Dan Etete: Architect of Nigeria's oil sovereignty
BY the twilight of 2024, Nigeria's local content participation in oil and gas had risen to an unprecedented 56 percent, as reported by the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB). This remarkable milestone reflects a strategic shift in Nigeria's resource governance—an ongoing revolution in which Nigerian companies, workers, and communities increasingly occupy center stage in the oil and gas value chain. But long before such progress became measurable or fashionable, it was visionaries like Chief Dan Etete, Nigeria's Minister of Petroleum Resources from 1995 to 1998, who laid the philosophical, political, and structural foundation for this transformation. Etete's time in office coincided with a turbulent yet defining period in Nigeria's history. Serving under the late General Sani Abacha, he operated in a milieu of intense international scrutiny, geopolitical tension, and entrenched foreign dominance over Nigeria's energy resources. For decades, multinational oil corporations such as Shell, Chevron, and Mobil had maintained monopolistic control over oil exploration and production in Nigeria. Local content was virtually non-existent, and the concept of indigenous ownership of oil blocks was treated as radical, even dangerous. Etete challenged this orthodoxy with courage and clarity. He recognised that economic sovereignty was inseparable from resource control, and he pursued bold reforms to break the stranglehold of foreign multinationals over Nigeria's oil wealth. It is instructive to note that the foresight of Etete in pioneering local content laid the foundation for the recent dynamic Nigeria First Policy by President Bola Tinubu that places emphasis on made in Nigeria goods.
For the record, Etete was the one that set up Marginal Field Decree of 1998 for the benefit of all Nigerians to be included in the oil and gas industry. His tenure heralded a new era of indigenous participation and empowerment, even as it attracted controversy from entrenched interests both within and outside Nigeria.
Pioneering the local content revolution
Etete's boldest policy decision was the allocation of Oil Prospecting Licences (OPLs) to Nigerian-owned companies. On April 29, 1998, he signed off on the award of critical oil blocks—including OPL 245 (Malabu Oil and Gas), OPL 246 (South Atlantic Petroleum), OPL 247 (Heritage Oil), and OPL 248 (Zebra Energy)—to Nigerian firms. Far from being arbitrary handouts, these allocations were grounded in a nationalistic philosophy: to redistribute wealth, transfer technology, build local capacity, and give Nigerian entrepreneurs a stake in the oil economy. It is crucial to understand the status quo Etete was up against. According to the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), over 80% of Nigeria's oil wealth historically accrued to foreign firms, with only $5 out of every $100 remaining in the country. The rest was exported as capital flight, enriching foreign shareholders while Nigerian communities, particularly in the Niger Delta, endured pollution, poverty, and violence. Etete was the first senior public official to confront this injustice—not through rhetoric, but through policy.
He expanded the Indigenous Concession Programme (ICP), which had been initiated in the early 1990s but lacked political will and institutional support. Under Etete, the ICP gained teeth. Notably, he facilitated the transfer of OPL 216 from BP-Statoil to Famfa Oil, co-founded by Mrs. Folorunsho Alakija. Today, Famfa Oil is among Nigeria's most successful indigenous oil companies, producing in partnership with Chevron.
The saga of OPL 245: A symbol of resource nationalism
Perhaps no oil block better illustrates the high stakes and political complexities of Etete's tenure than OPL 245. Covering over 1,800 square kilometers in deep offshore waters, the block holds an estimated 9 billion barrels in oil reserves. In 1998, the oil block was awarded to Malabu Oil and Gas. It is important to state with high sense of responsibility that Dan Atete did not have interest in OPL 245. It was the directors of Malabu that appointed him as a consultant to the oil firm. The goal, as contemporaneous documents show, was not personal enrichment but to create a Niger Delta-led consortium that would ensure the people of the oil-bearing region had a direct stake in the resources beneath their soil. The ownership of OPL 245 became a litmus test for indigenous empowerment. However, in 2001, during President Olusegun Obasanjo's administration, Malabu's license was revoked and the block was reallocated to Shell. This triggered a legal battle that would last more than two decades, involving multiple Nigerian administrations, international oil giants Shell and Eni, and litigation in Nigeria, the UK, France, and Italy. Despite the media firestorm and politically motivated allegations, no court has ever found Etete personally guilty of corruption regarding the Malabu transaction. In fact, in 2017, an Italian court acquitted Shell and Eni executives, and in 2021, a Milan court reaffirmed that no criminal wrongdoing was proven. Even Nigerian courts have affirmed Malabu's title to the block on several occasions.
