Big Pit charging mine admission is 'wrong'
It is wrong to charge people to enter the Big Pit National Coal Museum, a Senedd report says.The museum in Blaenavon, Torfaen, has started charging £8 per person, with some concessions, on a trial basis until July 2026.But the culture and sport committee says access should remain free on principle and not be a luxury for those who can afford it, calling for better funding for Welsh museums so collections remain free for all.The Welsh government said it was committed to keeping entry to all seven museum sites free, as well as to the national collections, and would consider the report's findings.
Tours of Big Pit, one of Amgueddfa Cymru's seven museums, are led by former miners and explore original mine shafts and museums.A sign outside the entrance now states: "Due to financial pressures and funding cuts, from 5 April we will be charging for the underground tour." But Delyth Jewell MS, chair of the Senedd's culture and sports committee, said the tours are "a fundamental part of our national collections, they are part of our national story, and that shouldn't be limiting if people can't afford to access them".The report says the Welsh government has "not fulfilled its responsibility in funding museums adequately", citing a 17% cut in real terms to funding for culture and sport in Wales in the last decade. "We appreciate that it is expensive for Amgueddfa Cymru to provide access to the underground workings at Big Pit," it says."However, we think this is an argument for the Welsh government to provide an adequate level of funding, not for Amgueddfa Cymru to charge for access."
Visitors gave a mixed response to the charge, with Deborah Clubb from Merthyr Tydfil saying: "I think [the fee] would make it something that I wouldn't visit as often, definitely, because it was always a free attraction before and something that you could do as a family without thinking about."Mother-of-six Amy Hughes, from Aberdare, said she took the underground tour several times when it was free. She said: "[The admission fee] does make me not want to take all my kids down there but I do feel it's such good value to be able to go underground and see an actual mine."It would be good if they did a family ticket."
Savannah Knox, visiting from Southern Ontario, said she didn't mind paying because she is used to doing that back home in Canada.She said: "If it's historical or a museum it's usually charged. It helps with the upkeep, right?"Showing her around Wales was Lauren Price from Risca, who said she didn't mind paying the fee "if the money's going back into keeping it up and going".
Amgueddfa Cymru said the Big Pit experience extends "far beyond" the underground tour, and the rest of the site remains free. It said it looks forward to continuing working with the Welsh government as they consider the report's findings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Allied Steel and Wire pension campaigners call for surplus to be used
Pensioners from a plant in Cardiff who lost their pensions when it went bust more than 20 years ago have called for surplus money to be used to compensate from Allied Steel and Wire got 90% of their pensions back, but that has been eroded because payments are not linked to rising of them, John Benson, said "retirement dreams" had been "destroyed" but that using a small portion of a £13bn surplus in the Pension Protection Fund would be enough to fully restore the UK government said it was considering the matter but warned "these are complex matters requiring a balanced approach". Pension protections were strengthened after the Maxwell Scandal, when newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell stole more than £400m from the pension funds of his Mirror newspaper group to prop up his ailing pensioners lost half of what they had paid in. As a result of his action, the Financial Assistance Scheme was set up as a safety net to protect pensioners when the companies they worked for went bust. It was this scheme that helped bail out a group of Welsh workers from Allied Steel and Wire (ASW) in Cardiff who lost out when the company went under in 2002. Although the ASW workers got 90% of their pensions, their value has fallen since that time as they are not linked to rising prices. 