Calls to retain disability transport funding
Disability groups are pushing for retention of Total Mobility funding amid potential trimming of the service in Invercargill.
CCS Disability Action access co-ordinator Mary O'Brien presented to the city council this week as part of its annual plan consultation, urging it to continue funding the programme at current levels.
"Total Mobility is an essential service for many people. It's there to provide a service for people who cannot use other forms of transport," she said.
The nationwide transport initiative assists people who struggle to get around, fares subsidised 75% by central and local government, to a limit.
Invercargill's programme has seen an 88% increase in popularity for the three years to 2023-24, prompting the city council to explore disincentivising options.
Although some used it for recreation, it was mostly used for essentials services such as shopping or going to the doctor, Ms O'Brien said.
The potential funding reduction has already received push-back from the organisation, which said last month it would negatively impact disabled people.
It also comes at a time when the council is considering increasing public transport fares.
Cash fares range from $1.10 to $3, but could jump to $5 for some as the government pushes for increased self-funding.
Ms O'Brien's written submission said public transport was important for helping disabled people meet their daily needs because they were less likely to access cars.
"We receive continual feedback from disabled people that they are continually having to make difficult choices such as purchasing food, heating their homes or paying for transport," she wrote, an increase in fares making that choice even harder.
Association of Blind Citizens Southland branch chair Carolyn Weston said Total Mobility was an essential service and also advocated for better public transport.
"Because buses are not necessarily accessible to disabled people, people are using Total Mobility probably more than they need to," she told councillors.
Her written submission called for an overhaul of the bus service so that it could be more "receptive, accessible, reliable and affordable".
Mrs Weston requested audio announcements be reintroduced, because it was "embarrassing" they were no longer offered by one of the first cities to use them.
Directions given to council staff from elected members on 1 April included developing a process to limit Total Mobility trip numbers and considering a reduction in subsidy to 50%.
■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Curious, Concerned: Picton Residents Weigh In On SH1 Changes
Article – Kira Carrington – Local Democracy Reporter Picton residents have stopped by an NZTA display to show the proposed relocation of SH1 through the town. In a small room in Picton's library, dozens of people have gathered to discuss the intricacies of truck routes, intersections, school crossings and parking spaces. They pored over stands and wall displays, showing the proposed permanent State Highway 1 route along Kent Street to the ferry terminal, instead of through central Picton. The proposed changes have already caused controversy, with one resident calling them 'horrible', when they were announced on 11 June. NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi's pop-up sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday hummed with questions, fresh ideas and a bit of debate, but not from Heather Hopkins, a resident of upper Kent Street, who had popped in to see how the highway would go past her home. She was pretty happy, she said. 'I'm not really affected, I just wanted more information,' Hopkins said. '[I have] no concerns at all, it'll be free flowing, once everyone gets used to it.' In the evening session, people were most drawn to the board showing where Kent Street met the Wairau Road/SH1 intersection, which would take ferry passengers and freight trucks from the terminals out of town under the new proposal. Lara O'Brien, who lived around the corner from Kent Street, said the intersection's new alignment would cut residents off from their own town centre during peak traffic. Drivers on SH1 south of Kent Street wanting to get into central Picton would need to make a right-hand turn onto Wairau Road towards Nelson Square. During peak ferry traffic, they would be stuck in a right-turning lane with no gaps, O'Brien said. 'These people [leaving the ferry terminal] get to just go, but people going to town, when do they get to go?' O'Brien said. 'You get 60 trucks coming out of the ferry terminal. This is going to be a congestion point for locals coming out of town.' Another group lingered around the board showing the relocation of the Picton School crossing on Kent Street. Many of the attendees were reluctant to speak publicly about their opinions on the divisive subject. The loss of roadside parking and problems with trucks parking along the road were common complaints. A truck driver from Levin, whose cousin was a Picton-based truckie, came along to the evening session. He said NZTA did a similar consultation about a pedestrian overpass in Levin and he was sceptical that feedback would alter the proposal. A Picton resident praised NZTA for moving the crossing outside Picton School back to its original position, saying he didn't know why it was put there a few years ago. 