‘None of our business': Is the US dusting its hands off the India-Pakistan conflict?
People gathering in front of a damaged restaurant outside the Rawalpindi cricket stadium in Pakistan's Punjab province after an alleged drone was shot down on May 8. AFP
News analysis 'None of our business': Is the US dusting its hands off the India-Pakistan conflict?
- The Trump administration's isolationist, America First stance is showing in its surprisingly low-key response to the escalation in hostilities between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan after a terrorist attack in the disputed Kashmir region.
Coming while the White House is simultaneously making efforts to end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, it perhaps reflects the superpower's reluctance to play the policeman of the world.
India and Pakistan – which have fought three wars over Kashmir, the picturesque Himalayan region which both nations claim but each hold only a part of – are locked in a spiral of tit-for-tat military strikes for a fourth day on May 9.
On May 9, Pakistan said it had shot down 25 Indian drones over the skies of its major cities like Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi. India said it had neutralised several Pakistani air defence radars and systems, including one in Lahore, after several cities in its border areas faced a barrage of missiles and drones.
Pakistan says Indian air strikes and cross-border fire have killed 36 people while India has reported at least 16 dead from Pakistani shelling.
US President Donald Trump was noncommittal when asked about India's May 6 airstrikes on 'terror infrastructure' targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
'I just hope it ends very quickly,' he said in response to the strikes which New Delhi said were in retaliation for the April 22 killings in Indian Kashmir of 26 tourists, mainly Hindu men, by terrorists backed by Pakistan.
'I know both very well, and I want to see them work it out,' Mr Trump said the next day as Pakistan began shelling across the de facto border with India.
'They've gone tit-for-tat. So hopefully they can stop now. If I can do anything to help, I will be there.'
Likewise, Vice-President J D Vance, who was in India for an official visit when the tourists were attacked, said the US would not intervene in the conflict.
'We're not going to get involved in the middle of [an India-Pakistan] war that's fundamentally none of our business,' he told Fox News in an interview on May 8.
Though there has been a hint that the US has hardened its position against Pakistan, there are no signs it will change its hands-off policy.
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, when asked at a press briefing on May 8, if Pakistan was supporting terrorist groups, answered in the affirmative.
'That's a call that we have been making for decades,' she said. 'It is the dynamic that we've seen in the Middle East, disrupting lives.'
This was also another divergence from traditional policy in the imbroglio on the subcontinent: the willingness to equate it with the situation in the Middle East, one of most volatile hotspots in the world.
Ms Bruce said the violence should stop because that had not produced a solution either in the Indian subcontinent or in the Middle East.
'There has to be a change in that regard… new ideas to stop generational violence,' she said.
A woman stands outside her house destroyed by Pakistani artillery shelling at the Salamabad village in Uri, about 110kms from Srinagar, on May 8.
PHOTO: AFP
Meanwhile, her boss, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, pressed the point in separate calls to the leaders of India and Pakistan on May 8.
Mr Rubio, who has also taken on the role of the National Security Advisor, is in some ways the most experienced face of the Trump administration owing to his tenure in the Senate intelligence and foreign relations committees. He has stressed the need for immediate de-escalation and direct dialogue between India and Pakistan.
The readout of the call to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said that Mr Rubio 'reiterated' that Pakistan should take concrete steps to end support for terrorist groups.
In his call with India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, Mr Rubio reaffirmed America's commitment to work with New Delhi 'in the fight against terrorism'.
The conservative view in Washington pins the blame on Pakistan for the presence of terrorist groups on its soil.
'Either these groups are acting on behalf of the Pakistani state, in which case Islamabad is directly responsible for their actions,' wrote Mr Jeff Smith, Director of the Asian Studies Center at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation which has close ties with the administration.
'Or they are rogue actors (which no one believes), and the Pakistani state is still responsible for policing its borders and ensuring its territory isn't being used to launch attacks on other countries,' he wrote in a post on X on May 7.
US-based analysts believe that the current tensions will ease before long.
'I believe Pakistan will be compelled to strike back at India,' said Mr Richard Rossow, Senior Adviser and Chair on India and Emerging Asia Economics at Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
'If they initiate a small, unimportant strike in Jammu and Kashmir, it could begin de-escalation. But if they hit meaningful civilian or military targets and strike further into India, India will need to counter-attack,' Mr Rossow said.
