The $1,999 Liberty Phone is made in America. Its creator explains how.

Next Story
Ben Raab , The Wall Street Journal Purism's Liberty Phone, priced at $1,999, is the most advanced U.S.-made smartphone but lacks competitive specs compared to the iPhone. Limited by domestic supply chains and higher costs, it sources components globally. Despite scaling potential, Purism sells fewer than 100,000 units, as many parts still come from Asia. The phone's unique features cater to security-conscious users. Purism's $1,999 Liberty Phone is assembled in the U.S. with parts from the U.S. and elsewhere, including China. Photo: Purism Gift this article
It is possible to build a smartphone in the U.S. right now. But it won't be as sleek or as powerful as an iPhone, and it will cost a lot more.
It is possible to build a smartphone in the U.S. right now. But it won't be as sleek or as powerful as an iPhone, and it will cost a lot more.
Todd Weaver's company, Purism, developed the Liberty Phone, the closest anyone has gotten. It has specs that would have been more impressive a decade ago, and it costs $1,999.
President Trump has threatened steep tariffs on foreign-made smartphones to pressure companies like Apple to shift manufacturing stateside. Meanwhile, the Trump Organization is promoting a 'Made in the U.S.A." phone for $499 with specs that deem it unlikely to be built here anytime soon. Supply-chain analysts agree it's impossible to match Asia's production quality and scale for now. But Weaver's Liberty Phone, not the Trump phone, offers a unique look at the realities of domestic manufacturing. And why nobody else is doing it.
The Liberty Phone's motherboard is built in-house, the chip comes from Texas, and the assembly is done at Purism's facility in Carlsbad, Calif. But not all of its parts are U.S. made: Other components come from China and other Asian countries.
'I've been working on this for 10 years and we've done everything we possibly can to build from U.S. manufacturing," Weaver says. 'There are just some parts that don't yet have a supply chain. We're gonna keep incrementing there until we can get to that point."
Weaver says he can produce Liberty Phones at a rate of about 10,000 a month, but so far, he's sold fewer than 100,000. By comparison, Apple shipped around 225 million phones in 2024, according to market analyst firm Canalys.
The Liberty Phone also doesn't run on Android or iOS. Its processor, produced by Dutch semiconductor firm NXP in Austin, Texas, is designed for cars, not smartphones. It runs on Purism's own PureOS, which is limited to calling, texting and web browsing, plus some basic apps like a calculator. Purism founder Todd Weaver holds up the Liberty Phone's motherboard, manufactured at the company's California facility. Photo: Purism
The screen and battery come from China and the rear-facing camera comes from South Korea. Weaver says a fully U.S.-made phone is limited by a lack of domestic infrastructure. There are no companies mass-producing smartphone screens in the U.S., for example.
Complications like this, even at Purism's small scale, help explain why Apple and others haven't made a serious attempt at producing premium smartphones in the U.S.
'Even if the specs were less impressive, it would take many, many years to be fully sourced out of the U.S. and not practical," says Jeff Fieldhack, a research director at Counterpoint Research. 'Cost aside, we don't have factories here building application processors, high-end displays or most of the other things in your smartphone."
Weaver says the Liberty Phone costs about $650 to make. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, a much more powerful device, was estimated to cost around $550 to make in China last fall, according to TechInsights.
Purism's higher U.S. labor costs are partially offset by cheaper, lower-quality parts: a basic camera, low-resolution screen and half the RAM. Weaver says the Liberty Phone isn't built to compete with an iPhone right now. He says the $1,999 retail price reflects a securely sourced phone with a vetted supply chain. About half of Purism's customers are government agencies across the U.S., he says.
'On the consumer side, it's security geeks, parents who want a phone for their kid, elderly people or people who want to avoid big tech," says Weaver. 'Someone who needs a wicked-strong camera is not our audience."
Weaver estimates he could scale to building 100,000 phones a month within six months. But getting there would require investment to cover new machines, more line operators and added floor space. He has no traditional venture-capital funding, relying only on revenue and crowdfunding.
Tariffs likely won't affect his costs at his current production rates because he ordered a large batch of parts when he started and still has them in supply at his facility. Weaver says that a long-term tariff on imported electronics could make the Liberty Phone's manufacturing cost more competitive, since the cheap components would only see marginal increases, and more components are likely to be built in the U.S. soon.
While companies like Intel already manufacture chips in the U.S. and firms like TSMC and Micron are building domestic facilities, Fieldhack says those efforts are a small fraction of global production. Companies lack incentives to move more to American soil.
'A lot of it isn't leading edge, the cost is still high, and it would still take a long time," he says.
Write to Ben Raab at ben.raab@wsj.com Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News , Corporate news , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

