Trump's economic ‘golden age' meets Fed's brass tacks

President Donald Trump speaks during an event to announce new tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House, Wednesday, April 2, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration promise in January that 'the golden age of America begins right now' remains unfulfilled in the outlook of Federal Reserve officials who so far see his policies slowing the economy, raising unemployment and inflation, and clouding the horizon with a still-unresolved tariff debate that could deliver a fresh shock in coming weeks.
The U.S. central bank's response has been to put planned interest rate cuts on hold until perhaps the fall while the debates over tariffs and other administration priorities unfold, and to project a slower eventual pace of rate cuts to a higher stopping point. Effectively it embeds steeper borrowing costs into Fed policymakers' outlook to insure against inflation they now see as higher in coming months than they did before Trump took office for a second time.
That isn't welcome news for Trump, who has called Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'stupid' for not slashing rates immediately. It is no more welcome for U.S. consumers and homebuyers hoping for lower financing costs. And it puts the Fed somewhat out of step with other central banks that continue to lower rates.
But it does highlight how much Trump's early policy moves, particularly on tariffs, have reshaped the short-term outlook for the world's largest economy, which at the end of last year was seen on track for continued above-trend growth, full employment and inflation steadily falling to the Fed's two per cent target. The steady series of rate cuts policymakers anticipated just six months ago has been replaced with a more tentative path as they wait for Trump's final decisions on tariffs and watch how the job market, consumer spending and inflation evolve.
'We feel like we're going to learn a great deal more over the summer on tariffs,' Powell told reporters on Wednesday after the Fed held its benchmark overnight rate in the 4.25 to 4.50 per cent range for the fourth straight meeting, and issued new projections showing inflation rising substantially by the end of this year and coming down slowly after that point.
Trump has latched on to recent weak inflation readings to argue for rate cuts, reiterating on Thursday that the Fed should slash its benchmark rate nearly in half and noting earlier in the week that the European Central Bank and others had kept easing monetary policy.
But, referring to the impact of the tariffs imposed so far, Powell said 'we hadn't expected them to show up much by now, and they haven't ... We will see the extent to which they do over coming months ... That's going to inform our thinking.'
LITTLE CONFIDENCE
At this point, investors expect the Fed to cut rates at its Sept. 16 to 17 meeting, though much will depend on what happens during Powell's summer of watching and waiting.
The most aggressive of Trump's tariff plans, levies on most trading partners announced on 'Liberation Day' in early April, were postponed after bond yields spiked, stocks dropped, and economists began penciling in a U.S. recession. The pause ends on July 9, with countries, including those in the European Union's combined trading bloc, supposed to negotiate deals by then or face steep import levies - 50 per cent in the case of the EU.
The only completed deal so far is a limited agreement with Britain.
Though the Fed's new policy statement this week said 'uncertainty about the economic outlook has diminished' since its May 6-7 meeting, when volatility around the trade issue was still intense, the situation could change quickly based on the July 9 deadline.
'We don't yet know with any confidence where they will settle out,' Powell said.
At the meeting last month, a Fed staff projection regarded a recession this year to be 'almost as likely as the baseline forecast' of slowing but ongoing growth.
The situation has since improved somewhat. Powell on Wednesday said the economy remains 'solid,' adding that as the risk of the most severe tariffs has abated, companies have begun to puzzle through how they might adapt to more modest levies.
'Businesses were in a bit of a shock after April too ... There's a very different feeling now that people are working their way through this ... It feels much more positive and constructive than it did three months ago,' he said. Prices of equities have marched higher as well, and the spike in Treasury yields that drove talk of the diminished status of the dollar has also eased.
DIMMER OUTLOOK
But skirting a recession is a large step from where the Fed was at the end of last year, when it was in sight of a 'soft landing' from the high inflation of the COVID-19 pandemic era.
The economy was at full employment and steadily growing above trend, inflation was on track to fall to the Fed's 2% target, and the central bank expected to steadily ease borrowing costs.
'The U.S. economy is just performing very, very well,' Powell said after the Fed's Dec. 17 to 18 meeting, a session at which staff and officials had just begun thinking through the implications of a trade war that became much bigger in scope than they expected. 'The outlook is pretty bright.'
It has dimmed since then.
In projections issued this week, Fed policymakers' median outlook for gross domestic product growth had fallen to 1.4 per cent, well below trend, from the 2.1 per cent projected in December, with the unemployment rate projected to rise from the current 4.2 per cent to 4.5 per cent by the end of the year. That would be the highest level, outside of the pandemic unemployment spike, since early 2017, when Trump's first term was starting.
Inflation that Powell said had been 'grinding down' is now anticipated to rise to 3 per cent this year and remain nearly half a percentage point above the Fed's target through 2026.
The job market remains solid, Powell said, but he cautioned that assessment could change, and policymakers have said that their policy expectations could shift quickly if employment falters.
'Labor demand is softening,' Powell said. 'There's not a lot of layoffs, but there's not a lot of job creation. If you're out of work, it is hard to find a job ... That is an equilibrium we watch very, very carefully because if there were to be significant layoffs and the job-finding rate were to remain this low, you would have an increase in unemployment fairly quickly.'
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns and Paul Simao)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Vancouver Sun