The enduring controversy surrounding OPL 245 is a case study in how resource nationalism can be criminalised when it challenges global corporate interests. Etete became a convenient scapegoat—not because of criminal acts, but because he sought to give Nigerians ownership of their oil. Advocacy for the Niger Delta:
Born in the heart of the Ijaw ethnic nation, Chief Dan Etete had firsthand knowledge of the paradoxes of Nigeria's oil wealth.
He was vocal about the marginalization of the Niger Delta, and his policies reflected a desire to use oil wealth to catalyze development in the region. Etete's advocacy extended to calls for new states in the Niger Delta, greater resource control, and environmental remediation. He supported the idea of using oil-derived revenue to fund education, infrastructure, and local enterprise. This perspective, though ahead of its time, now aligns with today's Host Community Development Trusts (HCDTs) embedded in the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021. The long-term impact of Etete's tenure is undeniable. Companies such as Seplat Energy, Aiteo, Oando, Sahara Energy, and Notore—all of which now employ thousands of Nigerians and are publicly traded—owe their rise to the indigenous empowerment precedent set by Etete. The idea that Nigerian firms could compete globally in oil and gas was once unthinkable. Today, it is taken for granted. In 2010, more than a decade after Etete's reforms, the Nigerian government enacted the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act (NOGICD Act), which mandates that Nigerians must own a minimum percentage of goods, services, and workforce in the sector. This legislation draws a direct philosophical lineage to Etete's early efforts.
Under the administration of President Bola Tinubu, Nigeria has doubled down on local content. In 2024, NCDMB reported that 56 percent of oil and gas industry services were performed by indigenous companies. These include fabrication yards, engineering services, and upstream operations—sectors previously monopolized by foreign contractors. In essence, the nation owes these milestones to the brave and bold efforts of pioneers like Dan Etete.
A visionary ahead of his time
Etete's role in shaping Nigeria's oil and gas architecture has been systematically downplayed, even maligned. Yet, a dispassionate review of the facts reveals that he was not a rogue actor, but a reformer within a resistant system. His decisions were rooted in strategic intent to advance national interest, despite being opposed by powerful foreign and domestic actors.
While some critics focus on his association with Malabu, they fail to assess the broader structural changes he made possible. Etete laid the groundwork for local ownership of Nigeria's most vital economic sector. He empowered Nigerian entrepreneurs, defended the rights of marginalized communities, and helped reposition Nigeria on the global oil map—not merely as a supplier, but as a sovereign participant.
Restoring a distorted legacy
At 80 years old, Chief Dan Etete remains one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented figures in Nigeria's modern economic history. Yet, his legacy is evident in every local oil company that thrives, every Nigerian engineer that works offshore, and every government policy that prioritizes domestic capacity over foreign dependence.As Nigeria looks to the future—with energy transition, climate change, and economic diversification at the forefront—it must not forget the shoulders it stands upon. Etete's boldness, foresight, and unwavering belief in Nigeria's potential deserve acknowledgment, not vilification.