Markets may dip as US strikes on Iran stoke oil fears, global volatility

Indian markets may open lower on Monday due to fears of crude oil disruption from the West Asia though domestic institutional investors may support valuations Sundar Sethuraman Mumbai Listen to This Article Investors may have to brace for a spike in volatility on Monday following the US military's direct involvement in the Israel–Iran conflict over the weekend. Experts believe benchmark Sensex and Nifty may correct 1–1.5 per cent if oil prices surge and Asian markets fall due to the widening of the West Asia conflict. However, domestic institutional investor (DII) buying could cushion the fall. Last week, the domestic markets had gained over 1.5 per cent even as hostilities between Iran and Israel escalated. On Saturday, President Donald Trump announced targeted strikes on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—using

Time of India

3 hours ago

• Time of India

Iran-Israel war & US bombings: Should possible Strait of Hormuz closure worry India about its oil supply? Explained in 10 points

India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations supplying more than 40% of these imports. (AI image) Iran-Israel war & Strait of Hormuz: With escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, especially after the US bombed nuclear facilities in Iran earlier today, there are rising fears of the Strait of Hormuz being closed. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial maritime passage handling 20% of global oil and gas transportation. According to state-run media, Iran's Parliament has approved the closure of Strait of Hormuz and the final decision will be taken by Iran's Supreme National Security Council. What will be the impact of the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz? And importantly, how will India be hit? We take a look: Why is the Strait of Hormuz important? The Strait of Hormuz serves as a crucial maritime connection between the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, extending into the Indian Ocean. This vital waterway, with its narrowest section at just 21 miles (33 kilometres), has Iran to the north and the Arabian Peninsula to the south. The navigable channels are considerably restricted, extending only two miles in either direction, which creates vulnerability to potential blockades and hostile actions. The Strait of Hormuz holds immense strategic and economic significance, particularly as a mandatory route for oil vessels departing from Persian Gulf ports. This maritime passage facilitates the transportation of one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies. Statistics from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicate that in 2024, the daily transport volume reached 20.3 million barrels of oil and 290 million cubic metres of LNG. The major oil-producing nations of the region - Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, Iran, and Kuwait - rely on this passage for their exports. Whilst historical concerns about disruptions to Persian Gulf energy flows majorly affected Western nations, particularly the US and Europe, in today's situation the implications would most significantly impact China and Asian countries. Based on EIA data quoted by PTI, Asian nations received 8% of crude oil and condensate shipments through the Strait of Hormuz in 2022. India, China, Japan, and South Korea collectively made up 67% of total flows during 2022 and the firstl six months of 2023. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cuối cùng, chơi miễn phí game chiến thuật hay nhất 2025! Sea of Conquest Phát ngay Undo Also Read | 'Highest in two years': India increases oil imports from Russia, US amidst Iran-Israel war; why it's about strategic positioning, not panic India's reliance on crude oil imports is at approximately 90%, with Middle Eastern nations, whose exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, supplying more than 40% of these imports. EIA reports indicate that during the first quarter of 2025, China's crude imports via the Strait of Hormuz reached 5.4 million bpd. India received 2.1 million bpd, whilst South Korea and Japan imported 1.7 million bpd and 1.6 million bpd respectively. The IEA has emphasised that any interference with the flow through the Strait would significantly impact global oil markets. How will the closure of Strait of Hormuz impact India? India imports 5.5 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, with 2 million bpd passing through this strategic waterway. However, experts suggest that India's position remains secure due to its diversified import strategy, with alternative suppliers including Russia, the United States and Brazil available to maintain supply continuity. The Russian oil supply remains unaffected by Hormuz-related disruptions, as it uses alternative routes including the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or Pacific Ocean pathways. Similarly, supplies from the US, West Africa, and Latin America, though more expensive, serve as viable alternatives. Regarding gas supplies, India's primary supplier Qatar delivers without using the Strait of Hormuz for Indian shipments. Additional LNG sources from Australia, Russia and the US remain accessible regardless of any Strait of Hormuz closure . However, analysts predict that increasing tensions in this significant energy supply region could cause short-term price fluctuations, potentially pushing oil prices towards $80 per barrel. India relies on imports for 90% of its crude oil requirements and sources approximately half of its natural gas from international markets. The imported crude oil undergoes refining to produce petrol and diesel, while natural gas serves multiple purposes including power generation, fertiliser production, CNG for vehicles, and domestic cooking gas supply. India obtains approximately 40% of its oil requirements from Middle Eastern countries including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait, with shipments travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Russia has become a significant oil supplier to India, with current imports exceeding the total imports from Middle Eastern nations. According to preliminary trade data from Kpler, Indian refineries imported 2-2.2 million bpd of Russian crude oil in June, surpassing the combined imports of about 2 million bpd from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, marking the highest level in two years. Additionally, imports from the United States increased to 439,000 bpd in June, showing substantial growth from 280,000 bpd in the previous month. Although current supplies remain stable, vessel movements indicate a reduction in crude loadings from the Middle East in the forthcoming period. Vessel operators are showing reluctance to dispatch empty tankers (ballasters) to the Gulf, with numbers decreasing from 69 to 40, whilst MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman have reduced by half. Kpler reports quoted by PTI indicate potential tightening of MEG supplies in the immediate future, possibly necessitating adjustments to India's procurement strategy, noting significant changes in India's import patterns over the past two years. In the event of escalating tensions or temporary Hormuz disruptions, Russian oil supplies could increase, providing both availability and cost advantages. India has options to diversify its oil imports from the United States, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, despite higher transportation expenses. On June 13, Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri confirmed India's sufficient energy reserves for upcoming months, with capability to access alternative sources if needed. India can utilise its strategic petroleum reserves, which cover 9-10 days of imports, to manage any supply gaps. To control inflation during price surges, particularly for diesel and LPG, the government maintains the option of implementing price subsidies. Will oil prices rise? Global oil prices saw a sharp increase after Israel launched attacks targeting Iranian military commanders, homes, military installations and nuclear facilities on June 13. Iran retaliated by firing numerous ballistic missiles. This heightened tension caused oil prices to rise substantially, as concerns grew about geopolitical instability and potential supply chain disruptions. The benchmark Brent crude oil has reached $77 per barrel, marking a 10 per cent increase since the onset of hostilities. According to oil market specialists at Goldman Sachs, prices could potentially rise beyond $90 should the situation deteriorate further. Citigroup analysts project that Brent crude values might approach $90 per barrel in the event of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The credit rating organisation Icra indicated that any intensification of regional tensions could have considerable effects on oil prices. Higher oil prices would reduce the profits that state-owned retailers IOC, BPCL and HPCL have built up by maintaining stable retail prices despite previous decreases in international rates. Also Read | Iran-Israel conflict: India keeping tab on Chabahar Port, International North-South Transport Corridor; why it's important According to Jain of Yes Securities, oil markets remain adequately supplied, supported by OPEC's 4 million barrels per day spare capacity and a pre-conflict global surplus of 0.9 million bpd. Additional stability comes from US shale production. Global security analysts deem an extended blockage of the Strait of Hormuz unlikely, given the US naval forces in the region. Any such action by Iran would not only impact the oil exports of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar but would also hamper its own export capabilities. Despite aggressive rhetoric from Iranian conservatives and state media predictions of oil prices reaching $400 per barrel, the international trade analysis organisation Kpler suggests the probability of a complete blockade remains minimal, citing significant deterrents for Iran. Such an action would severely affect China, Iran's primary oil buyer, which sources 47 per cent of its maritime crude imports from the Middle East Gulf region. As the world's second-largest economy, China stands as the principal purchaser of Iranian oil, reportedly consuming more than three-quarters of Iran's oil exports. The fact that Iran relies heavily on the Strait of Hormuz for its oil shipments through Kharg Island, which manages 96% of its exports, makes any self-imposed blockade counterproductive to its interests. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Mint

