Within 5 years, '70% of skills used in most jobs will change,' LinkedIn report says—how you can keep up

AI will upend much of how we function in the workplace — at least according to new LinkedIn data.
"By 2030, 70% of skills used in most jobs will change," says Andrew Seaman, LinkedIn news editor at large for jobs and career development. LinkedIn determined which skills are used in most jobs by combining the skills companies are currently listing in job descriptions and skills individuals are listing in their profiles. They then made their calculations considering historical shifts in skills and projections around AI-replicable skills.
Seaman doesn't think these skills will be replaced altogether. Instead, they'll evolve. And other experts agree. "As technology continues to change the way we work, everyone must be aware as to what is evolving to keep their skills relevant and marketable," says Stacie Haller, chief career advisor at Resume Builder.
Here's what jobseekers should keep in mind.
In the near future, employers will use AI "to enhance" their workers' abilities, says Seaman.
"You may not need to do data entry anymore," says Seaman as an example. "But you may need to do data management." Similarly, prompt engineering might not be necessary down the line. "It might be management of AI prompts and [large language models]" instead, he says. The menial tasks could be done by AI and the oversight and organization of those tasks could be taken on by people.
Not all jobs will be similarly affected. Manual labor or live performance, for example, likely won't be impacted as heavily. But in jobs like software engineer, web designer and casher, AI will take the tasks people have been doing and make people more productive by enabling them to complete more tasks throughout the workday.
Down the line, "maybe one person can do the job of several," says Seaman.
As tasks evolve with tech, there are several things you can do to make sure you're keeping up.
Read skills in demand lists on sites like LinkedIn, Upwork and Indeed to see what employers are looking for. If there are skills that seem relevant or interesting, "start adding them to your routine of learning" by taking different tutorials or even a class, says Seaman. If there's someone in your life who has that skill, you can also see if they're willing to teach you.
The bottom line is "people need to get used to change at this point," he says. "That's how they can stay competitive in the workforce going forward."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hamilton Spectator

14 minutes ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Pope Leo XIV flags AI impact on kids' intellectual and spiritual development

ROME (AP) — Pope Leo XIV warned Friday that artificial intelligence could negatively impact the intellectual, neurological and spiritual development of young people as he pressed one of the priorities of his young pontificate. History's first American pope sent a message to a conference of AI and ethics, part of which was taking place in the Vatican in a sign of the Holy See's concern for the new technologies and what they mean for humanity. In the message, Leo said any further development of AI must be evaluated according to the 'superior ethical criterion' of the need to safeguard the dignity of each human being while respecting the diversity of the world's population. He warned specifically that new generations are most at risk given they have never had such quick access to information. 'All of us, I am sure, are concerned for children and young people, and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development,' he said in the message. 'Society's well-being depends upon their being given the ability to develop their God-given gifts and capabilities,' and not allow them to confuse mere access to data with intelligence. 'In the end, authentic wisdom has more to do with recognizing the true meaning of life, than with the availability of data,' he said. Leo, who was elected in May after the death of Pope Francis, has identified AI as one of the most critical matters facing humanity, saying it poses challenges to defending human dignity, justice and labor. He has explained his concern for AI by invoking his namesake, Pope Leo XIII . That Leo was pope during the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and made the plight of workers, and the need to guarantee their rights and dignity, a key priority. Toward the end of his pontificate, Francis became increasingly vocal about the threats to humanity posed by AI and called for an international treaty to regulate it. Francis said politicians must take the lead in making sure AI remains human-centric, so that decisions about when to use weapons or even less-lethal tools always remain made by humans and not machines. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Yahoo

23 minutes ago

• Yahoo

With 59% institutional ownership, eHealth, Inc. (NASDAQ:EHTH) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Institutions' substantial holdings in eHealth implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 17 shareholders own 51% of the company Insiders have been buying lately AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in eHealth, Inc. (NASDAQ:EHTH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of eHealth. Check out our latest analysis for eHealth Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that eHealth does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of eHealth, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 14% of eHealth shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that 8 Knots Management, LLC is the largest shareholder with 8.1% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.4% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Francis Soistman, the CEO has 2.3% of the shares allocated to their name. After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can report that insiders do own shares in eHealth, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$7.4m worth of the US$123m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over eHealth. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand eHealth better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - eHealth has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo

26 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Nvidia (NVDA) Rises After Cathie Wood Rebuilds $18.5M Stake Near All-Time High

Cathie Wood's Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK, Financials) resumed its position in Nvidia (NVDA, Financials), purchasing 128,163 shares valued at approximately $18.5 million on June 16, as the stock trades just 2.7% below its all-time high of $149.41. The move marks a reversal from 2022, when Wood exited her Nvidia position amid tightening U.S. export controls and macroeconomic concerns. She began rebuilding the stake in April following eased trade tensions and the Trump administration's decision to roll back AI-related export restrictions. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. The buy came shortly after Nvidia reported fiscal first-quarter results on May 28, with adjusted earnings of 96 cents per share on $44.06 billion in revenue, beating expectations of 93 cents and $43.31 billion, respectively. For the July quarter, the company forecast $45 billion in revenue, nearly $1 billion below consensus estimates, citing the impact of chip restrictions to China. Nvidia said revenue would have been about $8 billion higher without those curbs. China accounted for 13% of the company's revenue in the past fiscal year. Despite geopolitical risks, Nvidia stock is up 8.3% year to date. Wood's purchase comes as Ark Innovation ETF gains momentum, rising 15.9% in 2025 through June 18, outpacing the S&P 500's 1.9% increase. Wood's strategy remains focused on innovation platforms such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and blockchain, with Nvidia seen as a core holding aligned with those themes. Her flagship fund, however, has faced volatility, including a 60% decline in 2022 and a five-year annualized return of negative 0.3%, compared with the S&P 500's 15.7%. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data