South Korea lifts 26-year ban on foreign goalkeepers in the K League

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — A 26-year ban on foreign goalkeepers in South Korea's top soccer league has been lifted for the start of the 2026 season.
Only Korean goalkeepers have been allowed to play in the K League, the oldest professional domestic league in Asia, since 1999. The rule was introduced in a bid to protect homegrown talent when there were only 10 professional clubs.
The K League announced after a board meeting in Seoul this week that because there's now 26 professional clubs in the top two tiers of competition, there's enough room for international goalkeepers.
'The increase in the number of clubs means that there are enough opportunities for domestic goalkeepers to play even if foreign goalkeepers are allowed,' the board said in a statement. 'We considered the fact that with foreign player registrations restricted, the salary increase rate of domestic goalkeepers has increased disproportionately to outfield players.'
There were reportedly concerns, due to the increased size of modern rosters which contain three or four goalkeepers, that there's a shortage of quality keepers in the country.
The move will put the K League in line with other major Asian leagues in Japan, Saudi Arabia and China.
___
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Times

an hour ago

• New York Times

Off-target shots: How the rise of the ‘good miss' is aiding talent ID in football

Off-target shots are football's missed opportunity, in more ways than one. As the analytics revolution began to sweep through the sport in the early 2010s, shots on goal quickly became a key area of interest, with the aim of identifying the game's most ruthless finishers firmly in mind. Some years after expected goals (xG) came expected goals on target (xGOT) — a metric that estimates the quality of on-target shots, taking into account factors such as the angle from which the shot was taken from, and its placement within the goal frame, to give an indication of how likely the subsequent effort was likely to find its way in. Advertisement It has since been used to evaluate both finishing ability — rewarding players who turn low-quality opportunities into high-quality attempts on goal with a positive shooting goals added (SGA) score — as well as goalkeeping, helping to distinguish those who consistently keep out the toughest-to-save shots. Given that xGOT works on the premise of scoring probability, however, it swiftly disregards shots that statistically have no chance of going in. And so for years, conventional shooting models would penalise a horrible miscue that flies high, wide and out of the stadium, just as harshly as it would a curling, dipping shot that just grazes the woodwork from the same spot; with a flat score of zero. This is traditionally where the eye test comes in; you would instinctively prefer Kevin De Bruyne to line up your long-range free kick than the centre-back who keeps putting speculative efforts into touch. But given that over half of non-blocked shots were off-target in the Premier League last season — that's more than 3,500 — there is surely extra value to be found. Are some players 'better' at missing than others? And can answering that help to uncover some wayward finishers who could soon be about to click into a more clinical gear? There is, of course, a simple way of measuring how often players go close with their shots, and that's by checking how often they hit the woodwork. Filtering from the start of the 2022-23 season, across Europe's top four leagues, and some likely names emerge; Robert Lewandowski is the player to strike the post or crossbar most often, with 14 across the last three seasons, while Darwin Nunez follows closely behind on 11. Both make sense, given how often they get into close-range goalscoring positions. Looking at that same statistic as a proportion of the player's total shots is more revealing, with Villarreal's Yeremy Pino leading the way. He is underperforming his expected goals output by just over six goals since August 2022, but has hit the woodwork six times, suggesting he might be more unfortunate in front of goal than a quick glance at his shooting statistics suggest. Advertisement Ten of the 15 players listed below perform below expectation on the SGA model, all punished by multiple scores of 0.0 xGOT for their woodwork shots, but our viewing experience tells us that players such as Youri Tielemans, Harry Wilson and Matias Soule can strike a ball well — an encouraging start to our search for finishers that slip through the statistical net. How about inflating the margin for error further, to capture those shots that whistle