It is time to tell the full story of Chief Dan Etete: not as a footnote in controversy, but as a patriot and pioneer who helped reclaim Nigeria's economic destiny from the grip of foreign dominance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
10 hours ago
- Zawya
Oman Shell and SQU strengthen local talent pipeline through Energizing New Markets program
RELATED TOPICS OMAN RELATED COMPANIES Salj PDO Shell Oman LNG TotalEnergies OQBI Block 10 Ashley Muscat – Oman Shell, in partnership with Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), successfully concluded the second edition of the Energizing New Markets program, an immersive learning experience designed to equip university students with practical skills and industry insights aligned with Oman's sustainable development ambitions. Held on the SQU campus, the four-day program brought together a group of promising students from the College of Economics and Political Science and the College of Engineering to take part in an intensive workshop. Centered around Shell's CAR framework, which focuses on Capacity, Achievement, and Relationships, the program offered participants hands-on exposure to the business side of renewables and energy transition through real-world case studies. Over the first three days, students worked in diverse teams to analyze a commercial expansion challenge linked to Shell's Powering Progress strategy. The sessions combined technical and soft skills training, while also addressing identified skillset gaps through mentorship and guided exercises led by Shell and SQU professionals and experienced facilitators. On the final day, student groups presented their commercial business plans before a panel of Shell and SQU leaders and judges. The presentations demonstrated not only their strategic thinking, but also their ability to apply classroom knowledge to industry-relevant scenarios. 'This program gave us a platform to challenge ourselves, apply what we've learned, and grow in new ways outside the classroom' shared one participating student. Professor Salim Al Harthi, Deputy Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Community Service at SQU, highlighted the importance of the partnership: 'This collaboration stands as a pioneering model of synergy between academic institutions and the industry sector, offering a practical learning environment that enhances students' skills in strategic thinking, problem-solving, teamwork, and other essential competencies required in today's dynamic job market.' This initiative, first introduced in 2024, is part of Shell's broader In-Country Value (ICV) efforts to support local talent and build a more sustainable, future-ready workforce. In 2025, the program expanded further with two workshops delivered and the number of participants doubling from 20 to 40 per batch, marking a significant step forward in its reach and impact. By bridging the gap between academia and industry, Energizing New Markets reaffirms Shell's commitment to empowering Omani youth with the tools and mindset to thrive in tomorrow's energy landscape. -Ends- About Oman Shell Shell has been a partner in Oman's development and progress over the last several decades. We have been providing pioneering technologies and expertise in the energy industry and creating value for the community. Shell is active in Oman across the oil and gas industry and is involved in joint venture and independent activities ranging from research and development, exploration and production to trading, retail and new energies. Shell also implements an extensive social investment program that contributes to the sustainable development of the country. Shell holds interests in Petroleum Development Oman (34%), Oman LNG (30%) and Shell Oman Marketing Company (49%). Together they represent a substantial part of Oman's economic growth. In January 2023, Oman Shell started producing gas from Mabrouk North East field in Block 10 in Oman. Shell holds a 53.45% working interest in Block 10, with OQ and Marsa Liquefied Natural Gas LLC (a joint venture between TotalEnergies and OQ) holding 13.36% and 33.19% respectively. Enquiries Salima Al Masrouri Email: Middle East and North Africa Media Relations: Email: Cautionary Note The companies in which Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this press release 'Shell', 'Shell Group' and 'Group' are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words 'we', 'us' and 'our' are also used to refer to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ''Subsidiaries'', 'Shell subsidiaries' and 'Shell companies' as used in this press release refer to entities over which Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. The term 'joint venture', 'joint operations', 'joint arrangements', and 'associates' may also be used to refer to a commercial arrangement in which Shell has a direct or indirect ownership interest with one or more parties. The term 'Shell interest' is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management's current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell to market risks and statements expressing management's expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as 'aim'; 'ambition'; ''anticipate''; ''believe''; 'commit'; 'commitment'; ''could''; ''estimate''; ''expect''; ''goals''; ''intend''; ''may''; 'milestones'; ''objectives''; ''outlook''; ''plan''; ''probably''; ''project''; ''risks''; 'schedule'; ''seek''; ''should''; ''target''; ''will''; 'would' and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this press release, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell's products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, judicial, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, such as the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak, regional conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, and a significant cybersecurity breach; and (n) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Shell plc's Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023 (available at and These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this press release and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the press release [June 22, 2025]. Neither Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Shell's Net Carbon Intensity