How should Mass. lawmakers spend the money from the state's millionaires tax? We asked around.
Write to us at
. To subscribe,
.
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
Call it the $1.3 billion question: How should Massachusetts spend the extra money that its so-called millionaires tax raised?
First, some background. In 2022, Massachusetts voters approved a 4 percent surtax on annual income over $1 million. The constitutional amendment that created it requires that the money go to transportation and education initiatives. Last fiscal year alone, the tax raised more than $2.4 billion, or about $1.3 billion beyond what officials budgeted. This year, revenue has again
The amendment left the Legislature with a lot of leeway to decide which initiatives to fund, and lawmakers have been
Advertisement
This week, lawmakers
Advertisement
More for the T
The Legislature's compromise proposal would give $535 million to the MBTA. But some argue that the T, which has languished with insufficient funding and a backlog of repair work for decades, could use more.
Amy Sutherland, a Charlestown resident and Starting Point reader, framed it this way: 'Making the T work at a 21st century level would solve traffic, economic, social, and climate problems in Boston and the surrounding metro area,' she wrote in an email. Jonathan Cohn of Progressive Mass, a liberal advocacy group, suggests using some millionaires tax revenue to expand efforts to make MBTA buses and trains free to ride.
Other transportation needs
The MBTA isn't the only transit service in the state that could use money. There are also
Another possibility, Wilson said, could be to expand so-called
Advertisement
The federal funding gap
But paying for transportation needs alone would leave little for other challenges — including ones that didn't exist when voters first approved the millionaires tax, like the Trump administration's efforts to cut federal funding to states. The administration has moved to
'Resources should be allocated to protect the schools impacted by these attacks,' Dominic Copeland and Davian Pagan of the Massachusetts Communities Action Network, a faith-based organizing collective, wrote. Jessica Tang leads the state branch of the American Teachers Association, which supported passage of the amendment. Tang said that $690 million — about half the Legislature's compromise proposal — could support low-income students and students with disabilities, as well as cover the Medicaid reimbursements that schools use to provide speech therapy, nursing, and more.
The administration is also pushing legislation in Congress that would cut federal student aid, which helps low-income
What's next?
There's no shortage of ideas about what to do with the money, but the debate over the millionaires tax may be unfolding on borrowed time.
Some business leaders remain staunchly opposed, arguing that the tax is a drag on the economy and will cause wealthier residents to leave the state. Research groups that support the tax recently reported that
Advertisement
Even if it stays in effect, it's unclear how much the tax will raise in the future. The surtax is tied to inflation, which means its income threshold has risen. In effect, the millionaires tax may
Still, any repeal effort would likely take years. And for now, the tax continues to bear fruit, raising more than state officials expected. Wilson, of Transportation for Massachusetts, sees a long list of possibilities. 'There are a lot of needs across the state,' he wrote.
🧩
9 Across:
83°
POINTS OF INTEREST
A black bear chewed on a garbage container in Wolcott, Conn., back in 2006.
Steven Valenti/Associated Press
Boston and New England
What do we do now?
The Karen Read retrial may be over, Beth Teitell writes, but
Filthy animals:
Rats in Boston are spreading leptospirosis,
Struggle to survive:
Amid tough tariffs and harsh immigration policies,
Connecticut bears:
Encounters with humans are happening so frequently that some lawmakers want to start a bear-hunting season. (
Vermont visitors:
Tourism businesses in the north are feeling the impact of Trump's rhetoric against Canada as Quebecers start to boycott US travel. (
Trump administration
Iran options:
President Trump's announcement that he could take up to two weeks to decide whether to attack Iran not only buys him time, it also gives him several new military and covert options. (
The Tok isn't really Tiking:
Trump delayed the ban on TikTok by another 90 days. The new deadline for a sale is Sept. 17. (
Silent treatment:
Trump honored Juneteenth in each of his first four years as president. But yesterday, he said nothing about the holiday. Instead, he complained on Truth Social that there are 'too many non-working holidays in America.' (
The Nation and the World
Israel and Iran:
The countries
Social Security rush:
Worsening finances and claims of fraud are prompting nervous recipients to take their retirement payments earlier than planned.