just wide? By expanding the size of the goal by 25 per cent, as illustrated below, we can see which players routinely go close with their efforts on goal, even if they don't clip the woodwork on the way out. Again, it's the high-volume shooters that rise to the top — Erling Haaland (23), Lautaro Martinez (23), and Lewandowski (22) lead the way for the sheer quantity of near misses across the sample — but taking a proportional approach reveals an interesting mix of players. The bar chart below suggests that high-calibre finishers such as Son Heung-min and Jamal Musiala — both comfortably scoring more than the quality of their chances suggest that they should across the sample — weren't far away from posting even more clinical numbers. But it also picks out a handful of players who look to be struggling according to xG data in isolation. Tottenham's Brennan Johnson, for example, had six near misses to his name in 2024-25 alone, while Samuel Lino, who scored only 13 non-penalty goals in La Liga from an expected value of 19.3, saw just over a quarter of his shots graze past the post, considerations that should surely be taken into account, even when evaluating shooting ability on a macro level. What all of the above fails to take into account is the quality of opportunity in the first place. If one player hits the post from point-blank range, while another crashes his shot off the crossbar from distance, it would skew the data to label one just as 'unfortunate' as the other. To remedy that, we can combine pre-shot xG data to our sample, to see which players are regularly turning tricky opportunities into close misses. Advertisement Doing so creates an xGOT-style metric for off-target shots, rewarding players who consistently almost hit the target from low-probability shooting zones. Of players to have missed at least 50 shots across the last three seasons, we have calculated the average distance by which their efforts have missed the goal, converting this to a score between zero and one using a logarithmic scale. Those who combine close misses with low xG shots, are the players who add most 'value' to their off-target efforts on goal. The results pass the eye test, with some familiar names cropping up from our previous searches. Matias Soule makes his third bar-chart appearance, with the evidence stacking up that 22-year-old is an accurate shooter who should take aim more often. Jorgen Strand Larsen just misses the cut to make it three out of three as well — no Premier League player hit the target with a higher proportion of their shots across Europe's top five leagues last season (61.1 per cent) — and this experiment suggests that even when does miss, he tends to put it just past the post. But this new list of players seems to reward talented ball-strikers, players such as Jarrod Bowen, Andreas Pereira, Hakan Calhanoglu, as well as long-range specialists Kevin De Bruyne and Bruno Fernandes, who consistently back themselves to get through the ball with power and precision from range. Some case studies stand out. While Raphinha is enjoying his most prolific season in front of goal, his league xG statistics still show underperformance. Similarly, Lamine Yamal has only ever scored below expectation in La Liga, despite his obvious ability to cut inside and curl the ball accurately towards the far corner. Once again, it suggests that off-target shots deserve more consideration in conventional analysis of a player's shooting skill, and can serve as a predictor for eventual improvement in the future if the same pattern of near-missing continues. Work continues at club level on how to use off-target shots in conjunction with traditional xGOT to get a broader picture of finishing ability. A data scientist at Nottingham Forest, Alex Marin Felices, delivered a talk at the inaugural Field of Play conference in Manchester in March, referring to research that shows a higher correlation between future player performance and metrics that combine on and off-target shots. Advertisement He also referred to progress on adapting xG models to specific positions and players, as well as the tracking of blocked shots, to continue the improvement of the model. Helping clubs identify skilled finishers earlier can allow them to acquire higher-quality players quicker — and more economically — crucial for those looking to get ahead of the recruitment curve. For our purposes, it's another reminder that underlying shooting metrics, while an invaluable tool over long periods of time, can still be enhanced with context. Raphinha, Soule, Lino, and Strand Larsen; keep shooting.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Club World Cup: Is European soccer's superiority being exposed as a myth?

