Residents of Sheva Koliwada move Bombay HC over four-decade wait for rehabilitation
Residents of Sheva Koliwada in Uran taluka of Raigad district, Maharashtra, who have spent the past 40 years in a transit camp, have approached the Bombay High Court against multiple authorities — including the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA), the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, the Divisional Commissioner of Konkan Division, the Raigad District Collector, and CIDCO — alleging false assurances regarding rehabilitation.
Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petition seeks judicial directions against JNPA for what the petitioners describe as a gross failure to fulfil statutory obligations under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1976.
The petitioners — the Maharashtra Small Scale Traditional Fish Workers Union, represented by its president Nandkumar W. Pawar and secretary Ramesh B. Koli — are seeking appropriate orders for permanent and adequate rehabilitation of 256 families displaced due to land acquisition for the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Project (JNPT).
The petition urges time-bound implementation of a rehabilitation plan approved on January 24, which includes the allocation of 10.16 hectares of land, interim relief, compensation for prolonged displacement, and the appointment of a court-monitored committee to oversee the implementation process.
The prolonged struggle has drawn media and administrative attention in recent years. A report titled '40 years in a transit camp' published in The Hindu on November 16, 2024, and a follow-up story on November 20, 2024, highlighted electoral boycotts by the affected community. Following the coverage, officials from the Election Commission of India and the Raigad District Collector visited the area, promising to convey residents' demands to higher authorities. On December 19, 2024, a senior Union government official gave a verbal assurance that permanent housing would soon be provided.
However, on April 14, more than 400 residents protested outside the tehsildar's office, displaying a photograph of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and a copy of the Constitution, in a symbolic plea for justice. The protest was held to draw attention to the community's displacement and the delay in rehabilitation by the State and Central governments.
Also Read | Party workers tried to force us to vote, Sheva Koliwada transit camp residents say
The petition, filed through advocate Siddharth Sonaji Ingle, also seeks ₹50 lakh compensation for each family, citing 'undue hardship, delay, and mental anguish' caused by the non-implementation of rehabilitation measures despite multiple government assurances over four decades.
The residents have also demanded immediate upgrades to existing transit camp facilities, including provision of safe drinking water, sanitation, drainage, reliable electricity, structural safety, and other essential services for the project-affected families.
Mr. Ramesh Koli, 65, said, 'We have had several meetings with all kinds of government officials all these years, from CMs, to Guardian Ministers, to different Union ministers... We staged protests, filed RTIs, took the matter to Lokayukta, we have been made to run from pillar to post... governments changed in this State and country, but we have remained in the same transit camp, waiting for our independence, hoping some day we will get our lost homes, our village that the country took away from us in the name of development and forgot about the people behind the mega project.'
He further stated that affected families were given assurances of employment and local business opportunities during the displacement process. 'But till date no one from affected fisherfolk families received any employment or any business to sustain their families,' he said.
'We are aboriginal, indigenous community of this region who have lost everything under the guise of development. Traditional fishing practices have dwindled due to fishing zones being allotted for various projects and heavy industrial pollution. We are left with no future for our young generation despite the fact that several coastal projects are running their business on our traditional fishing land. Is this democracy or dictatorship?' Mr. Koli added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kerala to include lesson on Governor's powers in school syllabus
Amid growing friction between the Kerala government and Raj Bhavan, state general education minister V Sivankutty said a lesson on the constitutional powers and duties of Governors would soon be a part of the school curriculum. In Kerala, the office of Governor Rajendra Arlekar, who took charge in January and who was seen to initially enjoy cordial relations with chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan(PTI) The announcement came just a day after Sivankutty walked out of an event at the Raj Bhavan in Thiruvananthapuram protesting against the display of a portrait of 'Bharat Mata', associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), on the dais. Speaking to reporters on Friday, Sivankutty said that the lesson explaining the constitutional rights and duties of Governors in India would be included in the second volume of social science textbooks for class 10 students this year. The chapter will be added to textbooks for students of classes 11 and 12 as part of curriculum revision as well, he added. 'Schools are the ideal place to learn the values of democracy. School curriculum is being revised while upholding constitutional values. In the country today, efforts to destabilise elected state governments through governors are rising. The Supreme Court has recently made it clear what the constitutional rights of governors are,' the minister said. His reference was to the Supreme Court's ruling on April 8 that set a timeline for Governors to clear state bills or refer them to the President. It also set a timeline for the President to clear them. The President has sought a Presidential Reference on the judgement. The court's ruling came after the state of Tamil Nadu approached it citing the alleged obstructionist behaviour of Governor R N Ravi. Several states governed by parties opposed to the Bharatiya Janata Party have seen clashes between the elected government and the Governor, whose powers are limited under the Constitution. When asked if the decision had anything to do with the ongoing row with the Raj Bhavan over the use of the 'Bharat Mata' portrait, the minister replied, 'I strongly feel students must learn and understand the duties of governors. That's why we have decided to include the chapter. It is a part of constitution. It is true that governors are interfering a lot. Students must be taught the right things.' In Kerala, the office of Governor Rajendra Arlekar, who took charge in January and who was seen to initially enjoy cordial relations with chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan -- especially when compared to the former Governor Arif Mohammed Khan -- has been locked in a tussle with the LDF government over the usage of a portrait of 'Bharat Mata' , showing a woman holding a saffron flag astride a lion at official events. The CM and ministers of the state government have argued that the portrait is associated with the RSS, the ideological fount of the BJP, and its display at official government events is inappropriate and violative of secular values. On Thursday, Sivankutty walked out in the middle of an event at the Raj Bhavan to honour scouts and guides after objecting to the display of the portrait. Later, he argued that Indian nationalism draws its strength from its diversity of languages, religions, regions, cultures etc. None of these can be contained within a narrow or unified image, he said. 'Calling the image of a woman carrying a saffron flag the sole symbol of Indian patriotism ignores this basic reality,' he added. Raj Bhavan issued a statement claiming that the minister's 'staged walkout' was a 'gross violation of protocol and a grave insult to the office of the Governor'. The Governor also said that there was 'no question of doing away with Bharat Mata as we draw our idea of patriotism and nationhood' from it. The office of the Governor said the minister's actions set a wrong precedent and that it viewed the developments with utmost concern. The row also spilled out onto the streets of Thiruvananthapuram with the SFI, student wing of CPI(M), taking a protest march to Raj Bhavan. In response, ABVP, the student wing of the RSS, displayed black flags as a convoy of the general education minister passed by.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Amid Bharat Mata row, state to include school lesson on guv's ‘real role'
Thiruvananthapuram: The controversy over the display of a Bharat Mata portrait allegedly used in RSS shakhas at functions in Raj Bhavan has all the signs of snowballing into a protracted showdown between the state govt and governor Rajendra V Arlekar. A day after walking out of an event at Raj Bhavan for the same, general education minister V Sivankutty on Friday said the real role and responsibilities of governors, as defined in the Constitution, would be included in the Class X social science textbook in this academic year. The decision, he said, was taken in view of the increasing attempts to weaken elected state govts using governors. "Since schools are the best places to instil democratic values, the constitutional powers of the governor will be included as a prominent section in the SSLC textbook," he said. Raj Bhavan sources, meanwhile, said the governor continued to stick to his stance that Sivankutty violated protocol by walking out of the event, which, according to Arlekar, was not strictly a state govt function. According to the governor, the distribution of Rajya Puraskar awards to Bharat Scouts and Guides was not a state govt event and the minister had no reason to object to the display of the Bharat Mata portrait. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Doctor: If You Eat Eggs Every Day, This Is What Happens WellnessGuide Learn more Undo Arlekar had on Thursday stated that there was no question of doing away with Bharat Mata "as we draw our idea of patriotism and nationhood from her." Some Raj Bhavan officials had earlier indicated that the governor had agreed to avoid such portraits at govt functions held at Raj Bhavan. Backing Sivankutty, CPM state secretary M V Govindan said only those who had studied the Constitution could identify violation of constitutional values. He accused Arlekar of trying to convert Raj Bhavan into RSS headquarters. "All those who believe in democracy should oppose this approach by the governor. This is not something CPM alone should protest against," he said after the party's state secretariat meeting on Friday. Hinting at CPM's intent to escalate the controversy, SFI workers took out a march to Raj Bhavan on Friday, carrying banners against the governor. SFI state secretary P S Sanjeev said the governor had no right to use Raj Bhavan to advance his RSS ideology. DYFI also staged a similar protest march to Raj Bhavan on Thursday. Meanwhile, ABVP activists came out in support of the governor, waving black flags at Sivankutty. Agriculture minister P Prasad had earlier refused to attend a function at Raj Bhavan when he was told that he should pay tributes in front of the Bharat Mata portrait before the ceremony.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Local train deaths are alarming, auto closing doors needed: HC
Mumbai. Observing that it is "alarming" that thereare daily deaths due to commuters falling from trains, Bombay High Court on Friday suggested that Mumbai local trains have doors that automatically close to avoid overcrowding. It mentioned the June 9 Mumbra train-fall incident in which five persons died. "You (the railways) have to take action so that this should not happen again," said Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne. They were hearing a PIL filed last year by Yatin Jadhav, a regular commuter, to direct the railways to submit a plan to reduce or eliminate fatalities due to untoward incidents. Asked by the judges what measures were taken by the railways, additional solicitor general Anil Singh said a high-level monitoring committee (HLMC) was already constituted to suggest safety and security measures. After the Mumbra incident, a multi-disciplinary committee was set up. It is examining the causes of the incident and shall soon suggest remedial measures. The judges referred to the railways' reply and said what "disturbs" is that in 2024 there were 3,588 deaths in Central Railway and Western Railway, which averages to 10 deaths per day. "So every day 10 Mumbaikars die by falling. And these numbers of deaths are due to falling down from trains, being hit by poles, or gaps between the footboard and the platform," said Justice Marne, adding, "This is an alarming situation. This is your own data, though you projected that there is a reduction by 46% as compared to 2009." Singh said HLMC suggested the construction of partitions or walls near tracks to avoid trespass and for fencing between tracks so there is no crossing. "As platforms are becoming overcrowded, we have shifted certain stalls from the stations. There are many measures which we are taking," he added. Justice Marne said, "Fencing and all is to take care of deaths because of crossing etc." Justice Marne asked, "What about people falling? Commuters who are on the train are falling." The judges said trains should not be open so that there is no scope for overcrowding. "You should provide automatic doors which close. This is one of the suggestions as a layman. We are not experts in rail safety," the Chief Justice said. Senior advocate Rohan Shah, for Jadhav, said the June 9 incident happened due to overcrowding. While the railways' reply said trains cannot have closed doors, after the incident the railway minister said trains will have closed doors and "we are owrking towards it". Adjourning the hearing to July 14, the judges directed the railways to submit suggestions of both committees "to avoid untoward incidents in future" and "clearly indicate the timelines with which measures recommended by the committee shall be implemented".
