Reform UK to send first ‘Doge' team to look at council spending in Kent

Reform UK is set to send in its first Elon Musk-style Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) unit to look at 'wasteful spending' in councils.
A team of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors will 'visit and analyse' local authorities, starting with Kent County Council on Monday, the party said.
It follows the US Doge, which was launched during Donald Trump's presidency to cut federal spending. Billionaire Musk was involved but has since left his position spearheading the unit.
Reform says its UK version will be led by a yet-unnamed man described as one of the country's 'leading tech entrepreneurs with a specialism in data analytics who has also been a turnaround CEO'.
The party said that the unit will use artificial intelligence, advanced data analysis tools and forensic auditing techniques to 'identify wasteful spending and recommend actionable solutions'.
A letter sent to Kent County Council, which Reform now controls after the May local elections, read: 'The scope of the review includes but is not limited to: Contractual arrangements with suppliers and consultants, all capital expenditure, use of framework agreements and direct awards, any off-book or contingent liabilities, use of reserves and financial resilience, any audit flags raised by internal or external auditors in the last three years.
'We request that all relevant council officers provide the Doge team with full and prompt access to: Council-held documents, reports and records (electronic and paper), relevant finance, procurement, audit and contract data, meeting minutes and correspondence concerning major procurements, any internal investigations or whistleblowing reports relevant to financial matters, any additional documents that might be of assistance.'
It added: 'Should you resist this request, we are ready to pass a council motion to compel the same and will consider any obstruction of our councillors' duties to be gross misconduct. We trust this will not be required.'
It is signed by council leader Linden Kemkaran, party chairman Zia Yusuf and party leader Nigel Farage.
Mr Yusuf said: "For too long British people have been British taxpayers have watched their money vanish into a black hole.
"Their taxes keep going up, their bin collections keep getting less frequent, potholes remain unfixed, their local services keep getting cut. Reform won a historic victory on a mandate to change this.
"As promised, we have created a UK Doge to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money. Our team will use cutting-edge technology and deliver real value for voters."
A Kent County Council spokesman declined to comment.
The Liberal Democrats, who are the second-biggest party in Kent, say that when so much of the budget is mandatory, Reform have very little room to make savings.
Liberal Democrat Cllr Richard Streatfield, Kent County Council, said: "Cuts are not part of the equation.
"We have a growing population of over 65s who are using demand-led services and only 0.6% of our budget is on discretionary services.
"We are using 99.4% of the county council's taxpayer's money for services that we are legally obliged to provide."
Sarah Barwick, Branch Secretary of Unison said: "There's fears of job cuts. KCC's really reduced its number of staff in the number of years I've been employed.
"We're right at almost the lowest point of staff that you can get without serious problems that could compromise the services."
During a local election campaign launch in March, Mr Farage told supporters: "Frankly folks, what we need in this country to pay for the cuts that people deserve and need, we need a British form of Doge, as Elon Musk has got in America. Let's have a British Doge."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

11 minutes ago

• Reuters

Explainer: -What is NATO's new 5% defence spending target?

