Parliamentary panel to recommend fresh set of changes to insolvency code

New Delhi: India's insolvency regime is set for further reform as the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance will likely recommend a set of measures aimed at speeding up decisions and boosting creditor recoveries under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), two people familiar with the matter said. The suggestions will follow the committee's ongoing review of the Code.
The review comes amid growing demands for speeding up debt resolution and improving recovery rates, and legal complexities exposed by the recent Supreme Court ruling in the Bhushan Power & Steel resolution case.
Read this | House panel to scan IBC functioning after SC's Bhushan order
The House panel, led by lawmaker Bhartruhari Mahtab, met last week with officials from the ministry of corporate affairs and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), along with executives of three state-run banks, to assess the performance of the Code since its rollout in 2016.
In the meeting, officials told the panel that the IBC has become the principal recovery mechanism for banks and financial institutions, accounting for nearly half of all debt recoveries, and has also helped reduce borrowing costs for distressed companies, one of the persons quoted above said. However, the process continues to suffer from persistent delays and subpar recovery rates in many cases, often due to protracted litigation among stakeholders.
So far, creditors have realised ₹3.89 trillion from approved debt resolution plans and ₹9,330 crore from liquidated companies, according to data from the IBBI. Another ₹1 trillion was realised from cases settled directly between creditors and companies.
The committee is expected to meet more stakeholders, including insolvency professionals and industry representatives, before finalising its report, one of the people cited above said. Among the concerns raised in last week's meetings were the challenges faced by homebuyers in ongoing insolvency cases, the person added.
Queries emailed on Monday to the ministry, the Parliamentary committee and IBBI seeking comments for the story remained unanswered at the time of publication.
Experts say that resolving these bottlenecks will require strengthening the judicial infrastructure supporting IBC.
'To improve the IBC process, we need faster court decisions. This can be done by increasing the number of judges, reducing adjournments, and using better technology for case tracking. The process should stick to strict timelines to avoid long delays that reduce the value of assets," said Ritesh Kumar Adatiya, director, NPV Insolvency Professionals Pvt. Ltd.
Court ruling questions IBC operations
The Supreme Court last month rejected the five-year-old resolution plan for Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL), citing jurisdictional issues and violations of IBC provisions. The ₹19,700 crore successful bid by JSW Steel Ltd was overturned, and the court ordered the liquidation of the company. It later granted JSW time to file a review petition.
In a landmark ruling, the apex court held that bankruptcy tribunals do not have powers of judicial review over statutory authorities such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED). It also struck down an earlier National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order that had insulated BPSL's assets from ED attachment, saying the tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction.
Read this | Mint Explainer: The Supreme Court's Bhushan Power ruling that has stunned India's insolvency ecosystem
That decision, along with other recent Supreme Court rulings on the priority of statutory dues and the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) clearance requirements for certain resolution plans, has introduced new legal complexities not originally anticipated in the Code.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs is now working on a draft amendment bill to clarify some of these ambiguities and streamline the process. The bill is expected to be tabled in Parliament later this year.
Despite the recent judicial setbacks, the Code has a strong foundation and remains robust in ensuring debt resolution, though some glitches persist in areas where the law remains unclear, said the second person cited earlier.
NPV Insolvency Professionals' Adatiya added that outcomes under IBC can improve significantly if resolution plans are filed earlier and by credible applicants. 'Proper background checks, faster approvals, and fewer legal hurdles after plans are approved can go a long way in protecting lenders' interests," he said.
Also read | A series of court orders changed bankruptcy rules. Now, the govt is amending the law
'IBC has helped change the credit culture in India," he added. 'But to improve outcomes, we need quicker resolution, stronger checks on resolution applicants, and better coordination between regulators, courts, and professionals. This will boost confidence and improve returns for creditors."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

26 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Sharing video of polling station violation of voter privacy: EC officials