'It's destroyed me' Mr Benson, from Dinas Powys, Vale of Glamorgan, has led a long campaign asking the government to make up the shortfall, which he said has had dire consequences."It's destroyed retirement dreams. Some colleagues have had to downsize," he said. "One lady who was seriously ill herself couldn't afford a funeral after her husband died, and a couple of months later she died herself. "It's soul destroying. It's destroyed me. "There are some horror stories, too many to tell." Now a cross-party group of Senedd members has written to the prime minister urging him to pay the pensions in full, among them the former Conservative leader in Cardiff Bay Andrew RT Davies."This is a massive injustice that's been inflicted on ASW pension holders and other pension holders across the UK," he said."Through no fault of their own, they've lost their entitlement to a full pension which they paid into, and we believe the system should be corrected and that's why we've signed this letter."It has been revealed that the scheme which replaced the Financial Assistance Scheme, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), has a surplus of £ Benson said paying a tiny amount of that money to him and his fellow pensioners to make up the shortfall would not be a hardship, but would make all the difference to them."This money, this surplus in the PPF, should be paid to restore our pensions in full."They've got a £13bn surplus in the PPF – use it!"Stop making excuses that it's public money – it's our money. This money is meant for us, not other government policies." 'Any hope?' The matter was also raised with Pensions Minister and Swansea West MP Torsten Bell at a meeting of the Commons Work and Pensions Committee earlier this chair Labour MP Debbie Abrahams asked: "I cannot understand the reason for not making a decision to enable them to spend the last few years of their life in some comfort, can you give us any hope around this?"Bell replied: "It does need to be looked at properly."It needs to be considered in the round of those wider impacts, as all public policy matters are, but I am absolutely aware of the issues."I am also aware of the average age of the people that are affected."The best thing I can do is to say that I am aware and I am looking at it, but the public finance implications are more complicated than you set out."In response, concerning its £13bn surplus, the PPF said it deliberately had what it called a reserve to protect it from future claims or in case people live longer than Department for Work and Pensions said it recognised members' incomes may have been eroded in recent years."However, these are complex matters requiring a balanced approach," it said."The government is continuing to consider what we have heard from the Pension Protection Fund and Financial Assistance Scheme members on this issue."More on this story on BBC Politics Wales at 10:00 BST on Sunday 22 June
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Senedd denied veto over whether assisted dying becomes legal in Wales
Senedd denied veto over whether assisted dying becomes legal in Wales The new bill would allow those aged over 18 and with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die Assisted dying bill protestors gather outside the House of Commons (Image: Ian Vogler / Daily Mirror ) MPs in the House of Commons have denied Welsh Parliament a potential veto over whether assisted dying will become legal in Wales. A change made to the bill at an earlier stage, which would have given members of the Senedd the power to decide when the law comes into force, has now been reversed. It means that now, both the UK Government and the Senedd will have the power to pass the regulations on assisted dying services in Wales. A significant decision remains for the Senedd, in a vote set to take place in Autumn, on whether to give consent to the legislation. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here . On Friday, MPs voted on whether the bill proceeds for House of Lords consideration. Whilst criminal justice is controlled by the UK Government, health in Wales is handled by the Senedd. It is unclear what would happen in Wales did not come on board. The assisted dying legislation was drawn up by MP Kim Leadbeater. But amendments were made to remove commencement powers for the Senedd, added at an earlier stage by Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney. The amendments of the Senedd's powers were passed with 274 votes and 224 against, and "reflected that criminal law is not the Senedd's responsibility". Article continues below Under current law, encouraging or assisting suicide is illegal in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The new bill would allow those aged over 18 and with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die. During the historic vote in November last year, Alex Barros-Curtis, Anna McMorrin, and Jo Stevens, the MPs for Cardiff West, Cardiff North, and Cardiff East respectively all voted in favour. Meanwhile, Stephen Doughty, the MP for Cardiff South and Penarth, voted against. In Swansea, Torsten Bell, representing Swansea West, voted in favour, while Carolyn Harris, the MP for Neath and Swansea East, did not record a vote. In Newport, Ruth Jones, the MP for Newport West and Islwyn, and Jessica Morden, the MP for Newport East, both voted against the Bill. Article continues below Bridgend MP Chris Emore voted in favour, as did Ceredigion Preseli MP Ben Lake. Caerfyrddin's Ann Davies voted against. And in north Wales, Wrexham's Andrew Ranger, Bangor Aberconwy's Claire Hughes, and Alyn and Deeside's Mark Tami all voted in favour.