BRUSSELS, June 23 (Reuters) - NATO leaders are expected to endorse a big new defence spending target at an alliance summit in The Hague on Wednesday, as demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. Here are some key questions and answers about the new target. They are expected to agree that NATO members should spend 5% of their economic output - or Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - on core defence and broader defence and security-related investments. That's a hefty increase on the current goal of 2%, which was approved at an alliance summit in Wales in 2014. But the new target will be measured differently. NATO members will be expected to spend 3.5% of their GDP on core defence such as troops and weapons – the items currently covered by the old 2% target. They will also be expected to spend a further 1.5% of GDP on broader defence and security-related investments – such as adapting roads, bridges and ports for use by military vehicles, and on cyber-security and protecting energy pipelines. Very big for a lot of them. Twenty-two of NATO's 32 member countries spent 2% of GDP or more on defence last year. As a whole, alliance members spent 2.61% of NATO GDP on defence last year, according to a NATO estimate. But that number masks big differences in spending among members. Poland, for example, spent more than 4% of its GDP on defence, making it the biggest spender. At the other end of the spectrum, Spain spent less than 1.3%. They will be expected to meet the target by 2035. The targets could also be adjusted when they are reviewed in 2029. It's hard to say exactly how much extra cash NATO members would have to spend, not least because it will depend on the size of their economies for years to come. Also, NATO does not currently measure spending on the new broader category of defence and security-related investments – so there is no baseline measurement to go by. But NATO countries spent over $1.3 trillion on core defence in 2024, up from about a trillion a decade earlier in constant 2021 prices. If NATO states had all spent 3.5% of GDP on defence last year, that would have amounted to some $1.75 trillion. So, hitting the new targets could eventually mean spending hundreds of billions of dollars more per year, compared with current spending. Russia's continued war in Ukraine, concerns about a possible future threat from Russia, and U.S. pressure have led many European capitals to boost investment in defence and plan to increase it even further over the coming years. 'Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said earlier this month. Europe is also preparing for the possibility that the U.S. under President Donald Trump will decide to withdraw some of its troops and capabilities from Europe. 'America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be,' U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this month. NATO this month agreed on new capability targets for its members – the types of troops, military units, weapons and equipment that NATO says they should possess to defend themselves and the alliance. Those targets are classified but Rutte said after they were approved that the alliance needed to invest more in areas including "air defence, fighter jets, tanks, drones, personnel, logistics and so much more". Not quite. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez says his country can meet its military capability targets by spending just 2.1% of GDP. His government approved the draft summit statement with the new spending target but made clear it does not intend to spend that much. NATO officials say Sanchez does not have an opt-out - Spain's spending will be tracked and if it's not investing enough to meet the military targets, it will need to improve. Some countries that have signed up to the targets may also not meet them, diplomats and analysts expect. But publicly, they have insisted they are committed. Every NATO country will decide on its own where to find the cash to invest more in defence and how to allocate it. The European Union has moved to try to make it easier for capitals to spend on defence. The EU is allowing members to raise defence spending by 1.5% of GDP each year for four years without any disciplinary steps that would normally kick in once a national deficit is above 3% of GDP. EU ministers last month also approved the creation of a 150-billion-euro arms fund using joint EU borrowing to give loans to European countries for joint defence projects. Some European countries are pushing for EU joint borrowing to fund grants – rather than loans – for defence spending. But they have met resistance from fiscally conservative countries including Germany and The Netherlands. NATO allies dedicate a much smaller share of their economic output to defence than Russia but, taken together, they spend significantly more cash than Moscow. Russia's military spending rose by 38% in 2024, reaching an estimated $149 billion and 7.1% of GDP, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. China, the world's second-largest military spender, dedicated an estimated 1.7% of GDP to military expenditure last year, according to SIPRI. In NATO countries, defence tends to make up a small portion of national budgets. Military spending accounted for 3.2% of government spending in Italy, 3.6% in France and 8.5% in Poland in 2023, according to SIPRI data. In Russia that year, military expenditure made up nearly 19% of government spending.

Spectator

13 minutes ago

• Spectator

Badenoch: Tories are ‘the adults in the room'

It is a year of two major anniversaries for the Tories. The first is the centenary of Margaret Thatcher's birth; the second is the half-centenary since she was elected leader. To mark the occasion, the think-tank Policy Exchange is laying on a series of events to commemorate the Iron Lady. Today's was a sit down interview between Thatcher's biographer, Charles Moore, and Kemi Badenoch, one of Thatcher's successors. The conversation between the pair was an engaging one, aimed at highlighting Badenoch's ability to grasp the major issues of our time. Some of her remarks were punchy: like her suggestion that the UK 'is being cut out of intelligence' on the Iran crisis 'because we cannot be trusted'. Others were familiar: her insistence that Reform is 'not serious… somebody has to be the adult in the room. We are the adults in the room, and sometimes it is not popular to be the adults in the room.' There was a hint of policy too. Badenoch confirmed she 'had looked at' Denmark's so-called 'ghetto laws', under which social housing areas with high levels of deprivation and a 'non-Western' population above 50 per cent are declared 'parallel societies'. She said she wanted something 'along the lines' of this policy, noting the disparities in population 'and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.' Much of it was good, sensible stuff for the various attendees nodding along in the think-tank's headquarters. But the question is: was anyone listening? The room might have been crammed been full of dozens of the great-and-the-good of the British right. Yet online, the likes of GB News, Daily Express and Policy Exchange struggled to get more than 40 viewers on their respective live streams. Lord Moore made a good point when comparing Badenoch's leadership to the early days of her predecessor. Back then, in 1978, Thatcher only had to say one word on migration – 'swamped' – and the polls began to move in her favour. Now, with Reform on the right, the bar for cut-through has risen much higher. Given the current pace of politics, it will be interesting tomorrow to compare the coverage of this event to that afforded to Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick's speeches today. Badenoch and her team believe that, ultimately, their patience will be rewarded. They point to her record in being proved right on self-ID and Kneecap's funding in government; her victories in opposition by forcing Labour to U-turn on winter fuel and an inquiry into grooming gangs inquiry. Yet to seize back power after a record defeat, she will need to not merely show that the Tories are not merely the adults in the room – but ones worth listening to as well.