Amid demands to make public webcasting footage of polling stations, Election Commission officials on Saturday said such a move is violative of privacy and security concerns of voters. They said while such demand suits their narrative in making it sound quite genuine and in the interest of voters and safeguarding the democratic process, it is, in fact, aimed at achieving exactly the "opposite objective". Officials claimed that what is veiled as a very logical demand is actually "entirely contrary" to the privacy and security concerns of voters, the legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and 1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court. Sharing the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both the elector who has voted as well the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements, they asserted. Creating an instance, they said if a particular political party gets the lesser number of votes in a particular booth, it would easily be able to identify, through the CCTV footage, which elector has voted and which elector has not, and, thereafter, may harass or intimidate them. To be sure, the Election Commission retains the CCTV footage, which is purely an internal management tool and not a mandatory requirement, for a period of 45 days which aligns with the period laid down for filing an election petition. Since no election can be challenged beyond 45 days of the declaration of the result, retaining the footage beyond this period makes it susceptible to misuse of the content by non-contestants for spreading misinformation and malicious narratives, the officials underlined. They noted that in case an election petition is filed within 45 days, the CCTV footage is not destroyed and also made available to the competent court when asked for. Maintaining privacy and secrecy of the elector is non-negotiable for the EC and it has never compromised on this essential tenet laid down in the law as well upheld by the Supreme Court, the functionaries said. Fearing the use of its electronic data to create "malicious narratives", the Election Commission has instructed its state poll officers to destroy CCTV cameras, webcasting and video footage of the election process after 45 days, if the verdict is not challenged in courts within that period. The remarks come in the backdrop of a demand by the Congress and other opposition parties to release post-5 pm CCTV footage from polling booths in the 2024 Maharashtra assembly elections. In December last year, the government tweaked an election rule to prevent public inspection of certain electronic documents such as CCTV cameras and webcasting footage as well as video recordings of candidates to prevent their misuse. Based on the recommendation of the EC, the Union law ministry amended Rule 93 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to restrict the type of papers or documents open to public inspection. In a letter to state chief electoral officers on May 30, the EC said it has issued instructions for recording various stages of the election process through multiple recording devices -- photography, videography, CCTV and webcasting during the election process. While electoral laws do not mandate such recordings, the Commission uses them as an internal management tool during various stages of the electoral process. "However, the recent misuse of this content by non-contestants for spreading misinformation and malicious narratives on social media by selective and out-of-context use of such content, which will not lead to any legal outcome, has prompted a review," it said.

Business Standard

26 minutes ago

• Business Standard

HCs not custodian of revenue department, says SC; stays Bombay HC order

High courts are not the "custodian" of the revenue department, the Supreme Court has said while dealing with a petition challenging a Bombay High Court order that stayed a tribunal's direction for a refund of Rs 256.45 crore to a firm. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan observed that prima facie, the high court could not have stayed the order after holding that the appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate, was not maintainable. "A high court is not the custodian of the revenue," the apex court, which stayed the high court's June 12 order, observed. "Prima facie, the high court could not have passed the order of stay after holding the appeal to be not maintainable and after recording that the writ petition and the appeal are disposed of as not pressed," the bench said in its order passed on June 20. The top court passed the order while hearing a plea filed by the firm, challenging the high court order. The bench noted that the high court had disposed of a writ petition as well as an appeal filed by the revenue department. It also noted that the appeal was filed under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against a January 2025 order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Mumbai that allowed the Service-Tax appeal of the firm. The apex court said subsequently, the company filed an application for the release of the amount, which was allowed in May. It noted that the high court had recorded in its June 12 order that both the petition and the appeal were "disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the respondent to prefer appeal before the Supreme Court, the high court has stayed the direction of CESTAT for refund for a period of eight weeks". The bench issued a notice to the revenue department, seeking its response within six weeks on the firm's plea challenging the high court order. "In the meanwhile, impugned order of the high court dated June 12, 2025 shall remain stayed," the bench said. "This order shall, however, not preclude the respondent from filing appeal before this court under section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, if not already filed, which shall be decided on its own merits and/or limitation," the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on July 2.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

‘High Courts not custodian of revenue': SC stays Bombay HC order blocking Rs 256 crore refund to firm

High courts are not the "custodian" of the revenue department , the Supreme Court has said while dealing with a petition challenging a Bombay High Court order that stayed a tribunal's direction for a refund of Rs 256.45 crore to a firm. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan observed that prima facie, the high court could not have stayed the order after holding that the appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate, was not maintainable. "A high court is not the custodian of the revenue," the apex court, which stayed the high court's June 12 order, observed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo "Prima facie, the high court could not have passed the order of stay after holding the appeal to be not maintainable and after recording that the writ petition and the appeal are disposed of as not pressed," the bench said in its order passed on June 20. The top court passed the order while hearing a plea filed by the firm, challenging the high court order. Live Events The bench noted that the high court had disposed of a writ petition as well as an appeal filed by the revenue department. It also noted that the appeal was filed under section 35G of the Central Excise Act , 1944 against a January 2025 order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) in Mumbai that allowed the Service-Tax appeal of the firm. The apex court said subsequently, the company filed an application for the release of the amount, which was allowed in May. It noted that the high court had recorded in its June 12 order that both the petition and the appeal were "disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the respondent to prefer appeal before the Supreme Court, the high court has stayed the direction of CESTAT for refund for a period of eight weeks". The bench issued a notice to the revenue department, seeking its response within six weeks on the firm's plea challenging the high court order. "In the meanwhile, impugned order of the high court dated June 12, 2025 shall remain stayed," the bench said. "This order shall, however, not preclude the respondent from filing appeal before this court under section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, if not already filed, which shall be decided on its own merits and/or limitation," the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on July 2.