Hafod landfill campaigner criticises lack of enforcement over smell
Earlier this month councillors told Hafod landfill operator Enovert to 'get it right or shut it' at a meeting of Wrexham's Homes and Environment Scrutiny Committee - but council officers insisted that the environmental permit issued and regulated by Natural Resources Wales held Enovert to account and further enforcement action would not resolve the problem for residents.
Now one campaigner has sent an open letter to the council criticising officers' unwillingness to act over a problem that has blighted the surrounding communities for almost 20 years.
Steve Gittins said the council had a 'moral responsibility' to take action to protect residents and end the odour problem at Hafod.
"Wrexham Council has both the legal authority and the moral responsibility to act," he wrote. "Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, local authorities have the power to issue abatement notices in cases of statutory nuisance.
"These powers are not contingent upon NRW's actions, nor are they negated by them. In fact, where one regulator is perceived to be failing, it becomes all the more critical that another steps in."
During the committee meeting Ian Jones, Head of Service for Public Protection at Wrexham Council told councillors the NRW environmental permit was designed to regulate Enovert's activity - meaning any statutory notice from the council would effectively be a double-regulation that could lead to a legal challenge.
"We theoretically get into a position where one organisation is being dealt with by two legal processes," he said. "That is not right and the courts wouldn't look favourably on that.
"So the key thing for us - and the advice we get from Welsh Government and UK Government - is to use the permitting process. It is a better and more defined process for enforcement and addressing the matter than statutory nuisance notices."
But in his letter Mr Gittins called the officers' claims into question, citing a specific example where a council in England had recently taken action in similar circumstances.
"The response by Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council to the long-running crisis at Walley's Quarry offers a clear and successful precedent," he wrote. "In 2021, the council independently issued an abatement notice despite the Environment Agency's jurisdiction.
"That notice was upheld following mediation and became enforceable in 2023. The Environment Agency then issued a closure notice in 2024. Together, these actions brought tangible relief to the affected community. Wrexham Council should do no less.
"The truth is plainly visible to anyone who chooses to look honestly. Yet those in power seem more intent on preserving illusion than confronting the facts."
Read more:
'Get it right or shut it' - councillors issue ultimatum to Hafod landfill operators
'End nightmare caused by Hafod refuse tip smell'
Frustrated residents turn out in numbers to protest ongoing Hafod landfill issue
In response to the letter Councillor Hugh Jones, Wrexham Council's Lead Member for Strategic Planning and Public Protection, said: 'We are working closely with NRW, site operators and local community councils to monitor and mitigate off-site odour issues for local residents, and we continue to support Natural Resources Wales (NRW) and the measures it has put in place with regards to the Hafod landfill site.
'The council undertook a review of legislative enforcement options towards the end of last year, including the likelihood of the site operator being able to appeal against or defend any legislative action taken by the council – especially given the fact it already faces enforcement action from NRW, and further action by the council might be seen as unnecessary by the courts.
'Legal processes and court actions can be very long, and so we have to consider enforcement action very carefully before going down that route. Our primary focus is to support NRW and Enovert in reducing the odour emission from the site in a timely manner for the benefit of the local community. We are aware there have been cases in other parts of the UK where councils have taken action against landfill site operators – some of the circumstances have been quite different and we recognise the available option should it be required.
