China paves path for South America's break from US

South America's largest trading bloc, Mercosur (Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay), recently inked a comprehensive free trade deal with the European Union after more than 20 years of negotiations. The deal now awaits ratification and implementation.
On the other side of the Andes, Chile is negotiating a comprehensive economic partnership with India, the world's fourth-largest economy.
Meanwhile, American trade policy is undergoing major shifts characterized by less free trade and more protectionism. But what's striking is South America's unchanged advance towards multi-alignment and away from a US-centered hemisphere.
When I visited Santiago in 2018, I noticed something I hadn't seen before – Chinese cars. Brands I hadn't heard of, such as Changan, Maxus, Great Wall, and Haval. Today, Chinese cars account for 40% of automotive sales in Chile. What was once a budding trend is now an avalanche.
Who could have imagined such a rapid reversal of the United States' position in the region 20 years ago? The US was simply too close, too big a market, and too powerful. It remained, in the words of more than one Latin American writer, 'The Colossus of the North.'
Then came China's meteoric industrialization of the early 21st century and its voracious appetite for copper, tin, oil, iron ore, timber and soybeans.
Strong Chinese demand raised prices for South America's commodities and that boom helped pull millions out of poverty. Between 2000 and 2014, Latin America's poverty rate decreased from 27% to 12%, according to the International Monetary Fund, an extraordinary achievement and one tied to China's rising fortunes.
During the same 2000 to 2014 period, the American political system became significantly more dysfunctional and polarized amid two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and an opioid epidemic that claimed 500,000 American lives.
Of course, the American market remains massive and indispensable for countries in the Caribbean Basin, but the United States isn't the giant that it once was. And China is the principal reason why.
In 2013, Chinese leader Xi Jinping announced the Belt and Road Initiative, a massive campaign to build infrastructure worldwide, from bridges and power plants to stadiums and port facilities.
Today, Peru's Chinese-funded Port of Chancay is poised to become the largest deepwater port on the Pacific side of South America, while Bolivia's El Mutún Steel Plant is just the latest geopolitically significant China-funded megaproject in the region.
When China replaced the United States as South America's largest trading partner in 2020, that tectonic shift received scant US media attention. Instead, immigration and drug cartels or flamboyant leaders like Jair Bolsonaro and Nayib Bukele dominated headlines. But sometimes impersonal, transformative processes are the real story.
China developed its position of strength over two decades and the rise of China has been broadly good for the region. What was once a rising trade in commodities between China and Latin America turned into a very different kind of relationship in which China builds hydroelectric dams and installs 5G internet.
Although a shadow of China's presence, India aims to deepen economic ties with South America in pursuit of 'strategic autonomy' or avoiding overreliance on any single global power. And South America welcomes India's push for diverse trading partnerships, as it wants the same thing.
During the 20th century, Latin American governments often viewed European or American capital with suspicion. There were ideological reasons for that position, but it also had to do with the lack of options.
In a multipolar world, trade and capital investments are no longer essentially Western, which makes for a far more balanced economic outlook.
To be sure, some things haven't changed. South America is still reliant on commodity exports and foreign capital continues to raise issues related to national sovereignty (as they do anywhere else).
But it's an era that looks remarkably different from the late 19th century when British capital prevailed or the mid-20th century when American capital predominated.
As the US-China trade war unfolds, South America's economies seem destined to emerge more diversified and balanced. US tariffs have increased the impetus for EU countries to ratify their deal with Mercosur. Brazil's exports of meat and grain to China have already surged in the wake of the new US tariffs.
Amid the current unpredictability of US trade policy, one thing seems clear: South America will continue to diversify its trade relationships and there are many new options for navigating the future.
Dr John R Bawden teaches Latin American history at Oregon State University. He is the author of ' The Pinochet Generation: The Chilean Military during the Twentieth Century .'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

RTHK

21 minutes ago

• RTHK

Per capita emissions in HK 'lower than in EU and US'

Per capita emissions in HK 'lower than in EU and US' Chief Executive John Lee said on Monday that Hong Kong is doing better in terms of lowering carbon emissions compared with the European Union and the United States. He made the comment at Greenway 2025, an event hosted by the EU's office in the SAR and the European Chamber of Commerce. Lee said Hong Kong has cut around a quarter of carbon emissions from its peak recorded in 2014. "In 2023, our per capita carbon emissions were about 4.58 tonnes," he said in a speech. "To put that in perspective, it is 60 percent of the EU's emissions, so we aren't doing too badly, and only one quarter of that of the United States." Lee said the SAR is well on its way to cutting its emissions in half by 2035 as it tried to reach its goal of achieving carbon neutrality before 2050. Hong Kong, he added, has made great strides in its efforts to be environmentally friendly, from green financing to turning to greener modes of transport. For example, he noted, some 110,000 electric vehicles were on the streets of Hong Kong by the end of last year, around seven times more than the figure five years ago. Subsidy programmes, Lee said, have also helped bus, taxi and ferry companies to go electric. The government is also working with the Airport Authority to set a target for using sustainable aviation fuel, which he said is much more environmentally friendly compared to conventional jet fuel. Lee went on to say that Hong Kong's country parks and biodiversity are very much part of the SAR's uniqueness, which is seen in few places globally. "This is Hong Kong's defining paradox, where business and ecology co-exist in symphony," he said. "For us, economic dynamism and environmental stewardship aren't just compatible. "They are dual engines propelling our future. We balance development with sustainability." Lee stressed that Hong Kong arranged 45 percent of the Asian market's green and sustainable bonds last year, marking the seventh consecutive year that the SAR was the biggest market in the region.