Adding insult to injury:
NFL widows who struggled to care for ex-players who had the devastating degenerative brain disease CTE say a new study is insulting and dismissive of their experience. (
Rout:
The Indiana Pacers rolled to an easy Game 6 victory over the Oklahoma City Thunder in the NBA Finals, forcing a Game 7 Sunday night. (
VIEWPOINTS
The Globe's Opinion pages featured two different takes on Israel's war with Iran.
Matthew Levitt,
director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, made the case that
Ankit Panda,
the Stanton senior fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and
Nicole Grajewski,
a fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, warned that the US
Meanwhile, the Globe's editorial board weighed in on the
Karen Read verdict,
Advertisement
BESIDE THE POINT
By Teresa Hanafin
💘
Blind date:
He's a data analyst whose family immigrated; she's a teacher who used to work in immigration law.
📖
Contradictions:
Jen Hamilton, a nurse with 4.2 million followers on TikTok, picked up her Bible a couple of weeks ago and
🦁
The next 'White Lotus':
Travel writer Christopher Muther tried to have a non-working vacation. But when he entered the Mahali Mzuri
📺
Top TV picks:
From 'The Better Sister' to 'Forever,' here are Chris Vognar's
💦
A watery escape:
Of the Charles River's 80-mile journey from Hopkinton to Boston Harbor, the last 6 miles are a pure delight. Here are
🧒
Keeping kids busy:
Here's a sample of
🌮
Keeping kids fed:
And after all that excitement, Kara Baskin suggests some stress-free and delicious
Advertisement
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
This newsletter was edited by
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Vermont lawmaker resigns to move to Canada, citing financial insecurity and political fears
'It's heartbreaking,' she said in an interview Thursday in a break room at the University of Vermont Medical Center, where she currently works, tears filling her eyes. 'I'm relieved, too.' Cordes' reasons for leaving are complicated — and speak to the disparate challenges of living in Vermont and serving in government as an outspoken, progressive, LGBTQ+ woman in the era of Donald Trump. Well before the assassination of a Minnesota lawmaker last weekend during a shooting spree that killed or injured three others, Cordes had twice faced death threats related to her public service. She had taken to carrying a 9mm handgun, searching her apartment when she came home and scanning crowds in public places. Advertisement 'I do feel unsafe,' she said. 'I don't feel comfortable freely being myself … The tenor of tolerance in our culture now is so bad.' If politics contributed to her decision to move, financial considerations drove it. Rank-and-file legislators in the 150-member Vermont House make around $15,000, plus food and lodging stipends, for approximately four months of service each year. Lawmakers have complained for years that, to afford to serve, one has to be independently wealthy or retired. Advertisement Cordes, 66, is neither. As a per-diem nurse at UVM Medical Center, she has taken whatever shifts she can — and has even worked as a traveling nurse at a hospital in Maine. With Vermont's health care system in crisis, Cordes said, her employer has cut back nursing shifts, making it harder for her to make a living. As a member of the House Committee on Health Care, Cordes thinks she has a pretty good idea of what's coming down the line. She fears Trump's proposed cuts to Medicaid will further imperil hospitals like her own. 'Things are not going to get better — in our health care system or any other part of our culture, any part of our governance,' she said. Since leaving her marriage a few years ago, Cordes has struggled to find affordable housing in the rural Addison County district she represents in the House. She has crashed with one of her two adult daughters, stayed in dorm rooms in Montpelier and, for a few weeks last summer, lived in a tent at a state park. What does it say that a highly trained nurse and well-known public servant can't afford a roof over her head? 'I think our society is in entropic freefall and I don't know where the bottom is,' she said. 'I do have hope that it will turn around, but I believe it will get much worse before that happens.' Rep. Alyssa Black, a fellow Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Health Care, called Cordes' departure 'bittersweet.' She said she wants to be happy for her friend and colleague, but will miss her. Advertisement 'She's a legislator with a lot of courage, and we will feel her absence. Vermont will feel her absence,' Black said. 'I don't know who's going to fill her shoes.' A former president of the state's nursing union, Cordes has been a vocal supporter of legislation supporting workers' rights and reforming the health care system. She's sought to regulate pharmacy benefit management companies and protect health care providers who work in gender-affirming and reproductive care. 'I think it's her empathy that drives her,' Black said. 'She takes on the struggles and pain of others and wants to do something about it.' Like some others of her political persuasion, Cordes joked last year that, if Trump won a second term, she'd move to Canada. But she didn't really mean it at the time, she says. She always assumed she'd stick around and push back against the president's policies. 'I think sometimes that I shouldn't be leaving now — that I should stay and fight,' she said. 'And then I also know that I have been fighting my whole life. I'm exhausted. And I just want to give myself some grace.'
