Inside the ‘abhorrent' state of UK temporary housing with one family homeless since 1998
Children are spending their whole childhoods living in temporary accommodation, with one family in homelessness housing since 1998, a report has said.
In a new report into the dire state of England's temporary accommodation, Citizens UK found that councils are charging homeless people hundreds of pounds in fees to access basic services, such as storage and washing facilities.
Affluent London boroughs are also moving homeless families into more deprived areas outside their boroughs, the report said.
The number of families in temporary accommodation across England is at record levels, with some 165,510 children living in this precarious housing as of the end of 2024.
Nearly 130,000 households now live in temporary accommodation, which includes hostels and B&Bs.
Citizens UK and Trust for London researchers looked in detail at the temporary accommodation provided in London, Birmingham and Manchester. London is the epicentre of homelessness in England, with over 70,000 households in temporary accommodation.
The report found that one family with children in Croydon has been living in temporary accommodation since 1998.
In Westminster, another family had been in temporary accommodation since 2001, and in Brent, a household had been housed since 2003, the report said.
As well as families, there has been a rise in retired people being moved into temporary accommodation. According to freedom of information data, obtained by Citizens UK, a 97-year-old from Brent had been in temporary housing for three years.
A 95-year-old was in homeless housing in Kingston upon Thames, and a 91-year-old was being housed in Enfield.
They also highlighted the practice of more affluent London boroughs, such as Richmond upon Thames, moving homeless families out of their area.
London councils place around 43 per cent of households outside their boundaries, but in Richmond this was much higher at 75 per cent, the report found.
On the other hand, Brent and Barking & Dagenham, who have a higher proportion of low-income residents, only placed 6 per cent of their temporary accommodation households outside of their area.
Families are also sinking into debt because of high charges to put their belongings in storage, the research said.
In Barnet, one household in temporary accommodation had accrued £8,647 in debt due to storage costs, and in Bexley, another household had accrued £7,758, they found.
In Wandsworth, storage costs can add up to £240 per month, the report said. The council also told researchers that putting homeless people on a repayment plan for their debt was 'effective for clients on a low income or in receipt of benefits'.
Homeless people are also being charged to use washing machines in their accommodation. In Manchester, some accommodation charges £1 for use of the washing machines, and in Newham the highest rate was £2.40 per wash and £1.90 per dry. The report calculated that, if the average household does a clothes wash 208 times a year, families in Newham could spend up to £900 annually to wash and dry their clothes.
Dame Siobhain McDonagh MP, responding to the findings, said: 'The lack of social housing has culminated in a situation where one in every 49 households in London is homeless and living in temporary accommodation.
'To live in accommodation without the ability to cook meals, access the internet, store your belongings safely or even have basic access to a toilet and washing facilities is quite simply abhorrent.'
A spokesperson for Croydon Council said: 'Like many councils across the country, Croydon is facing an acute shortage of affordable housing. This has sadly meant that households have remained in temporary accommodation for longer than we would want.
'We are unable to comment on individual cases, but stays of this length are extremely rare and there are many different types of temporary accommodation which include larger council homes and private sector properties.'
Wandsworth cabinet member for housing, Aydin Dikerdem, said the council agreed affordable repayment plans with residents for storage. These are 'typically between £5 and 70 a month, which is below the average £145,79 a month the storage companies ask for', he said.
Mr Dikerdem added: 'The upfront costs are paid by the council directly, in compliance with our duty to protect homeless families' possessions and a repayment plan is then agreed. We can also confirm that no one is paying the full charge.
'The highest debt amount for storage costs referenced in the report relates to missed payments over a number of years for one case'.
A Richmond council spokesperson said they were working hard to ensure temporary accommodation was 'safe, suitable and as close to home as possible'. They added: 'Currently 64 per cent of the people experiencing homelessness we support are placed either within the borough or in neighbouring areas'.