India and Pakistan have seen such cycles of violence before and there is a de-escalation built into this escalation, said Dr Aparna Pande, research fellow for South Asia at the Hudson Institute.
'There is a possibility Pakistan may send some missiles or strike inside India for one final round, in which case India will say its air defence have struck those down. That gives both sides enough to satisfy their domestic opinions,' she said.
'India's desire is that the global community understands that Indian victims of terrorism deserve as much sympathy as Western victims of terrorism. And that there should be global pressure on Pakistan, which has allowed in terror proxies since the 1990s.
'But most of all, India needs to tell its people that it has punished the perpetrator of the attacks on tourists.'
She said the Pakistani government, which has been under pressure from restive politics and a struggling economy, likewise needed to tell its people that Pakistan had been able to stand up to an Indian attack.
'So both sides have an off ramp. I do think it will take about 24 to 48 hours for that to happen. I'm not one of those who believes this is going to escalate into war, let alone a nuclear war,' Ms Pande said.
Still, this is the closest the two sides have come to a direct conflict in recent years.
During a serious escalation in the past, then president Bill Clinton intervened forcefully in the Kargil conflict in 1999 to prevent a broader spill-off among the two nations, which had then recently conducted nuclear tests.
While US attempts to broker peace are absent this time, previous administrations have been comfortable with limited Indian counter-attacks in 2016 and 2019 when India made cross-border strikes, said CSIS's Mr Rossow.
'At the same time, the US administration is working hard to further accelerate the growing US-India partnership, and having India bogged down in a regional conflict with a far weaker nation can decelerate US-India ties,' he added.
And apart from the US abhorrence of terrorism, reasons to support India have only proliferated in recent years.
There is a clear tilt towards India over the past decade, agreed Mr Josh Kurlantzick, senior fellow for South-east Asia and South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Mr Trump's personal relationship with Indian Prime Minister Modi is also a factor, according to Mr Kurlantzick. 'The fact that Pakistan is so close to China does not help either,' he added.
Washington's geopolitical rival China is Pakistan's most important strategic and economic partner and has replaced the US as the top source for its military equipment.
For the US, the reasons for building a relationship with India go well beyond a shared concern about China's increasing belligerence.
India is about to become the world's third-largest economy, and is now the most populous nation. A partner to the US in sectors like IT services, India has offered to eliminate its tariffs and its vast market offers opportunities to US companies.
'And China's combative rise makes India an attractive partner for a deeper strategic and commercial relationship,' Mr Rossow said.
Bhagyashree Garekar is The Straits Times' US bureau chief. Her previous key roles were as the newspaper's foreign editor (2020-2023) and as its US correspondent during the Bush and Obama administrations.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump doubles down on 'monumental damage' to Iran nuclear sites; impact of US strikes still unconfirmed
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump insisted on Sunday (Jun 22) that US strikes had destroyed Iranian nuclear sites, after other officials cautioned that the extent of damage was still unclear. "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!" Trump wrote on social media, without sharing the images he was referencing. "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he added. Commercial satellite imagery indicates the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged - and possibly destroyed - the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but there was no confirmation, experts said on Sunday. "They just punched through with these MOPs," said David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector who heads the Institute for Science and International Security, referring to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the US said it dropped. "I would expect that the facility is probably toast." But confirmation of the below-ground destruction could not be determined, noted Decker Eveleth, an associate researcher with the CNA Corporation who specialises in satellite imagery. The hall containing hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery", he said. To defend against attacks such as the one conducted by US forces early on Sunday, Iran buried much of its nuclear programme in fortified sites deep underground, including into the side of a mountain at Fordow. Satellite images show six holes where the bunker-busting bombs appear to have penetrated the mountain, and then ground that looks disturbed and covered in dust. The United States and Israel have said they intend to halt Tehran's nuclear programme. But a failure to completely destroy its facilities and equipment could mean Iran could more easily restart the weapons programme that US intelligence and the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) say it shuttered in 2003.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran weighs retaliation against U.S. for strikes on nuclear sites
