Budget 2025: Welsh government plans approved - but what do they mean for Wales?
The Welsh government's budget has been approved by Senedd members in a vote on Tuesday.
Every year, the government sets out its spending plans for Wales in funds devolved from the UK government, which then have to be agreed by a majority of members.
Labour has exactly half the number of seats in the chamber, 30 out of 60, since the last election in 2021.
After the election, Labour had entered into a co-operation agreement with Plaid Cymru which involved the Welsh nationalist party supporting the government on a number of key policies.
But the deal came to an abrupt end last year due to concerns about a controversial £200k donation to then first minister Vaughan Gething and government delays to policies such as council tax reform.
So without their coalition partners, Labour were looking to borrow a vote to get them over the line.
The final budget vote passed on Tuesday, 29 votes to 28, after the Labour government struck a deal with the Welsh parliament's sole Liberal Democrat member, Jane Dodds, who agreed to abstain.
In exchange for her abstention, the Welsh government announced a number of investments, including a £1 bus ticket pilot scheme for under 21s.
The agreement also includes a commitment to ban greyhound racing in Wales.
'Demanding better'
The £26bn budget has allocated funding for areas such as health, housing and education for the next financial year, taking Wales into 2026 when voters will next go to the polls to vote for their representatives in the Senedd.
Welsh finance secretary Mark Drakeford said: "Passing this budget is a significant moment for Wales - it unlocks a real uplift in funding for the services that matter most to people, after some very tough years.
"We have secured a financial package that will strengthen our NHS, reduce waiting times, support schools and help communities across Wales thrive, making a real difference to people's lives."
Welsh Lib Dem leader Ms Dodds said she agreed with "those who are demanding better from their government", but said she was not prepared to see Wales's public services "lose £5bn worth of funding" if the budget vote failed.
The Welsh Conservatives ' shadow finance secretary Sam Rowlands said his party "would instead focus on putting money back into Welsh people's pockets", including the creation of a Welsh Winter Fuel Allowance.
Plaid Cymru's finance spokesperson Heledd Fychan said Wales needed "fresh thinking" and that her party had "long-term solutions to improve [the] NHS" and "grow [the] economy".
At the next election, the number of Senedd members will increase from 60 to 90, with a more proportional voting system adopted.
And with just over a year to go, politicians of every party will be keener than ever to make their case for Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
27 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Political placards may be stopped at Powys council meetings
COUNCILLORS may be stopped from having placards, signs or banners that make a political statement at future Powys council meetings. At a meeting of the authority's Standards Committee last week, members received a report from colleague Jonathan Goolden who had observed the council meeting that took place on March 6. At that meeting, opposition councillors had hoped a motion calling for a pause in the roll out of a controversial booking system at Powys recycling centres would be voted on. But their hopes were dashed as they were told that they had not submitted the motion in time. Committee lay member, Mr Goolden said that meeting had been 'good humoured, well chaired," but added: "One member displayed what I thought was a local paper headline saying 'What a load of rubbish'. 'At the time I thought this was a reference to a Powys issue, but it was a Shropshire issue.' The headline came from a newsletter published by the Liberal Democrats that highlighted they had successfully campaigned to overturn a similar booking system for recycling centres in Shropshire. The newsletter was placed in front of Conservative group leader, Cllr Aled Davies and highlighted the differing stances on recycling centres taken by Liberal Democrat politicians in Powys and Shropshire. Mr Goolden said: 'There is a balance between the right of members to express themselves freely on political matters and for a council meeting to be conducted with due efficiency and decorum – I just wish to draw that to members' attention in case it becomes an issue.' Head of Legal Services and Monitoring Officer, Clive Pinney, said: 'This is something we could ask the Democratic Services Committee to consider – if members think it's inappropriate we could write it into the constitution and prevent it happening in the future.' Cllr Iain Harrison said that the incident in question had been 'trivial', but with the state of the world at the moment this could lead down a 'slippery slope'. Cllr Harrison continued: 'We could see all sorts of imaging popping up that could create great offence to quite sizeable sections of the population. 'The simplest behaviour to adopt is that is that it's not allowed at all under any circumstances and we need to be very clear on that.' Cllr William Powell, council chairman, welcomed referring the issue, commenting: 'I think for a chair to be freelancing on the issue is probably dangerous in its own way and it would be better if it's backed up by due process. 'It would be a more solid basis on which to proceed.'
