'No recession bet whatsoever': The stock market isn't pricing in any sort of economic downturn, investment firm says
Investors are betting that the US economy will continue to grow and they're behaving as if there's "no recession risk whatsoever," market research firm The Leuthold Group wrote in a note last week.
That conclusion is based on a key indicator, the S&P 500 Cyclical/Defensive Ratio, which compares the most economically sensitive sectors, like consumer discretionary, industrials, and materials, to more stable areas of the market such as consumer staples, healthcare, and utilities.
The Leuthold Group calculates this metric based on price to earnings, price to cash flow, price to sales, and price to book ratios.
Cyclical stocks typically trade at a discount during recessions because their earnings are more vulnerable to economic slowdowns. Investors, meanwhile, pay a relative premium for the safety of defensive stocks with more inelastic demand.
In May, this ratio hit an all-time high of 1.19, indicating a 19% premium for cyclical stocks relative to defensive shares. This isn't an anomaly, as the ratio has held above 1.05 — placing it in the top 10% of historical readings — for 13 consecutive months.
Recession fears have come down since reaching a fever pitch in April. After the announcement of a 90-day tariff pause and trade negotiations with China, the odds of a recession have fallen from 66% to 28% on prediction market Polymarket.
However, several Wall Street strategists are still concerned, as a 28% chance of recession is still higher than the long-term average of around 15%. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo, and Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, have been ringing the bell on stagflation concerns.
According to The Leuthold Group, a 28% chance of recession is still far too high based on what the market is pricing in. Ahead of past recessions — including 2000, 2008, and 2020 — cyclical sectors were trading at steep discounts to their more stable counterparts.
The average valuation gap at pre-recession market peaks was about 25% in favor of defensives. During these recessions, the average valuation gap increased to 38%.
"Much of the recession 'discount' in the comparative valuations of Cyclicals occurred during the twelve months (or earlier) preceding the pre-recession stock market peak. Today, that process does not appear to have begun," the firm wrote.
The elevated S&P 500 Cyclical/Defensive Ratio also reflects some valuation shifts that have occurred over the last few decades. Defensive stock valuations have been declining as long-term growth for consumer staples and healthcare companies slow down.
These companies now trade at a 10% discount to the S&P 500, compared to a medium premium of 10% since 1990. During previous recessionary bear markets, defensives traded at a 33% premium relative to the rest of the market, suggesting room for a defensive comeback if recessionary fears return. If this does occur, investors heavily exposed to cyclicals will suffer the most.
Investors are continuing to bet on the most economically sensitive parts of the market. As long as cyclical stocks retain their valuation premium against defensives, it seems like there's no recession scare to be worried about.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites is expected to cause market reactions, potentially increasing oil prices and strengthening the U.S. dollar. Increased oil prices could lead to higher inflation and reduced consumer confidence, potentially impacting interest rate cuts. Market uncertainty remains high due to limited information regarding the extent of damage and future developments in the conflict. NEW YORK - A U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday could lead to a knee-jerk reaction in global markets when they reopen, sending oil prices higher and triggering a rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global economy. The attack, which was announced by President Donald Trump on social media site Truth Social, deepens U.S. involvement in the Middle East conflict. That was the question going into the weekend, when investors were mulling a host of different market scenarios. In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, they expected the U.S. involvement was likely to cause a selloff in equities and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when trading begins, but also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict remained. While Trump called the attack "successful", few details were known. He was expected to address the nation later on Saturday. "I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital. "We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though he has described this as 'done', we're engaged. What comes next?" Spindel said. "I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil," he added. Spindel, however, said there was time to digest the news before markets open and said he was making arrangements to talk to other market participants. How will oil prices and inflation be affected? A key concern for markets would center around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. "This adds a complicated new layer of risk that we'll have to consider and pay attention to," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer of Cresset Capital. "This is definitely going to have an impact on energy prices and potentially on inflation as well." While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. Before the U.S. attack on Saturday, analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, including a de-escalation of the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian oil production and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, "each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices." In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving U.S. inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note. "Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the U.S. this year," Oxford said in the note, which was published before the U.S. strikes. In comments after the announcement on Saturday, Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, agreed oil prices would likely spike on the initial news. But Cox said he expected prices to likely level in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States. "With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal," Cox said. Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. What will this mean for the US dollar? An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the U.S. dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished U.S. exceptionalism. In the event of U.S. direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. "Do we see a flight to safety? That would signal yields going lower and the dollar getting stronger," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at IBKR in Greenwich, Connecticut. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much. It will depend on Iranian reaction and whether oil prices spike."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy the 3 Highest-Paying Dividend Stocks in the S&P 500?
