I quit Big Tech to start my own business. Here are 5 AI tools that save me up to 15 hours a week.
For over a decade, I worked in Big Tech. To be honest, I loved it.
I built programs and launched cross-functional initiatives at places like Meta, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Figma. I had incredible teammates, an amazing boss, and a total comp of $300,000 a year. I was learning from the best and growing fast.
Then something inside me shifted, and I left.
About a year and a half after quitting my job and starting my own business, I'm now a founder constantly improving my systems with the help of AI tools, allowing me to scale without burning out.
Even as I thrived in my day job, I experimented on the side
While still at Figma, I started posting content on LinkedIn, coaching job seekers who wanted to land fulfilling program manager roles, and building a community around career growth. That side hustle started to take off.
I realized I didn't just want to help tech companies grow. I wanted to help people grow inside them.
In early 2024, I left my full-time role at Figma to build my own business. I didn't make the choice out of burnout or bitterness, but because I saw a different path — one where I could design my own schedule, create work that felt meaningful, and scale impact in a way that aligned with my values.
Today, I run a multiple six-figure business helping professionals land tech roles through a live cohort program, content creation, and brand partnerships. I've grown my audience to more than 300,000 across platforms without a full-time team.
AI tools have become my go-to team behind the scenes. Here's how I've used them to get hours back, grow faster, and stay focused on what actually matters.
1. Fathom: My meeting assistant
Time saved: ~3 hours/week
As a coach and founder, I'm on Zoom constantly — whether it's sales calls, group coaching sessions, or networking 1:1s. I used to rewatch recordings or spend hours summarizing notes and writing follow-ups.
Now, I use Fathom. It records my meetings, pulls out key moments, and auto-generates action items. I don't even have to leave Zoom — it connects with HubSpot and syncs the recording and summary to each contact.
I save three to four hours a week, and clients and partners compliment how accurate it is.
2. Notion: My operating system
Time saved: ~3 hours/week
Before I went all in on entrepreneurship, my organization was all over the place. I used Google Docs for ideas, spreadsheets for planning, and Asana for task tracking.
Now, everything runs through Notion. It's where I organize student feedback, build a real-time revenue dashboard, map out launches, and manage my calendar. I've even templatized my entire business inside it.
I love the AI feature. It helps me summarize messy notes, write agendas, and surface the exact piece of information I need without digging through 10 tabs.
3. Fyxer: The reason I am inbox zero
Time saved: ~5 hours/week
Email used to drain me. I'd spend an hour writing five thoughtful follow-ups, only to fall behind again the next day.
Now, Fyxer drafts 80% of my replies. It learns from how I write and handles things like student onboarding emails, brand partnership outreach, and thank-you notes. I just personalize and hit send. It's an invisible tool that makes a big difference.
4. ChatGPT (Custom GPT): Tailored résumé feedback at scale
One of the most rewarding parts of my business is helping students rewrite their résumés. However, it's also one of the most time-consuming.
I built a custom GPT that takes a student's current résumé and the job description they're targeting and rewrites it using Google's famous formula: "accomplished X by doing Y, resulting in Z." It highlights their impact, aligns with the role, and uses the results-driven language hiring managers look for, especially in strategic program management roles.
It doesn't replace coaching, but it speeds up the process dramatically. Students still get a personalized experience, but I don't need to edit every single line myself.
5. Content creation prompts: My creative brain
Time saved: ~4 hours/week
People often ask how I consistently post across platforms. The truth is that I don't start from scratch.
I use different ChatGPT prompts depending on the format.
For LinkedIn, I might say: "Turn this student win into a three-part story with a clear takeaway."
For newsletters, I'll ask: "Expand this idea into a personal essay that sounds like me."
For video scripts, I go with: "Make this story punchy, with a hook and a clear CTA."