4 hours ago

• Mint

Will the US bombing of Iran actually matter for markets?

Will something finally happen? The 'Nothing Ever Happens" meme that has taken hold in financial markets will get its most severe test after the U.S. bombing of nuclear sites in Iran this past weekend. Before this weekend, markets had been bracing for a tense two-week period during which President Donald Trump had indicated he would decide whether to go ahead with the mission to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities. The decision to join Israel's campaign against Iran marked an abrupt about-face from Trump's long-held vow to keep the U.S. out of overseas conflicts, especially in the Middle East. Whatever the geopolitical motivation, markets have to deal with the possible economic and financial consequences. Most notably, oil prices could spike if Iran retaliates by halting shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. But bourses in the Middle East have rallied Sunday, John Brady, head of sales at futures broker R.J. O'Brien, wrote in a client note. The Tel-Aviv market indexes have risen more than 1%. Kuwait's KWSE Premier index was up 0.40%, while Egypt gained 2.67%. Qatar's and Bahrain's indexes were fractionally higher while the Saudi market was fractionally lower. When Asian markets open later, the 'Nothing Ever Happens" notion may be put to the test. After flinching initially, stocks and bonds globally had been little affected with Israel's initial incursion. As Peter Atwater noted in his Financial Insyghts note published late last week, every dip appears to have been bought by individual investors. Threats, such as the April 2 Liberation Day tariffs announcement that sent markets plunging, have been treated as buying opportunities. Even the market plunges following the Covid collapse in 2020 ultimately led to new highs, Atwater added. On that score, Peter Tchir, head of macro strategy at Academy Securities, wrote in client note Sunday: 'Stocks are likely to be under pressure (probably want to buy the dip.) If Treasuries open lower [in price,] you want to buy higher yields hand over fist." U.S. Treasury securities typically rally during times of crisis as investors seek a safe haven. This may be a test if Treasuries still hold that status. As for risk assets, the S&P 500's roughly 20% rebound from its April lows to within a few percent of record highs leaves it susceptible to some selling on the Iran news. But if dip buyers appear, that would suggest that not even a sudden U-turn in Trump's foreign policy thrusting the U.S. into war means much for markets. Write to Randall W. Forsyth at