A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'We are providing £1bn for crucial homelessness services this year so councils can support families faster, including an extra £78m for London than the previous government. Alongside this we are also tackling the root causes by building 1.5 million new homes and boosting social and affordable housing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Major Bristol care provider celebrates its 100th birthday
A major care provider has marked its 100th birthday with a large garden of St Monica Trust's villages and care homes celebrated with cream cakes, strawberries and glasses of Pimm's, as well as music from brass quintet and poetry party was held at Cote Lane Retirement Village in Westbury on Trym, where the charity opened its doors in June Williams, head of the trust, which has care homes across Bristol and North Somerset, praised the residents, saying: "They volunteer in the organisation, they run the shops, they're even brewing their own beer at the moment!" He said the trust "believe in contribution" and "want to enable people to flourish by allowing them to develop relationships".VIP attendees at the summer party – where temperatures hit 30C – included the Lord Lieutenant of Bristol, Peaches Golding. Monica Carp, who has lived at Cote Lane for almost 20 years, spoke about the benefits of activities at the trust."You get what you give in," she said. "You can do what you like or you can help to organise events. I organised a craft group which I called 'pin and needles'."The charitable foundation works with older people across the west of England to improve their quality of life.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Wakehurst Mansion to reopen after roof restoration
An Elizabethan mansion in West Sussex is to reopen with new exhibition spaces after being closed for a two-year roof billiard room and the chapel at Wakehurst Mansion will host exhibitions, while the library will offer visitors a "tranquil retreat" and "contemplative environment", Wakehurst Mansion organisers said the displays told the story of Wakehurst as a living laboratory in a historic landscape shaped by centuries of careful and innovative Mansion director, Susan Raikes, said: "We are proud to welcome visitors into a revitalised mansion that honours its past while embracing an exciting future." The billiard room will feature work exploring the transformation of the surrounding landscape, while the chapel will document Wakehurst's role in seed reopening coincides with the 25th anniversary of the Millennium Seed Bank and 60 years since the Royal Botanic Gardens, at Kew, began managing the Ikin, curator at the National Trust, which worked with Kew on the restoration, said: "This marks the beginning of an exciting new chapter at Wakehurst, with new displays exploring the rich history of the mansion and the people who've lived and worked there."The mansion reopens on 27 June.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Michael Gove: ‘I stood as the Labour candidate in the school election'
School Days is a regular series by author Danny Danziger in which acclaimed British names and faces share the childhood stories that shaped them. This week, the former Secretary of State for Education talks about being adopted, his love of books, being a pain at school – and making it to Oxford My grandfather had set up a fish merchants' business, which involved going into the harbour at dawn, buying fish from the boats that had just landed, and then filleting, salting and selling them to fishmongers, or the Rosses and Finduses of this world. My dad, Ernest, left school at 15 to go into the family business. My mum, Christine, also left school at 15 and worked in a jewellers' shop in Aberdeen called Jamieson & Carry, and then latterly as a lab assistant at Aberdeen University. She met my dad while ice skating, which they were both passionate about, and they very quickly got married. But they couldn't have children. The person who gave me up for adoption was from Edinburgh, although she was studying in Aberdeen to be a catering demonstration assistant, which is where she became pregnant. I was born in August 1967 and arrived at the Gove home just before Christmas, so I was four months old when I was adopted. My mother said I was covered in eczema and bathed me in an iron bath in front of the fire. Five years later, my sister, Angela, arrived, and she was also adopted. Several months later, my parents discovered she was profoundly deaf, and so she went to the Aberdeen School for the Deaf. At my primary school every day I would walk back home for lunch – or dinner, as they call it in Scotland – mince and tatties, delicious, and I can't imagine any children doing that today. Aged 11, I went to my secondary school, Robert Gordon's College, which was then a fee-paying boys' independent day school. I started in the autumn of 1979, shortly after Margaret Thatcher had become Prime Minister. Right from the beginning, I was upbraided for being cheeky, which was a consistent theme of my secondary education; most of the times I got into trouble was because of being 'cheeky', 'sarcastic', or 'a pain'. Gordon's was quite trad, teachers in gowns, for instance, not quite a male version of Jean Brodie's school, but that would give you some sense of the vibe. I didn't have a scholarship at the time so my parents paid the full fees, which was fine – until it became an issue when my dad had to sell his business, essentially because of the overall decline of the fishing sector in Aberdeen. Fortunately I got a