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. — European soccer's superiority had, throughout the 21st century, become self-evident; inescapable and irreversible; extreme and presumed. It was apparent in the salaries and prices of players, in the exodus of talent from the Americas and Africa, in the prestige of the UEFA Champions League and, twice per year, on the field. At the former Club World Cup, the seven-team version played each winter, since 2007, European teams played 34 games. They lost once. So they strolled into this expanded version, the 2025 Club World Cup, as runaway favorites. They negotiated outside appearance fees. Their supporters assumed they'd waltz to the latter stages, untouched. Advertisement Instead, halfway through the group stage, they've been humbled. In six games so far against South American opposition, they've lost two, drawn three, won one. They have also dropped seven points to the Saudi Pro League, MLS and Liga MX. Their early stumbles have delighted fans from other continents. They've surprised Western pundits. And they've ignited a combustible debate: Is European club dominance a myth? Or at least exaggerated? The two sides of the Europe-South America debate On one side, there are the raw results and the performances here over the past week. Flamengo didn't just beat Chelsea 3-1 on Friday in Philadelphia; at times, it pummeled the free-spending English Premier League giants. And Fluminense — Brazil's 13th best team last year — held Borussia Dortmund to a 0-0 draw and outplayed what was, a month ago, the hottest team in Germany. Advertisement In almost every single match between South American and European foes, there was evidence that the gap is slimmer than most Europeans (and non-Hispanic Americans) realize. Botafogo's upset of PSG was a so-called 'smash-and-grab,' but even smash-and-grabs require a certain level of physical, technical and tactical quality. Boca Juniors, similarly, bellied up to Bayern Munich and snatched a second-half equalizer, before conceding late. There was also Monterrey 1, Inter Milan 1; and Al Hilal 1, Real Madrid 1, 'a very balanced match,' as Al Hilal fullback João Cancelo said afterward. On paper, per Opta, these were games between the 9th best team in the world and the 81st; between No. 15 and No. 238; No. 4 and 132; No. 7 and 131; No. 6 and 130; No. 8 and 77. On the field, they looked very different, and begged the question: Is Opta wrong? Are the assumptions of European preeminence wrong? Were we all wrong? Flamengo players celebrate during their statement win over Chelsea at the 2025 Club World Cup in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Derik Hamilton) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) But on the other side of the debate, there are excuses — or at least other explanations, some legitimate. Advertisement There is the timing of this tournament, which falls at the end of 10-month European seasons, but mid-campaign for clubs from Brazil, Argentina and MLS. Whereas South American teams built up to the Club World Cup, weary European bodies and minds were ready to wind down. Most got a couple weeks off before reconvening with teammates 7-10 days before their Club World Cup openers. 'There are many tournaments that they've had to play, and perhaps they'll arrive with some fatigue,' Inter Miami forward Luis Suarez predicted before the competition began. 'I think there will be some surprise results.' There is also the suffocating U.S. summer heat, which has seemed to affect European teams more than others. 'We are used to the heat,' Al Hilal's Brazilian winger Malcom said after his team hung with Real Madrid on a humid 90-degree afternoon in Miami. Atlético Madrid's Spanish midfielder Marcos Llorente, on the other hand, called an 88-degree afternoon in Southern California 'impossible.' There is travel to which the Europeans aren't accustomed. There are games that kick off after all their friends and family back home are asleep. There are all sorts of confounding variables that preclude the Club World Cup from being an accurate point of comparison. Advertisement And most of all, there is the unavoidable sense, or narrative, that the European teams just don't really care. Many players do, to be clear. But do they care, with every last ounce of their being, like some of their South American counterparts do? There has undoubtedly been an intensity gap that has neutralized the quality gap, and helped some South American sides show well. To them, these games are among the most significant in recent club history. To the Europeans, the Champions League and, in some cases, their domestic league were and are more prestigious. Public attitudes toward the Club World Cup have also colored this excuse. While European fans have stayed home, and in some cases slept through games, supporters of South American and North African clubs have filled stadiums with balloons, flags, banners and unceasing noise. They've turned Palmeiras-Porto and Boca Juniors-Benfica and Flamengo-Chelsea into quasi-home games for the South American teams. That, too, is an equalizing factor. The conclusion None of that entirely explains the upsets. But there is nuance in the conclusion that the gap is somewhat narrower than many thought — because there are also gaps within Europe and within South America. Advertisement There is a massive gulf, for example, between Bayern Munich, which ultimately outclassed Boca here on Friday night; and Porto, which finished third in the Portuguese Primeira Liga, closer to fourth-place Braga than the top two. There is also a massive gulf between Palmeiras or Flamengo, the two most powerful teams in South America's richest league, and most of the other non-European teams at this Club World Cup. What we probably overestimated was the distance between the Portos and the Inter Miamis; between the Dortmunds and the Fluminenses; between the Benficas and Bocas; between the Chelseas and the Flamengos. Most of the teams Porto and Benfica play, weekend after weekend, are probably worse than the top half of MLS — and certainly worse than Boca, River Plate and much of the Brasileirão. Some of the Brasileirão, and certainly the top two, meanwhile, could compete with the top halves of the top flights in Germany, Italy, Spain and France. Advertisement There is still, though, a distance to the tippy-top. 'There is an elite in soccer that is superior,' Flamengo coach Filipe Luis, who played for Atlético Madrid and Chelsea, said Friday. 'Brazilian clubs are competitive at the second level of European football. Flamengo will not devalue themselves against any opponent. But the squads of the elite are better. That's a fact.'

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

📊 Latest group standings: Flamengo, Bayern, Boca in the Copa

Four more games continued the second round of the first phase of the FIFA Club World Cup, on Friday (20). The matches were valid for groups C and D of the tournament. Benfica did their homework and THRASHED Auckland City, who, with two defeats, is already eliminated. Advertisement Later, Flamengo showed its strength and PUT Chelsea ON THE ROPES to secure early qualification and first place in Group D. The Rubro-Negro achieved the feat thanks to Espérance's victory over Los Angeles, who also ended up eliminated. Finally, in a DUEL OF CONTINENTAL GIANTS, Bayern Munich beat Boca Juniors and also secured qualification. Remember that the first tiebreaker in the FIFA Club World Cup is the DIRECT CONFRONTATION. Then, the goal difference. 📆 Check the schedule for the last round of the group stage (24/06) Group C 16h (Brasília time) - Benfica x Bayern Munich 16h (Brasília time) - Auckland City x Boca Juniors Group D 22h (Brasília time) - Espérance x Chelsea 22h (Brasília time) - Los Angeles FC x Flamengo 📊 See the updated table of the FIFA Club World Cup (groups C and D) This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here. 📸 Megan Briggs - 2025 Getty Images