The Independent

16 minutes ago

• The Independent

Israel strikes Iran's Fordow nuclear site as Trump hints at regime change

Israel struck Iran's Fodow nuclear site and key military and intelligence facilities on Monday as the conflict continued to escalate with attacks from both sides. The White House was also left scrambling Donald Trump also entertained the idea on Sunday of a regime change in Tehran following the strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, leaving the White House scrambling 24 hours later to say the president was 'simply raising a question' about the future of Iran's rulers. The US embassy in Qatar warned its citizens to take shelter as fears grow of an imminent Iranian response, after Iran's army chief warned that the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites have given Tehran a 'free hand' to "act against US interests and its army'. Qatar - which houses the biggest US base in the Middle East - also closed its airspace on Monday evening amid fears of a retaliatory strike from Iran. Iran responded after the US struck Iran's three key nuclear facilities on the weekend, and the UN's nuclear watchdog said on Monday that 'very significant damage' was expected to have occurred at Fordow during the US attack. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency Rafael Grossi said ahead of an emergency meeting that "given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme(ly) vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred'. Fordow was also struck by Israel on Monday as it launched an offensive targeting Iranian military and regime centres, including the notorious Evin prison. Israel warned of other strikes in the coming days. Video of the attack on Evin shows a projectile smashing into the entrance of the facility which is used to hold political prisoners, including high-profile foreign detainees. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said the defence force was using 'unprecedented force' against 'regime targets and governmental oppression entities in the heart of Tehran'. 'For every attack on the Israeli home front, the Iranian dictator will be punished, and the strikes will continue with full force,' he said. The Israeli Defence Force (IDF) said it had hit two military command centres as well as the general intelligence directorate for internal security forces. 'The IDF continues the ongoing effort to degrade the Iranian regime's military capabilities and will persist in its efforts to ensure the security of the State of Israel,' the IDF said in a statement. Iran launched a new missile barrage at Israel on Monday, described as a new wave of its operation "True Promise 3," targeting Haifa and Tel Aviv. The Tehran regime has also sought help from its ally, Russia, sending foreign minister Abbas Araghchi to meet with Vladimir Putin in Moscow and deliver a letter from Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei seeking support from the Kremlin. During their televised meeting, Putin said there was 'no justification' for the US bombing of Iran. "The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification," Putin told Araghchi. "For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.' Exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi says the Iranian regime will not back down, and urged Western leaders not to support Tehran. 'If the West throws the regime a lifeline, there will be more bloodshed and chaos, because this regime will not stop before surrender after it has been humiliated; it will lash out,' he said, using a press conference to call on Iranians to help him lead the country to become a 'secular, democratic' country. 'As long as [the regime] is in power, no country and no people are safe - whether in the streets of Washington, Paris, Jerusalem, Riyadh or Tehran,' he said. The head of Nato Mark Rutte said the biggest worry about the Iran conflict is 'Iran having a nuclear weapon'. Speaking ahead of a two-day Nato summit in The Hague, the secretary general was asked what his biggest fear was when it came to the escalating conflict around Iran. Mr Rutte responded: 'Let's focus on the essentials. My biggest fear would be for Iran to own and be able to use or build nuclear weapons. He continued: 'It would be a stranglehold on Israel, on the whole region and other parts of the world, and that's why Nato has said Iran should not - and this is a consistent position of Nato - Iran should not have its hands on a nuclear weapon.'