The abuse I've had just weeks into my journalism career is abhorrent

ON Thursday, our editor published an open letter responding to JK Rowling's claims that The National is an 'anti-women newspaper'. I shared the article on Twitter/X, expecting little to no engagement, given I have only been a professional, paid journalist for about seven weeks and my account had 30 followers. I was mistaken.
At the time of writing, my post is sitting at over 600,000 views, with more than double the amount of engagement the original tweet posted from the official National account got. As you might expect when a social media post picks up that kind of traction, I have been inundated with abuse.
This week, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes called social media 'destructive', noting that the misogynistic and often personal attacks sent online will have an impact on the number of young women going into politics.
She's right, and it's not just politics. Since I started my journalism journey in 2023, being subject to this sort of abuse was something that concerned me.
Luckily, I am part of the generation which grew up online and this isn't my first taste of virality. Being labelled a 'pick me' and a 'handmaiden' hasn't quite stung the way comments from TikTok tweens telling me to kill myself over a video of me playing Subway Surfers at a Harry Styles concert did.
READ MORE: From the editor: David Lammy's 'clickbait' jibe won't silence us
I have no issue with people having different opinions to my own – after all, our differences are what make for meaningful and engaging debate. This kind of dogpiling that is often directed at women, however, is abhorrent and should not be tolerated, especially from those who hide behind anonymous social media accounts. If you have something to say, at least have the courage to show your face.
But what saddens me is that there are probably swathes of young women, my age or younger, who are exceptionally talented writers that we will never be exposed to over fears of experiencing this unacceptable behaviour themselves.
Journalism is already seriously lacking female voices. We do not need to widen the gender gap any further because people are incapable of civil debate on the internet.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

13 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Finally, SNP bans WhatsApp from official mobiles in wake of deleted messages scandal

The use of WhatsApp on Scottish Government devices has been banned following the Covid inquiry deleted messages scandal. The SNP Government confirmed that a new policy which ensures mobile message apps like WhatsApp are removed from its phones, tablets and laptops came into effect yesterday (FRI). It applies to all government employees, including ministers, special advisers, civil servants and contractors. But concerns were raised that the move will not be enough to remove the 'secrecy and evasion' culture in the Scottish Government. During the UK Covid-19 inquiry, it was revealed that former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon 's messages from throughout the pandemic had been deleted, and that national clinical director Jason Leitch said in a private message that 'WhatsApp deletion is a pre-bed ritual'. It led to claims that claims that there was an 'industrial-scale' deletion policy at the Scottish Government in an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Announcing that the new policy restricting mobile messaging apps on Government devices yesterday, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said it was part of a 'commitment to openness and transparency'. Scottish Conservative MSP Craig Hoy said: 'This is as close as we'll get to an apology from the SNP for the shameful, industrial-scale deletion of Covid WhatsApp messages which was orchestrated by John Swinney and Nicola Sturgeon. 'This change in policy is all well and good but the horse has already bolted for bereaved families who were denied the answers they deserved over the decisions taken by SNP ministers during the pandemic. 'Secrecy and evasion are hardwired into this SNP government, so the Scottish people will not be duped into thinking one overdue concession marks a change in culture.' The new policy states that mobile messaging apps and non-corporate communication channels will not be permitted on government devices. A small number of business areas will be given a 'transition period' until the end of the year, including those responsible for responding to emergencies such as wildfires or for matters of safety and security. Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: 'None of this changes the fact that the Scottish Government deleted WhatsApp messages on a wholesale basis throughout the pandemic. 'In doing so, they denied the Covid bereaved a full understanding of the decisions that were made, undermining their search for justice and closure. 'The SNP will have to move mountains before people can be confident this deception won't happen again.' Ms Forbes said: 'We are setting out a clear approach to ending government use of mobile messaging apps, and this will support wider work to deliver on our commitment to openness and transparency. 'The use of mobile messaging apps increased during the pandemic as staff worked remotely in unprecedented and difficult circumstances. Having reflected on our working practices, we are now implementing changes to the use of such apps. 'This follows on from actions to implement other recommendations from Ms Martins' externally-led review including updating our hybrid working policy. 'I want to reassure the public that it is a priority of this government to maintain secure and searchable data, ensuring compliance with all records management rules. We will continue to act to ensure our data policies are robust, especially considering technological advances.'

