came more than six months after Islamist-led forces ousted longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad. Authorities said at least 25 people were killed and more than 60 others wounded in the shooting and suicide bombing in the Saint Elias church in the Syrian capital's Dwelaa district. They blamed the Islamic State group, which has not yet claimed the attack. The attacker "entered the house of God and opened fire on us", Nasr, 35, told AFP. If her husband and brother-in-law had not stopped the man from going deeper into the church, "we would have all died", she said. President Sharaa has pledged to bring all those involved to justice, emphasising "the importance of solidarity and unity... in facing all that threatens our nation's security and stability". "Let him investigate the case and not allow anyone else to die because of these terrorist acts," said Nasr. "Let Daesh be eliminated from Syria," she said, using an Arabic acronym for IS. Holding her husband's phone, belt and the remnants of his blood-stained clothes, she decried the suffering inflicted on her extended family. "Eight of us have died, including my husband, my brother-in-law and their sister," she said. 'Our turn was coming' Elsewhere in Dwelaa, 21-year-old worker Jenny al-Haddad was mourning her father. "My father didn't do anything wrong -- he was praying in church. He never carried a weapon against anyone or ever fought anyone," she said from her family home. "His fault was that he was praying. No one there did anything wrong, they were all good people," she added. In a corner, Haddad placed pictures of her father, a 50-year-old government worker who attended mass twice a week. "Nothing is harder than living in a place where you do not feel safe," she said. "I no longer want to stay here. I want to leave because death has encircled us from all sides." Since Assad's December overthrow, the new Islamist authorities have faced pressure from the international community to protect minorities and include them in the country's transition. Sectarian massacres in March that killed over 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor, and deadly clashes involving the Druze community the following month increased concerns about the safety of minorities. Christians "knew our turn was coming", Haddad said, urging the authorities to hold those behind the church attack responsible and to protect minority groups. Restrictions, fears "I am a Syrian Christian, I want to live in Syria whether people like it or not. What have I done to become a widow? Was it our fault to pray?" Nasr said, surrounded by relatives who had not yet buried their dead, while others remained in hospital. Shops were closed in Dwelaa, while in the church, civil defence personnel collected scattered human remains after removing most of the rubble and cleaning the churchyard. Around a million Christians lived in Syria before the civil war in 2011, but experts believe their numbers have dwindled to around 300,000. Syria's new authorities have not officially imposed restrictions on freedoms, but several violent incidents characterised as "individual acts" by officials and measures including mandating full-body swimwear at public beaches have raised concerns. In March, a dispute took place in front of the Saint Elias church, as residents expressed opposition to Islamic chants being played on loudspeakers from a car. Nebras Yusef, 35, who survived Sunday's attack but lost six of his friends and neighbours, said that "today, you can no longer protect yourself or feel safe when entering a church". He said there had been an "accumulation" of violations in the months before the attack without intervention from the authorities. "When you don't feel safe in your belief, religion and ritual practices, you are a fourth-class citizen -- not even a second-class citizen," he said. © 2025 AFP
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran after backing him for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan has condemned the US President Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran, a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India and describing him as "a genuine peacemaker". Islamabad on Sunday criticised Washington for attacking Iran, saying that the strikes "constituted a serious violation of international law" and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond," Pakistan's foreign ministry said. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. The US military struck three key Iranian nuclear sites early on Sunday, after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran. Pakistan has close ties with its neighbour Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying that it has the right to self-defence. Hundreds of Shiite Muslims in Karachi marched in protest against US and Israeli strikes on Iran on Sunday. Just a day earlier, Pakistan's government said in a post on X that it had decided to formally recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize "in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis". Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to conflict in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, which were led by Washington, resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. In its post on X, Islamabad said Trump had "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship" and described him "as a genuine peacemaker". The recommendation came after a meeting between Trump and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir, at the White House on Thursday. The meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs Steve Witkoff. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the "prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict". While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Islamabad denies.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
NATO to take 'quantum leap' with 5% summit pledge: Rutte
The 32 members of the alliance will pledge to boost defence expenditure to five percent of gross domestic product, a key demand of President Donald Trump, who has long grumbled that the US pays too much for NATO. NATO's members have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate at least 3.5 percent of GDP to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader security-related items like cybersecurity and infrastructure. "The defence investment plan that allies will agree in The Hague introduces a new baseline, five percent of GDP to be invested in defence," Rutte told reporters at a pre-summit news conference. "This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic and fundamental to securing our future." The focus at the summit in the Hague will be on keeping Trump happy after his return to power sparked fears he could blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. In the run-up to the meeting, Spain had sparked fears of undermining a carefully choreographed unity by refusing to commit to the headline figure of five percent. But Rutte stressed that Spain had not been granted an "opt-out" from the pledge. "NATO does not have as an alliance opt-outs, side deals, etcetera, because we all have to chip in," Rutte said. The NATO chief said that the increase in spending would see the alliance boost its air defences five-fold and add thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles to its arsenals. "Our focus is ensuring that we have all we need to deter and defend against any threat," he said. "Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation." Iranian 'stranglehold' Rutte insisted that the summit would also send a strong signal of support to Ukraine -- despite Trump upending the West's stance towards Russia's war on Kyiv. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky will attend a state dinner with the Dutch king but he has largely been sidelined from the summit's main event. Rutte said that Europe was stepping up already to fill the gap left by Washington pulling back from supporting Ukraine. He said that Europe and Canada had already pledged 35 billion euros ($40 billion) to help arm Kyiv so far this year. Dismissing the idea that the fresh conflict between Israel and Iran could deflect attention from the summit, Rutte stressed that Tehran should not be permitted to possess a nuclear weapon. He said his "greatest fear" was that Iran would secure access to a nuclear bomb, giving it a "stranglehold" over Israel, the region, and the wider world. Over the weekend, Trump said that US warplanes had used "bunker buster" bombs that had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities. Other officials said it was too soon to assess the true impact on Iran's nuclear programme, which Israel and some Western states consider an existential threat. Pressed over the legality of Washington's strikes against Iran, the NATO chief replied: "I would not agree that this is against international law, what the US did." © 2025 AFP