'They're just putting it back to where it was, because people don't use it.' NZTA regional manager of system design Robert Osborne said the sessions were a valuable way of sharing information with Picton residents and getting their feedback. 'The drop-in sessions were all well attended, with around 30 – 40 people each session and some coming to visit us a couple of times to ask further questions,' Osborne said. 'We received a great range of questions and comments, which will help us with our detailed design work. 'We also understand… that there will likely be a wide range of opinions about them. However, this project is aimed at improving Picton's roads and making it easier for people to get around. 'We look forward to continuing to hear from the community about our plans.' Design plans would now be finalised and work would start next winter.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Tai Rāwhiti Protest: A Burning Question On Ngāti Oneone's Redress
Article – Zita Campbell – Local Democracy Reporter An online petition supporting the hap has over 1950 signatures. A fire signalling Tai Rāwhiti hapū Ngāti Oneone's call for the return of their ancestral lands has been burning for over six weeks. The hapū said it will stoke the fire until the grievance is resolved, but after three generations of attempting to remedy it, does not want the redress to fall on them. 'It always falls on us to 'make the case',' Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told Local Democracy Reporting (LDR) when the movement started on 5 May. The Crown said any potential redress in this case is the responsibility of the landowner and the hapū. As part of its protest, members of Ngāti Oneone have inhabited Te Pā Eketū Shed, a warehouse-sized property on Gisborne's Hirini St. Rather than an 'occupation', the hāpu calls the action 'a reclamation of whenua'. The location is where Ngāti Oneone's marae and pā were originally established in 1852 before being removed for harbour development under the Private Works Act. Eastland Port, of which Trust Tai Rāwhiti is the sole shareholder, owns the shed and others on the hapū's ancestral land on Hirini St and the Esplanade. At the beginning of the protest movement, the hapū called on the trust, Eastland Port and Gisborne District Council to return land not used for 'core business'. Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann told LDR the council had started exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024. This includes investigating the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners. However, Trust Tai Rāwhiti, which has a funding partnership with the council and serves as the region's economic development and tourism organisation, earlier said addressing historical Treaty breaches was not its responsibility, but rather a matter for the Crown, after it sought independent legal advice. 'We support Ngāti Oneone in pursuing this with the Crown,' chairman David Battin told LDR when the protest started. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka had a different view. The 2010 Ngāti Porou settlement of historical Treaty of Waitangi claims includes Ngāti Oneone, Potaka told LDR. 'The matter being raised … is outside of the process for the settlement of historical Treaty claims. 'Any exploration of options to return and/or purchase the land is a matter for the landowner agency to undertake in discussion with Ngāti Oneone,' he said. Regarding Potaka's statement, a Trust Tai Rāwhiti spokesperson this week said trustees continued to 'engage directly with Ngāti Oneone and remained focused on constructive resolutions'. The 'reclamation of whenua' Gibson confirmed the hapū had met with the landowner groups involved under Trust Tai Rāwhiti and would have a meeting with the council next week. She was unsure whether the groups would respond individually or together. The hapū has committed to maintaining the protest for two months and then will reassess depending on outcomes, she said. 'We'll keep the fire burning until we've had an acceptable response.' In addition to the return of land, the hapū has made other requests to the landowners through an online petition signed by over 1950 as of Friday. The petition urges the Tai Rāwhiti leaders to take three actions: 'Whakahokia Whenua Mai', which requests the return of land not used for core business, 'Whakamana Tangata' and 'Te Tiriti'. Whakamana Tangata requests that Trust Tai Rāwhiti financially compensate Ngāti Oneone for 'the alienation' of their lands without conditions. 