'As a result, we'll continue to work closely with NRW, Enovert and other members of the Hafod landfill stakeholder group, with a view to supporting our communities and ensuring continued progress.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Rules for cattle relaxed in the new Bluetongue rules
Cattle moving from England into Wales WILL be permitted if they are vaccinated for bluetongue, the Welsh Government says - but sheep must still be tested before crossing the border. In a new announcement on Friday, the Welsh Government confirmed it will allow cattle fully vaccinated with Boehringer Ingelheim's Bultavo-3 vaccine, to move under licence, from a Restricted Zone to Wales without a pre-movement test – however this will not apply to sheep. There has been outrage amongst Powys farmers about rules being brought in from July 1 which would mean that any sheep that crossed the Welsh border would require a test for the bluetongue virus. Tests for Bluetongue cost anywhere from £40-£70 per animal meaning some farmers would be faced with bills of tens of thousands to move livestock across the border for grazing or for going to market. The Welsh Government confirmed that 'all sheep must be pre-movement tested and require an accompanying licence to move into Wales to live from the Restricted Zone (RZ) in England, as no vaccine products currently meet the requirements for protecting sheep from BTV-3 to allow them to move out of the RZ.' Deputy First Minister with responsibility for Climate Change and Rural Affairs, Huw Irranca-Davies, said: 'My goal at this stage remains to keep Bluetongue out of Wales for the benefit of our animals and those who keep them. 'The economic and farmer wellbeing concerns caused by dealing with severe Bluetongue are first and foremost in my mind. "I also want to allow more time to observe the severity of the disease in England, and for keepers to vaccinate their herds and flocks. Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get Unlimited access to the Oswestry Advertizer website Advert-light access Reader rewards 'I have made clear the thinking behind my decision in the Senedd this week, but I want to keep it under review. Should the evidence change, and we need to alter the policy, we will revisit and review this in a dynamic way. 'Our shared priority over the coming weeks is to promote vaccine take-up. All representatives at the Roundtable I recently convened were unanimous in their support for vaccination as the best method of protecting livestock and reducing the impacts of Bluetongue." 'I cannot in all conscience invite Bluetongue into Wales, but we are prepared to adapt to the evolving disease situation.' In the announcement, the Welsh Government also confirmed that as a response to increased risk of Bluetongue, including 'temperatures that are consistent with the active transmission period,' these measures will come into force as of today (June 20) in relation to the current Restricted Zone in England, which covers the east of England.
South Wales Argus
a day ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd members lambast bluetongue response as 'total chaos'
Samuel Kurtz, who is from a farming family, expressed deep concern about the Welsh Government's handling of the disease, saying it 'falls far short of what farmers deserve'. The Conservatives' economy secretary said Senedd members received no briefing from the deputy first minister nor the chief veterinary office on the science behind the decision. Mr Kurtz warned: 'There has been no economic impact assessment despite the far-reaching consequences for our rural community. 'And perhaps most troubling of all, the decision was issued via a written statement on a Thursday afternoon – just after the Senedd week had ended, ensuring no scrutiny, no questions and no answers until today.' He told the Senedd: 'We all understand the importance of protecting Welsh livestock from bluetongue but the measures imposed are not only excessive, they're unworkable.' 'Requiring pre-movement testing for all live imports, even vaccinated animals, might look reasonable on paper but – in the real world of Welsh farming – it's chaos." He put the cost of vaccinating all livestock in Wales at £32m – £6 a cow and £3 for every sheep or goat – placing a 'staggering financial' burden on a struggling industry. During a statement on the Welsh Government's approach to bluetongue on June 17, deputy first minister Huw Irranca-Davies said policy will be kept under regular review.
South Wales Argus
a day ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd rejection for renewed calls for M4 relief road
Sam Rowlands described the M4 relief road as a golden opportunity, not only to ease congestion for motorists but also to boost the economy. The Conservatives' shadow finance secretary said the Welsh Government spent £135m of public money on the project before it was scrapped in June 2019. He accused then-first minister Mark Drakeford of breaking a pledge on the £1.6bn relief road and going against an inquiry's finding that the costs would outweigh the benefits two to one. Mr Rowlands told the Senedd: 'At every step of this journey, there's been indecision and money wasted. At the end of it all, it's been the Welsh people who've had to suffer as a result. And nothing has been done to ease congestion around Newport ever since.' Peredur Owen Griffiths, Plaid Cymru's shadow transport secretary, criticised the Tories for calling for a new road through a site of special scientific interest. Calling for a more affordable and environmentally sustainable solution, he raised the lengthy and costly completion of the Heads of the Valleys Road improvements. He told the Senedd: 'After 23 years of roadworks and around £2bn later, [the] Welsh Government will now pay more than £40m a year for 30 years to a private firm before the road will be publicly owned in 2055.' Mr Owen Griffiths, who represents South Wales East, criticised the Welsh Government for being 'too slow' to put forward a genuine alternative solution to M4 congestion. John Griffiths welcomed £445m from the UK spending review for rail in Wales, including three new railway stations planned in his Newport East constituency. Mr Griffiths called for urgency in taking forward the recommendations of the Burns commission 'after far too much delay'. Natasha Asghar said her constituents in South Wales East are regularly faced with bumper-to-bumper traffic and long delays on the route which is not fit for purpose. 'These never ending clogs are not just a nightmare for those stuck in them, they're also a major economic roadblock,' she said. 'The constant gridlock and unreliable nature of the M4 is undoubtedly making Wales a less attractive place to do business.' Senedd members voted 32-12 against the Tory motion following the debate on June 18.
