logo
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation accused of using charity logo without consent

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation accused of using charity logo without consent

Middle East Eye29-05-2025

US-based charity Rahma Worldwide has accused the newly created Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) of using photos of aid deliveries in Gaza containing its logo as part of its press pack without consent.
The charity told The Guardian it had allowed GHF to take "custody" of its aid; however, on its Facebook account, it said GHF "took custody", leading to confusion over whether Rahma had provided consent.
Rahma Worldwide is a Michigan-based charity that, according to its website, provides 'aid and assistance to the most vulnerable communities around the world'.
Rahma said in a Facebook statement that it had been waiting for four days to transport 4,000 boxes of food and 16 containers of wheat into Gaza, but the logistics organisation that was supposed to transport aid 'did not deliver.' It said that GHF took custody of the aid and asked Rahma to 'assist with distribution', but Rahma refused.
Rahma told The Guardian that it had asked for its logo to be removed from aid parcels.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Photos of the logo in GHF's press materials include both Rahma and a partner organisation called Heroic Hearts, based in Illinois.
The controversial privately-run GHF, which is backed by Tel Aviv and Washington, was formed to oversee aid distribution across Gaza, with the intention of sidelining all existing structures, including the United Nations.
Most humanitarian organisations, including the UN, have distanced themselves from GHF, arguing that the group violates humanitarian principles by restricting aid to south and central Gaza, requiring Palestinians to walk long distances to collect aid, and only providing limited aid, among other critiques.
A former spokesperson for Unrwa has condemned the initiative as 'aid washing', a strategy meant to obscure the reality that 'people are being starved into submission'.
Rahma Worldwide's logo on GHF's press materials implies a formal partnership and lends credibility to GHF, which has no experience with aid distribution and is being shunned by aid agencies.
In the Facebook statement released on Thursday, Rahma said that it 'had noticed images of our food boxes with logo being distributed without Rahma's direct involvement".
'Rahma did not authorize such distribution and none of our team was allowed to participate in this process."
It also added that it did not 'support or permit the presence' of armed groups during the distribution of aid.
Siraj Muhammad, president of Heroic Hearts, told Middle East Eye in a statement that 'we are not in partnership with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and are not involved in the aid distribution currently circulating in the media that features our branding'.
'These food parcels were part of a one-time shipment prepared in collaboration with Rahma Worldwide. Heroic Hearts and Rahma arranged the shipment to support vulnerable families in Gaza and coordinated the required approvals and logistics to ensure proper delivery,' Muhammad added.
Muhammad said he regretted 'any confusion this may have caused'.
Chaotic aid roll-out
Chaos and violence erupted during GHF's first attempts to roll out aid at its distribution site in Rafah on Tuesday, as thousands of Palestinians, who have been denied food, water, and aid for 11 weeks, overwhelmed the distribution centre.
What's inside the boxes of aid being distributed in Gaza? Read More »
The Israeli military was accused of killing at least three civilians and injuring almost 50 others after it fired shots at people collecting aid, according to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. An Israeli military spokesperson said they were just firing 'warning shots'.
Aid that has been distributed so far has been considered inadequate, with food boxes containing just a handful of ingredients.
Jonathan Whittall, who heads the UN aid coordination office, said in a UN press release that 'People are being starved and then drip-fed in the most undignified way possible.'
In addition, the executive director of GHF resigned from his position earlier this week, saying that Israeli restrictions meant that GHF could not adhere to 'humanitarian principles'.
Controversy
GHF has been rocked with controversy since its inception. Under the group's proposals, more than two million of Gaza's residents will be forced to collect food from one of four 'secure distribution sites'.
None of the proposed sites are located in northern Gaza, a region that Israel has attacked and occupied, meaning those still living there will be forced to flee south to access life-saving aid. The deprivation of aid as a means to forcibly transfer a population is recognised as a crime against humanity.
GHF's official announcement about its plans made no mention of Israel's repeated attacks on pre-existing food distribution centres, bakeries and aid convoys, in which hundreds of Palestinians have been killed while trying to feed their families, or Israel's obstruction of the pre-existing humanitarian system.
Israel banned Unrwa, the primary UN aid agency for Palestinian refugees, from the country in January.
The UN's emergency relief coordinator, Tom Fletcher, has described the plans put forward by GHF as a 'fig leaf for further violence and displacement'.
Despite the January 2024 ruling by the International Court of Justice, which demanded immediate protection for civilians in Gaza and the widespread provision of humanitarian assistance, the situation has continued to deteriorate precipitously.
A January 2025 survey of 35 humanitarian organisations working in Gaza revealed an overwhelming consensus: 100 percent reported that the approach taken by Israel was either ineffective, inadequate or had systematically impeded aid delivery.
Rights groups say that warnings about mass malnutrition and the collapse of Gaza's health and social infrastructure have been ignored for years, and the imminent famine now afflicts a population that has been systematically deprived of food.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Central Kitchen resumes cooking meals for Gazans after 12 weeks
World Central Kitchen resumes cooking meals for Gazans after 12 weeks