Asia Times

an hour ago

• Asia Times

Behind Trump's flip-flop on Chinese student visas

President Donald Trump appears to have walked back plans for the US State Department to scrutinize and revoke visas for Chinese students studying in the country. On June 11, 2025, Trump posted on his social media platform TruthSocial that visas for Chinese students would continue and that they are welcome in the United States, as their presence 'has always been good with me!' The announcement came weeks after Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that his department would begin scrutinizing and revoking student visas for Chinese nationals with ties to the Chinese Communist Party, or whose studies are in critical fields. The contradictory moves have led to confusion among Chinese students attending college or considering studying in the United States. Over time, Chinese nationals have faced barriers to studying in the US. As a scholar who studies relations between the two nations, I argue that efforts to ban Chinese students in the United States are not unprecedented, and historically, they have come with consequences. Student visas under fire The Trump administration laid out the terms for revoking or denying student visas to Chinese nationals but then backtracked. Photo: STAP / Getty Images / The Conversation Since the late 1970s, millions of Chinese students have been granted visas to study at American universities. That total includes approximately 277,000 who studied in the United States in the 2023-2024 academic year. It is difficult to determine how many of these students would have been affected by a ban on visas for individuals with Chinese Community Party affiliations or in critical fields. Approximately 40% of all new members of the Chinese Communist Party each year are drawn from China's student population. And many universities in China have party connections or charters that emphasize party loyalty. The 'critical fields' at risk were not defined. A majority of Chinese students in the US are enrolled in math, technology, science and engineering fields. A long history Since the late 1970s, the number of Chinese students attending college in the U.S. has increased dramatically. Photo: Kenishiroite / Getty Images via The Conversation Yung Wing became the first Chinese student to graduate from a US university in 1852. Since then, millions of Chinese students have come to the US to study, supported by programs such as the 'Chinese Educational Mission,' Boxer Indemnity Fund scholarships and the Fulbright Program. The Institute for International Education in New York estimated the economic impact of Chinese students in the US at over US$14 billion a year. Chinese students tend to pay full tuition to their universities. At the graduate level, they perform vital roles in labs and classrooms. Just under half of all Chinese students attending college in the US are graduate students. However, there is a long history of equating Chinese migrants as invaders, spies or risks to national security. After the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, the US Department of Justice began to prevent Chinese scholars and students in STEM fields – science, technology, engineering and math – from returning to China by stopping them at US ports of entry and exit. They could be pulled aside when trying to board a flight or ship and their tickets canceled. In one infamous case, Chinese rocket scientist Qian Xuesen was arrested, harassed, ordered deported and prevented from leaving over five years from 1950 to 1955. In 1955, the United States and China began ambassadorial-level talks to negotiate repatriations from either country. After his experience, Qian became a much-lauded supporter of the Communist government and played an important role in the development of Chinese transcontinental missile technology. During the 1950s, the US Department of Justice raided Chinatown organizations looking for Chinese migrants who arrived under false names during the Chinese Exclusion Era, a period from the 1880s to 1940s when the US government placed tight restrictions on Chinese immigration into the country. A primary justification for the tactics was fear that the Chinese in the US would spy for their home country. Between 1949 and 1979, the US and China did not have normal diplomatic relations. The two nations recognized each other and exchanged ambassadors starting in January 1979. In the more than four decades since, the number of Chinese students in the US has increased dramatically. Anti-Chinese discrimination The idea of an outright ban on Chinese student visas has raised concerns about increased targeting of Chinese in the US for harassment. In 1999, Taiwanese-American scientist Wen Ho Lee was arrested on suspicion of using his position at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico to spy for China. Lee remained imprisoned in solitary confinement for 278 days before he was released without a conviction. In 2018, during the first Trump administration, the Department of Justice launched its China Initiative. In its effort to weed out industrial, technological and corporate espionage, the initiative targeted many ethnic Chinese researchers and had a chilling effect on continued exchanges, but it secured no convictions for wrongdoing. Trump again expressed concerns last year that undocumented migrants from China might be coming to the United States to spy or 'build an army.' The repeated search for spies among Chinese migrants and residents in the US has created an atmosphere of fear for Chinese American communities. Broader foreign policy context An atmosphere of suspicion has altered the climate for Chinese international students. Photo: J Studios / Getty Images via The Conversation The US plan to revoke visas for students studying in the US and the Chinese response is being formed amid contentious debates over trade. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Lin Jian accused the US of violating an agreement on tariff reduction the two sides discussed in Geneva in May, citing the visa issues as one example. Trump has also complained that the Chinese violated agreements between the countries, and some reports suggest that the announcement on student visas was a negotiating tactic to change the Chinese stance on the export of rare earth minerals. When Trump announced his trade deal with China on June 11, he added a statement welcoming Chinese students. However, past practice shows that the atmosphere of uncertainty and suspicion may have already damaged the climate for Chinese international students, and at least some degree of increased scrutiny of student visas will likely continue regardless. Meredith Oyen is associate professor of history and Asian studies, University of Maryland, Baltimore County This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

HKFP

2 hours ago

• HKFP

US urges China to prevent Iran from shutting down Strait of Hormuz, key trade route

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China on Sunday to help deter Iran from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial trade route, following American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said on Fox News. Analysts have said Iran may opt to retaliate to Washington's early Sunday attack by shutting the Strait, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil output passes. 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that,' Rubio added. 'But other countries should be looking at that as well, it would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours. It would be, I think, a massive escalation that would merit a response. Not just by us but from others,' he said. Meanwhile, Iran has threatened bases used by the US military, with an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei saying they will be considered a 'legitimate target for our armed forces.' However, it remains to be seen whether the US strikes will push Tehran to de-escalate the conflict or to widen it further. China has joined Russia and a chorus of Arab states in condemning the US attacks, saying that they 'escalate tensions in the Middle East.'