Also, in this press release, we may refer to Shell's 'Net Carbon Intensity' (NCI), which includes Shell's carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers' carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers' carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell's NCI also includes the emissions associated with the production and use of energy products produced by others which Shell purchases for resale. Shell only controls its own emissions. The use of the terms Shell's 'Net Carbon Intensity' or NCI are for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell plc or its subsidiaries. Shell's net-zero emissions target Shell's operating plan, outlook and budgets are forecasted for a ten-year period and are updated every year. They reflect the current economic environment and what we can reasonably expect to see over the next ten years. Accordingly, they reflect our Scope 1, Scope 2 and NCI targets over the next ten years. However, Shell's operating plans cannot reflect our 2050 net-zero emissions target, as this target is currently outside our planning period. In the future, as society moves towards net-zero emissions, we expect Shell's operating plans to reflect this movement. However, if society is not net zero in 2050, as of today, there would be a significant risk that Shell may not meet this target. Forward-Looking non-GAAP measures This press release may contain certain forward-looking non-GAAP measures such as [cash capital expenditure] and [divestments]. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of these forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile those non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is dependent on future events some of which are outside the control of Shell, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures with the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Shell plc's consolidated financial statements. The contents of websites referred to in this press release do not form part of this press release. We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this press release that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
From Discovery to Delivery: Building a Legal Framework for Namibia's Midstream Infrastructure (by Rachel Mushabati)
By Rachel Mushabati, Senior Associate Attorney&Country Head – CLG Namibia ( Namibia's recent offshore oil discoveries mark a pivotal moment in the country's energy sector. With major players such as Shell, TotalEnergies, QatarEnergy, and Galp uncovering significant reserves, Namibia is poised to become a key oil producer. However, while exploration and production activities have gained momentum, the midstream sector; involving transportation, storage, and refining of petroleum, remains underdeveloped. A strong legal framework for midstream infrastructure is essential to ensure that Namibia maximizes economic benefits, attracts investment, and builds a sustainable energy industry. CLG Legal and Business Advisory, with its extensive advisory experience across Africa, is uniquely positioned to support this transition. CLG has advised on midstream regulatory frameworks, infrastructure structuring, and investment promotion strategies in various jurisdictions, and brings this expertise to the Namibian context. Understanding Midstream Infrastructure and Its Importance Midstream infrastructure serves as the critical link between oil extraction and the end consumer. This includes pipelines, refineries, storage facilities, and specialized port infrastructure that facilitate the transportation of crude oil and natural gas. Without adequate midstream infrastructure, Namibia risks becoming an exporter of raw crude without capturing additional value through processing and distribution. A robust midstream sector can boost job creation, industrial development, and energy security, making it a strategic national priority. Market studies from other African producers have shown that well-developed midstream infrastructure can contribute up to 30% more in local value addition compared to direct crude exports.[1] In Ghana, for instance, domestic refining and pipeline infrastructure contributed significantly to its GDP growth in the petroleum sector between 2016–2022. Namibia has the opportunity to tap into similar economic potential.[2] Existing Legal Framework and Gaps Namibia's petroleum sector is primarily governed by the Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Act 2 of 1991 and the Petroleum Products and Energy Act 13 of 1990. These laws focus largely on upstream activities and the regulation of downstream petroleum products. However, there is no dedicated midstream regulatory framework. The absence of clear midstream regulations means there is little guidance on ownership structures, investment incentives, and operational guidelines for pipelines, storage, and refining facilities. For example, Nigeria's midstream sector prior to the Petroleum Industry Act (2021) faced significant bottlenecks due to the absence of a clear regulatory framework, particularly regarding third-party access and tariff setting for pipeline infrastructure. These issues led to investor reluctance and underinvestment, which were only addressed after the establishment of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Nigeria Petroleum Industry Act, 2021). Lessons from Other Oil-Producing Countries Namibia can draw inspiration from countries that have successfully developed midstream infrastructure through effective regulation. Norway, for example, has established a robust midstream legal framework that ensures state participation in pipelines and refineries while promoting private investment.