29 minutes ago

• Vancouver Sun

Letters to The Sun: Community services not keeping up with development in Vancouver

Being a long-time Vancouver resident, I've seen the evolution of the city firsthand. There are so many amazing attributes to enjoy and be proud of, but the current direction of city council and development at all costs is not one of them. They work to build more housing — great, but then delay the needed investments in renewals for community services and amenities, which is a travesty. Add 24,000 people to the old Jericho lands, 64,000 people to the Broadway corridor, three towers at Commercial and Broadway, perfect. A replacement 50-metre pool at the Vancouver Aquatic Centre, I don't think so. A new Britannia Community Centre, delay that. More park and recreation amenities, no, let's just cram the people in. Given this current trajectory, the Vancouver of tomorrow will be a far cry in terms of livability from what people know today. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Levi Higgs, east Vancouver B.C. Ferries announced on June 10 that the bidding process to replace four aging vessels resulted in contracts going to China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards. Since then, loud accusations have come from all corners and levels of British Columbia's political spectrum, with many incendiary comments from professional pundits and members of the public. Many declare that the vessels should be built in Canada, although no Canadian yard answered the invitation to bid. Then come claims that China is untrustworthy in trade tariffs and international politics. Some dissenters worry about the quality of steel used in Chinese shipyards, along with perceived lack of expertise of welders and other trades. Having spent a large chunk of my life working on freighters and tankers criss-crossing the oceans, it's amazing to hear so much negative rhetoric from those who should know better. Hardly ever mentioned is that China has been the world's leading commercial shipbuilder for many years, and is far more cost-competitive than anywhere else. Latest figures show China accounting for 62 per cent of global shipbuilding orders. China produces and delivers to all parts of the world just about everything used in our daily lives, from vehicles to appliances to electronics, and everything in between. China manufactures the goods and builds the ships to transport them — they also build huge gantry cranes that load and discharge containers at ports worldwide. These cranes arrive from China on purpose-built heavy-lift vessels, of course. Recently, U.S. President Donald Trump blustered that he would revitalize the shipbuilding in the U.S., but industry experts advise that it is five times as expensive to build comparable ships in America than in China. I rest my case. Bernie Smith, Parksville British Columbians should be concerned about the B.C. government's reported plan to purchase ferries from a Chinese state-linked shipyard. This raises serious ethical and security concerns, especially given China's increasingly aggressive behaviour in the Indo-Pacific, including its harassment of neighbouring countries and threats to regional stability. Just last year, Canadian naval vessels were confronted by Chinese warships in international waters near Taiwan. It would be troubling for B.C. to direct public funds to a shipbuilder linked to a regime known for threatening peace and democracy. There are also cybersecurity risks. Modern ferries are not just mechanical — they rely on embedded digital systems that could be vulnerable to interference, particularly if sourced from authoritarian states. Premier David Eby should cancel the deal and commit to sourcing from democratic countries instead. Public infrastructure should reflect our values and protect our security, not compromise them. Gabriel Yiu, Vancouver Re: Alberta minister 'optimistic' B.C. tanker ban will be lifted During a visit to Prince Rupert, Alberta's minister of transportation and economic corridors, Devin Dreeshen, questioned why there is a ban on oil tanker ships to and from that port but no ban on similar ships at the Port of Vancouver. Dreeshen is too young to remember the Exxon Valdez oil spill that fouled the northwest coast. The moratorium is its legacy. Nevertheless, Dreeshen pointed out that American oil tanker ships routinely carry Alaskan crude oil down the west coast. I wonder if the diluted bitumen from Alberta poses more of an environmental risk in the event of a tanker spill than a spill of Alaskan crude oil? After passing new legislation to expedite national projects, I expect the new Mark Carney federal government will lift the northwest oil shipping ban by pledging to expand the 'world class' emergency response infrastructure at the Port of Vancouver to include the Port of Prince Rupert. Derek Wilson, Port Moody

