logo
Haldimand-Norfolk MPP calls for ‘Foodbelt' to protect Ontario's farmland

Haldimand-Norfolk MPP calls for ‘Foodbelt' to protect Ontario's farmland

Dave Kranenburg got up early Tuesday to
plant trees
on his 28-hectare farm in the
Oak Ridges Moraine.
Then the director with the National Farmers Union drove to Queen's Park in Toronto to show his support for a private member's bill designed to protect
farmland
like his.
At a news conference, Kranenburg said the
Protect Our Food Act
is 'vitally needed' as Ontario's arable land falls victim to encroaching development.
'We're investing a lot of our time, our energy, our resources in protecting this soil, the water around us, and to grow food for our neighbours,' he said.
'And I want to know that it's going to be there in 20 years.'
The bill, co-sponsored by Haldimand-Norfolk MPP
Bobbi Ann Brady
and Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner, would see the province create a 'Foodbelt' — like the Greenbelt, but for farmland.
The proposed legislation would assemble a task force of farmers, agricultural experts and land-use planners to craft a 'Foodbelt protection plan,' Schreiner explained.
Farmland inside the Foodbelt would be permanently protected from development.
The plan would include strategies to reduce land speculation, improve soil health, and 'enhance farmland,' all with an aim to 'grow more food right here in Ontario,' Schreiner said.
'Because food security is national security, and without farmland, there are no farms, no food, no future.'
With the province losing nearly 130 hectares of farmland every day to urban sprawl, aggregate mining and highway construction, swift action is needed, Brady added.
'So that we can feed ourselves, we must cease the constant subtraction of arable land,' she told reporters.
'This legislation will help prevent further land degradation and protect farmland and arable land for future Ontarians and Canadians, all while respecting farmers who want to create succession plans and reinvest in their farms.'
Brady said the farmland lost every day in Ontario could be used to grow 23.5 million apples, 37 million strawberries or enough grapes to fill 1.2 million bottles of wine.
'If we don't protect our food-producing land, we will send shock waves across our economy,' Brady said, noting the agriculture and food processing sector employs nearly one million Ontarians and adds $50 billion to the economy every year.
Schreiner and Brady's bill is supported by Ontario Farmland Trust, the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario and the Ontario Federation of Agriculture.
At Tuesday's news conference — held a few hours before the bill was tabled in the legislature — OFA director Mark Reusser called farmland 'a strategic resource that can't be made (after) you destroy it.'
'We need to save this precious resource,' Reusser said.
Safeguarding Ontario's food sovereignty trumps partisan politics, Schreiner said, adding MPPs should 'put people before party (and) work together to tariff-proof our economy and protect the places we love in Ontario, especially the farmland that feeds us.'
Brady said conserving farmland 'is a passion near and dear to my heart,' as she comes from one of Ontario's most productive agricultural regions.
This is the independent MPP's second try at getting farmland protection into law. A similar private member's bill she tabled in 2023 was voted down by the government.
This time, with formal support from the Greens and a proposed task force to be led by farmers themselves, Brady is more optimistic.
She said she plans to consult with rural stakeholders to 'really drill down and get the best piece of legislation that this government can't say no to this time.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites

Hamilton Spectator

time8 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites

Iranian Canadians and Jewish groups turned worried eyes to the Middle East on Sunday, as U.S. strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites raised fears of escalating violence. Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, said family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.' 'I'm very worried because this will only accelerate the violence in the region,' she said in a phone interview. 'It will further aggravate the problem and take us further away from peace.' Machouf, who is also an epidemiologist and former NDP candidate, believes the strikes will only hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime. Attacks from other countries means that Iran's people 'are not protected by their government, nor protected by others, by the international community,' she said. 'So people feel abandoned by everyone, everywhere.' The United States inserted itself in Israel's war against Iran early Sunday as it launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on social media that U.S. military action was designed to alleviate the 'grave threat' Iran's nuclear program represents to international security. 'Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' he wrote. But Carney said the situation in the Middle East was 'highly volatile,' and urged the parties to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution. The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs described Iran's nuclear program on Sunday as a 'grave danger to global peace and security.' 'Eliminating this threat is an essential step toward achieving a safer Middle East and a more secure and peaceful world,' wrote Noah Shack, who urged the federal government to 'stand strong against the Iranian threat.' Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision will have on civilians. 'I think there's quite a bit of (concern) simply because there's a lot of unknowns,' he said. Shahrooz said Iran's regime offers virtually no protection to its own citizens in the form of air raid sirens or shelters, and internet has been cut off. 'So there's a lot of fear about what we will find out once internet connection is restored and we're able to talk to our families again,' he said. He said feelings among Canada's Iranian diaspora vary, from anger at the strikes to support for U.S. actions. 'Among the people who are not supportive of Iran's regime, I think there are some who are cheering and who are saying this was long overdue,' he said. 'And they're happy to see the Iranian regime's nuclear program effectively dismantled and to see that regime humiliated.' Machouf, on the other hand, called any suggestion that Israel will 'liberate' Iran's people a 'masquerade' and said regime change must come from within. Gur Tsabar, a spokesperson with Jews Say No to Genocide, said a rally called 'Hands Off Iran' was organized for Sunday afternoon in Toronto to demand sanctions on Israel and a two-way arms embargo. He described recent Israeli and American actions in Iran as 'beyond disturbing.' Tsabar said the rally scheduled for Sunday afternoon is co-organized by 16 groups, including the Iranian Canadian Congress, Palestinian Youth Movement, Jews Say No to Genocide and a number of labour unions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Mark Carney's minority government has an unexpected partner in the Conservatives — for now
Mark Carney's minority government has an unexpected partner in the Conservatives — for now

Hamilton Spectator

time10 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Mark Carney's minority government has an unexpected partner in the Conservatives — for now

OTTAWA—There's a new coalition in town. If the last Parliament was dominated by the Conservatives' insistence that the Liberal-NDP alliance had spun the country into an irreversible state of disarray, the opening weeks of the latest session has put a new pact on the map. 'It appears to me, and it remains to be seen, that (Prime Minister) Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering Pierre Poilievre's policies with a more friendly face,' said the Green Party's Elizabeth May on Monday, as she raised the alarm over C-5, the Liberals' major projects bill. The Grit-Tory co-operation around that bill, which led to the proposed legislation being bulldozed through Parliament this week, prompted members of other federal parties to make the same dig. The Bloc Québécois warned of a 'new cross-party alliance,' while the NDP accused both parties of joining forces to steamroll over environmental protections and Indigenous rights. Of course, there is no actual coalition at play. But charges of one, combined with a fledgling Carney government pulling the Liberals away from the left, means the Conservatives must make a new case as to why they are still the top alternative in a post-Justin Trudeau world. 'Mark Carney is governing like a Progressive Conservative. So where's your opportunity?' said Tim Powers, a former Conservative strategist and chair of Summa Strategies. Carney's 'One Canadian Economy' bill, which proposes, in part, to grant Ottawa temporary powers to fast-track major resource and infrastructure projects, contains some promises that are not altogether different from what Poilievre pledged during this year's campaign. Rapidly spurring Canadian resource projects and accelerating approvals were key commitments in the Conservatives' platform, even if they were accompanied by other promises like scrapping the industrial carbon price and repealing the Liberals' contentious Impact Assessment Act. Bill C-5 is unlike any piece of legislation we have seen in Canada federally. Because Bill C-5 doesn't go that far, it doesn't have Poilievre's complete approval. And while his decision to be the Liberals' dance partner this week quickly drew the ire of other opposition parties, others believe it wasn't a damaging move. 'Canadians ultimately want them to work together,' said Shakir Chambers, a Conservative strategist and vice president at the public affairs firm Oyster Group. 'If you're going to co-operate on some things, co-operate on the things that you have been championing, even pre-election, to move forward and get them passed.' Powers said Poilievre now has heavyweights in his caucus like Edmonton Northwest MP Billy Morin, the former chief of Enoch Cree Nation, to push back against narratives that the Conservatives aren't attuned to concerns from Indigenous communities about the bill. MPs are expressing reservations about the push to fast-track major development projects. The Liberals, too, don't seem particularly bothered by the 'coalition' barbs. 'I don't take them very seriously,' London Centre Liberal MP Peter Fragiskatos told the Star. 'I'm very glad (the Conservatives) are coming to the game and playing a constructive role. It's been a very long time since they've done that,' Liberal MP and former House Speaker Greg Fergus said. Nevertheless, the early weeks of Canada's 45th Parliament have offered a few glimpses into where the Conservatives see their lines of attack. One emerged this week in the form of the Trudeau-era target that zero-emission vehicles should make up 20 per cent of new car sales starting in 2026, growing to 100 per cent by 2035. 'Well, somebody wants to tell you where to go and how to get there,' Poilievre said in a five-and-a-half minute video posted on social media Thursday. 'It's the Liberal government's new attempt to ban your gas-powered vehicles.' Conservative Deputy Leader Melissa Lantsman introduced a defeated motion this week, calling on the Liberals to scrap the policy and posting on social media that 'the government has no place in the driveways of Canadians.' The policy is not a 'new attempt,' nor is it a flat-out 'ban' on gas-powered vehicles: it's a regulatory scheme aimed at incentivizing the sale of more EVs. 'That's another thing that Justin Trudeau was focused on,' Powers said. 'Guys, wake up! And girls. Justin Trudeau is gone. He's gone. There's a new Liberal leader, and he's not giving you much ammunition.' But Chambers said zeroing in on the EV mandate is a natural next step for a party focused on buoying the oil and gas sector. 'It's a good point to attack,' Chambers said. 'If you bring back … the industrial carbon tax issue, again, opposing the EV mandate kind of fits with that overall blanket of policy ideas.' Other issues the party focused on this week, such as bringing forward a motion imposing a lifetime ban on ArriveCAN contractor GCStrategies, were more successful. But Chambers said that the past few weeks of Parliament have mostly been a 'test run', and that Canadians are currently focused on more pressing issues like affordability, trade disruptions and international conflicts. That's where he says Poilievre's focus should lie as he prepares for a fall session, where it's expected that the Conservative leader will make his triumphant return to the House of Commons after a summer byelection, revamp his shadow cabinet with fresh faces, and set Carney's first federal budget in his sights. He'll also have to factor in the Conservative party's national convention, set to be held next January, where he will face a leadership review following his election loss. Powers said that by the time the calendar rolls over into September, he wants to see more 'maturity' from the party. 'I think Conservatives need to lead a little bit again in thought, not just in (social media) clip, and in meme,' Powers said. 'Poilievre's a smart fellow. How can he do that? Where can he put a marker down?'

Lidl says ‘we will not compromise on standards' while affirming ‘commitment to British farmers'
Lidl says ‘we will not compromise on standards' while affirming ‘commitment to British farmers'

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lidl says ‘we will not compromise on standards' while affirming ‘commitment to British farmers'

Lidl has announced that it is standing firm on its "commitment to British farmers" as they confirmed that they will "not compromise on standards". The supermarket giant confirmed it will continue sourcing 100% fresh, British beef across all its stores, and has no plans to import or switch sourcing to beef suppliers outside of Great Britain. Lidl GB vowed to maintain its long-term support for British producers and farmers, ensuring its customers can continue to rely on the discounter for locally and responsibly sourced, high-quality fresh beef at market-leading value. READ MORE: Foreign Office issue stream of travel alerts following US strikes on Iran READ MORE: 'I was kicked out of Dubai and flown back to Manchester over my tattoos' The discount supermarket's fresh beef range is all Red Tractor Assured, which ensures that food safety, animal welfare, traceability, and environmental protection are all taken care of throughout the food chain. Lidl has written to Red Tractor, The National Farmers' Union, and its suppliers to reassure them on this commitment and pledge ongoing support for the British agricultural sector. Richard Bourns, Lidl GB Chief Commercial Officer, said: 'British farming is recognised globally for its high standards of animal welfare, food safety and environmental stewardship. At Lidl, we know these values matter to our customers, which is why we proudly support and champion British agriculture. 'As we enter our fourth decade in Great Britain, our commitment to these principles has never been stronger. We will not compromise on standards even if others choose to do so. Our commitment goes beyond maintaining high standards - it's about standing by British farmers when they need us most and doing what's right for our customers.' Lidl established itself in Great Britain in 1994 and today has more than 35,000 employees across its 980 stores and 14 distribution centres in England, Scotland and Wales.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store