Dividend-paying stocks are generally powerful performers. But not all are alike -- some are riskier than others. Be especially careful with ultra-high-yielders. 10 stocks we like better than Dow › It's hard to argue with dividend investing. Many assume dividends are mainly for retirees, and it's true that dividend income can be critically important when you're living on a fixed or semi-fixed income. But pre-retirees can benefit greatly from dividends, too -- for example, that income can be used to buy more stock! So, if you're hunting for dividend payers for your portfolio, you may be tempted to buy into the highest-paying dividend stocks. Think twice before doing so, though. Here's why, including a look at the three highest payers in the S&P 500. First, here's why dividend-paying stocks deserve your attention: Dividend-Paying Status Average Annual Total Return, 1973-2024 Dividend growers and initiators 10.24% Dividend payers 9.20% No change in dividend policy 6.75% Dividend non-payers 4.31% Dividend shrinkers and eliminators (0.89%) Equal-weighted S&P 500 index 7.65% Data source: Ned Davis Research and Hartford Funds. Their outperformance isn't that surprising since dividend payers have generally grown enough to have somewhat reliable income that supports a commitment to a dividend. When you start comparing dividend payers, though, here are some things to keep in mind. Don't focus just on the amount of the dividend -- for example, favoring a $3 annual payout to a $1 one. To really compare apples to apples, you need to look at the dividend yield. Let's say the $3 payout belongs to a $240 stock. Its yield would be 1.25% ($3 divided by $240). If the $1 payout belonged to a $40 stock, its dividend yield would be 2.5% ($1 divided by $40). You would get more dividend income per dollar spent on the second stock. That said, though, a very high yield is often a sign of trouble because when a stock's price drops, its yield goes up. So, it can be best to seek relatively high yields, but not necessarily the highest yields you can find. Here's a look at the three highest payers in the S&P 500 as of mid-June. Shares of Dow (NYSE: DOW) recently sported a whopping dividend yield of 9.8%. Not surprisingly, the stock is down -- recently by more than 40% over the past year. Its five-year average annual gain is 1%, too. That's not pretty, but the dividend yield certainly is fetching. So, why is the stock down? Well, per my colleague Daniel Foelber, it's facing weak customer demand, global competition, and high costs. Yikes. Such problems don't always last, though, and Dow is working to cut its costs and diversify even further, which can spread its risks across multiple kinds of operations. (It's been investing in recycling plastic waste, for example.) The company hasn't been generating sufficient cash to cover its dividend payout, so unless things change, it may have to shrink the dividend. But even if the payout is cut in half, a roughly 5% dividend yield would still be way above average. LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (NYSE: LYB) is another chemical company that has seen its fortunes -- and its share price -- fall. Over the past year, it's down about 31%, and its dividend yield was recently 9.2%. It, too, isn't generating enough in earnings to cover its dividend yield, so a dividend cut is not out of the question. Interestingly, though, the company announced a (modest) dividend increase in May. So management isn't looking very pessimistic. CEO Peter Vanacker said: LYB continues to reward shareholders with a strong and growing dividend in 2025, which will mark 15 consecutive years of dividend growth of our dividend reaffirms confidence in our disciplined capital deployment, our value-driven strategy and our capability to navigate the cycle during these challenging times. Alexandria Real Estate Equities (NYSE: ARE) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) -- a company that owns many real estate properties, charging its tenants rent. REITs are required to pay out at least 90% of their taxable earnings as dividends, and the dividend yield for Alexandria Real Estate Equities was recently a fat 7.5%. The company specializes in leasing offices to the life sciences industry, and the fact that many people are working from home these days has put pressure on office real estate. Indeed, this REIT's stock has also fallen hard over the past year -- down nearly 34%. Founded in 1994, Alexandria describes itself as "the pioneer of the life science real estate niche." The company owns, operates, and develops what it calls "collaborative Megacampus ecosystems in AAA life science innovation cluster locations." These are spread out among such places as Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Research Triangle Park, and New York City. So, take a closer look at any of these high yielders that interest you, but know that there are plenty of other solid dividend payers out there, many with less murky near-term futures. Before you buy stock in Dow, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Dow wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Selena Maranjian has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alexandria Real Estate Equities. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy the 3 Highest-Paying Dividend Stocks in the S&P 500? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy Right Now
Roku is a long-term growth play with recent volatility and a promising ad partnership with Amazon. Costco continues to deliver market-beating returns, justifying its premium price tag. Target is a risky turnaround story, priced for pessimism but showing signs of a strategic comeback. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › The stock market has been less predictable than usual lately. As I'm writing this on June 20, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index is up only 1.5% year to date. But this mellow return included a deep dip in April, so the index has gained 24% from the bottom of its 52-week low. So, things are extra volatile this year, and I understand if you'd rather keep some cash on hand right now. But even now, a few stocks can inspire me to put my extra cash to work. Read on to see why my hand hovers over the "buy" button for Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU), Costco (NASDAQ: COST), and Target (NYSE: TGT) in June 2025. Media-streaming technology veteran Roku has had quite a ride lately. Its stock price shot up by 50% over the past year but has taken a slight detour more recently, dropping 3% in the last six months. The growth story is still alive and well, with excitement over new deals, such as the recent Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) ad partnership, keeping optimism afloat. However, the company still isn't showing a profit, so valuation ratios based on profitability don't make any sense. Instead, you can look at Roku's price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which sits at a reasonable 2.8. That metric floated in double-digit territory four years ago. For now, Roku is acting a bit like the kid in class who has tons of potential but hasn't quite turned in the homework -- yet. The platform is growing, and recent partnerships could be a game changer, but the market wants to see proof that all these moves will translate to real, scalable profits. That's why Roku's stock looks cheap in this period of growth-focused operations and limited profits. If you're in it for the long haul and don't mind a few twists and turns, Roku still looks like a compelling candidate for a growth-focused portfolio. It's one of the few stocks I don't mind buying right now since its short-term price moves tend to be unpredictable anyway. This is a long-term growth idea. Wholesale warehouse retailer Costco is a different story. The stock has been soaring for years, lifting the P/S ratio to a lofty 1.6. That would be low in the high-growth media-streaming market, but Costco's valuation looks luxurious next to other large-scale retailers. But the stock is rising for good reasons. The company has more cash and less debt than sector giant Walmart (NYSE: WMT). Trailing sales are up 61% over the last five years, while Walmart's sales increased by only 26%. Costco's return on invested capital is 26%, nearly twice that of Walmart's 14% reading. Long story short, Costco runs a superior business, and its stock deserves a price premium. This stock looked expensive five years ago, with a 5-year price gain of 114% at the time. By comparison, the S&P rose 47%, and Walmart gained 65% over the same time span. But if you cashed in your Costco gains or sat on your hands in 2020, you've missed out on a market-beating 227% return in the last 5 years: Costco's stock isn't cheap, but you get what you pay for -- a world-class retailer with a history of great shareholder returns. Last but not least, fellow big-box retailer Target tells another compelling story. Target's stock is down 21% in 5 years, and the P/S ratio stands at a skimpy 0.4. If investors are paying extra for Costco's incredible performance, they're stuffing Target shares in Wall Street's bargain bin. This is a turnaround story, not a march to ever greater heights. Turnarounds are risky, but this one should have a happy ending. The company is no longer competing against Walmart and Costco on lower prices, but is refocusing on the affordable-luxury status it once held. The new strategy leans on the nearly forgotten "Tar-zhay" branding. "In a world where shopping has become less inspiring, consumers expect us to be the place they can recapture the joy of retail," CEO Brian Cornell said in the fourth-quarter 2024 earnings call. "Our guests are looking for Tar-zhay. Consumers coined that term decades ago to define how we elevate the everything, every day to something special, how we add unexpected fun into shopping that would be otherwise routine." So, Target is betting the barn on a better shopping experience. The stores need to feel friendlier than Costco's or Walmart's low-cost emporiums. Nobody likes an empty shelf, so popular items must always be in stock -- even if it costs more to run a more complete supply chain. And the Target Circle loyalty program can't be all about discounts, which is why it also offers personalized product recommendations and extended product returns. Target's stock is priced for absolute disaster, but I see good things happening in the turnaround effort. It's a risky bet, but one worth making in the summer of 2025. Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Amazon, Roku, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Roku, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. My 3 Favorite Stocks to Buy Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool
