Electronic Warfare Is Key To Indian And Pakistani Military Strategies

As India and Pakistan prepared for conflict over the last month, they revealed the next evolution of intimidating war rituals that once included banging shields and intimidating dances: the deployment of electronic warfare systems. In addition to tanks and artillery, move reflects the new face of modern warfare, where combat extends into the electronic domain.
As seen in the Russia-Ukraine war, EW technology has a decisive impact on the battlefield. These systems interfere with a range of electronic signals, including those used for communications, radar, and navigation. They typically block GPS signals, jam the control links to drones and missiles, disrupt ground and air communications, and weaken the radar that supports air-defense networks. By placing EW systems along the border, both India and Pakistan made a show of force while reducing the other's ability to conduct offensive and defensive operations.
Tensions rapidly escalated between these two nuclear powers following the Pahalgam massacre on April 22, when 26 Indian tourists were killed in Indian-controlled Jammu and Kashmir by militants linked to Pakistan. India made the initial move, deploying several systems along the border. India's main EW system is the Samyukta system, which consists of 145 vehicles and covers an area of 150 kilometers by 70 kilometers. Developed domestically in 2004, the system is capable of electronic surveillance, direction finding, and jamming both communication and radar signals. India has other EW weapons in their arsenal including the Himshakti, a jamming system for mountainous terrain, and the Spectra suite, which is integrated into their Rafale fighter aircraft.
Pakistan quickly responded by moving its own EW systems into forward positions. Many of its assets are Chinese-supplied, including the DWL-002 passive detection system. Unlike traditional radar, it detects and tracks airborne threats by picking up their electronic signatures. Pakistan also deployed several Chinese-made commercial-grade GPS jammers intended to disrupt Indian drones and missiles. Additionally, the Pakistani J-10C fighter aircraft carry advanced EW equipment, which reportedly disrupted the control systems on Indian Rafale aircraft flying along the border on April 29.
While it may seem unusual for countries to showcase their EW capabilities in this way, such deployments are consistent with modern military doctrine. Given the long-standing hostility between India and Pakistan, both militaries have established a layered air-defense network designed to stop aircraft and missiles, as well as artillery intended to block ground advances. These defenses typically include EW systems, which are commonly used for detecting and disrupting incoming missiles and aircraft.
Meanwhile, EW has become the preferred method for breaking through these layered defenses. It can interfere with the radar systems that support air-defense networks, which are then targeted and destroyed by air and missile strikes. Once the adversary's air defenses are neutralized, a military gains temporary air dominance, enabling it to carry out further missile and air strikes with minimal resistance. EW systems also disrupt communications, making it difficult for adversaries to coordinate a response, issue warnings, or mount a counteroffensive. Furthermore, the deployment of these systems carries a psychological impact. They are expensive and typically kept secret, so their visible deployment signals that a significant attack may be imminent.
Both countries had their EW equipment tested on May 7, when India launched a series of air and missile strikes into Pakistan. Pakistan responded with its own set of strikes. Although the true effectiveness of these systems is unclear, both India and Pakistan have made claims that their EW systems played key roles in the conflict. The Indian military claims that they successfully jammed the Pakistani air defense systems, as reported by Times of India, allowing the Indian Air Force to strike its targets in Pakistan. Meanwhile, Pakistan has made claims that the EW systems on their J-10C aircraft contributed to the downing of Indian Rafale aircraft.
As seen in the Russia-Ukraine war, the recent India-Pakistan conflict further highlights the growing role of electronic warfare in shaping military outcomes. While aircraft and missiles carried out the physical strikes, India's offensive operations relied heavily on the effective use of EW systems. Pakistan's defense similarly leveraged its own EW systems. These systems have become essential elements of the modern battlefield, offering capabilities as important as armor and artillery.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