scholarship for my final two years at school; if I hadn't secured it, my parents would not have been able to continue to pay the fees. Our home wasn't a household full of books; my dad would read the newspapers, but only the sports pages, and Reader's Digest condensed books, and my mum would read Catherine Cookson and that sort of thing. I was the cuckoo in the nest: I was a voracious reader, my head was always in a book. As soon as I got my pocket money, I would go down to the local bookshop. Also, there was a magazine called All About Science that I badgered my parents to get every week. Just a few generations ago, there may have been a slightly antithetical idea to the fact that your son or daughter was attached to book learning; there's a particular phrase in Scotland, ' I knew your father,' i.e. don't get above yourself. But my mum and dad loved the fact that I had this interest in reading, they appreciated that I was bookish and that that was clearly my orientation, and they encouraged me and gave me all the support possible, even though it wasn't their thing. I enjoyed almost every subject at school. The English teacher, Mike Duncan, nurtured and encouraged my love of books and drama, and introduced me not just to the novels we were studying but also made recommendations: 'I think you'd enjoy Anthony Powell's A Dance to the Music Of Time,' he said, which was a series of 12 books. I also had two great history teachers, one of whom for some reason that was not immediately obvious was nicknamed Zoot, in reference to the saxophone player in the Muppets. They knew I was interested in political ideas and ideology, and most of all debating, which was my principal school activity, and I joined the Labour Party as a 16-year-old, and canvassed for the Aberdeen North MP, which was then a safe Labour seat, and in the 1983 general election I stood as the Labour candidate in the school election. Everyone had to play rugby in their first two years, and even though I was relatively well built I was just terrible at it. I have terrible hand-eye co-ordination, for one thing, and have never been particularly sporty. In the third year, you were allowed to pick between rugby and hockey, and I opted for hockey because my view was the best athletes would have already chosen rugby, and I became the hockey goalkeeper, being prepared to get hit by the ball, and just take the punishment rather than display any skill. It was the 1980s and the music was great: BA Robertson, the Boomtown Rats, Duran Duran, Spandau Ballet, and the first party where I kissed a girl, to Heaven 17's Temptation. She was called Kate, although she subsequently, and very quickly thereafter, moved on to a much better prospect: taller, better-looking, way better at sport, and all the rest of it. Perhaps I was too distracted by life, but I was not a well-behaved schoolboy. In fact, I wrote a letter the other day to my French teacher, Danny Montgomery, to apologise for being such a pain in the neck, a mixture of back-chat, being a smart alec and asking absurd questions. So, for example, in the middle of a translation exercise: 'Sir, sir?' 'Yes Gove.' (Said wearily.) 'What does ' baise-toi ' mean?' 'I think you know, Gove.' 'No, I don't, sir, can you explain?' It was beyond juvenile, and on a couple of occasions, the tawse was used, which is a piece of leather, split at the end. Hand out, thwack. Very painful. However, when I was 17, I was made a prefect. Perhaps it was the classic ploy which is if you've got someone who is a little bit wayward but you think has potential then make them a prefect, and hopefully whatever it is about them that is contrary will become channelled in the right direction. In fact, I do think I became a straighter arrow. For a long time, I thought I was going to be a doctor, but while I remained fascinated by human psychology and every aspect of medicine, I realised that was not my strongest calling. Mike Duncan said, 'You should think about applying to Oxford to read English – that's your best subject, that's the one you enjoy most.' I still remember my impressions of Oxford when I went up for my interviews. Fairyland! I hadn't been to Oxford before, and immediately thought it would just be amazing to go there. I had applied to two colleges, Corpus Christi and Lady Margaret Hall (LMH). At Corpus I was interviewed by Valentine Cunningham, the professor of English language and literature, who clearly thought I was an idiot. When we sat down, his first question was: 'What is Hamlet about?' 'Well, it's about the prince's indecision following the death of his father.' 'NO! What is it about?' 'The tragic flaw of indecision?' 'NO!! (Now frothing at the mouth) What is it about?' 'Is it about politics in the Danish court?' 'No. It's about Protestantism.' 'Bloody hell,' I thought, 'I don't stand a chance here…' But the conversation at LMH was about Middlemarch and my mini dissertation was about George Eliot. And so we had a conversation about Dorothea and her sister, and what the jewels revealed about Dorothea's vanity, and why she had married the Rev Edward Casaubon, and what a mistake that was. So I was allowed to shine, and on the strength of that I was offered a place at Oxford. But huge credit to Gordon's. If I hadn't gone there I would have gone to a state secondary school, and I doubt anyone at that time would have thought of recommending any student to apply to Oxford. I was and remain very grateful. Michael Gove will be speaking at the Chalke History Festival on June 26. His talk is entitled 'Change Maker: A Life in Politics'. For tickets visit:
