Tackling the youth unemployment crisis in South Africa
Organisations speak on how the system has failed the youth as many are left jobless and have to fend for themselves.
Image: File
As youth unemployment rises to 46.1% in the first quarter of 2025, a 9.2% point increase over the past decade, organisations working with young people warn that a generation is being systematically excluded from the economy, despite meeting educational requirements.
Oliver Meth, communications manager at Black Sash, said this is a national crisis.
'The latest Quarterly Labour Force Survey revealing an expanded unemployment rate of 56.3% among youth aged 18–34 is a devastating indictment of the country's failure to secure the future of its young people.
'This figure is not only alarmingly high, it reflects chronic structural inequality, policy inaction, and a growing disconnect between the promises of democracy and the lived reality of many young South Africans.'
Meth added: 'The government is failing its youth by underinvesting in inclusive economic development and failing to deliver on targeted, sustained, and accountable youth employment strategies. Initiatives such as the Presidential Youth Employment Intervention have been poorly coordinated, underfunded, and disconnected from grassroots realities.
'Moreover, there is insufficient political will to address corruption and inefficiency that diverts public funds from critical job-creation initiatives. The social grant system, while vital, is not being fully leveraged as a developmental tool for youth.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Siyabulela Monakali, spokesperson for advocacy group Ilitha Labantu, said the crisis reflects a 'structural lockout,' not a lack of education or ambition.
'This is not a skills gap. Even education no longer guarantees employment,' the organisation stated.
'Most of those affected are black youth from townships and rural areas, where access to opportunity remains severely limited.'
The organisation added that many unemployed youth have matric, TVET qualifications, or university degrees but remain outside the formal job market.
They argue that the education system continues to produce paper qualifications with little real-world value, particularly in under-resourced schools.
According to the organisation, over half of young South Africans do not complete matric. Those who do often lack digital, critical thinking, or entrepreneurial skills relevant to the modern economy.
'South Africa remains a country where your birthplace often determines your outcome,' said the organisation.
'Beyond the classroom, young people face a second layer of exclusion: limited access to mentorship, transport, the internet, and guidance on how to apply for jobs, bursaries, or skills programmes.
'Without these basics, even the best-intentioned policies remain out of reach for many.
'Without mentors, there is no one to show the way. Without training, there is no confidence to step forward. Without resources, the concept of 'opportunity' becomes abstract.'
The youth of 2025 are facing several challenges, from high unemployment rates to substance abuse.
Image: File
Ilitha Labantu also criticised the private sector, saying most companies have failed to transform their leadership and are not doing enough to create pathways for youth.
'Corporate South Africa continues to hold the country at ransom. Most companies remain white-owned, with white-dominated leadership that bears no resemblance to the nation's demographics or aspirations.'
The group said the most effective job creation sectors, care work, green energy, construction, agro-processing, digital services and creative industries, remain out of reach without proper investment and training infrastructure.
'There is high demand for skills in coding, solar installation, caregiving and data analysis, but access to this training is limited,' it said.
It called for urgent improvements to TVET colleges, including updated curricula, reliable infrastructure, and stronger links to local employers.
Ilitha Labantu drew a direct connection between unemployment and youth crime, particularly gang activity. In areas with few job prospects, gangs are often the only available source of income and belonging.
'It is easier to make R200 a day through crime than to spend six months applying for jobs that do not exist,' the group said.
The fear and distrust of law enforcement were also raised.
'For many, fear of the police rivals fear of criminals,' the group stated, calling for trauma-informed policing and collaboration with social workers and NGOs.
Long-term youth unemployment, they argue, is not just an economic issue, it is a threat to national stability.
'The longer we leave youth excluded, the more likely they will turn to alternatives that offer what the state has failed to: a sense of identity, control and power.'
Abigail Moyo, spokesperson for the trade union United Association of South Africa (UASA), also raised concerns about exclusion in government policy discussions.
Responding to President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent National Dialogue initiative, Moyo asked: 'Where are the young people who face the daily challenges of unemployment and inequality? We want to see the young unemployed youth contributing to these dialogues.'
She called for the establishment of forums that include graduates and job seekers, saying the most practical solutions often come from those directly affected.
Meanwhile, employment platform Lulaway's CEO Jake Willis said South Africa is confronting 'a national emergency that threatens the future of an entire generation'.
Lulaway has connected thousands of young job seekers to employers through a mix of technology, work readiness training, and mentorship.
Business Partners Limited, a major financier of small businesses, said the country's future may lie in youth-led entrepreneurship.
Area Manager Lawrance Ramotala said SMEs are playing a critical role in creating jobs, transferring skills, and mentoring first-time entrepreneurs.
'In many cases, SMEs are the first to take a chance on young people,' he said. 'What we're seeing is a groundswell of youth entrepreneurship rooted in community enterprise.'
Ramotala said young entrepreneurs are not just surviving, but building businesses that tackle social issues, from education to mental health. But he warned that without support, these efforts are at risk.
'It's not enough to encourage youth to start businesses. They need support to stay the course, particularly in the early stages when failures can be discouraging and resources are limited.'
He added that many young business owners are creating peer-to-peer support systems that go beyond what large companies can offer, using their platforms to share opportunities, funding, and mentorship.
'If we want to build a more inclusive, sustainable economy, we must invest in our youth, not just as jobseekers but as job creators. By backing youth entrepreneurship, we're not only building businesses, we're building futures.'
mandilakhe.tshwete@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars enforcement: the new era of tax compliance in South Africa
Tax Discover how the South African Revenue Service has transformed into a powerful enforcement agency with Project AmaBillions, and learn how to navigate the new landscape of tax compliance to protect your finances. The South African Revenue Service (Sars) is no longer the passive revenue service many South Africans remember. With the injection of R3.5 billion from the national budget and the ominous launch of 'Project AmaBillions,' Sars has entered its most aggressive phase of enforcement in years and is quickly turning into one of the most sophisticated, assertive, and unrelenting revenue authorities in the world. Welcome to the new high-stakes era of tax compliance, which marks the end of the era of any perceived leniency. It is now the time of relentless enforcement. If you've received a surprise assessment or an additional tax bill, doing nothing could be financially and legally disastrous. Sars has flipped the switch: compliance or consequences South Africa's budget is strained, and Sars has one clear mandate: collect at all costs. The days of informal engagement are over. Today, Sars is functioning as a well-resourced enforcement agency, driven by targets and backed by increasingly automated systems that flag non-compliance in real-time. Their legal tools of collection include: - Final demands; - Civil judgments; - Third-party appointments are issued directly to your bank without having to inform you; - Garnishee orders issued directly to your employer; - Instructing the Sheriff to collect; - Asset seizures; and - Criminal prosecution. If you disagree with an assessment, silence is surrender. Unless formally and timeously disputed, Sars will pursue recovery. And they don't knock, they act. From garnishee orders to default judgments, Sars is now executing collections swiftly and with minimal notice. Once the machine is in motion, it becomes significantly harder and more expensive to reverse. There's a process, but it's not forgiving Yes, there is a dispute process. And yes, it exists to protect taxpayers, but only if used strategically and correctly. You have 80 business days from the date of assessment to object. Miss this window, and you must beg Sars to condone your lateness, and they're under no obligation to say yes. Even if the assessment is wrong, Sars is entitled to collect unless and until a dispute is lodged and the debt is suspended. Without this, enforcement proceeds. Your bank accounts, salary, or even those who owe you may be targeted. Sars has shown no hesitation in using every legal mechanism at its disposal, and you must thus use every legal mechanism at your disposal to protect your interests. Disputes must be strategic - this is a legal battlefield This is not the time for 'DIY' tax disputes. In the enforcement era, objections need to be drafted like legal pleadings, not complaints. Sars doesn't respond to emotion; it responds to evidence, statute, and precision. A skilled tax attorney can mean the difference between a successful objection and irreversible enforcement. This is especially critical when multiple years are at stake or where Sars alleges serious non-disclosures. Sars Commissioner Kieswetter has made their philosophy clear: compliance will be facilitated; non-compliance will be punished. The playing field may be fair, but it is also ruthless to those who don't act timeously. Every single day counts, and delay is dangerous In today's enforcement climate, an assessment is not a suggestion; it's a trigger. It signals the start of Sars' collection clock. If you don't respond with speed and legal force, you may find your finances, assets, and reputation under siege. Every day you delay, Sars gains ground. An assessment isn't an invitation to negotiate. It's a legal action, and if you fail to act swiftly and strategically, Sars will act for you through your bank, your employer, or the courts. Dispute on time. Dispute strategically. Or prepare for the full force of Sars enforcement. Act now, those who wait, lose. * Daniels is the head of tax controversy and dispute resolution at Tax Consulting SA. PERSONAL FINANCE
TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says
Freedom of Religion South Africa (Forsa) has strongly denied what it termed false and defamatory allegations made by chairperson of the CRL Rights Commission Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva on Thursday. During a media briefing convened by the commission, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva alleged Forsa and its executive director Michael Swain had accused her, Cheryl Zondi and/or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation of receiving R1.5m from the National Lotteries Commission. Zondi was a witness in the rape trial of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso. Forsa said this donation was reported widely in the media. It said a press release from the National Lotteries Commission of December 13 2018 stated the Cheryl Zondi Foundation had partnered with the Izimvo 447 NPC and received R1.5m to aid their work for those exploited in sacred spaces. 'Neither Michael Swain, nor Forsa, has ever alleged financial misconduct of any kind. Such claims are false and wholly without any factual basis at all,' the organisation said in a statement. Forsa said it was disappointed that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva did not first seek clarity or engage with it before making public accusations and threatening legal action. 'Her subsequent laying of criminal charges against Michael Swain and Forsa is seen as vexatious and unfounded. It appears to be a personally motivated attack designed to intimidate and deter Forsa (or others) from opposing the chair's agenda to push again for state regulation of religion.' Forsa said it reserved all legal rights in its response to this matter and was considering appropriate legal remedies in response to these false and harmful allegations. 'These include a formal demand for retraction as well as amending its extant damages claim for defamation.' Forsa said it was not against any person or institution, including Mkhwanazi-Xaluva or the commission. 'On the contrary, Forsa supports all of its legitimate and constitutional objectives. However, our singular focus is the protection and advancement of religious freedom and related constitutional rights in South Africa.' Forsa said a letter from more than 20 senior religious leaders representing about 12-million South Africans was sent to President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2019, raising several concerns, including that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva simultaneously served as CRL chairperson and deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation. The commission was a Chapter 9 institution, created to be independent and impartial, accountable only to parliament, Forsa said. 'Thus, its chair must avoid bias, preferential treatment and dual loyalties. Arguably, this includes keeping clear boundaries when interacting with organisations, especially advocacy organisations, linked to matters before the commission.' Forsa said under Mkhwanazi-Xaluva's leadership at the time, the CRL strongly pushed for state regulation of religion. 'A wide diversity of faith communities strongly opposed the CRL's proposal. The 'conflict of interest' concern arose because the CRL chair cited the Omotoso case as a high-profile example to justify the CRL's proposed regulation model (via peer review councils, licensing of religious leaders, etc).' Her appointment as the deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation, therefore, created a strong impression of an overlap of interest and influence. 'On the one hand, the chair of the CRL is tasked with impartial interaction with faith communities, constitutional compliance, and safeguarding diverse religious rights. Acting as deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation is an advocacy-aligned — not neutral — position.' This raised legitimate concerns about a conflict of interest on the part of the chairperson, Forsa said. 'It must be stressed that this in no way raises any concern or casts any suspicion on Cheryl Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation.' Since being reappointed, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva has continued promoting proposals for state regulation of religion, including the introduction of peer review mechanisms, Forsa said. It said it had consistently opposed this course of action, repeatedly warning that state regulation of religion was unnecessary, unconstitutional, unworkable and unaffordable. 'In Forsa's public education efforts to point out the dangers to religious freedom of state regulation of religion, we gave the historical background to the current context. One part of this extensive presentation referenced the 2019 letter to the president in good faith and with full transparency.' Forsa said the 2019 letter did not accuse Mkhwanazi-Xaluva of theft or corruption of any kind and did not contain any accusations against Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation at all.
eNCA
9 hours ago
- eNCA
Teaching money lessons early
CAPE TOWN - Understanding financial risks is a life skill, not just an adult concern. Those words are from JustMoney, a platform that helps South Africans to make good money choices. And, in Youth Month, youth financial literacy also takes the spotlight.
