Ukraine's drone swarm attack was a warning for Russia and the US may be next

No shelter at home
Live Events
Drone warfare, democratized
Homeland incursions and sleeper threats
China's fortress, America's exposure
'We're not even close'
The budget tug-of-war
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Ukraine's surprise drone strike on Russian airbases has shaken US defence leaders into acknowledging a grave risk — America's own airfields could be hit just as easily.'It's an eyebrow-raising moment,' said Gen. David Allvin, US Air Force Chief of Staff , at a Washington defence conference this week. 'Right now, I don't think it's where we need to be.'Ukraine's attack damaged or destroyed at least 12 Russian warplanes on June 1, including strategic bombers. Ukrainian officials claimed 41 aircraft were targeted in total. Their method was both simple and alarming: commercial-style drones were hidden inside wooden mobile houses mounted on trucks. These were driven near four Russian bases, and the drones were launched by remote once in position. The Russian bombers, unprotected on open tarmacs, never saw them coming.And neither, experts warn, would US planes in similar conditions.Thomas Shugart of the Center for a New American Security didn't mince words: 'There is no sanctuary even in the US homeland – particularly given that our bases back home are essentially completely unhardened.''Hardened,' in military terms, means aircraft are parked in reinforced shelters. But at most US facilities, including key sites like Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri or Dyess Air Force Base in Texas, multibillion-dollar bombers sit in the open, not far from public highways. It's a vulnerability mirrored in Russia — and just as easily exploitable.'We are pretty vulnerable,' retired US Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal told CNN. 'We've got a lot of high-value assets that are extraordinarily expensive.' The B-2 bomber, for example, costs $2 billion apiece. The US has only 20.Ukrainian officials estimated the strike cost Russia $7 billion. And it cost Ukraine mere tens of thousands of dollars.This isn't science fiction. A first-person view (FPV) drone, like the ones used in Ukraine's strike, can be bought online for under $700. Controlled by a headset, the operator can steer the drone with precision. These cheap tools are now deadly weapons.'Ukraine inflicted billions in damage,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told Congress this week. 'The world saw in near-real time how readily available technology can disrupt established power dynamics.'Ukraine has honed its drone tactics with urgency. Each week, engineers adapt to Russian countermeasures, staying a step ahead.Drone threats are not confined to foreign battlefields. According to US Northern Command, there were 350 drone incursions into domestic military bases last year. Some were hobbyists, but others could have been surveillance missions by foreign adversaries — or worse.'Think of all the containers and illegal entrants inside our borders,' warned Carl Schuster, a former Pacific Command intelligence director. Every cargo truck could conceal a drone. Every base near a highway — and many are — becomes a potential target.'It's a logistical nightmare,' wrote David Kirichenko on the Atlantic Council's Ukraine Watch. Russia's vast geography, once a strength, is now a weakness. The same applies to America.While the US debates budgets, China has built more than 650 hardened aircraft shelters within range of Taiwan, according to a Hudson Institute report co-authored by Shugart. The report warned that, in a US-China conflict, most American aircraft losses would occur on the ground — not in combat.Even Guam's Andersen Air Force Base, home to B-2 and B-52 bombers, lacks hardened shelters.'The F-47 is an amazing aircraft, but it's going to die on the ground if we don't protect it,' Allvin said, referring to a proposed $300 million stealth jet touted by former President Donald Trump.By contrast, Shugart estimates that a hardened aircraft shelter would cost about $30 million.The Pentagon is scrambling. After a deadly drone strike killed three US soldiers in Jordan earlier this year, efforts to counter drones intensified. Strategies include jammers to sever control signals, intercepting missiles, even nets to snare drones mid-air. Still, none are foolproof.'There's no simple solution,' a US defence official told reporters. 'We're not even close.'That same official, speaking anonymously, warned that cheap drone swarms could soon trigger a 'mass-casualty event.' High-profile civilian targets like sports arenas and infrastructure remain dangerously exposed.The root problem is money — and priorities.'If all we are doing is playing defence and can't shoot back, then that's not a good use of our money,' Allvin said. The Pentagon, with an annual budget nearing $1 trillion, must decide whether to fund new offensive systems or protect the ones it already has.Lawmakers are listening. On Capitol Hill, Senator Roger Wicker, head of the Armed Services Committee, promised billions in funding to address the drone gap. But officials remain sceptical that the urgency will match the rhetoric.'We are not doing enough,' Army Secretary Driscoll testified. 'The current status quo is not sufficient.'Ukraine's innovation with FPV drones shows how war is changing. Technology has levelled the field. The next war — or attack — could arrive in the back of a truck, not a fighter jet.For now, America's billion-dollar bombers remain on open runways. And the clock is ticking.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