Al Etihad

time19 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

World Central Kitchen resumes cooking meals for Gazans after 12 weeks

22 June 2025 21:33 Allan Jacob (ABU DHABI)Food charity World Central Kitchen has resumed cooking for starving Gazans affected by relentless attacks and displacement by Israeli armed forces in the charity said almost 10,000 meals were cooked on the first day after it resume cooking 12 weeks after the wave of attacks amid depleted food supplies. "As of today, we have resumed cooking at select kitchens, a critical step toward increasing meal production to meet the urgent need of displaced Palestinians," said World Central Kitchen in a statement. Teams from the charity are now preparing nourishing and warm carb-rich meals such as pasta and hearty potato stews. On May 7, the charity was forced to halt cooking across all its large kitchens and its mobile bakery after food supplies ran out. "This pause marked a devastating moment in our response, cutting off a vital source of daily nourishment for families already facing extreme hardship," it that aid shipments are trickling in after Israel eased some measures, the charity said cooking again for the affected people in enclave was an important milestone. It, however, said that the effects of prolonged hunger do not disappear overnight. Hunger leaves deep physical and psychological scars-and even as meals begin again, the damage caused by extended access disruptions continues to impact families and communities."We are grateful to once again cook for the people of Gaza-but our continued ability to do so is not guaranteed. Consistent and sustained humanitarian access is essential. Our teams stand ready to scale efforts. Without it, feeding communities safely and effectively is impossible," charity said. In the food crisis engulfing Gaza, the charity sought to find sustainable fuel sources. It began using innovative, fuel-efficient stoves that eliminate the need for traditional fuels or electricity, which have been limited since October 2024. This breakthrough allowed the team to initially utilise eco-pellets, it said. But the pellets too became scarce as Israel choked entry points into the enclave. Wooden pallets were the option and were mixed with what was left of the remaining eco pellets to keep cooking fires burning. The charity also tried olive husk, which is a plentiful in the region and is a by-product of olive oil. However, using it comes with its own set of challenges. Raw olive husk creates a lot of smoke, so it needs to be compressed into briquettes. Sourcing and processing the olive husk also requires complex logistics, the charity said. But despite facing these odds the Kitchen, which began operations in Gaza in October 2023, has served more than 133 million meals to people of the area. According to the World Health Organisation, the entire 2.1 million population of Gaza is facing prolonged food shortages, with nearly half a million people in a catastrophic situation of hunger, acute malnutrition, starvation, illness and death. Founded by Jose Andres in 2010, the World Central Kitchen has served over 300 million meals to communities affected by violence and natural disasters across the world.

How did US carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites?
How did US carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites?

The National

timea day ago

  • The National

How did US carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites?

US B-2 bombers and Washington's 'bunker-buster' bombs were involved in the attacks on Iran 's nuclear sites on Sunday, US officials have told American media outlets. Those bunker-busters were widely seen as the best chance of damaging or destroying the Fordow nuclear enrichment site, as it is deep underground. Israel's military is believed not to possess weapons capable of disabling the facility. The US is also the only military capable of dropping the bombs, and the movement of B2 stealth bombers towards Asia on Saturday had signalled activity by Washington. 'Bunker buster' is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. In this case, it refers to the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the American arsenal. The roughly 30,000 pound (13,600kg) precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels, according to the US Air Force. It is believed to be able to burrow about 60 metres below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive explosion. It was not clear how many were used in the Sunday morning attack. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordow, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if it was the GBU-57 A/B that was used to hit the site. However, Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge centre have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. US warplanes also hit Natanz on Sunday. In theory, the GBU-57 A/B could be dropped by any bomber capable of carrying the weight, but at the moment the US has only configured and programmed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the air force. The B-2 is only flown by the US air force, and is built by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds (18,000kg) but the US Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters – a total weight of some 60,000 pounds (27,200kg). The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 11,000 kilometres without refuelling, and 18,500 kilometres with one refuelling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store