Markets aren't ready for a US move on Iran
If the United States launches direct military strikes against Iran, global stock markets will likely react with speed and force—dropping hard before any official policy statements are made or economic forecasts adjusted.
This would not be a measured repricing. It would be a sharp reflex from investors who have, until now, largely overlooked the rising threat of a wider regional war in the Middle East.
Equities across the US, Europe and Asia are still trading near record highs. Confidence has been built on assumptions of rate cuts, stable oil prices, and easing inflation. Those assumptions are now vulnerable. The prospect of a broader military conflict—especially one involving the world's largest economy—threatens to knock markets off balance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Oil has already climbed nearly 9% since the initial Israeli strikes on Iran. That alone sends a clear signal. Energy traders are building in the possibility of deeper supply disruptions. If US forces join the offensive, that risk multiplies. Supply chains would be at risk. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could be affected. The effect on crude would likely be immediate and severe.
Higher oil prices feed directly into inflation expectations. After a long and painful stretch of monetary tightening, many central banks have just begun preparing to pivot. Those plans would stall. Rate cuts expected later this year would be pushed back, or possibly cancelled altogether, if energy costs spike again.
This matters for equity markets because so much of the recent rally is based on an expectation of easier policy ahead. Investors have leaned heavily into risk, chasing yield and growth stories on the belief that borrowing conditions will soon improve. If inflation returns, that narrative collapses. And with it, much of the positioning tied to it.
We are already seeing hints of a shift. The US dollar has strengthened modestly against safe-haven currencies like the yen and Swiss franc. Treasury yields have edged lower as capital moves into government bonds. None of this is extreme, but all of it reflects a market sensing that something is changing.
A direct US strike on Iran would remove all ambiguity. The market's tolerance for risk would drop instantly. The initial reaction would likely hit tech stocks, high-beta names, and emerging market assets first. Liquidity would shrink. Volatility would surge. Many investors would step to the sidelines, awaiting clarity that may not come for days.
ADVERTISEMENT
There's also the issue of timing. Should US action occur suddenly—overnight or during a weekend—it would leave global markets scrambling to price in the consequences before trading resumes. That sort of blind repricing creates wider gaps and sharper drops.
None of this is about the long-term value of businesses or the global economy's trajectory five years from now. It's about near-term risk tolerance. The kind of rapid repricing triggered by geopolitics tends to override valuation logic. It pulls markets down in broad strokes.
What makes this situation particularly sensitive is how underprepared markets seem to be. Despite the headlines and military posturing, positioning remains optimistic. Risk appetite has returned. Rate-sensitive trades are back in fashion. Many investors appear to be assuming that the conflict will remain contained.
That assumption is weak. The Middle East remains highly interconnected. A move by the US opens the door to a wider confrontation, including proxy responses across multiple borders. Markets will struggle to measure the implications if those scenarios begin to unfold.
Even a limited US strike would likely bring airspace closures, shipping route disruptions, and the possibility of further retaliation. All of this increases complexity for supply chains, commodities, and corporate earnings. The most affected companies may not be the most obvious ones—but the reallocation of risk would be fast and indiscriminate at the start.
Investors should be using this moment to assess exposure. That doesn't mean exiting markets entirely. But it does mean understanding where the pressure will come first, and how it could spread. Diversification, liquidity access, and contingency planning all become more important in periods of sudden geopolitical stress.
What's unfolding is not just a regional military story—it's a global market risk. If the United States escalates its involvement, the reaction will not be slow or orderly. It will come in a wave of de-risking that hits asset prices across regions and sectors.
Markets have recovered from shocks before. But the damage often comes from being unprepared when the first move hits. The cost of ignoring this risk is far greater than the cost of adjusting for it. Investors need to be alert now, not later.
When geopolitics meets stretched valuations and overconfidence, the result is rarely subtle. If Washington acts, markets will move—and they will move fast.
Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder
Also published on Medium.
Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
33 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Father and son killed in Gaza strike as death toll rises to 48
An Israeli air raid targeting a residential building in the Al-Tuffah neighbourhood of Gaza City killed a Palestinian man and his son on Friday, according to medical officials. The victims were identified as Abdul Majeed Al-Sharafi and his son, Basem, WAFA news agency reported. Their deaths bring the number of Palestinians killed in the Gaza Strip since dawn to at least 48, as Israeli bombardment continues across the besieged territory.
Middle East Eye
33 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli forces block worshippers from Al-Aqsa Mosque for second Friday in a row
Israeli forces once again closed all gates leading to Al-Aqsa Mosque on Friday, preventing worshippers from attending prayers for the second consecutive week, according to the Jerusalem Governorate. Israeli security forces stationed themselves at every entrance to the mosque, including Bab al-Hatta and Bab al-Silsila, allowing only a limited number of people to pass under what they claimed was a quota-based entry policy. Worshippers were also stopped at Bab al-Sahira, with their access to the Old City and Al-Aqsa blocked ahead of Friday prayers. Since 13 June, Israel has imposed sweeping restrictions on Al-Aqsa, including a full closure for six consecutive days. On Thursday, only 450 people were permitted to enter for noon prayers before Bab al-Hatta was shut again. Waqf staff were granted access under heavy surveillance, while Bab al-Maghariba was opened to allow settlers to enter the mosque compound. The Jerusalem Governorate condemned what it described as 'unprecedented encroachment' on religious freedoms and warned the policy aims to alter the historical and legal status quo of the site.
Middle East Eye
33 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel lashes out over Iran's UN speech ahead of Geneva talks
Israel's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva has strongly objected to Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addressing the UN Human Rights Council, just hours before key diplomatic talks with European leaders aimed at calming the Israel-Iran conflict. In a letter seen by Reuters, Israeli envoy Daniel Meron criticised the council's decision, writing: 'Affording the Iranian foreign minister the floor before this body continues to undermine the council's credibility and constitutes a blatant betrayal of the many victims of this regime worldwide.' Meron accused Tehran of using the platform to 'promote the regime's despotic campaign,' calling the move a blow to the Council's integrity. Despite Israel's protest, the Council confirmed Araghchi would speak, followed by talks with the EU's foreign policy chief and officials from the UK, France, and Germany. Earlier in the week, Iran's UN ambassador described Israel's military strikes as a 'war against humanity.' Israel launched the attacks last Friday, saying it intended to block Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons—claims Tehran denies, insisting its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