34 minutes ago

• Time of India

Is New Zealand's multiculturalism under threat? Destiny Church's anti-immigration rally poses a challenge to national values

Live Events What is Destiny Church? Is New Zealand losing its multiculturalism? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Hundreds of supporters of Destiny Church marched down Queen Street in central Auckland on Saturday, June 21, led by Brian Tamaki , protesting against non-Christian religions and calling for stricter immigration policies. The rally began at Aotea Square, where flags representing Islam , Buddhism, Sikhism, the LGBTQ+ rainbow, and mainstream media were torn, stomped on, and in some cases, set on fire. His followers performed a haka after each ritualistic destruction of a denounced the 'spread of non-Christian religions' and said 'uncontrolled immigration' threatened New Zealand's identity. He led chants of 'no immigration without assimilation' and described the march as a 'bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation'.Temporary clashes with counter‑protesters occurred. The protesters walked down Queen Street holding a large banner that read, 'NZ's official religion: Christianity.'They chanted 'Faith, flag, family' before announcing, 'No assimilation, no immigration'.Police were present throughout and confirmed no arrests were made. Fire and Emergency crews responded after flags were set alight, but protesters extinguished them before further action was demonstrators are affiliated with Destiny Church, a Christian movement known for its conservative, nationalist, and, critics say, fundamentalist views and linked political groups like the Freedoms & Rights Coalition and Vision Tamaki is its outspoken founder, and his daughter Hannah leads Vision NZ, a small far-right political party that opposes abortion, homosexuality, mosque construction, and promotes Christian nationalism Tamaki and Destiny Church are known for previous confrontations, including protests targeting library Drag Queen Story Hour events and blocking motorways under slogans like 'Make New Zealand Great Again'. They also disrupted children's events in libraries earlier this year, drawing widespread condemnation from weekend's protest has reignited debate over whether New Zealand's multicultural identity is under threat. Tamaki and his followers frame their cause as a defense of 'Christian values' and 'Kiwi identity,' but critics argue these protests chip away at the nation's commitment to inclusivity and Prime Minister David Seymour strongly denounced the rally's anti-immigration themes as 'un‑Kiwi,' saying that New Zealand welcomes diverse backgrounds and affirmed that immigration remains open to those 'committed to building a better society with tolerance of others.'.Immigration restrictions put forward by Tamaki , especially his demand to repeal the country's stance that New Zealand has no official religion, were widely Seymour reiterated the church's right to protest, he defended all New Zealanders' right to practice their faiths has previously sent letters to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon demanding changes to the official religion policy and tougher assimilation rules.

Time of India

36 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Now is the time for peace,' says Trump after bombing three Iranian sites- but did Iran outsmart the bombs?

