Aussies exit NSW, WA hits 3 million population milestone
More people are fleeing NSW than any other state in Australia.
Population data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics this week shows 28,118 people left NSW in 2024.
Western Australia tipped over three million people for the first time as the resource-rich state recorded the highest nationwide growth rate.
At the end of 2024, 27.4 million people called Australia home, an increase of 445,900 on the previous year and representative of a 1.7 per cent increase.
Commonwealth Bank economist Lucinda Jerogin said population growth had slowed quicker than anticipated on the back of the post-pandemic peak.
This sea of blue is not streaming into the State of Origin, instead they are headed for a Melbourne versus Collingwood AFL match. Picture: David Crosling / NewsWire
'A slowdown in natural increase continues to place a drag on Australia's population growth,' she said
'Cost-of-living pressures, rising female workforce participation and broader uncertainty are likely driving this downward trend.
'Growth in deaths are outpacing births leading to the decline in natural increase.'
The data shows NSW lost more than 28,000 people to net interstate migration, with 112,763 people leaving for elsewhere in the country.
Queensland picked up more than 106,000 people from other states for a result of nearly 26,000 fresh faces. Nearly 40,000 Aussies moved to WA for a net increase of about 12,500 people.
Australians continue to leave NSW, destined mostly for Queensland but also WA. Picture: NewsWire / Dan Peled
While Queensland and Victoria's total populations grew by 1.9 per cent, WA's grew 2.4 per cent. The population of every state and territory grew by at least 1.1 per cent, except Tasmania, which recorded a 0.3 per cent increase.
'Within Australia, people are continuing to leave NSW, and to a lesser extent Victoria and the smallest jurisdictions, and head into Queensland and WA,' Housing Industry Association economist Tom Devitt said.
'But even the jurisdictions losing residents interstate are absorbing enough overseas arrivals to see their populations expand.'
State governments needed to do more to stimulate housing construction, he said.
'Foreign capital is highly liquid. State governments have forced institutional investors into building apartments in other countries,' Mr Devitt said.
'As a consequence, multi-unit construction volumes in Australia have halved, likely costing state governments tax revenue.'
Blair Jackson
Reporter
Blair's journalism career has taken him from Perth, to New Zealand, Queensland and now Melbourne.
Blair Jackson
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Report finds increasing number of Australian renters fear confronting landlords
Report finds increasing number of Australian renters fear confronting landlords Published 23 June 2025, 8:43 am A shortage of residential properties available for rent may be discouraging some renters from claiming their full rights as tenants. According to a new report - almost seven out of ten private renters surveyed worry about asking for repairs in case the landlord retaliates by increasing their rent.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Did Australia provide support for the US strikes on Iran?
The Prime Minister today confirmed Australia supports Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites. But he wasn't weighing in on the debate over whether this US action is in breach of international law. Nor would he confirm whether Australia provided any support for this mission - only saying it w a unilateral action by the United States. Mike Pezzullo is the former Secretary of Home Affairs and a former Deputy Secretary of the Defence Department, and author of the 2009 defence white paper. He spoke to David Speers.
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Editorial: Wishy-washy Anthony Albanese puts Australia on the outer
Close to 24 hours after the United States bombed key Iranian nuclear facilities, Anthony Albanese finally stood to address the nation. This was a pivotal point in history: Australia's closest military and strategic ally had made a bold strike against one of the world's most tyrannical and dangerous regimes. Australians want to know what it all means, and what was likely to come next. They got a Prime Minister who looked like he'd rather be anywhere else. It was clear from Mr Albanese's curt manner at his Monday morning press conference that he didn't want any part of US President Donald Trump's surprise attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. He said what he had to: that Iran could not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons and that Australia was in support of actions to prevent that nightmare scenario. But Mr Albanese also stressed that Australia was not involved in this conflict. Five times, the Prime Minister said that this had been a 'unilateral action' by the US. And when asked directly, repeatedly, whether Australia was given any heads-up an action would occur prior to the bombs falling, Mr Albanese skirted the question. What he did say was that he had not spoken to Mr Trump since before last week's G7 summit, which the President left a day early, causing the planned sit-down between the two leaders to be abandoned. Australia-US relations have never been at a lower ebb. Mr Trump is a challenging character. And Mr Albanese isn't alone in his distaste for him. Successive polls have found Australians are among the world's biggest critics of him, finding him dangerous and untrustworthy. But this isn't about Donald Trump the man. This is about the fact that the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran is an intolerable one. Iran's regime is the antithesis to liberal democracy, obsessed with the destruction of Israel and of Western values. The decision by the US to join Israel in doing what needed to be done — despite Mr Trump's clear personal preference not to get involved in matters beyond his borders — was the right one. Contrast Mr Albanese's non-existent relationship with Mr Trump's administration with that of British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who did get a heads-up about the US' intentions in Iran. Mr Albanese and Mr Starmer are ideological kin, sharing a leftist world view. Yet where Mr Albanese wears his repugnance towards Mr Trump on his sleeve, Mr Starmer makes it work. The result is a UK which is firmly within the Western alliance, and an Australia increasingly on its outer. Mr Albanese must make it his priority to repair Australia's deteriorating relationship with the US. That means we need an effective ambassador in Washington. While this is not intended as a Kevin Rudd-bashing exercise, it is apparent he is not that person. Shifting him out and finding the right person to serve Australia's interests in the Trump era is one step along the road to restoring our alliance. Responsibility for the editorial comment is taken by Editor-in-Chief Christopher Dore.