Globe and Mail

39 minutes ago

• Globe and Mail

Why Centrus Energy Stock Leaped 5% Higher Today

Centrus Energy (NYSEMKT: LEU) attracted the right kind of energy on the stock exchange Friday. The company's shares closed that session 5% higher, after it published news of an important contract renewal. That pop looked particularly impressive when matched against the S&P 500 's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) trajectory, which dipped into the red with a 0.2% decline. An energetic extension Before market open that morning, Centrus divulged that the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) exercised its option to extend the company's contract to produce for it high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU). The extension now runs through June 30, 2026. HALEU is a type of nuclear fuel that has a level of enrichment considered most suitable for current nuclear reactor technology, including the small nuclear reactors (SMRs) that have recently come into vogue. In what's probably not a coincidence, Centrus' latest news comes barely a week after its business partner Oklo was tapped to build and operate a nuclear plant to supply heat and electricity to an Air Force base in Alaska. The two companies have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in place for Centrus to supply HALEU for Oklo's projects. The trend is its friend In its press release on the contract extension, Centrus added that the DoE holds options for further extensions to the existing contract. It could opt to keep Centrus's HALEU supply going for as much as a further eight years. So it's not only good news that a major business for the company has a longer runway, but it's looking for more as time goes by. Assuming President Trump's embrace of nuclear energy remains in place (and possibly outlives his administration), Centrus will be in a very good position indeed. Should you invest $1,000 in Centrus Energy right now? Before you buy stock in Centrus Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Centrus Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

CTV News

an hour ago

• CTV News

Liberals, Conservatives pass major projects legislation in House of Commons

Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks at a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Thursday, June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle Conservative members of Parliament voted with the minority Liberal government to pass its marquee major projects legislation Friday evening, setting it up to become law before Canada Day. The legislation, also known as the one Canadian economy act, would allow the government to green-light a list of projects that have been deemed to be in the national interest, fast-tracking their approvals. The Liberals have called it the core of the government's domestic economic response to U.S. tariffs. 'This is what makes us different from the United States, this is what makes us more independent from the United States, this is what's going to move us forward,' Prime Minister Mark Carney said at a press conference after the vote, adding the legislation needed to pass quickly 'because we are in a crisis.' 'And if you don't think we're in a crisis, go to Sault Ste. Marie, go to Hamilton, go to Windsor.' After the second of two votes in the House of Commons on Friday, Carney crossed the floor to shake hands with Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer and Conservative deputy leader Melissa Lantsman. Two votes were held instead of one after the House Speaker ruled that the legislation had two distinct parts without a clear common element. That allowed the Bloc Quebecois and NDP members to vote in favour of the first part of the bill -- which looks to tackle internal trade barriers -- and against the more controversial second part dealing with major projects. The major projects bill grants the government sweeping powers to quickly approve projects that are deemed to be in the national interest. Provincial and territorial premiers have given Carney lists of projects they want to see approved, but no national list of projects has been made public so far. 'We all agree that more fulsome conversations are needed to select the nation-building projects and to determine the conditions that they must fulfil. In other words, the real work begins now,' Carney said. The legislation has drawn criticism from Indigenous leaders and environmental groups who say it gives too much power to the federal cabinet to bypass existing laws. The legislation was introduced on June 6 and was pushed through the House after about eight hours of committee study on Tuesday and Wednesday. The House transport committee did amend the bill to, among other things, remove the Indian Act from a list of laws the government can sidestep when determining whether a project should move forward. First Nations leaders have warned the bill could violate their constitutionally protected rights and may lead to legal challenges. Carney emphasized the need to respect the constitutional rights of Indigenous Peoples in his press conference on Friday. 'The major projects office will have an Indigenous advisory council whose core function will be to honour Section 35 rights in the implementation of this bill,' he said. He promised to hold full-day summits with First Nations, Inuit and Metis rights-holders and leaders in the coming weeks, alongside Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Rebecca Alty and Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty. 'Consultation, co-operation, engagement and participation are at the heart of this bill,' he said. The bill is now headed to the Senate, which is scheduled to sit until June 27. By Sarah Ritchie. With files from Kyle Duggan and Alessia Passafiume.