The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
We still need to have difficult conversations about abortion
My mother remembers that, when she was a child, a friendly woman, probably in her thirties, lived next door. One day, that woman was gone. Another neighbour had helped her carry out a 'backstreet abortion' – in the days when terminating a pregnancy was illegal but coathangers were not – and she'd bled to death in her own home. I don't even know her name. But I thought of that poor woman this week when MPs voted overwhelmingly to stop women in England and Wales being prosecuted for ending a pregnancy outside the law – for instance, after 24 weeks. Thank goodness, I thought, we live in a nation where women no longer have to risk death or imprisonment in desperate situations. But if there's one thing I've learnt from a decade of writing about abortion – speaking to women, joining pro-choice marches and questioning anti-abortion protesters holding rosary beads and praying outside clinics – it's this. Whichever side you're on (and it's not always black or white), it's easier to make your case if you've engaged with those who don't agree with you. In this deeply emotive debate, talking it out is not only helpful but essential. So, on this heatwave weekend, if you're going to a family gathering or having barbecue with friends, and the topic comes up? Don't shy away from it. It's why I listened this week as LBC presenter Shelagh Fogarty told listeners of her lunchtime radio show: 'I am horrified by what happened in the Commons yesterday… I feel sad and deeply worried.' I expect many of us will have a woman in our lives who feels this way about Tuesday's vote, which saw MPs give abortion law its biggest overhaul in 50 years. No longer will women in England and Wales be prosecuted using an 1861 law designed for Victorian backstreet abortionists. Women will no longer be pulled from their hospital beds following a miscarriage and investigated on suspicion of causing their own late abortion (yes, this happened, and recently). But I also know that not everyone feels the same way, even my fellow women. You might know one of them – your mum, grandmother or aunt; a friend, sister or colleague. We need to be able to have these conversations with each other and not avoid it out of shame or fear (or how ever do we hope to have them with men?) So here's your basic toolkit for talking to a woman in your life who feels worried about what decriminalisation means. First, don't approach them with a 'you're so ignorant' stance – tempting though it might be – especially an older woman. They fought many of these battles first, or have had decades to think about them. Softly, softly. It's also best to shelve any arguments over when a clump of cells becomes a foetus or becomes a baby – if you disagree on that straight away, it's probably game over. Fogarty mentioned 'Sarah', who called her show to share how she'd experienced mental health issues at 35 weeks pregnant and felt the only way out was an abortion. It had helped Fogarty understand, she said, how 'demanding, exacting and desperate a pregnancy can be for some women'. That's what you're going for: compassion and an appreciation that no woman who procures her own abortion, late into a pregnancy, is doing so just because they can. It's not 'abortion on demand'. These women – and there are very few, around 0.1 per cent of all abortions each year – are vulnerable, backed into a corner, sometimes being coerced. They need help, not prison. So talk about Nicola Packer, who took abortion medication thinking she was less than 10 weeks pregnant and, when she went to hospital and discovered she was actually 26 weeks, was thrown in the back of a police van. She was finally cleared last month after a criminal trial. Or Carla Foster, who was jailed in 2023 after taking abortion pills between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant and at a time of serious distress. She was sentenced to 28 months and denied access to her other children, one of whom has special needs. She was freed after a public outcry, but not cleared. It's hard to see how locking these women up does anything useful. Deter others? The tiny number who are so very desperate enough to do this won't be deterred, though they may be put off from seeking medical care. And it's heartbreaking to think of women suffering the tragedy of miscarriage or stillbirth being treated with suspicion, not sympathy. 'Even if you're opposed to abortion, you can understand why the law shouldn't be used in that way,' says Katherine O'Brien from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Next: demystify. I've seen one too many social media posts saying 'abortion is now decriminalised in the UK up to the day of birth'. Except, it isn't. The Abortion Act 1967 requires a termination to be approved by two doctors and it can be performed until 24 weeks (10 weeks for pills by post), unless there are exceptional circumstances such as the woman's life being at risk. That still stands. A doctor who performs an abortion after 24 weeks, without there being exceptional circumstances, can be prosecuted. Now, a woman who ends her own pregnancy after 24 weeks, or without two-doctor approval, cannot. Stay calm. But if they can't? If language like 'murderers' or 'evil' comes up? Take a moment or agree to continue the conversation another time. You can't pretend the other side doesn't exist, but you can be safe in the knowledge that you're on the right side of history.