Leader Live
28 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Consultation opens on charging drivers £5 for entering city centre
Oxfordshire County Council said it is proposing to charge drivers £5 per day to enter parts of Oxford city centre. The Liberal Democrat-run local authority claimed the plan has a series of objectives, such as reducing traffic, making bus journeys faster, improving the safety of pedestrians and cyclists, and cutting air pollution. Our cabinet approved the public consultation for our proposed Oxford temporary congestion charge. You'll be able to share your views on Let's Talk Oxfordshire from Monday 23 June. Find out more about our proposal: — Oxfordshire County Council (@OxfordshireCC) June 18, 2025 London and Durham – the only other parts of the UK with congestion charges – introduced their schemes in the early 2000s. A number of other cities have implemented clean air zones, which charge vehicles that fail to meet minimum emission standards. Oxfordshire County Council is proposing to launch the temporary congestion charge in the autumn. It said 'urgent action is needed' to reduce delays to buses, partly caused by the temporary closure of Botley Road since April 2023 because of a Network Rail project to expand the city's railway station. The congestion charge would remain until the introduction of a traffic filtering trial once Botley Road reopens, which is expected to be in August 2026. It could be in place as a temporary measure for up to two years, the council said. The scheme would apply only to cars and be enforced using automatic number plate recognition cameras (ANPR) positioned at six locations. Cars with a permit or day pass would be able to pass through the charging area without paying. The council is planning to make permits available for groups such as residents, blue badge holders, frequent hospital patients, taxis and private hire vehicles. Electric cars will not be exempt from the daily fee as the scheme's purpose would be to 'reduce traffic by reducing the number of car journeys', according to the local authority. The council said income generated by the congestion charge would be used to cover the cost of setting up and operating the system, with any additional money going towards discounted park and ride services and improved bus services. The consultation opened on Monday and runs for six weeks. Jack Cousens, head of roads policy at the AA, said residents need assurances that the scheme will end within two years as there have been 'too many times' when charges that are 'supposedly temporary' are kept because they become 'too lucrative'. He added: 'Ultimately, the aim of the council is to reduce car traffic while creating a better alternative via buses and bikes. 'Expanded park and ride or park and pedal facilities would contribute in a big way towards that ambition.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Farage makes his pitch to non-doms
Reform UK are on the rise – quite literally. The party is planning to move one floor up in their headquarters at Millbank Tower, giving its 40-odd staff a commanding view of Westminster from their office. That change in circumstance was reflected in Nigel Farage's speech this morning, when he strolled in to Westminster's Church House to set out his party's pitch to non-doms. The Clacton MP told journalists that 'tens of thousands' of people would be tempted to the UK by the offer of the card The party's headline announcement today was the launch of a new 'Britannia card'. This would be a one-off £250,000 fee which would allow non-doms – UK residents whose permanent home for tax purposes is outside the UK – to avoid income tax. The Clacton MP told journalists that 'tens of thousands' of people would be tempted to the UK by the offer of the card, with the one-off payment representing 'just the tip of the iceberg of what these people will pay if they come back' in stamp duty and VAT in the UK. The party estimates its policy would raise between £1.5billion to £2.5billion annually, which would be redistributed to the poorest ten per cent of workers. Some referred to this as a 'Robin Hood' policy; but Disraeli is perhaps a better comparison. The presence at the speech of Nick Candy, multimillionaire property developer and the party's honorary treasurer, demonstrates that Reform UK hardly see the rich as enemies of the poor. Farage's argument is that it is necessary to create a 'transparent link' between the social classes and restore the 'social contract' which exists between them. Under a Reform UK government, 'every wealthy individual who wishes to move here makes a tangible contribution to Britain's lowest earners,' said Farage. The questions, inevitably, were dominated by Iran. No Foreign Office-style flim-flam here; Farage insisted that the Israel and the US were 'right' to try to destroy Tehran's nuclear capacity. Noting his history of opposing regime change in Libya and Iraq, Farage argued it was 'difficult to see' what could be 'worse' than the current 'evil' Ayatollah. Asked whether he supported the UK joining military action in Iran, Farage said: 'I doubt they are going to ask for our help but they could do with our support.' For good measure, he accused Richard Hermer, the Attorney General, of 'bordering on treacherous' for his legal advice on the future of the Diego Garcia military base. Overall, it was a pitch aimed squarely at a very different type of regime change: toppling the Tories as the primary opposition to Labour by the next election in 2029.