26 minutes ago

• Fox News

The new map that could be guiding Trump's Middle East moves

Video President Donald Trump came back into office promising no new wars. So far, he's kept that promise. But he's also left much of Washington — and many of America's allies — confused by a series of rapid, unexpected moves across the Middle East. In just a few months, Trump has reopened backchannels with Iran, then turned around and threatened its regime with collapse. He's kept Israel at arm's length — skipping it on his regional tour — before signaling support once again. He lifted U.S. sanctions on Syria's Islamist leader, a figure long treated as untouchable in Washington. And he made headlines by hosting Pakistan's top general at the White House, even as India publicly objected. For those watching closely, it's been hard to pin down a clear doctrine. Critics see improvisation — sometimes even contradiction. But step back, and a pattern begins to emerge. It's not about ideology, democracy promotion, or traditional alliances. It's about access. Geography. Trade. More specifically, it may be about restarting a long-stalled infrastructure project meant to bypass China — and put the United States back at the center of a strategic economic corridor stretching from India to Europe. The project is called the India–Middle East–Europe Corridor, or IMEC. Most Americans have never heard of it. It was launched in 2023 at the G20 summit in New Delhi, as a joint initiative among the U.S., India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the European Union. Its goal? To build a modern infrastructure link connecting South Asia to Europe — without passing through Chinese territory or relying on Chinese capital. IMEC's vision is bold but simple: Indian goods would travel west via rail and ports through the Gulf, across Israel, and on to European markets. Along the way, the corridor would connect not just trade routes, but energy pipelines, digital cables, and logistics hubs. It would be the first serious alternative to China's Belt and Road Initiative — a way for the U.S. and its partners to build influence without boots on the ground. But before construction could begin, war broke out in Gaza. The October 2023 Hamas attacks and Israel's military response sent the region into crisis. Normalization talks between Saudi Arabia and Israel fell apart. The Red Sea became a warzone for shipping. And Gulf capital flows paused. The corridor — and the broader idea of using infrastructure to tie the region together — was quietly shelved. Video That's the backdrop for Trump's current moves. Taken individually, they seem scattered. Taken together, they align with the logic of clearing obstacles to infrastructure. Trump may not be drawing maps in the Situation Room. But his instincts — for leverage, dealmaking and unpredictability — are removing the very roadblocks that halted IMEC in the first place. His approach to Iran is a prime example. In April, backchannels were reopened on the nuclear front. In May, a Yemen truce was brokered — reducing attacks on Gulf shipping. In June, after Israeli strikes inside Iran, Trump escalated rhetorically, calling for Iran's "unconditional surrender." That combination of engagement and pressure may sound erratic. But it mirrors the approach that cleared a diplomatic path with North Korea: soften the edges, then apply public pressure. Meanwhile, Trump's temporary distancing from Israel is harder to miss. He skipped it on his regional tour and avoided aligning with Prime Minister Netanyahu's continued hard-line approach to Gaza. Instead, he praised Qatar — a U.S. military partner and quiet mediator in the Gaza talks — and signaled support for Gulf-led reconstruction plans. The message: if Israel refuses to engage in regional stabilization, it won't control the map. Trump also made the unexpected decision to lift U.S. sanctions on Syria's new leader, President Ahmad al-Sharaa — a figure with a past in Islamist groups, now leading a transitional government backed by the UAE. Critics saw the move as legitimizing extremism. But in practice, it unlocked regional financing and access to transit corridors once blocked by U.S. policy. Even the outreach to Pakistan — which angered India — fits a broader infrastructure lens. Pakistan borders Iran, influences Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, and maintains ties with Gulf militaries. Welcoming Pakistan's military chief was less about loyalty, and more about leverage. In corridor politics, geography often trumps alliances. None of this means Trump has a master plan. There's no confirmed strategy memo that links these moves to IMEC. And the region remains volatile. Iran's internal stability is far from guaranteed. The Gaza conflict could reignite. Saudi and Qatari interests don't always align. But there's a growing logic underneath the diplomacy: de-escalate just enough conflict to make capital flow again — and make corridors investable. That logic may not be ideologically pure. It certainly isn't about spreading democracy. But it reflects a real shift in U.S. foreign policy. Call it infrastructure-first geopolitics — where trade routes, ports and pipelines matter more than treaties and summits. To be clear, the United States isn't the only player thinking this way. China's Belt and Road Initiative has been advancing the same model for over a decade. Turkey, Iran and Russia are also exploring new logistics and energy corridors. But what sets IMEC apart — and what makes Trump's recent moves notable — is that it offers an opening for the U.S. to compete without large-scale military deployments or decades-long aid packages. Even the outreach to Pakistan — which angered India — fits a broader infrastructure lens. Pakistan borders Iran, influences Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, and maintains ties with Gulf militaries. For all his unpredictability, Trump has always had a sense for economic leverage. That may be what we're seeing here: less a doctrine than a direction. Less about grand visions, and more about unlocking chokepoints. There's no guarantee it will work. The region could turn on a dime. And the corridor could remain, as it is now, a partially built concept waiting on political will. But Trump's moves suggest he's trying to build the conditions for it to restart — not by talking about peace, but by making peace a condition for investment. In a region long shaped by wars over ideology and territory, that may be its own kind of strategy. Tanvi Ratna is a policy analyst and engineer with a decade of experience in statecraft at the intersection of geopolitics, economics, and technology. She has worked on Capitol Hill, at EY, at CoinDesk and others, shaping policy across sectors from manufacturing to AI. Follow her takes on statecraft on X and Substack.

Wall Street Journal

2 hours ago

• Wall Street Journal

U.S. Sanctions Houthi Shipping Network

The U.S. imposed new sanctions on shipping firms, vessels and front companies it says are helping Houthi militants in Yemen generate revenue through illicit trade, according to the State Department. The announcement said the targeted network has played a key role in sustaining the Iran-backed Houthis. The State Department added that the U.S. is focused on cutting off the Houthis' financial lifelines, protecting freedom of navigation, and defending U.S. forces and allies in the region.

Washington Post

4 hours ago

• Washington Post

Thousands of Afghans are fleeing Iran every day to escape war and deportation

ISLAMABAD — Thousands of Afghans are fleeing Iran every day to escape deportation and war , a major international aid agency and Taliban official said Friday. Millions of Afghans have called Iran home for decades. But they have been leaving in large numbers since October 2023, when authorities announced a crackdown on foreigners who it said were in the country illegally. Neighboring Pakistan launched a similar campaign around the same time.