A U.S. Air Force B-2 stealth bomber returns after the U.S. attacked key Iranian nuclear sites, at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, U.S. June 22, 2025 in a still image from video. ABC Affiliate KMBC via REUTERS A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex, after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran June 22, 2025. MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES/Handout via REUTERS Iran weighs retaliation against U.S. for strikes on nuclear sites ISTANBUL/WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM - Iran and Israel traded air and missile strikes as the world braced on Monday for Tehran's response to the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites and U.S. President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in the Islamic republic. Iran vowed to defend itself on Sunday, a day after the U.S. joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the country since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite calls for restraint and a return to diplomacy from around the world. Commercial satellite imagery indicated the U.S. attack on Saturday on Iran's subterranean Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged or destroyed the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but the status of the site remained unconfirmed, experts said. In his latest social media comments on the U.S. strikes, Trump said "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran." "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government "must now make peace" or "future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier." The U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles against three Iranian nuclear sites, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the U.S. strikes. Rafael Grossi, the agency's director general, told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Tehran, which denies its nuclear programme is for anything other than peaceful purposes, sent a volley of missiles at Israel in the aftermath of the U.S. attack, wounding scores of people and destroying buildings in Tel Aviv. But it had not acted on its main threats of retaliation, to target U.S. bases or choke off oil shipments that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Attempting to strangle Gulf oil supply by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite conflict with the U.S. Navy's massive Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf. Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January. Brent crude futures LCOc1 rose $1.88 or 2.44% at $78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude CLc1 advanced $1.87 or 2.53% at $75.71. Iran's parliament has approved a move to close the strait, which Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Caine said the U.S. military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. State Department issued a security alert for all U.S. citizens abroad, calling on them to "exercise increased caution." The United States already has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops and warships that can shoot down enemy missiles. The Israeli military reported a missile launch from Iran in the early hours of Monday morning, saying it was intercepted by Israeli defences. Air raid sirens blared in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. Iran has repeatedly targeted the Greater Tel Aviv - a metropolitan area of around 4 million people - the business and economic hub of Israel where there are also critical military assets. Iranian news agencies reported air defences were activated in central Tehran districts to counter "enemy targets", and that Israeli air strikes hit Parchin, the location of a military complex southeast of the capital. REGIME CHANGE In a post to the Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" he wrote. Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday. The Kremlin has a strategic partnership with Iran, but also close links with Israel. Speaking in Istanbul on Sunday, Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses and there would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated. Russia's foreign ministry condemned the U.S. attacks which it said had undermined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. "The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly," it said. The U.N. Security Council met on Sunday to discuss the U.S. strikes as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council the U.S. bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
US strikes on Iran leave hopes for nuclear diplomacy in tatters, World News
PARIS/ISTANBUL — In a bid to defuse the conflict over Iran's nuclear programme, foreign ministers from Europe's top three powers hurried to meet their Iranian counterpart on Friday (June 20) in Geneva. Those hopes collapsed on Saturday when US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran's three main nuclear sites, in support of Israel's military campaign. "It's irrelevant to ask Iran to return to diplomacy," Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, visibly angry, told reporters in Istanbul on Sunday, promising a "response" to the US strikes. "It's not time for diplomacy now." Trump, who said the US airstrikes "obliterated" the sites, warned in a televised speech on Saturday the US could attack other targets in Iran if no peace deal was reached and urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table. Reuters spoke to seven Western diplomats and analysts who said the prospect of negotiations was negligeable for now, with an unbridgeable gap between Washington's demand for zero enrichment by Iran and Tehran's refusal to abandon its nuclear programme. "I think the prospects of effective diplomacy at this point are slim to none," said James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank headquartered in Washington. "I'm much more worried about escalation, both in the short and the long term." According to European diplomats, the three European allies - Britain, France and Germany — were not made aware of Trump's decision to strike Iran ahead of time. French President Emmanuel Macron had promised on Saturday — just before the US strikes - to accelerate the nuclear talks, following a call with his Iranian counterpart. One European diplomat, who asked not to be identified, acknowledged there was now no way of holding a planned second meeting with Iran in the coming week. In the wake of the US military action, any European diplomatic role appears likely to be secondary. Trump on Friday dismissed Europe's efforts towards resolving the crisis, saying Iran only wanted to speak to the United States. Three diplomats and analysts said any future talks between Iran and Washington would likely be through regional intermediaries Oman and Qatar, once Tehran decides how to respond to the US airstrikes on its nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The attacks leave Iran with few palatable options on the table. Since Israel began its military campaign against Iran on June 13, some in Tehran have raised the prospect of withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to signal Iran's determination to accelerate enrichment, but experts say that would represent a considerable escalation and likely draw a forceful response from Washington. Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said Iran's most obvious means for retaliation is its short-range ballistic missiles, that could be used to target US forces and assets in the region. But any military response by Iran carried the risk of miscalculation, he said. "On the one hand, they want a strong enough response that they feel the US has actually paid a price. On the other hand, they don't want to encourage further escalation," he said. European effort ended in failure Even before the US strikes, Friday's talks in Geneva showed little sign of progress amid a chasm between the two sides and in the end no detailed proposals were put forward, three diplomats said. Mixed messaging may have also undermined their own efforts, diplomats said. European positions on key issues like Iran's enrichment programme have hardened in the past 10 days with the Israeli strikes and the looming threat of US bombing. [[nid:719366]] The three European powers, known as the E3, were parties to a 2015 nuclear deal that Trump abandoned three years later during his first term. Both the Europeans and Tehran believed they had a better understanding of how to get a realistic deal given the E3 have been dealing with Iran's nuclear programme since 2003. But the Europeans have had a difficult relationship with Iran in recent months as they sought to pressure it over its ballistic missiles programme, support for Russia and detention of European citizens. France, which was the keenest to pursue negotiations, has in the last few days suggested Iran should move towards zero enrichment, which until now was not an E3 demand given Iran's red line on the issue, two European diplomats said. Britain has also adopted a tougher stance more in tune with Washington and that was expressed in Geneva, the diplomats said. And Germany's new government appeared to go in the same direction, although it was more nuanced. "Iran has to accept zero enrichment eventually," said one EU official. A senior Iranian official on Saturday showed disappointment at the Europeans' new stance, saying their demands were "unrealistic", without providing further details. In a brief joint statement on Sunday, which acknowledged the US strikes, the European countries said they would continue their diplomatic efforts. "We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear programme," it said, adding the Europeans stood ready to contribute "in coordination with all parties". David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum, a Paris-based think tank, said Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's government had taken advantage of the Europeans for years to gain time as it developed its nuclear programme and ballistic missile capabilities. "The European attempt ended in failure," he said. However, the Europeans still have one important card to play. They are the only ones who, as party to the nuclear accord, can launch its so-called "snapback mechanism", which would reimpose all previous UN sanctions on Iran if it is found to be in violation of the agreement's terms. Diplomats said, prior to the US strikes, the three countries had discussed an end-August deadline to activate it as part of a 'maximum pressure' campaign on Tehran. 'Multiple channels' for US talks In total, the US launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against the three nuclear sites, US officials said. [[nid:719370]] US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday warned Iran against retaliation and said both public and private messages had been sent to Iran "in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the table." Five previous rounds of indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran collapsed after a US proposal at the end of May called for Iran to abandon uranium enrichment. It was rejected by Tehran, leading to Israel launching its attack on Iran after Trump's 60-day deadline for talks had expired. Iran has repeatedly said from then on that it would not negotiate while at war. Even after Israel struck, Washington reached out to Iran to resume negotiations, including offering a meeting between the Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in Istanbul, according to two European diplomats and an Iranian official. That was rebuffed by Iran, but Araqchi did continue direct contacts with US Special envoy Steve Witkoff, three diplomats told Reuters. One of the challenges in engaging with Iran, experts say, is that no-one can be sure of the extent of the damage to its nuclear programme. With the IAEA severely restricted in its access to Iranian sites, it is unclear whether Tehran has hidden enrichment facilities. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60 per cent, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack there. Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said that — putting aside from the damage to its physical installations — Iran had thousands of scientists and technicians involved in the enrichment programme, most of whom had survived the US and Israeli attacks. "You can't bomb knowledge," said Acton. [[nid:719368]]
