logo
LA mayor says city ‘will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against residents

LA mayor says city ‘will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against residents

The Hill12-06-2025

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Wednesday that her city 'will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against its residents.
'Los Angeles will not allow fear to be used as a weapon against Angelenos who make our city strong,' Bass said in a post on the social platform X.
'My administration is working with community organizations, legal advocates, and local leaders to ensure that every resident knows their rights and has the support they need. This city stands united,' she added.
Earlier Wednesday, Bass said the raids were 'political retribution' against residents of the predominantly Democratic city.
'This fear paralyzes communities. We saw it before: kids too scared to go to school, families torn apart without warning. Let's not pretend this is about public safety. It's political retribution—plain and simple,' she added.
President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said the LA protests were making ICE raids more 'difficult' and 'dangerous' on Tuesday.
'It's like we're a third world nation where people think it's okay to threaten the life and safety of federal law enforcement officers and their families,' Homan said during an appearance on NBC Nightly News.
On Monday, Bass said that immigration raids in her city resulted in 'disorder' the prior night.
'Well, I just have to say that if you dial back time and go to Friday, if immigration raids had not happened here, we would not have the disorder that went on last night,' Bass said on CNN's 'The Situation Room.'
'I will tell you that it is peaceful now, but we do not know where and when the next raids will be,' she added.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) went after President Trump in a video address later on Tuesday, following the Trump administration deployed thousands of National Guard soldiers and Marines to Los Angeles in an attempt to subdue immigration protests.
Newsom said while California is not unfamiliar with immigration enforcement, the administration was not focusing on immigrants living in the country illegally who have criminal records or those with deportation orders but 'indiscriminately targeting hard-working immigrant families regardless of their roots or risk.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles
Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

Chicago Tribune

time25 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. 'The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows,' the court wrote. 'The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.' It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a 'BIG WIN.' He wrote that 'all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' Newsom said. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.

Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration
Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration

Wall Street Journal

time32 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration

Oil prices were mixed in European afternoon trade on Friday, with Brent crude down more than 2% to around $77 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate edging 0.7% higher to $74 a barrel. Brent futures fell after President Trump set a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will strike Iran, easing fears of an imminent military intervention. The international oil benchmark had settled 2.8% higher on Thursday at $78.85, its highest close since January.

Trump Gives Netanyahu Green Light to Continue His Reckless Wars
Trump Gives Netanyahu Green Light to Continue His Reckless Wars

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Gives Netanyahu Green Light to Continue His Reckless Wars

President Trump took time on Wednesday to reaffirm his unwavering support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wars. 'I said, 'Keep going.' What do I say?' Trump said when asked about his recent conversations with Netanyahu. 'I speak to him every day. He's a good man … been very unfairly treated by his country, I think. Very unfairly.' 'Have you given him any indication that you may seek to aid them more than you have already?' a reporter asked. 'No.' At this point in the Israel-Iran conflict, the U.S. has offered Israel intelligence and helped shoot Iranian missiles out of the air. Trump has also left the door open for further U.S. military intervention, a development that would make Netanyahu's job that much easier. Trump doesn't seem willing to budge on his support for Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran under the guise of some potential nuclear threat, even as many in his own base oppose it in the name of 'America First.' If anything, this war offers Netanyahu some temporary reprieve from attention on his genocide in Gaza. If Trump believes Netanyahu is being treated unfairly even as he commits genocide in Gaza and provokes all-out war with Iran, all while failing to both eliminate Hamas and free all the Israeli hostages, then Trump is even more blindly committed to the prime minister than initially feared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store