'Te Tiriti' requests that the leaders seek a pathway that treats Ngāti Oneone in the same vein as a 'Treaty' partner, rather than 'a community group'. Gibson said that after Eastland Port sold a shed on their ancestral land to the Gisborne Tatapouri Sports Fishing Club three years ago, they worried about what could happen to the rest of their ancestral land, so they started negotiations for the Te Pa Eketū Shed. If the land were sold, it would be harder to reclaim, she said. However, they then realised the port had other sheds in the area, not used for 'core business'. 'In my view, it's not an occupation, it's a reclamation of whenua,' Gibson said, explaining that the shed had been leased while negotiating the sales and purchase agreement. The port would send the hapū the bill, which they would send to Trust Tai Rāwhiti, who would pay Eastland Port (owned by the trust), she said. Trust Tai Rāwhiti was going to give them $1.4 million to purchase the shed, but the hapū wanted to use the money to buy the lot. When their request was denied, they understood and looked into other ways of obtaining the sheds, Gibson said. However, when the hapū got the sales and purchase agreement, things shifted. 'There were four clauses within the sales and purchase agreement, which undermined Mana motuhake [self-determination], which made it untenable,' said Gibson. On 5 May the beginning of the hapū's 'Reclamation of whenua', they were supposed to sign the sales and purchase agreement but decided to 'reclaim' the land instead.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Curious, Concerned: Picton Residents Weigh In On SH1 Changes
In a small room in Picton's library, dozens of people have gathered to discuss the intricacies of truck routes, intersections, school crossings and parking spaces. They pored over stands and wall displays, showing the proposed permanent State Highway 1 route along Kent Street to the ferry terminal, instead of through central Picton. The proposed changes have already caused controversy, with one resident calling them "horrible", when they were announced on 11 June. NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi's pop-up sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday hummed with questions, fresh ideas and a bit of debate, but not from Heather Hopkins, a resident of upper Kent Street, who had popped in to see how the highway would go past her home. She was pretty happy, she said. "I'm not really affected, I just wanted more information," Hopkins said. "[I have] no concerns at all, it'll be free flowing, once everyone gets used to it." In the evening session, people were most drawn to the board showing where Kent Street met the Wairau Road/SH1 intersection, which would take ferry passengers and freight trucks from the terminals out of town under the new proposal. Lara O'Brien, who lived around the corner from Kent Street, said the intersection's new alignment would cut residents off from their own town centre during peak traffic. Drivers on SH1 south of Kent Street wanting to get into central Picton would need to make a right-hand turn onto Wairau Road towards Nelson Square. During peak ferry traffic, they would be stuck in a right-turning lane with no gaps, O'Brien said. "These people [leaving the ferry terminal] get to just go, but people going to town, when do they get to go?" O'Brien said. "You get 60 trucks coming out of the ferry terminal. This is going to be a congestion point for locals coming out of town." Another group lingered around the board showing the relocation of the Picton School crossing on Kent Street. Many of the attendees were reluctant to speak publicly about their opinions on the divisive subject. The loss of roadside parking and problems with trucks parking along the road were common complaints. A truck driver from Levin, whose cousin was a Picton-based truckie, came along to the evening session. He said NZTA did a similar consultation about a pedestrian overpass in Levin and he was sceptical that feedback would alter the proposal. A Picton resident praised NZTA for moving the crossing outside Picton School back to its original position, saying he didn't know why it was put there a few years ago. "They're just putting it back to where it was, because people don't use it." NZTA regional manager of system design Robert Osborne said the sessions were a valuable way of sharing information with Picton residents and getting their feedback. "The drop-in sessions were all well attended, with around 30 - 40 people each session and some coming to visit us a couple of times to ask further questions," Osborne said. "We received a great range of questions and comments, which will help us with our detailed design work. "We also understand... that there will likely be a wide range of opinions about them. However, this project is aimed at improving Picton's roads and making it easier for people to get around. "We look forward to continuing to hear from the community about our plans." Design plans would now be finalised and work would start next winter.