Tone and pacing shift depending on the platform, and AI helps me map that out quickly. It's like having a creative assistant who understands my voice while recognizing copywriting best practices. I taught it my voice by providing custom instructions, feeding past posts, and refining outputs until it sounded like me.
Instead of getting stuck on what to say, I get to focus on how I want people to feel.
One day I looked up and saw that AI had quietly given me back 10 to 15 hours a week
That's a full day and a half I could now spend on strategy, deep work, coaching, or rest. I wasn't always working, which is a new normal for me. I was building something that felt both sustainable and scalable.
If you're in Big Tech doing meaningful work but starting to wonder if something else might feel more aligned, know that you don't have to burn out to build something great. All the experience you've gained so far won't go to waste. It will become the foundation for something that's aligned, intentional, and yours.
You don't need a big team to scale. You need the right tools, a clear direction, and the willingness to show up, fail forward, and get 1% better each time.
AI hasn't made me less human. It's made me more focused, present, and available for work I love.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
3 hours ago
- The Verge
Meta held talks to buy Thinking Machines, Perplexity, and Safe Superintelligence
At this point, it's becoming easier to say which AI startups Mark Zuckerberg hasn't looked at acquiring. In addition to Ilya Sutskever's Safe Superintelligence (SSI), sources tell me the Meta CEO recently discussed buying ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati's Thinking Machines Lab and Perplexity, the AI-native Google rival. None of these talks progressed to the formal offer stage for various reasons, including disagreements over deal prices and strategy, but together they illustrate how aggressively Zuckerberg has been canvassing the industry to reboot his AI efforts. Now, details about the team Zuckerberg is assembling are starting to come into view: SSI co-founder and CEO Daniel Gross, along with ex-Github CEO Nat Friedman, are poised to co-lead the Meta AI assistant. Both men will report to Alexandr Wang, the former Scale CEO Zuckerberg just paid over $14 billion to quickly hire. Wang told his Scale team goodbye last Friday and was in the Meta office on Monday. This week, he has been meeting with top Meta leaders (more on that below) and continuing to recruit for the new AI team Zuckerberg has tasked him with building. I expect the team to be unveiled as soon as next week. Rather than join Meta, Sutskever, Murati, and Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas have all gone on to raise more money at higher valuations. Sutskever, a titan of the AI research community who co-founded OpenAI, recently raised a couple of billion dollars for SSI. Both Meta and Google are investors in his company, I'm told. Murati also just raised a couple of billion dollars. Neither she nor Sutskever is close to releasing a product. Srinivas, meanwhile, is in the process of raising around $500 million for Perplexity. Spokespeople for all the companies involved either declined to comment or didn't respond in time for publication. The Information and CNBC first reported Zuckerberg's talks with Safe Superintelligence, while Bloomberg first reported the Perplexity talks. While Zuckerberg's recruiting drive is motivated by the urgency he feels to fix Meta's AI strategy, the situation also highlights the fierce competition for top AI talent these days. In my conversations this week, those on the inside of the industry aren't surprised by Zuckerberg making nine-figure — or even, yes, 10-figure — compensation offers for the best AI talent. There are certain senior people at OpenAI, for example, who are already compensated in that ballpark, thanks to the company's meteoric increase in valuation over the last few years. Speaking of OpenAI, it's clear that CEO Sam Altman is at least a bit rattled by Zuckerberg's hiring spree. His decision to appear on his brother's podcast this week and say that 'none of our best people' are leaving for Meta was probably meant to convey a position of strength, but in reality, it looks like he is throwing his former colleagues under the bus. I was confused by Altman's suggestion that Meta paying a lot upfront for talent won't 'set up a great culture.' After all, didn't OpenAI just pay $6.5 billion to hire Jony Ive and his small hardware team? When I joined a Zoom call with Alex Himel, Meta's VP of wearables, this week, he had just gotten off a call with Zuckerberg's new AI chief, Alexandr Wang. 'There's an increasing number of Alexes that I talk to on a regular basis,' Himel joked as we started our conversation about Meta's new glasses release with Oakley. 