The National

14 hours ago

• The National

Rowling and Ewing: Loud, proud, and missing the point

Today there are two tales of self-importance. JK Rowling, who came to fame and fortune as the author of derivative children's fiction, Billy Bunter on broomsticks, has in recent years set herself up as the arbiter of feminism, devoting herself to an all-consuming social media attack on trans people, cis gender women she suspects of being trans, and any woman who dares to espouse a form of feminism which is trans-inclusive. Thus it was that Rowling took to social media to attack The National as being "anti-woman". This newspaper is one of the very few publications which covers both sides in the heated and polarised debate about the trans issue, it has a female editor, a female assistant editor, has more female than male reporters, and has gender balance amongst its columnists and regular contributors. On International Women's Day last year, the entirety of The National, from the front page to the sports section, was written and produced by women. READ MORE: The abuse I've had just weeks into my journalism career is abhorrent No newspaper in Scotland comes close to The National in terms of female representation and in the breadth and depth of coverage of women's and LGBT issues. But because that means that The National gives space to opinions on the contentious trans issue which are at variance with those of JK Rowling, that makes The National "anti-woman" in her eyes. Trans exclusive feminists like Rowling lob accusations of misogyny about like the Israeli Government weaponizes accusations of antisemitism – as a tool to bully and silence those who dare to disagree with them. However, empirical evidence strongly suggests that they represent only a minority of women, and an even smaller minority of lesbians. (Image: LESLEY MARTIN)Despite her apparent belief to the contrary, JK Rowling does not get to be the sole judge of what constitutes valid feminism. There are very many women whose feminism has no problem with trans people. Indeed, most surveys find that a majority of lesbians, particularly younger lesbians, believe in a trans inclusive form of feminism and have no problem with admitting trans people into women's spaces. LGBT young people's charity Just Like Us commissioned a poll of 3,695 adults aged 18 to 25. The research found that young lesbians are the demographic most likely to agree that they are supportive or very supportive of trans people, rising to over 90% of respondents. These results were confirmed by a YouGov survey which found that cisgender lesbians and bisexual women in particular are likely to have positive feelings towards trans people, at 84%, including 66-68% who say they are 'very positive' towards trans people. YouGov says this finding mirrors national polling which shows that women are generally more likely to hold pro-trans views than men. But I suppose that JK Rowling would dismiss these lesbian feminists as being "anti-woman" too. We are now at the point in this so-called debate where anyone who doesn't express overt hostility to trans people is dismissed as a woman hating misogynist. READ MORE: 'Where's the dignity?': SNP minister hits out at Labour's 'damaging' welfare cuts Even Rowling's former friend and ally Stephen Fry has now spoken out against her, saying that she has become 'radicalised' and calling her views on trans people 'cruel' and 'mocking'. Rowling's gloating and knife twisting cigar selfie, published on social media when the UK Supreme Court ruled in favour of For Women Scotland, was a tipping point for many. Fry said he used to enjoy Rowling's company and admired her wit, but now feels her behaviour is no longer something he can excuse or overlook. He said: "She says things that are inflammatory, contemptuous, and mocking. It's a terribly distressing time for trans people, and her words only make it worse." Fergus Ewing stands as an independent Meanwhile, the intensely self-important right wing MSP Fergus Ewing has announced that he intends to stand as an independent in next year's Holyrood election. Ewing is one of those mediocre politicians who is permanently angry that the rest of the world does not accept his own estimation of his brilliance. READ MORE: SNP councillor succeeds in bid to force Labour action on Israeli arms sales Ewing owes his position to his family name and connections. Were it not for his belief in Scottish independence, he'd be perfectly happy in the Conservative party. His reactionary and right-wing views are deeply at variance with the mainstream SNP. Ewing has spoken out in favour of fracking. In 2015 the south Scotland SNP MSP, Joan McAlpine, complained to then-First Minister Nicola Sturgeon about Ewing's support for plans by the Duke of Buccleuch to mine coalbed methane at Canonbie in Dumfries and Galloway. (Image: PA)In 2018 he also tried to block Scottish Government moves to ban the pesticide Acetamiprid, which was categorised as a "Highly Hazardous Pesticide (HHP)" by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in 2015. The chemical is highly toxic to birds and earthworms and moderately toxic to most aquatic organisms with a high potential for bioaccumulation. It has been blamed for killing bees and butterflies. It is widely used by the forestry industry and in attempting to block moves to ban it, Ewing was again demonstrating that he puts the commercial interests of businesses ahead of all other considerations. Ewing has served as an SNP MSP for the Inverness and Nairn constituency since 1999 and is seeking re-election for the seventh time. This time, he runs as an independent after he became estranged from the SNP when he refused to accept the very mild slap on the wrist punishment of suspension from the SNP group in Holyrood for a week, which he received for the political cardinal sin of voting against now-former Green minister Lorna Slater in a no-confidence motion in 2023. All that Ewing is likely to achieve is to split the pro-independence vote in the constituency and allow an anti-independence candidate to take the seat. But Fergus will always have his self-righteousness to comfort him. In an interview with the BBC today, Ewing said that politicians should start acting like grownups. Quite, Fergus. How about you going first?