[3] Ghana has a dedicated Petroleum Midstream Regulatory Authority that oversees infrastructure development and ensures compliance with environmental and safety standards. Similarly, Nigeria's Petroleum Industry Act (2021) introduced the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, which provides clear guidelines on pipeline ownership and operations. The Role of Key Stakeholders in Strengthening Namibia's Legal Framework To unlock the full potential of the midstream sector, coordinated action is required among various stakeholders: Government Ministries and Regulators: Responsible for drafting legislation, setting environmental and safety standards, and issuing licenses. Private Sector and Investors: Bring in capital and technical expertise, while also needing legal certainty to invest confidently. State-Owned Entities: Can serve as infrastructure operators and strategic partners in public-private partnerships. Civil Society and Communities: Essential for ensuring environmental accountability and social license to operate. Legal Advisory Firms: Provide technical assistance in drafting laws, structuring transactions, and navigating policy reform. Strengthening Namibia's Midstream Legal Framework To address the existing gaps, Namibia must develop a comprehensive legal framework that clearly defines the governance of midstream activities. A dedicated Midstream Act would be a crucial first step, providing legal certainty on pipeline infrastructure, refineries, storage, and transportation. Encouraging public-private partnerships can drive midstream development while ensuring local participation. Establishing an independent regulatory authority will help enhance transparency, streamline approvals, and enforce compliance. Additionally, Namibia should implement policies that prioritize local employment and skills transfer, ensuring that midstream investors contribute to national workforce development. Environmental and safety standards must also be strengthened to mitigate risks associated with pipeline integrity, spill prevention, and emergency response. To further attract investors, tax breaks, duty exemptions, and streamlined licensing processes should be introduced to make Namibia a more competitive destination for midstream infrastructure development. Conclusion For Namibia to fully capitalize on its oil discoveries, it must establish a strong midstream legal framework that facilitates the efficient transportation, storage, and processing of petroleum resources. Without this, the country risks losing significant economic value and remaining dependent on crude exports. By adopting best practices from other oil-producing nations and implementing strategic legal reforms, Namibia can create a thriving midstream sector that benefits both investors and citizens alike. CLG stands ready to support this transformation, leveraging its pan-African expertise in midstream regulation, infrastructure development, and legal advisory. Our team has been instrumental in shaping midstream legal regimes across West and Central Africa, and we are committed to helping Namibia build a regulatory foundation that supports sustainable growth and long-term prosperity. [1] Ruben, R., Kuijpers, R.,&Dijkxhoorn, Y. (2022). Mobilizing the Midstream for Supporting Smallholder Intensification. Land, 11 (12), 2319. [2] Oxford Business Group. 'Ghana's energy production targets and exploration attract investment'. Retrieved from [3] Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (2021). 'Midstream Regulatory Framework and Investment Guidelines'. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of CLG.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
Petralon Energy Set to Shape Conversations on Nigeria's Oil Future at African Energy Week (AEW) 2025
African Energy Week (AEW) 2025: Invest in African Energies is honored to welcome Ahonsi Unuigbe, Founder and CEO of Petralon Energy, as a distinguished speaker at this year's edition in Cape Town. A driving force behind one of Nigeria's leading indigenous upstream oil and gas companies, Unuigbe will offer valuable perspectives on the role of independent operators in Africa's energy future, as well as the opportunities arising from sector reforms, new fiscal incentives and major IOC divestments. Since its founding, Petralon Energy has positioned itself at the forefront of Nigeria's upstream sector, with a mission to create value through indigenous ownership and technical excellence. In 2025, the company continues to make significant strides at the Dawes Island Field, where drilling and completion of a new well added 2,500 barrels of oil per day to Nigeria's daily production, directly supporting national energy security and economic growth. Petralon is also pursuing strategic offshore investments through its non-operated interests in OML 127 and OML 130, part of a broader plan to strengthen its asset portfolio amid the shifting dynamics of Nigeria's upstream sector. Beyond its operational achievements, Petralon Energy is focused on long-term capacity building. The company launched its Future Leaders Program in 2024, aimed at equipping young Nigerian engineers with the technical, leadership and problem-solving skills necessary to drive the sector forward. Petralon's strategic partnership and joint investment agreement with engineering firm Julius Berger Nigeria, announced earlier this year, further reflects its commitment to delivering infrastructure solutions that support sustainable field development and enhance project delivery. At AEW 2025, Unuigbe will join key discussions on how African independents can leverage new fiscal frameworks, attract investment and form partnerships that maximize the potential of both mature and frontier assets. His participation will contribute to high-level dialogue around indigenous firms' expanding role in shaping the continent's energy landscape. 'Companies like Petralon Energy represent the future of Nigeria's oil and gas sector — a future where African companies take the lead in driving production, creating jobs and delivering energy security. We are proud to welcome them at AEW 2025, where we will celebrate and support the success of local firms like Petralon that are building Africa's energy industry from the ground up,' states NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the African Energy Chamber. Petralon Energy's participation in AEW 2025 embodies the conference's core theme of African solutions for African energy challenges, and reflects the growing leadership of indigenous companies in delivering the continent's energy future. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Energy Chamber. About African Energy Week (AEW): AEW: Invest in African Energies is the platform of choice for project operators, financiers, technology providers and government, and has emerged as the official place to sign deals in African energy. Visit for more information about this exciting event.