'I was just in my first meeting with him. There were like three people in a room with the camera real far away, and I was like, 'Who is talking right now?' And then I was like, 'Oh, hey, it's Alex.'' The following Q&A has been edited for length and clarity: How did your meeting with Alex just now go? The meeting was about how to make AI as awesome as it can be for glasses. Obviously, there are some unique use cases in the glasses that aren't stuff you do on a phone. The thing we're trying to figure out is how to balance it all, because AI can be everything to everyone or it could be amazing for more specific use cases. We're trying to figure out how to strike the right balance because there's a ton of stuff in the underlying Llama models and that whole pipeline that we don't care about on glasses. Then there's stuff we really, really care about, like egocentric view and trying to feed video into the models to help with some of the really aspirational use cases that we wouldn't build otherwise. You are referring to this new lineup with Oakley as 'AI glasses.' Is that the new branding for this category? They are AI glasses, not smart glasses? We refer to the category as AI glasses. You saw Orion. You used it for longer than anyone else in the demo, which I commend you for. We used to think that's what you needed to hit scale for this new category. You needed the big field of view and display to overlay virtual content. Our opinion of that has definitely changed. We think we can hit scale faster, and AI is the reason we think that's possible. Right now, the top two use cases for the glasses are audio — phone calls, music, podcasts — and taking photos and videos. We look at participation rates of our active users, and those have been one and two since launch. Audio is one. A very close second is photos and videos. AI has been number three from the start. As we've been launching more markets — we're now in 18 — and we've been adding more features, AI is creeping up. Our biggest investment by a mile on the software side is AI functionality, because we think that glasses are the best form factor for AI. They are something you're already wearing all the time. They can see what you see. They can hear what you hear. They're super accessible. Is your goal to have AI supersede audio and photo to be the most used feature for glasses, or is that not how you think about it? From a math standpoint, at best, you could tie. We do want AI to be something that's increasingly used by more people more frequently. We think there's definitely room for the audio to get better. There's definitely room for image quality to get better. The AI stuff has much more headroom. How much of the AI is onboard the glasses versus the cloud? I imagine you have lots of physical constraints with this kind of device. We've now got one billion-parameter models that can run on the frame. So, increasingly, there's stuff there. Then we have stuff running on the phone. If you were watching WWDC, Apple made a couple of announcements that we haven't had a chance to test yet, but we're excited about. One is the Wi-Fi Aware APIs. We should be able to transfer photos and videos without having people tap that annoying dialogue box every time. That'd be great. The second one was processor background access, which should allow us to do image processing when you transfer the media over. Syncing would work just like it does on Android. Do you think the market for these new Oakley glasses will be as big as the Ray-Bans? Or is it more niche because they are more outdoors and athlete-focused? We work with EssilorLuxottica, which is a great partner. Ray-Ban is their largest brand. Within that, the most popular style is Wayfair. When we launched the original Ray-Ban Meta glasses, we went with the most popular style for the most popular brand. Their second biggest brand is Oakley. A lot of people wear them. The Holbrook is really popular. The HSTN, which is what we're launching, is a really popular analog frame. We increasingly see people using the Ray-Ban Meta glasses for active use cases. This is our first step into the performance category. There's more to come. What's your reaction to Google's announcements at I/O for their XR glasses platform and eyewear partnerships? We've been working with EssilorLuxottica for like five years now. That's a long time for a partnership. It takes a while to get really in sync. I feel very good about the state of our partnership. We're able to work quickly. The Oakley Meta glasses are the fastest program we've had by quite a bit. It took less than nine months. I thought the demos they [Google] did were pretty good. I thought some of those were pretty compelling. They didn't announce a product, so I can't react specifically to what they're doing. It's flattering that people see the traction we're getting and want to jump in as well. On the AR glasses front, what have you been learning from Orion now that you've been showing it to the outside world? We've been going full speed on that. We've actually hit some pretty good internal milestones for the next version of it, which is the one we plan to sell. The biggest learning from using them is that we feel increasingly good about the input and interaction model with eye tracking and the neural band. I wore mine during March Madness in the office. I was literally watching the games. Picture yourself sitting at a table with a virtual TV just above people's heads. It was amazing. More to click on: If you haven't already, don't forget to subscribe to The Verge, which includes unlimited access to Command Line and all of our reporting. As always, I welcome your feedback, especially if you've also turned down Zuck. You can respond here or ping me securely on Signal. Thanks for subscribing.