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: This reader felt the call to speak out against the ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
To the editor: When I retired from my teaching career, I decided that I was going to get more actively involved in trying to make a difference through communication in written form. I had already educated students in history for 16 years and now I wanted to reach a bigger audience. Although writing was rewarding, I felt that I still needed to continue to communicate verbally to try to make a difference. To that effect, I have, on three occasions, made calls to lawmakers to express my opinion about legislation. I called countless federal legislators during President Trump's first term to try to keep the Affordable Care Act from being repealed. I still remember my joy in watching Sen. John McCain cast the deciding vote. Twice now in the last two months, I have called every senator over two bills, the first being the SAVE Act. Yesterday, I completed 100 calls to try to convince the senators that parts of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' are devastating ('Senate Republicans seek tougher Medicaid cuts and lower SALT deduction in Trump's big bill,' June 17). The huge cuts to social programs like Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act are overwhelming and the amounts seem to change daily. My biggest fear is the provision on Page 562 that few know about and mention (including your article). Although the details are confusing, the effects are clear: The power of the courts, which so far have been the people's only recourse, will essentially be weakened and the results could lead to full dictatorship. Lynn Lorenz, Newport Beach .. To the editor: The simple answer to avoiding the cruel and unnecessary cuts to programs and services funded by the federal government is to let the Trump tax cuts expire ('Republican fractures multiply over Trump's megabill,' June 19). Our priorities should be the poor, those in danger of losing healthcare, school lunch programs, national parks and climate change, not continuing tax breaks for the wealthy. Patricia Koch, Long Beach
Indianapolis Star
3 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Hoosiers could be kicked off Medicaid under Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' What to know
Some Hoosiers could be kicked off Medicaid if President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passes in its current form, as the state grapples with the revenue cuts that would come with it. Language added to the federal legislation on June 16 caps the Medicaid provider tax — which is used to cover 90% of the state's portion of the costs for the Healthy Indiana Plan — at 3.5%. Indiana utilizes a 6% provider tax, meaning the change would decrease funding from the fee by nearly half. Opponents of the provider tax view it as a loophole used by states to qualify for matching dollars from the federal government, which pays for 90% of the costs of the program, without having to dedicate much of their own funds. If passed as is, Indiana would not be able to afford the current costs of the Healthy Indiana Plan, the state's insurance program for low-income people, Indiana Family and Social Services Administration Secretary Mitch Roob said at a state budget committee meeting June 18. But neither Roob nor Gov. Mike Braun are asking Congress to keep the full 6%. Instead, Roob said at the meeting that he wants Congress to add language that would give states the flexibility to adapt. Those changes would allow the state to enroll fewer Hoosiers in HIP, according to Roob. 'Please give us the needed flexibility to roll back our eligibility if they change the fuel mix for our program,' he said at the meeting. Even without the added impact of the federal legislation, the state is making it more challenging to qualify for Medicaid. The latest version of HIP already includes more restrictions, such as work requirements for able-bodied recipients that passed the legislature this year. The new law includes a list of exceptions, though not all would be covered under the work requirement language proposed in the federal bill. In a statement June 18, Braun said the efforts to reduce federal spending were overdue. "However, flexibility in managing Indiana's HIP program will be essential for the state moving forward, especially if we are required to take on more of the financial obligation,' he said in the statement. 'This will require a hands-on approach to updating and maintaining Indiana's Medicaid system that only Hoosiers can provide.' Braun said he would work to 'stretch the dollar' for people with chronic diseases and those who 'really can't afford health care' when speaking to reporters at the Indiana Statehouse on June 19. 'That's what I'd like to have it there for, not what it's expanded into with very lax supervision, pushed by the feds and now with a bunch of begrudging state partners because it's been busting the budget,' he said. The provision has already faced some GOP opposition in the U.S. House of Representatives, which must approve this version of the bill before it can move on. With a slim Republican majority, it's possible the part of the bill that imposes the 3.5% tax cap could be removed. The version that already passed the House only capped future increases in provider fees.