Evacuations blunt the edge of U.S. firepower Live Events Inside the strikes: what was targeted U.S.-Israel coordination: A calculated escalation Did Iran anticipate the attack? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In a striking display of both military might and diplomatic paradox, President Donald Trump declared, 'Now is the time for peace,' just hours after ordering U.S. airstrikes on Iran 's most sensitive nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz , and attacks, coordinated closely with Israel, were intended as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions and a dramatic intervention in the spiraling Israel-Iran as new details emerge, a different narrative is taking shape—one that raises questions about both the effectiveness and the real impact of this high-stakes state media revealed that the targeted nuclear sites had been evacuated 'some time ago,' a move that appears to have dramatically limited the physical and radiological consequences of the strikes. Sensitive materials and personnel were removed in advance, reportedly as part of a contingency plan to avoid casualties and prevent environmental preemptive action meant that, despite the deployment of advanced B-2 bombers and bunker-buster munitions, the U.S. strikes may have hit mostly empty facilities, blunting the intended effect of crippling Iran's nuclear deeply buried enrichment facility was the primary target, with the U.S. unleashing its most powerful bunker-busters. However, the extent of the damage remains unclear, and Iranian officials insist there were no casualties or radiation main uranium enrichment hub was also struck, but, according to Iranian sources, no radioactive material was present at the time, further limiting the risk of site, crucial for uranium conversion and fuel production, was similarly evacuated, and no significant radiological impact has been reported.U.S. officials confirmed that Israel was notified both before and after the strikes, underscoring a high level of coordination between the two allies. Israeli sources described the operation as a critical escalation, coming after days of Israeli strikes that had already weakened Iran's missile revelation that Iran had already cleared its nuclear sites before the strikes raises the possibility that Tehran anticipated the attack, potentially through intelligence or by reading the diplomatic and military signals coming from Washington and Jerusalem. This has sparked debate among analysts: Did the U.S. and Israel achieve their objective, or did Iran's advance warning and evacuation render the operation more symbolic than strategic?As President Trump calls for peace, the region remains on edge. Iran's leaders have vowed a response, and the risk of further escalation persists. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports no immediate radiological threat to the public, and European diplomats continue to push for de-escalation.

Business Standard

39 minutes ago

• Business Standard

'Historic for US, Israel, world': Trump to address nation on Iran strikes

Earlier in the day, several US B-2 stealth bombers took off from the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on Friday night (local time) and were seen heading West, CNN reported ANI US Soon after announcing that the United States had launched a "very successful military operation" targeting three key nuclear sites in Iran, US President Donald Trump said that he would address the nation at 10 In a post on Truth Social, Trump described the operation as a historic moment for the US, Israel and the world, while urging Iran to agree to end the ongoing conflict. "I will be giving an Address to the Nation at 10:00 P.M., at the White House, regarding our very successful military operation in Iran. This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!" Trump wrote. The post comes after Trump announced that the US had struck three key Iranian nuclear sites--Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan--asserting that the operation, which involved a full payload of bombs on Fordow, was completed successfully with all US aircraft safely exiting Iranian airspace. The strike, part of a broader conflict between Iran and Israel, has marked the US's entry into the war with Iran. Earlier, Trump stated that the US has launched an attack on three nuclear sites in Iran. According to another post on Truth Social, Trump stated that the US had "successfully" hit three of Iran's key nuclear facilities--Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan--with a "full payload of BOMBS" being dropped on Fordow as the primary target. "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home," Trump stated. "Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter," he added. The underground site at Fordow and the larger Natanz plant were Iran's two primary uranium enrichment facilities, out of which Natanz had already been hit by Israel with smaller weapons earlier in the week, the New York Times reported. The third site, located near the historic city of Isfahan, is believed to store Iran's stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium. Earlier in the day, several US B-2 stealth bombers took off from the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on Friday night (local time) and were seen heading West, CNN reported, citing flight tracking data. However, there is still no confirmation if the B-2 bombers were part of the attack on these nuclear sites. As of Saturday, the aircraft were flying over the Pacific Ocean and appeared to be en route to Guam, as reported by CNN. According to CNN, the B-2 bombers are uniquely equipped to carry the Massive Ordnance Penetrator -- a 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bomb believed to be the only weapon capable of targeting Iran's underground Fordow nuclear site. Each B-2 can carry two of these powerful bombs. The conflict between Israel and Iran entered its ninth day on Saturday, with the US now joining in support of Israel. The conflict started after Israel, on June 13, launched a massive airstrike on Iranian military and nuclear sites, dubbed "Operation Rising Lion." In response, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a large-scale drone and missile operation, 'Operation True Promise 3', targeting Israeli fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centres. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)