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Meta CTO Bosworth says OpenAI countered lucrative job offers to AI startup's employees
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said on a podcast this week that Meta has dangled $100 million signing bonuses in front of the startup's employees, but that his company's best people have opted to stay. According to Meta technology chief Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI countered Meta's offers. "The market is setting a rate here for a level of talent which is really incredible and kind of unprecedented in my 20-year career as a technology executive," Bosworth, who joined Meta in 2006 and has been CTO since 2022, told CNBC's "Closing Bell Overtime" on Friday. The AI hiring war heated up dramatically last week, when Alexandr Wang, co-founder of Scale AI, said he will join Meta to work on superintelligence, a term for technology that exceeds human capability. Meta will invest over $14 billion in Scale AI in exchange for a 49% stake, in a deal that was targeted at luring Wang and a few of his top staffers. On Thursday, CNBC reported that Meta had sought to buy former OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever's new startup Safe Superintelligence but is now hiring its CEO, Daniel Gross, and former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. The two have a position in Safe Superintelligence through their venture firm NFDG. And earlier on Friday, CNBC confirmed that Meta reached out to startup Perplexity AI about a possible acquisition, but the deal never materialized. "We really believe in a future where a superintelligent AI is going to be helping humans at every step of the way," Bosworth said. "Wherever they could use an extra helping hand, it's there for them. And so we've been lucky to have this kind of team rally around, both external now and increasingly internal, with people like Alex Wang, this idea of superintelligence and doing what it takes to pursue that vision." In the first quarter, Meta's capital expenditures and principal payments on finance leases approached $14 billion. "Now," Bosworth said, "we're meeting that investment in personnel, and the compute and the people together are what makes it happen." Altman said on this week's podcast, hosted by his brother, that Meta had promised the bonuses on top of more than $100 million in annual compensation. OpenAI didn't respond to a request for comment. Earlier this month OpenAI said it had reached $10 billion in annualized revenue, but the company continues to rack up hefty losses.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta Warns Iran May Block WhatsApp Amid Snooping Allegations
Meta (META, Financials) expressed concern that Iran may move to block WhatsApp following claims by Iranian state media that the messaging platform is being used by Israel for surveillance. The U.S. tech company strongly denied the allegations, calling them false reports, and warned they could be used as a pretext to restrict access to its services at a critical time. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with META. Meta said, We're concerned these false reports will be an excuse for our services to be blocked at a time when people need them the most. The company emphasized that WhatsApp uses end-to-end encryption, meaning that neither Meta nor third parties can access the contents of messages. It also clarified that it does not track users' exact locations or log who is messaging whom. The statement came in response to Iran's state-run IRNA urging citizens to delete WhatsApp, claiming the Zionist regime is exploiting the app to gather private data. In a broadcast shared by Rudaw, an IRNA host warned viewers about potential surveillance targeting individuals linked to sensitive sectors, including nuclear science. While Meta confirmed it does not provide bulk data to any government, it acknowledged that metadatasuch as contacts and device informationcan be shared under specific legal requests. Meta also pointed to over a decade of transparency reports outlining such disclosures. WhatsApp, along with Instagram, was previously banned in Iran in 2022 during nationwide protests. That ban was lifted two months later as part of reforms introduced by President Masoud Pezeshkian to expand internet freedoms. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