Telegraph

15 hours ago

• Telegraph

How JK Rowling became a lightning rod for attacks by pro-trans activists

These are dark times in the wizarding world. Stephen Fry, who narrated all seven of JK Rowling's Harry Potter audio books, has become the latest celebrity to lambast the author for her views on trans issues. Fry told the Show People podcast that Rowling 'has been radicalised by terfs' (a slur meaning 'transgender-exclusionary radical feminists') and described his former friend and colleague as a 'lost cause'. But Fry's censure won't deter the author. Rowling has spent the past five years fending off increasingly vitriolic attacks and even death threats as she became the chief spokesperson for women's rights – and the biggest lightning rod for attacks by pro-trans activists. It was in 2019 that Rowling began sharing her views publicly, initially by supporting other campaigners. In December of that year, she robustly defended Maya Forstater, a researcher locked in an employment discrimination battle for expressing gender-critical opinions. Rowling posted on Twitter: 'Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who'll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill'. Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who'll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) December 19, 2019 Rowling progressed to leading the charge in 2020. In June, she posted a scathing tweet in response to an article about 'people who menstruate'. Rowling commented: 'I'm sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?' It prompted an online backlash in which her critics called her transphobic – an allegation she denied. 'People who menstruate.' I'm sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud? Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020 Still, it wasn't entirely clear what was motivating her involvement until she published a lengthy and thoughtful essay on her website that same month. Rowling wrote that her interest in this subject actually went back two years: she had been closely following the debate, and reading books and articles by trans people, gender specialists, psychologists, doctors and more. Rowling explained that she also had a very personal interest. She revealed that she was a domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor, and that was part of her concern around the erosion of protected single-sex spaces. Rowling's remarkable candour is part of what makes her such an effective advocate, says her friend, fellow campaigner and Telegraph columnist Suzanne Moore. The pair first got in touch in 2020 – also an eventful year for Moore, who left The Guardian after 338 of its employees wrote a critical open letter in response to Moore's column about women's rights. Moore says of Rowling: 'Her experience of domestic violence, and her understanding of what it is to be poor, to be a single parent, to not to have access to services, that is a crucial aspect. Although she's incredibly rich and famous, a part of Jo will always be worrying about how to pay the next bill or afford childcare. That means she understands the vulnerability of others. I think people relate to that – it's a very human thing.' Rowling's emotional response is balanced, says Moore, by her conviction about the core issues, including 'that women and girls matter, and that children should not be medicalised. She sees this as one of the biggest medical scandals of the past decade.' Mandy Rhodes, editor of Holyrood magazine and a long-time campaigner for women's rights in Scotland, admits she was initially sceptical about Rowling's involvement. 'I did have that moment of thinking 'Oh, it's someone very famous jumping on the bandwagon'. But within days I understood how committed she was.' Crucially, argues Moore, Rowling 'didn't come into this for her own ego'. Nor was it a fashionable position to take; quite the opposite. 'She could have just sat back and enjoyed her massive success,' says Moore. 'She chose to take a stand. You see all these men like Stephen Fry or Boy George coming at her and they end up looking absolutely stupid. She's what everybody fears: a woman who doesn't give a f---. She doesn't need to be liked – she's already loved. She's a rock star.' Rhodes explains: 'Many of us who put our heads above the parapet were then in the position of trying to save our jobs or keep our sanity because of the criticism being levelled at us. Jo was in a more powerful position and she used it. That really elevated everything.' In 2022, Rowling took action by funding a women-only support centre, Beira's Place in Edinburgh, for victims of sexual violence. 'There was no such single-sex service before,' she said in an interview. 'I know that was well worth doing because of the number of women who are coming through our doors.' Over three years she has donated £1 million to fund running costs, including a staff of nine counselling support workers who have provided more than 6,000 hours of support to 700 women and girls.' Moore visited the centre with Rowling and was struck by how 'Jo sat back and listened to the experienced staff explaining why this was important. That said a lot to me.' Rowling has also regularly challenged controversial legislation in Scotland. In 2022 she condemned a bill that would make it easier for trans people to legally change gender, and in 2024 she criticised a new hate crime act by posting her views on X and challenging Scottish police to arrest her. 'As a writer, she passionately believes in free speech,' says Moore. 'That's something that her critics don't necessarily understand about the arguments she's making.' That same year, Rowling leapt to the defence of resigning Labour MP Rosie Duffield, who had previously been criticised by Keir Starmer for saying that only women have a cervix. The author wrote on X that Duffield 'was one of the few female Labour politicians with the guts to stand up for vulnerable women and girls.' Rosie Duffield was one of the few female Labour politicians with the guts to stand up for vulnerable women and girls, while self-satisfied numbskulls like you fought to give away their rights and spaces. TL;DR Keep her name out of your mouth. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) September 28, 2024 Rowling has also weighed in on women's sport. In 2024 she posted a photograph of Olympic Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, saying that it showed a man 'enjoying the distress of a woman he's just punched in the head'. Rosie Duffield was one of the few female Labour politicians with the guts to stand up for vulnerable women and girls, while self-satisfied numbskulls like you fought to give away their rights and spaces. TL;DR Keep her name out of your mouth. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) September 28, 2024 Moore says that while many women share such concerns, voicing them puts you in a very lonely position. Even Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson, who owe their fame to Rowling's Harry Potter movie franchise, have publicly disagreed with her on trans issues, as has Fantastic Beasts star Eddie Redmayne. 'People are hurling abuse at you constantly,' adds Moore. 'This issue came to a head during lockdown, when you felt really isolated. Jo is absolutely the person you want beside you in the trenches: her personal courage, her cleverness and her funniness keep you going.' They were both highly amused, says Moore, when a lunch that Rowling organised for campaigners (including Forstater, Prof Kathleen Stock and Julie Bindel) at the River Café in west London in April 2022 became the focus of rabid attention. 'Women have pasta and wine and suddenly it's a national news story! Actually what she's done is bring people together from across the political spectrum and foster real camaraderie.' Rhodes was delighted to meet Rowling at the Edinburgh launch, in 2024, for the book of essays The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht (Rowling contributed a piece). 'At first I didn't recognise her – she hadn't made an effort to stand out,' says Rhodes. 'I tapped her on the shoulder and said, 'Hi, I'm Mandy', and she immediately said, 'It's so amazing to meet you', and was actually quite deferential to me, which was very kind. I don't think you can exaggerate how horrible and painful it felt being in Scotland at the forefront of all this. It meant a lot to all of us that she was there.' It also helps to have a globally best-selling author articulating your message. Reflecting on Rowling's 2020 personal essay, Rhodes says: 'What she wrote was so simple, so easily understood, it cut through all the nonsense.' Moore thinks that the relentless criticism does sometimes get to Rowling, 'but she jokes to us about it and she stays amazingly calm online. There's all sorts of stuff she could say to someone like Stephen and she doesn't. It's a relief seeing 'there's a woman who cannot be put in her place'. She's inspirational. I'm confident we can keep fighting back, as long as we have people like Jo fighting with us.'